EPTStudent Mafia IV (New/Newish Players Welcome) - Page 95
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
meatpudding
Australia520 Posts
| ||
|
meatpudding
Australia520 Posts
On December 03 2014 23:02 Oatsmaster wrote: Hopeless is massively scum. You guys are giving him a free pass for lurking? No town lurks this hard when they are almost gonna lose the game. scum does though, because apparently nobody wants to lynch him for it. I really cant believe that you guys dont think lurking is a legitimate scumtell. This late in the game, it is. Then he tries to push sicklucker by referencing his read on damdred? His points are not even legitimate. This reads so much like hopeless trying to create a lynch outta nothing. And for him to be actually doing stuff so he has some content. It sucks. LYNCH HOPELESS. This just takes me back to kush. We haven't had another ml since then. So you stepped in to defend kush for lurking, which unfortunalteyl didnlt work. But now you want to lynch hopeless for lurking. Now how much later in the game is it since kush was the only ml since then, and how does that make it so much different? I really want to see what you are thinking, you obviously have good reads but I can't follow them. Can you let me know your argument without just repeating your conclusion in caps? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Hopeless has said scummy shit. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Its like completely different. | ||
|
meatpudding
Australia520 Posts
On December 04 2014 11:09 Oatsmaster wrote: no, i defended kush cause he said stupid shit. Hopeless has said scummy shit. Like what? anything besides that sicklucker post? | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On December 04 2014 10:16 meatpudding wrote: What would a bats flip tell you about oats? If bats flips, to me that would suggest that oats is a team, and that they were staging a bus. Can you confirm if this is what you are trying to say. Oats has been half-defending bats and directing the lynch toward hopeless instead without actually saying that he thinks bats is town. You should probably just read the night posts for yourself and make your own judgment call. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On December 04 2014 10:44 meatpudding wrote: sl was for pushing hopeless today, he said it several times. Did he give any reason for it? Perhaps it was by the process of elimination by who he thought was town? If I remember correctly it was oats who suggested first to lynch hopeless. Again, should probably just read the night posts. You'll see who SL was pushing and why. My problem with hopeless is he's basically a policy lynch, which at this point in the game I feel is insufficient unless you genuinely think all the rest of us are town. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On December 04 2014 11:49 rsoultin wrote: Again, should probably just read the night posts. You'll see who SL was pushing and why. My problem with hopeless is he's basically a policy lynch, which at this point in the game I feel is insufficient unless you genuinely think all the rest of us are town. You could always vote meat | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On December 04 2014 11:49 rsoultin wrote: Again, should probably just read the night posts. You'll see who SL was pushing and why. My problem with hopeless is he's basically a policy lynch, which at this point in the game I feel is insufficient unless you genuinely think all the rest of us are town. he is completely not a policy lynch, come on. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On December 04 2014 11:55 rsoultin wrote: I'm not reading meat as scum, Bats. You already know this. You do know his filter is 1/3rd as long as yours, right? | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
| ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
| ||
|
meatpudding
Australia520 Posts
On December 04 2014 11:45 rsoultin wrote: Oats has been half-defending bats and directing the lynch toward hopeless instead without actually saying that he thinks bats is town. You should probably just read the night posts for yourself and make your own judgment call. On December 04 2014 11:49 rsoultin wrote: Again, should probably just read the night posts. You'll see who SL was pushing and why. My problem with hopeless is he's basically a policy lynch, which at this point in the game I feel is insufficient unless you genuinely think all the rest of us are town. reading for myself definately, but I'm interested in what oats thinks of hopeless. Like I know oats said mopeless was scummy, and I want him to say why he thinks that. On SL, I see he was pushing for hopeless and bats but I didn't see him say why. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
I don't disagree with lynching hopeless on principle. Once again it looks like we're all going to be piling on the same person, though. Except bats who suddenly reversed who he wanted to vote without being able to explain it (at least not very well when I questioned his decision). Trying to tell me that you really think mafia is going to buss their last partner voluntarily when they just lost LS? I'm kind of surprised we're buying into the same mentality as yesterday. | ||
|
meatpudding
Australia520 Posts
On December 04 2014 12:53 rsoultin wrote: Can probably find the quote for you, meat, but he really is just echoing me. HTS, SL and I were more or less in agreement last night before SL was killed. Take that as you will. I don't disagree with lynching hopeless on principle. Once again it looks like we're all going to be piling on the same person, though. Except bats who suddenly reversed who he wanted to vote without being able to explain it (at least not very well when I questioned his decision). Trying to tell me that you really think mafia is going to buss their last partner voluntarily when they just lost LS? I'm kind of surprised we're buying into the same mentality as yesterday. That's the thing, everyone says vote hl but noone can really say why. So really no one can agree on a second lynch as well. Though I agree with breshke, at this point policy is mostly a necessity. If we don't lynch and he turns out to be scum then what? At this point I still would vote but even when he flips it tells us nothing. | ||
|
meatpudding
Australia520 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
It's not like there is a lot of posts, why can't you make up your own mind? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
meatpudding
Australia520 Posts
On December 04 2014 13:09 Oatsmaster wrote: I said why man meat. Have you even read his filter? It's not like there is a lot of posts, why can't you make up your own mind? What? I have said what I'm thinking so far. To repeat, it's voting hl. But I was looking into sl as well because he was saying the same thing but I wanted to be sure why he thought that. It turns out that his argument was poe. All you said on hopeless was that he was lurking and said scummy shit. We still have all day to consolidate on a vote and it can't be that hard. Again, it's not that I don't agree with your conclusion but why can't you go into what you think the scummy shit is? | ||
| ||
