I will not run climb or jump. I will not sit kneel or lie down. I will not spam either.
You Only Shoot Once Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
I will not run climb or jump. I will not sit kneel or lie down. I will not spam either. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On April 17 2014 07:20 geript wrote: Was RoL the guy who hated BH or was that someone else? everyone hates BH, he's a punk | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
##vote geript | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
VE: I understand what you're saying about Palmar, but I do not think it likely he will flip scum. I don't think it's a good policy to just maxvote anyone with a nuke on them because thye MIGHT be scum and shoot someone. If there's anyone I'd trust as town to actually make a non-shit shot, also (besides myself, who never misses) it would be palmar. I'd rather place my vote on geript. Suck it. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
Foolishness wish Is my command | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
##unvote ##vote geript | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On April 27 2014 02:45 strongandbig wrote: [/b][/b]On reread I don't get as bad a vibe from this post as I did before. I guess the first part feels a bit off/overwrought, but it's not as terrible as it seemed. That said, I don't like how VE insists on misunderstanding the caller situation, and how he hasn't been talking about anything but saying the same stuff over and over. --radom crap about claler-- What does that mean about VE? Well, VE focuses only on reasons why caller making this shot as scum would be strategically terrible, and even goes so far as to pull a strategic reason for caller to do this as town out of his ass. He ignores the (in my mind far more likely) possibility of a non-strategic action as either alignment. He also ignores the possibility that caller has some extra information as scum, which as I said above makes a strategic shot much more likely to have come from scum than town. I don't like that when this is the only thing VE has talked about, he's ignoring possibilities and building a particular story that I think is very unlikely. It feels kind of like VE knows caller is town. There are possible scum motivations for this. Someone else said that as scum VE likes talking about things where he's right, and if VE knows caller is town then he would be guaranteed to be right. Also, as long as he focuses on this one "big event," he won't have to participate in conversations about other players. (Except for the throwaway townread on geript.) So yeah. It's not a slam dunk but I'm putting my scum bet on VE at this point. tl;dr this post from VE feels good, random crpa about claler, serious wafflepush on VE then.. it's not a slam dunk but you're putting your "scum bet" on VE? Get real, I haven't seen this much waffle since my last trip to IHOP and they don't even DO waffles. Check it. Make a case on VE if you want, or don't make a case, but don't leave us guessing about what's what. Wanna know why Fool be votin you? It's cause of shit like this, followed by shit like this: On April 27 2014 02:51 strongandbig wrote: We have more than 30 hours left in the day. Lets talk about who is scum for a while. There's no need to shut anything down yet. I still don't know whether you actually think VE is scum or not even after reading these sorry excuse for posts. Let me quote some of your waffling so it's 100% unambiguous what I'm complaining about here. Oh wait I already did. Yeah. So look dude I'm gona be straight with you cause that's how I roll: you are not talking about who is scum, you're talking about weird feelings and shit. You're not even making it clear that you push on VE in your post. Yeah, at the end you say "it's not a slam dunk but i'm putting my scum bet (but clearly not my vote for some reason herpa derpa) on VE" but the ENTIREBODY OF YOUR POST IS WAFFLING. So EZ to backtrack, especially since you're so EZ 2 b scum. Look at that and tell me you're contributing meaningfully to the discussion. Oh, what you can't tell me that? YEah, that's cause you don't call anyone out, you don't push for reactions, you don't even VOTE him. You don't do anything because you're not here to DO anything. You're here to waffle. You're here to slink away later with some crap vote and you're not allowed to do that. Here's what I want from you in addition to your half-assed response to this post. You must include this in your post: 1) who you think is scum, and a vote on them 2) a response detailing what you think not only of VE, but of me, and all the people who you think had bad OR good reasoning about VE's alignment 3) sobbing nerd tears | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On April 27 2014 15:14 sandroba wrote: Gonna post more on week days, posting mostly from my phone now. I'll have something tomorrow most likely. I'm cool with prpl so far, fool is no to be taken srs at least till he posts something good. More talking, less not talking please. What do you think of snB | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On April 27 2014 15:19 sandroba