EPTNewbie Mini Mafia LX
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
| ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
| ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
I AM TOWN I AM TOWN I AM TOWN I also have a broken compy. Womp womp. Ill also be more active when Im not sick but Ill read and stuff | ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
I need some more excuses.... its cold outside....reading is hard... Exo have any ideas/reads on anyone else? You just seem angry to me. | ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
Exo and Celestial: I think you are wrong about LS. She did have some scum reads. The first post that everyone has been overanalyzing is a typical first post (at least in my newbie mind). Using "we" at the beginning implies to me that she wanted people to post. It's kind of like a "Let's go" kind of deal. Actually the first whole page of stuff seemed like people who were just excited the game started. I would expect more scumreads in the future, when there's much more to work with. Lol Rsoultin. Everyone did think you were a guy! I thought it was just the other game! Reading through all of this, I do see a lot of posts about how I need to defend my lack of posts. Right now I'm resisting the urge to come up some more excuses just so you guys can complain about them. I'll try to post more tonight. | ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
On January 06 2015 06:10 LightningStrike wrote: Oh god I so sorry calling you a guy for so long T_T Also the drive by posting by Shining I think if Shining doesn't follow up on that then I could definitely see Shining as Scum but for now null I guess. This seems like a scumread to me? It's not exactly detailed lol | ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
I've only played with Shining once before, but I would agree with Rsoultin on the Shining vote solely on his behavior in our last game when he was mafia in the early days of the game. She did the same thing, scumreading most people that scumread her each time. It is possible that she just always does that (I'm an easy target if you want to fire back Shining!), but I would say that the chances she's scum are higher than the solid 27% probability for the rest of ya'll. Is it ok to pass judgement based on previous games? What is blue hunting? Sorry I called you a girl LS. You're last post had 0 scumreads. If you were to pick someone to lynch as of now who would it be? | ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
| ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
On January 06 2015 12:36 rsoultin wrote: It's actually not meta, LS. It's that there are a lot of words with little content, and Shining's read on ExO seems to misrepresent ExO by claiming that ExO is just jumping from scumread to scumread with no logical line of thought. The only change I saw was switching off JarJar before he returned. Everything else was explained to my satisfaction, at least. JarJar mentioned meta. He could link you. Here's the link. Much more inactive game than this one I think the total is 17 pages. I died halfway through the game. I think me rsoultin and shining were in it among others. Very embarrassing ending so it seems lol https://www.starkingdoms.com/community/discussion/3840/finished-the-werewabbits-rise-again-village-lost-but-shining-and-kenshin-lost-the-mostest-/p16 | ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
| ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
On January 06 2015 13:37 Tubesock wrote: I'd vote Gumdrop too, but I'm hoping he drops some knowledge on us real soon. I'm starting to have more of an issue with people who scum some people for inactivity, or talking about future inactivity but not the ones who are actually inactive. I'm not willing to vote ExO yet (sorry about misspelling your name 1000 times earlier) because even while I disagree with his tactics and whatnot, I think his motivation is town. Maybe you don't have too much of an issue of scumming inactives after all since you voted gumdrop before he made a real post? | ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
| ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
| ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
Shining- Based off 1 past game, I could see Shining’s posts on here being similar to when she was mafia last game. Really weak case though, as I’ve only played with Shining once. I could see her defending her way out of my suspicion, since it is a weak case and Shining has prodded several different people as well as defended herself in the past. Tubesock- If I was a mafia, I would be playing like tubesock. First posts are shallowish, then stepped it up when told to. I haven’t thought his recent posts have been that great, they mostly follow up other’s ideas. It would be posts I could see myself posting if I wanted to post more. Plus he is off Celestial’s scum-list, which does worry me that he will be off other’s as well. A solid defense against my suspicion would be that tubesock is new and is now more confident in posting than he was at the beginning. He has also made analysis, just not at the level as others in my opinion. I don’t think Tubesock would be a smart day 1 lynch because I think we could figure him out later because of the amount of posts he has been posting. Silverarte- If I had to choose someone who was playing similar to LS that wasn’t LS it would be Silverarte. Silverarte has no relative suspicion in comparison to LS which makes me suspicious! Gumdrop- Lack of posts. Most people have given him a pass which isn’t good in my opinion. He has gotten some votes though, despite me seeing myself as an easier target than gumdrop. A good defense against my suspicion would be his last post, which I thought was pretty good. LS- I would file LS as suspicious but someone I would want to not lynch day 1. He has the attention of people, and he posts a lot. I think it should be easier to determine him mafia later on IF he is mafia. I think it would be easier to get backing from others as well based on what I have read on here so far. Suspicions on collaboration (I think it would be stupid to collaborate as mafia day 1, but what do I know): Celestial-Exo: Small hints of collaboration. If I was mafia, I think the best person to estabilish my credibility as town would be Celestial. Have generally agreed with all of their posts. Both went after LS. Rsoultin-Silverarte-LS-me if you would like: Rsoultin generally makes good logical arguments from what I have seen from her and from personal experience. It is very easy to bandwagon her points. Silverarte, LS, and I have all done that already. Silverarte has been on her side since the beginning. You can attribute that to them being friends. LS did bandwagon on Rsoultins ideas, but you could attribute that to LS’s defense. Still worth noting for now. People I’m generally scared of: Celestial- Established great credibility day 1. Your writing style is very similar to a very established economist professor’s. If I was good at this game and was mafia, establishing credibility would be a top priority. Rsoultin- Very good at prodding and generating very logical arguments against people. Which means, if mafia, would be very good at it. Can prod and generate arguments about fallacies in people’s posts remarkably well. If she is mafia, I will have a difficult time reading it and a difficult time trying to convince others of it. People I think are least scummy: HTS-Good analysis and limited posts make it hard for me to be suspicious. Exo- great prodder early day and seems to be flinging scum everywhere. I would try to do this as scum (I think I’d have a better shot at this over establishing credibility lol). I also like that he tried to generate others to talk more (I’m such a hypocrite). Plus, people have been suspicious of him. That makes me a little more at ease about not being suspicious of him just in case he truly is mafia. | ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
He is gone, and will likely try to lynch whoever he feels is contributing the least when he gets back. I have a sinking feeling... lol | ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
#1: Shining #2: Tube #3: Silver #4: Waffle #5: LS | ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
| ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
| ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
I didn't see that you were mostly gone on Monday for a reason. I thought you were just not talking. | ||
|
jarjarbinks
569 Posts
| ||
| ||
