Team Melee Mini Mafia V: Newbies and Vets

On July 11 2014 18:50 marvellosity wrote:
I think I'm going to ignore Eden, dunno if he posts like a stupid kid for a particular reason, but it makes him look like a stupid kid and it's annoying to read his posts with terrible english.

On July 11 2014 19:51 Eden1892 wrote:
my good read on OK is that he's town, it's kind of a meta thing because we have pretty similar thought processes when we're town, so the fact that he's almost literally in my head at times in this thread points to him being town to me.

uh more generally i feel like the questions he asked bunnies during the back-and-forth we had about my VT claim were on-point, bunnies' questions didn't seem like they were going anywhere and he was asking specific questions about the direction of her questioning to figure out whether the questions were coming from the right place.

as for why me, i'm town because i'm vanilla townie, but even aside from that... idk same reasons OK is town tbh, like i said my thought process and his have been nearly identical this game. i've been asking pretty similar questions with the same intent (figure out what bunnies was doing, in particular) and so most of what i said about OK applies to me as well

On July 11 2014 12:38 GlowingBear wrote:
Kenpachi rule doesn't sound as a winning plan to me. You may use it as a secondary argument but to get to the point you have a primary one there is so much game to be played. I think that if we keep discussing this topic it will just a waste of breath.
Why do I think it's secondary: a scum can fake claim vt just so he can get townie to accuse him and get mislynched. More than that, a vt can simply try to pressure someone who claimed vt. Why not?

-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and Glowingbear

On July 11 2014 11:47 GlowingBear wrote:
/confirm

Hello guys, it's my second game here.
It seems that there is a ruckus going on already. Can someone explain me what Is the Kenpachi rule?

Also, I'll be signing every post of mine with a bolded "-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear" so it gets easier to identify the team.

-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear

On July 11 2014 12:38 GlowingBear wrote:
Kenpachi rule doesn't sound as a winning plan to me. You may use it as a secondary argument but to get to the point you have a primary one there is so much game to be played. I think that if we keep discussing this topic it will just a waste of breath.
Why do I think it's secondary: a scum can fake claim vt just so he can get townie to accuse him and get mislynched. More than that, a vt can simply try to pressure someone who claimed vt. Why not?

-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and Glowingbear

On July 11 2014 19:59 HaruRH wrote:
/confirm

Robik is going to be afk? But exo is a d1 non-poster too...

Meh

-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear

On July 11 2014 21:28 Palmar wrote:
Actually, I'm going to do this:

##Unvote
##Vote Team WeDemandALawyer

3. This post



Talking about stuff that is really easy to talk about without giving any sort of an opinion on anyone in the game. I think it was sinani who pointed out that this post also came at a really awkward time, after people had mostly dropped the kenpachi thing.

On July 11 2014 21:34 HaruRH wrote:


1) we were excited to play yes. But not terribly excited to talk about kenpachi rule for 10 pages.

2) this means we won't see robik/exo team for a whole of d1. Meh.

3) fluff = scum?

UNICORNS AND DRAGONS WEEEEEE