wrote: Im cool with snb tô o, bh not so much Please stop overwhelming me with details the detials they are too many ![]() | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On April 28 2014 02:07 strongandbig wrote: Just to talk for a second about bh's case - it's stupid and lazy. He also uses way too many words to say I'm not being committal enough / am giving myself room to back out. This is the TL meta at work, no room for nuance or honest actual thought processes. The thing is, I feel like it's such a trope that I'm not even mad - like, the case is stupid but less stupid than koshi's cases. I said exactly what I thought in the post bh doesn't like, I guess I should've made up more machismo. Anyway, bh asked me to read him as well so here it is. He accused geript of overexplaining and put an early vote down, flipped that vote a few times, and made his own overexplained case on me. Honestly, I've stopped expecting much out of bh. I know his read on me is wrong, and I really disagreed with how he justified his vote on geript. I know he won't be happy if I just say "he's been wrong in a scummy way, but his posts don't give me a strong gut impression and I don't really expect him to be right so I have a mild scum lean" so I'm gonna go ahead and say "he's 100% scum seal of approval lynch this motherfucker but lynch VE first and probably some other people too." I'm not saying you can't be nuanced, though thanks for strawmanning the shit out of my statements. You can say that it's like "TL Meta" or whatever, but first, 1) TL Meta is objectively the best-- we are literally better htan other mafia sites 2) even if I use too many words or it's a trope or whatever, or you lack machismo, that still doesn't change the fact that your case still literally gave you the ability to back out and didn't include a vote. What you've said doesn't contradict what I've said, you've just made some words and put them on a page and made it LOOK like it does, but really you're just shitting the bed. I also would like to note saying "I have a weak read on BH but will pretend to have a strong read on him" is literally the same as saying "I have a weak read on BH" except with added snark. We should call you snarkandbig. You think my vote on geript was shit? Look at it this way, I'm here driving the town discussion and making things happen, and you're here not taking stances and being scum. Complain all you want about "expecting things out of BH" or "TL Meta" but all your whining is going to be extra funny when you flip scum kek On April 28 2014 02:05 sandroba wrote: wtf is this snb shit? honestly he is one of the few people I'm actually leaning town so far and somehow he is the one being wagoned? I'm gonna leave my vote on foolishness and probably will have time to read/post for a bit before the day ends. I still have no clue how this fake nuke thing worked, but since palmar isnt dying I see no reason to kill caller yet. See you guys later. ##vote: foolishness Foolishness almost certainly is not scum. His posts have real intention behind them and he's looking into people's meta to try to figure out whether their plays this game (and there have been many odd plays this game) align with their scum play or town play. That level of interest in actually determining people's alignment tells me Fool is town. Not a good lynch today imo. Not really sure why you're voting him. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
##unvote ##vote SnB | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On April 28 2014 07:04 Koshi wrote: I stick on SnB. gn. that's my boy | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On April 28 2014 07:24 yamato77 wrote: people will move off of snb or I will rng between the people left on him and shoot one. god what is it with you people this game? jesus christ | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On April 28 2014 07:36 yamato77 wrote: it's literally imperative that we don't lynch my one solid townread you know what, don't RNG it. If people don't move off of SnB you shoot ME. You don't get to say rng or anything like that, so if you want to threaten someone, threaten BlazingHand and own up to the thread. Say you'll kill me, the best scumhunter on all of TL, if you don't get your why. Whine and cry like a baby and be specific about who you are shooting. I volunteer. And you won't shoot, either. You know why? You don't have the guts. Get in line, your read on SnB is wrong, we're lynching him today. nothing's stopping this wagon. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
##unvote ##vote oats | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
##unvote ##vote SnB | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On April 28 2014 12:04 OdinOfPergo wrote: This guy is such a hot topic. I really feel uncomfortable with his lynch atm though. Like I read it... and come to the conclusion "This dude totes scum" you should just stop your throught process here and vote SnB | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
