|
On December 04 2014 07:37 Breshke wrote:Show nested quote +On December 04 2014 07:27 batsnacks wrote:On December 04 2014 07:20 Breshke wrote:On December 04 2014 02:06 batsnacks wrote:On December 04 2014 01:48 rsoultin wrote:
Okay, fair enough.
So you think meat and hopeless are scum then, but think hopeless is the better lynch because you agree with what oats said about hopeless lurking? Yes. I'd maybe add that regardless of what I think hopeless is objectively the best lynch. What has changed since this post bats? I thought oats would die. Here's what's going on: meat is scummy If meat is scum (I think he is) then oats might be mafia If meat is town (I don't think he is) then oats isn't mafia So by voting meat I get to vote 1. who I think is scummy and 2. someone who's alignment would be helpful in solving the game. As opposed to hopeless who is just 1. scummy. 2 is better than 1 is the point I'm trying to make So why if oats is mafia do you think meat might be? Are you saying if oats is town you are going to clear everyone who voted LS? from what i have gathered from your POV you seem to think hopeless is scum no matter what anyone flips so why not just lunch him first to confirm that and get a better picture of what is going on this game.
What I'm saying is that if meat is scum then we were lynching between scum yesterday.
And, in your own words, since I seem to think hopeless is scum no matter what anyone flips, then lynching hopeless isn't going to tell me anything except hopeless's alignment.
|
On December 04 2014 07:41 rsoultin wrote:
More seriously, bats, I don't actually want to mislynch you and I know I'm biased, so would you please explain why you think meat and oats are in cahoots?
I DON'T
But if meat is town then I -KNOW- they aren't.
|
You know that meat and oats aren't scum. But how does that clear oats of being scum entirely? I guess is the question I should have asked.
|
On December 04 2014 07:44 rsoultin wrote:
You know that meat and oats aren't scum. But how does that clear oats of being scum entirely? I guess is the question I should have asked.
If meat is town then oats had a choice to either
a) vote town (meat)
b) vote mafia (lightning)
If meat is mafia then oats had a choice to either
a) vote mafia (meat)
b) vote mafia (lightning)
|
Which assumes that no scum is bussing. Which by default means that if meat flips town we should assume you and hopeless are scum?
|
On December 04 2014 07:47 rsoultin wrote:
Which assumes that no scum is bussing. Which by default means that if meat flips town we should assume you and hopeless are scum?
It was easy to vote meat. Oats said so himself:
On December 03 2014 12:07 Oatsmaster wrote:
How have I been "go with the flow"? If i was scum, I can make a sickass case on meat and he wouldve been lynched way earlier. Also why defend kush?
Think a bit please rsoultin.
|
Maybe I've made a mistake. Trying to win as safely as possible sort of hinges on me not being lynched which might happen. It might be better for me to just push hopeless and hope for the best.
w/e
|
How is meat more safe for town to vote than hopeless?
|
On December 04 2014 08:01 rsoultin wrote:
How is meat more safe for town to vote than hopeless?
Good question.
Better question is how I'm a safer vote for town that either of them? 
|
Well, I've made no bones about believing that meat is town.
You flip town, I'd push for hopeless, our lurker.
I'm pretty sure it's one of you.
Now please answer my question. 
|
On December 04 2014 08:09 rsoultin wrote:Well, I've made no bones about believing that meat is town. You flip town, I'd push for hopeless, our lurker. I'm pretty sure it's one of you. Now please answer my question.
I seriously don't know though. I'm a post before you think kind of person I'm just working stuff out.
If you, and whoever else is town, learn anything from this game though, try to learn that lynching the person with the biggest thread presence over the person with the smallest thread presence is always bad. I would estimate about half of the content in this game is about me in one way or another.
|
ebwop and if you're mafia fuck off. You suck.
|
Well, you haven't convinced me yet, sorry. You've got plenty of time to come up with something though, and if not me, maybe you'll convince the others here. Gl.
|
No seriously. Next time don't be a noob and lynch the people who are happy to sit out.
|
|
|
I'll be the first to admit I can't be this active and this forward as mafia. Go look at any game I've played as mafia it's -nothing- like this. That's why kush and damdred, who I have played 10+ games each with both town read me pretty quick.
|
Got links?
I've already made it well-known that I don't trust meta, but I am willing to look to avoid lylo.
|
|
|
Ty...I'm not sure where to find these on the site. If you (or anyone else) would be willing to link me to the database with the games you've participated in that would be great.
|
On October 24 2014 08:33 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2014 08:32 IAmRobik wrote:
batsnacks seems too calm and rational to be towm I've been shaping up since we last played
That's pretty funny in retrospect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
