Team Melee Mini Mafia V: Newbies and Vets

On July 11 2014 18:50 marvellosity wrote:
I think I'm going to ignore Eden, dunno if he posts like a stupid kid for a particular reason, but it makes him look like a stupid kid and it's annoying to read his posts with terrible english.

On July 11 2014 19:51 Eden1892 wrote:
my good read on OK is that he's town, it's kind of a meta thing because we have pretty similar thought processes when we're town, so the fact that he's almost literally in my head at times in this thread points to him being town to me.

uh more generally i feel like the questions he asked bunnies during the back-and-forth we had about my VT claim were on-point, bunnies' questions didn't seem like they were going anywhere and he was asking specific questions about the direction of her questioning to figure out whether the questions were coming from the right place.

as for why me, i'm town because i'm vanilla townie, but even aside from that... idk same reasons OK is town tbh, like i said my thought process and his have been nearly identical this game. i've been asking pretty similar questions with the same intent (figure out what bunnies was doing, in particular) and so most of what i said about OK applies to me as well

On July 11 2014 12:38 GlowingBear wrote:
Kenpachi rule doesn't sound as a winning plan to me. You may use it as a secondary argument but to get to the point you have a primary one there is so much game to be played. I think that if we keep discussing this topic it will just a waste of breath.
Why do I think it's secondary: a scum can fake claim vt just so he can get townie to accuse him and get mislynched. More than that, a vt can simply try to pressure someone who claimed vt. Why not?

-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and Glowingbear

On July 11 2014 11:47 GlowingBear wrote:
/confirm

Hello guys, it's my second game here.
It seems that there is a ruckus going on already. Can someone explain me what Is the Kenpachi rule?

Also, I'll be signing every post of mine with a bolded "-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear" so it gets easier to identify the team.

-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear

On July 11 2014 12:38 GlowingBear wrote:
Kenpachi rule doesn't sound as a winning plan to me. You may use it as a secondary argument but to get to the point you have a primary one there is so much game to be played. I think that if we keep discussing this topic it will just a waste of breath.
Why do I think it's secondary: a scum can fake claim vt just so he can get townie to accuse him and get mislynched. More than that, a vt can simply try to pressure someone who claimed vt. Why not?

-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and Glowingbear

On July 11 2014 19:59 HaruRH wrote:
/confirm

Robik is going to be afk? But exo is a d1 non-poster too...

Meh

-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear

On July 11 2014 21:28 Palmar wrote:
Actually, I'm going to do this:

##Unvote
##Vote Team WeDemandALawyer

3. This post



Talking about stuff that is really easy to talk about without giving any sort of an opinion on anyone in the game. I think it was sinani who pointed out that this post also came at a really awkward time, after people had mostly dropped the kenpachi thing.

On July 11 2014 21:34 HaruRH wrote:


1) we were excited to play yes. But not terribly excited to talk about kenpachi rule for 10 pages.

2) this means we won't see robik/exo team for a whole of d1. Meh.

3) fluff = scum?

UNICORNS AND DRAGONS WEEEEEE

On July 11 2014 21:41 HaruRH wrote:


I don't think making a case on anyone makes you scum. #freedomofspeech

-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear

On July 12 2014 01:24 mderg wrote:
Can we lynch Robik for being a liar?

On July 12 2014 01:29 ExO_ wrote:


What about my case is bullshit? I literally just went through the filter of every other player in this game. My reads may not be perfect, but I don't think I'm particularly good at day 1 reads. But how am I going to improve as a player if I don't get out of my comfort zone? That's what I'm doing here, so yeah there might be mistakes.

I'll give you that I skimmed some parts, and likely missed a thing that was said here or there. But I did go through everybody, so telling me I didn't read is insulting to me, because I don't see you offering anything better

Team Magic Carpet
Not a lot of posts from straightform just asking questions "Robik why won't u post?, Why would exo/robik not posting Day 1 not be bad for town" etc.. Palmar calls out team lawyer for not posting anything of value, but I see very little of value from him at all. After reading his filter i think Palmar is the most scummy looking person so far in the thread.
*scum read*

On July 12 2014 01:31 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
Also this is not the palmar I saw when I played him. He was more analytical, more smart that game. This game, not so much.

On July 12 2014 01:47 marvellosity wrote:

What's wrong with it, buddy?

On July 12 2014 01:46 ExO_ wrote:


You think the post you made calling lawyer and co out was contributing in a good way? You think just voting is contributing in a good way?

I don't believe what you have said so far is contributing in a major way. Perhaps you aren't as good at conveying your thoughts to the town as you think?

On July 12 2014 01:52 marvellosity wrote:

really.

##Vote: The Magic Computer

On July 12 2014 01:58 marvellosity wrote:

To think what way?

Last time I remember that you told town to go screw itself like that was in Cell.

What way do you think I'm thinking in exactly here, Plammy?

On July 12 2014 02:04 marvellosity wrote:

I don't think so. Robik's (?) point about nitpicking on smaller things chimed with me, I remembered that's how you operated in... that game I obsed. With DP.

Mostly you tell towns/people they're awful like that when you are mafia, and mostly you call me bad or mafia when you are mafia (bureaucracy, Rock band, the mini me/you/robik were in). The only exception I can think of to this is LVIII which was 2 years ago or something.

In the previous newbie game you were staunchly tryhard and nurturing, here you started trolling, tried a bit in the middle, and then told town they're all terrible and you're going away.

Is any of this unfair/incorrect?

On July 13 2014 07:08 27ninjabunnies wrote:
Also, if Slamroot flips town, tell me, what information will we gain from it?

On July 13 2014 07:18 27ninjabunnies wrote:


Wrong. You can see who pushed hardest. You can see who defended hardest.

You can also see who just sheeped.

So much info gained.

On July 13 2014 08:44 27ninjabunnies wrote:
Awww. Mderg. Didn't see your post. My bad.

Yeah, so my case isn't 100%.

But it's the best I've got so far.

other people I'm reading as town. Koshi and CR, I'm not. IT's what makes the most sense to me.

Sqrt, I'd like to know why OK is scum?

Also, smart or mafia? Can you not be a smart mafia?

And does smart mean I'm a smart town?

So many questions.

On July 13 2014 09:06 27ninjabunnies wrote:


You obviously have no humor.

Tis a joke Rob. A Joke.

On July 13 2014 09:09 27ninjabunnies wrote:


haha how was that scummy?

I'm not that stupid to where I would slip such a thing as that.

I asked that in order to see where Sqrts thinking is.

He said I'm smart, or mafia.

If he thinks the first, he obv thinks Im town.

So why is that?

On July 13 2014 09:12 27ninjabunnies wrote:


Saying can't mafia be smart was a joke.

The post has a point.

So yes, I can do both.

On July 13 2014 09:40 27ninjabunnies wrote:


I don't remember him really answeing these.
If he has, I've completely missed them.

Also, seriously. Whoever is reading me as scum, you're wrong.

And that wasn't overreacting. If anything he was overreacting and reading completely wrong the things I've post.