|
On October 31 2014 14:18 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Alternatively you can try talking to me instead of dictating how to waste our analyzer thingie within the first two hours of the game. What kind of target do you think would be better for the cat?
And given what we know, if we don't use it in the next ~22 hours, we would have wasted one cycle of the cat. There are no charges, the cat says it does the analysis once it hits majority, and it refreshes every 23 hours.
|
On October 31 2014 14:00 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2014 13:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 31 2014 13:53 GlowingBear wrote:On October 31 2014 13:51 Oatsmaster wrote: I would analyse scum. british spelling.
GB, are you scum?
So, you think asking me if I'm scum is doing a better job than pointing out a bad entrance? C'mon oats. Face it, your point was not good and you keep going on about it which makes me think that you dont have anything else to post. I dont care what kinda job you think im doing. Ok, it's not the best point, but it is the strongest so far. Propose a better discussion. This one is already saturated. SO WHY DO YOU KEEP BRINGING IT UP? YOU BROUGHT IT UP NOT ME.
WHAT THE FUCK GLOWING BEAR.
|
On October 31 2014 14:20 Misder wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2014 14:18 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Alternatively you can try talking to me instead of dictating how to waste our analyzer thingie within the first two hours of the game. What kind of target do you think would be better for the cat? And given what we know, if we don't use it in the next ~22 hours, we would have wasted one cycle of the cat. There are no charges, the cat says it does the analysis once it hits majority, and it refreshes every 23 hours.
Lmao idk. Give it some time and we can use it on someone we find scummy.
No need to rush it if we have 22 hours.
|
Use it on the scummiest person. End of discussion.
If we dont use it, no loss.
Hey Holyflare, has anything popped out as being interesting to you?
|
On October 31 2014 14:20 Misder wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2014 14:18 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Alternatively you can try talking to me instead of dictating how to waste our analyzer thingie within the first two hours of the game. What kind of target do you think would be better for the cat? And given what we know, if we don't use it in the next ~22 hours, we would have wasted one cycle of the cat. There are no charges, the cat says it does the analysis once it hits majority, and it refreshes every 23 hours.
I don't know if it was just you not being here, but seems like you were having a difficult time getting into the thread; then this cat appears. Now you're all cat all the time. Just a very awkward entrance.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On October 31 2014 14:23 Oatsmaster wrote: Use it on the scummiest person. End of discussion.
If we dont use it, no loss.
Hey Holyflare, has anything popped out as being interesting to you?
misder giving me some weird feels
1. went role fishing 2. questioned gb uselessly about his vote being in an illegitimate format 3. talking about the cat repeatedly 4. wants to analyse obi specifically when he hasn't even been here when there's multiple others that are the same
|
INTERESTING.
although the illegitimate format thing makes no sense to me if he was town or scum. Like nobody intentionally mistypes their vote. Nobody. So its like a total non-point that he kept mentioning.
but yeah, interesting.
|
On October 31 2014 14:19 Holyflare wrote: misder is there anything you hoped to achieve by asking if gb's vote was in the right format? and why obi when he's in a similar 0 content boat as like 4 other ppl No - I just want to confirm there are no shenanigans going on. It really should be a quick yes or no - not something to get a read on. Obviously, it wasn't just a quick yes or no lol.
I didn't consider any of the people that didn't post at all - I think using it on other people that posted, but not really (and ppl I did not get a town tell on) is a fine first use, and saying ObiWanShinobi makes it so that we have a target instead of lolidadiling(sp?) since we need majority vote if we really do want to use it.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
also LT completely different and i mean COMPLETELY different from his fanfic game and all he's done is talk about useless things that the op contradicts (alignment/role stuff) and wants to lynch/joke lynch me based off of something when he knows that im busy doing something else (he came and saw me playing league) also super weird unvote after gb made a post and then disappearing
|
On October 31 2014 14:19 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2014 13:59 jaybrundage wrote: Wait guys I just had an idea what if Mr.Bigglesworth is actually part of Kulthazard as a third party. Who's job is to eliminate the horde cause in that case we should never give votes to the cat. As it can't help us find scum. As horde is not indicative of Mafia Alignment. I dont see why doing a side objective could be bad in any way. Not sure what you mean by side objective. It could hurt us however as third party could glean information to win the game and it would make town lose. Hm thinking about it if horde could be both mafia and town then the third party would be indifferent to helping either of us. hm
If third party wins does it mean that town and mafia lose? or does third party win condition, have an objective they have to fufill so they can win with either Mafia or town?
Sorry if I didnt make my question clear. I dont know too much about third party in mafia set ups.
|
Holyflare is making good points.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On October 31 2014 14:31 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2014 14:19 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 31 2014 13:59 jaybrundage wrote: Wait guys I just had an idea what if Mr.Bigglesworth is actually part of Kulthazard as a third party. Who's job is to eliminate the horde cause in that case we should never give votes to the cat. As it can't help us find scum. As horde is not indicative of Mafia Alignment. I dont see why doing a side objective could be bad in any way. Not sure what you mean by side objective. It could hurt us however as third party could glean information to win the game and it would make town lose. Hm thinking about it if horde could be both mafia and town then the third party would be indifferent to helping either of us. hm If third party wins does it mean that town and mafia lose? or does third party win condition, have an objective they have to fufill so they can win with either Mafia or town? Sorry if I didnt make my question clear. I dont know too much about third party in mafia set ups.
Town Win Condition: You win when all anti-town threats have been eliminated. Mafia Win Condition: You win when all threats to the mafia team are eliminated or nothing prevents this from happening. Third Party Win Condition: ???
read op before playing, come back and post content, kk?
|
On October 31 2014 14:23 Oatsmaster wrote: Use it on the scummiest person. End of discussion.
