EPTHearthstone Mafia - Page 47
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On November 02 2014 06:39 jaybrundage wrote: Hm weird Alakaslam said this so You should literally find out what "everyone" means. I can't wrap my head around the fact that you could do this as both alignments. It is such a scummy, mafia-esque trait. Here is an example of something you said that was distinctly wrong. I'm sure you will ignore it tho. Rofl you remind me of Cartman stealing Jimmy's joke and being completely oblivious to the truth. HF you really believe that you haven't been misrepresenting me at all this entire time. Oh my god, Wait, I totally get it now. All this time I have been mad at you HF for trying to misrepresent me. But now I realize that your ego has made you believe that things happened differently, that's what Alakaslam was trying to tell me. That you have such a huge ego that you do these mental gymnastics so you don't appear wrong. I thought you were intentionally being thick. But now I realize that some people have egos that are so out of wack. That no matter what people tell them. They can't accept the truth of what actually happened. HF I realize now that you can't help but think you never made a mistake, Because your ego won't let you think otherwise. Oh and btw and I couldn't give two craps if I'm almost on your list. You ARE still on my list. I have yet to see good reasons why you aren't scum. The only problem is that people that have played with you previously aren't getting any scum vibes. And as I have no previous experience playing with you that i can remember . I'm deferring to their judgement of you. I think you underestimate the ability of folks to use a persona; this is a persona that works for mafia play. (Not scum play; I mean the whole game). I doubt HF is personally egotistical on that level. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Like it must be some sick mafia joke that you're talking about me misrepresenting you when that's literally what I'm calling you out for. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On November 02 2014 06:42 Holyflare wrote: It literally does not matter if i am wishy washy, "misrepresnting" or whatever. At the end of the day all i have to do is lead the town to lynch mafia and if you are posting about me representing YOU but then start posting about me town reading someone for their role when that didn't happen at all then all it does is make you look completely terrible. This is to my point (about not seeing it as a personal thing- that this playstyle is a strat and a fairly good one) @jaybrundage | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On November 02 2014 06:42 GlowingBear wrote: Fite me slam | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
To me, damdred reads like bad town, cracking under pressure. You shouldn't care that he claims blue though, because it looks like all the reds are going to have random powers too. But overall, it doesn't read like scum, more like clueless town to me. + Show Spoiler [Crazy Theory, not important] + Although I did for a second entertain a crazy theory - GlowingBear and Damdred are scumbuddies. GB pushes the Damd lynch day one, if it flips mafia he gets an easy rest of game. He's been on Damd's case since the beginning of the game literally. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On November 02 2014 06:49 jrkirby wrote: Where the hell are BH and Misder? The longer they are gone, the scummier I feel they are. To me, damdred reads like bad town, cracking under pressure. You shouldn't care that he claims blue though, because it looks like all the reds are going to have random powers too. But overall, it doesn't read like scum, more like clueless town to me. + Show Spoiler [Crazy Theory, not important] + Although I did for a second entertain a crazy theory - GlowingBear and Damdred are scumbuddies. GB pushes the Damd lynch day one, if it flips mafia he gets an easy rest of game. He's been on Damd's case since the beginning of the game literally. why is risk.nuke not in that list anymore? has your scum read on him evaporated? if so, why? | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
I admit to strengthening your stance, indeed you were wishy-washy and I attributed your usual aggressiveness to your post Hence, I had change blindness and now I see you | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
misrepresenting Quoted from his post btw | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On November 02 2014 06:48 Holyflare wrote: This is just like rayn last game where i call him out for doing terrible scummy things and his reply is that I'm terrible and must be mafia. You do realize you and Rayn are just two sides of a magnet, or a battery, in this You are the live wire and he is the ground You are the positive polarity and he is the negative. He says "you suxxu you are skum I dknt Kare wut U SEZ u die now" You say "whatteffer I am town mang so bakcofft PHUUL, you are not steering this ship I am" So You see it? | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