If we dont use it, no loss.
Hey Holyflare, has anything popped out as being interesting to you?
it is a loss. We need to at least know how it works on the first try. If we dont use it we lose 1 cycle.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On October 31 2014 14:27 Oatsmaster wrote: INTERESTING.
although the illegitimate format thing makes no sense to me if he was town or scum. Like nobody intentionally mistypes their vote. Nobody. So its like a total non-point that he kept mentioning.
but yeah, interesting.
the first sentence totally contradicts the last...mafia love to talk about non-points
|
On October 31 2014 14:20 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2014 14:00 GlowingBear wrote:On October 31 2014 13:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 31 2014 13:53 GlowingBear wrote:On October 31 2014 13:51 Oatsmaster wrote: I would analyse scum. british spelling.
GB, are you scum?
So, you think asking me if I'm scum is doing a better job than pointing out a bad entrance? C'mon oats. Face it, your point was not good and you keep going on about it which makes me think that you dont have anything else to post. I dont care what kinda job you think im doing. Ok, it's not the best point, but it is the strongest so far. Propose a better discussion. This one is already saturated. SO WHY DO YOU KEEP BRINGING IT UP? YOU BROUGHT IT UP NOT ME. WHAT THE FUCK GLOWING BEAR.
I wanted you to talk about it, you didn't want. I brought it up to say that your question was useless, not to re-engage the discussion.
|
I expected more posts from VE at this point.
|
On October 31 2014 14:20 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2014 14:13 jaybrundage wrote:On October 31 2014 14:08 ritoky wrote:On October 31 2014 14:03 jaybrundage wrote:On October 31 2014 13:58 GlowingBear wrote:On October 31 2014 13:55 jaybrundage wrote:On October 31 2014 13:53 GlowingBear wrote:On October 31 2014 13:51 Oatsmaster wrote: I would analyse scum. british spelling.
GB, are you scum?
So, you think asking me if I'm scum is doing a better job than pointing out a bad entrance? C'mon oats. Would you prefer if that person hadn't posted then? Would that be more townie? Tell me the town motivation behind coming to the thread, summarizing a thread 2 pages long, downgrading his gameplay and bringing nothing contributive. It isn't even a conversation starter. You didn't answer my question You stated if they didnt wanna joke around why would they post. I would say cause people feel obligated to post on day 1 as there is nothing else to do. As for downgrading himself. I know i am not the next prodigy mafia player, palmar incarnate. I am a just an average mafia player that enjoys the game. Who cares if someone knows they aren't great. I think people say that ts a scum tell but i never feel like scum actually use it. You are on about some really arbitrary, nitpicking stuff imo. I am not a fan. There's a difference between knowing you're not great; and first posts advertising how not great you are. I'm trying to get people to post about there reasoning and to post more so i can get a better read on them. The faster there is substance in the thread. The faster real analyzing can happen. By me "nitpicking" hopefully you can also get a better read on me as well as GB. Who is my nit...pickeded XD How is hammering on a point that he clearly won't back down on and you disagree with getting more info into the thread? People already challenged him on it and he didn't budge. You just seem to be trying to find an arbitrary hole to throw scum at. I am not very fond of you atm. I wanted to see his thought process. I may be hyper focusing on it a bit. (Bad tendency of mine.) But it was one of the things that stuck out to me.
Oh also to the people that haven't posted yet. Get on it. I can't stand lurkers.
|
Good to know that HF and Oats are town this game.
|
On October 31 2014 14:24 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2014 14:20 Misder wrote:On October 31 2014 14:18 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Alternatively you can try talking to me instead of dictating how to waste our analyzer thingie within the first two hours of the game. What kind of target do you think would be better for the cat? And given what we know, if we don't use it in the next ~22 hours, we would have wasted one cycle of the cat. There are no charges, the cat says it does the analysis once it hits majority, and it refreshes every 23 hours. I don't know if it was just you not being here, but seems like you were having a difficult time getting into the thread; then this cat appears. Now you're all cat all the time. Just a very awkward entrance.
I totally agree. He was clearly reading the thread and bam he comes out of nowhere and votes to analyze LT on his first post. Only scum come in dry.
|
On October 31 2014 14:24 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2014 14:20 Misder wrote:On October 31 2014 14:18 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Alternatively you can try talking to me instead of dictating how to waste our analyzer thingie within the first two hours of the game. What kind of target do you think would be better for the cat? And given what we know, if we don't use it in the next ~22 hours, we would have wasted one cycle of the cat. There are no charges, the cat says it does the analysis once it hits majority, and it refreshes every 23 hours. I don't know if it was just you not being here, but seems like you were having a difficult time getting into the thread; then this cat appears. Now you're all cat all the time. Just a very awkward entrance. Don't have a response to whether my entrance was awkward or not. Cat thing responded below.
On October 31 2014 14:25 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2014 14:23 Oatsmaster wrote: Use it on the scummiest person. End of discussion.
If we dont use it, no loss.
Hey Holyflare, has anything popped out as being interesting to you? misder giving me some weird feels 1. went role fishing 2. questioned gb uselessly about his vote being in an illegitimate format 3. talking about the cat repeatedly 4. wants to analyse obi specifically when he hasn't even been here when there's multiple others that are the same
For the "role-fishing" thing - don't know if what I said actually counts as role-fishing, but if we ever do find out his character, I'm inclined to believe that jkirby is not the opposite alignment of that character (subjective of course). I would have thought that either way, but I asked because I wanted to get the point across. Talked about 2. What is wrong with talking about the cat? If the cat is useful, why not use it? Talked about 4.
|
|
|
|