You have your RAWR and Rayn his PFFT... (Rayn is never calm) But generally! Yes | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
GB Sson u lyin u know this See you up in here trying to tell me Damd b SKYM So much that you be like "I'm outta here you cannot change my vote" Well Town was like "we are the children of Blazinghand we do not talk to terrorists" Now you are back Now you also say this stuff about lynch all liars, but SSON did you not just lie? !!!!¡Hijole! | ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
On November 02 2014 06:56 ritoky wrote: why is risk.nuke not in that list anymore? has your scum read on him evaporated? if so, why? No, I just forgot to mention him. I'd jump on risk in a second if I thought we could get majority. He's done almost absolutely nothing for town. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
It is sometimes good to be narcissus with our filters, for we are what we are doing | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On November 01 2014 21:01 GlowingBear wrote: But there are two problems here: 1) He came to the thread late when discussion was already generated. There is plenty of information to have reads now. So this excuse to use RNG is off 2) It rolled one of the most active and prolific player in the game, so the chance of a mislynch is very high. But he insists to use RNG. The whole point or RNG, GB, is that I don't have control over who is lynched. Nobody does. It's RNG. If it was "I'm gonna use RNG, but only follow up on it if the guy is a lurker", that wouldn't be RNG, that would be "BH likes to talk about RNG but when the chips are down he folds" and I am not a guy who folds when the chips are down. I take RNG seriously, and yes, sometimes RNG lands on an active scum instead of a passive scum. That doesn't make it less valid. On November 01 2014 21:25 Oatsmaster wrote: nah point 2 isnt relevant because RNGing then deciding to push that person defeats the purpose of RNG. So yeah these are mostly bad reasons why BH is scum. If BH was town, he would do the RNG shit too. But he would do additional stuff like trying harder to convince people to jump on the RNG wagon. Fair enough. Look at how GB has responded to RNG this game. Most people who don't like RNG just dismiss it, or call it bad (which eventually, it seeems he did). What GB isntead has done has said it was "disruptive" somehow (even though basically i was the only one voting along those lines) and responded with a counterattack against me. Is this how a town player, one who is familiar with RNG, would react? Why not just call RNG bad? Why not just call me scum for using RNG? Why call attention to the fact that RNG is disruptive to the town discourse, or say that it's unusually bad becuase it landed on him? This is not how my thought process would go if I were RNGed as town and I think it shows us that GB is scum. On November 01 2014 21:34 GlowingBear wrote: Slam, he had the chance to do it earlier. He came to the thread, someone sent him to dinner (lol) and he peace'd out. Why he didn't start the RNG that time and not now? Eh, I wasn't really planning to do it, but it turned out I had to go to dinner and didn't have enough time to do any other voting strategy or do a bigger analysis of the thread. I'm 100% sure I already said this. Didn' you read my filter? On November 01 2014 23:51 GlowingBear wrote: Ok oats. My first thought was that maybe we should lynch Kirby But after reading BH's previous games I want to lynch him so much. Explain? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On November 02 2014 00:39 Damdred wrote: While I would love to lynch GB today I mean I really would love to lynch gb. I am 100% not lynching into the biggest filter on day one. GB still hasn't delivered cases like hes promised or a lot of updated reads but hes usually not spammy as scum either so possibly a d3 lynch. BH has a shot at being scum for his inactivity really, misder has a decent shot I have legit IRL reasons for being inactive: I was busy eating dinner On November 02 2014 01:00 Damdred wrote: I said could be due to his inactivity, its just a meta suspicion bh has to do more or less to get a firm scum read. What about those cases and reads you promised gb don't mind GB he's just trying to opt out of the discourse by yelling about me and RNG, and hoping people don't pay attention to the fact that RNG is objectively a great strat, and it landed on scum last game. I can't believe anyone questions RNG at all any more | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
| ||