VOTE HIM OR BE HELD IN MY ETERNAL IRE (this is not a bet of an out of game object) | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On April 28 2014 13:06 OdinOfPergo wrote: SnB was a one shot. Did he kill Yam? .... On April 28 2014 08:05 Alakaslam wrote: ##Shoot: Yamato77 Reason: I was out of posts and can post my reason with the shot. I can't change my vote folks and I was already looking at Yam shot. Not playing pro town much at all IMO. On April 28 2014 08:06 Hapahauli wrote: Mod Announcement: ![]() Yamato77 has been shot! This is a no-flip kill. ._. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
Gumshoe however HAS posted, just not in the past 24 hours. I don't buy his reason of having some kind of sc2 clan war, and honestly I see him as scum being less interested in actual scumhunting. When you play scum you're mostly motivated to float by rather than learn things about what's happening in the game, and that's what I see happening here with Gumshoe. Especially in this town, the emotion driving scum is fear and wanting to hide rather than like seriousness. A Gumshoe lynch is a good lynch. ##vote gumshoe | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
BH... knows to some degree what an on-point geript is capable of. ##Vote: Blazinghand >implying geript is capable of anything other than shitting the bed | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On May 01 2014 00:47 justanothertownie wrote: Yes, yes it is a crapshoot. If you have a gun feel free to shoot gumshoe - maybe I will even do it - but today we are lynching foolishness. Get on the wagon. Lynch of justice yada yada. I want to see more votes on Foolishness! Foolishness really is not scum. I'm in a mason qt with him and with few exceptions he has been helpful and honest. Even better he has pushed me to develop and clarify my reads. He asks questions and shares thoughts and ideas. Foolishness has put more work into solving this game than any of you jub jubs. Why not lynch one of the many scummy people like Gumshoe instead of the helpful foolishness? | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
![]() What really seals the deal for me with "Foolishness is Scum" is this. Foolishness and I during D1 were hanging out in the !T being biffles. About an hour before the lynch, we're discussing various candidates and Foolishness said he had a meta read on Oatsmaster. He asked me to compare Oats post here as mafia: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/432880-white-flag-mafia?page=11#216 with Oats most here in this game: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/448443-you-only-shoot-once-mafia?page=9#166 What's important to see here is that these posts are actually very different. They both begin with a one-liner and have two paragraphs, but they represent different playstyles. In one, Oats is meta-ey, and in the other he talks about mindset and stuff. Basically, I'm pretty sure Foolishness was planting this as a trap to see if I would accept bad reasoning about Oatsmaster, and when I rejected it, he quickly moved on. In other words: even though we were productive, Fool was subtle trying to catch me out in case I was scum, and evaluate my chops. I can tell you that this is just one of many times we compared evidence. If I were scum, and also not quite as observant and talented as I am (since I am the #1 player on Tl Mafia) it might have even worked. Most people on this forum underestimate me or think I'm joking when I say I'm th ebest, and Foolishness probably bought into that when he tried to trick me like this. The point isn't whether or not I'm the best (though I am), the point is the fact that Foolishness was willing to go through all this effort means he must be town trying to solidify his read on me. I can't at all see how he could be scum. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On May 01 2014 02:14 austinmcc wrote: WEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEEOOOWEE FACT: We nearly no lynched yesterday, due both to lack of candidates AND time zones causing us trouble late. FACT: Our current votes look like this: FACT: Nobody has even 1/2 a majority. FACT: There are mafia in this game and they don't want us to lynch mafia. OPINION: We should start consolidating. Specifically
A rough list of
I PERSONALLY still want to lynch Oats. I'm still suspicious of Foolishness, but between letting someone who is posting sometimes in thread and apparently posting in a QT live, vs. letting someone live who actually is just doing nothing, I'd much rather keep the Foolishness alive than the Oats. Sorry Oats. I PERSONALLY don't want to lynch RoL. I gave some reasons when asked (maybe by JAT?), but also the push on him from Foolishness makes me shy away even more. Foolishness's cases have not resonated with me this game like they have in recent ones. ANYWAY. SEEING AS WE HAVE PEOPLE ALL OVER THE GLOBE AND WE HAD TROUBLE GETTING MAJORITY ON D1 AND WE'RE HAVING LOTS OF TROUBLE GETTING MAJORITY ON D2, WE REALLY NEED TO START CONSOLIDATING. DOES ANYONE THINK THAT THE ABOVE LIST OF OPTIONS IS PARTICULARLY BAD? NONE OF THOSE 4 ARE MAFIA? THERE'S SOMEONE WHO SHOULD BE ON THAT LIST ABOVE A BUNCH OF OTHERS, AND THAT SOMEONE HAS GOTTEN SCUMREAD BY MULTIPLE FOLKS, MAKING THEM A REALISTIC LYNCH CANDIDATE? CUZ OTHERWISE, WE'RE DOWN TO LIKE 1/4 CYCLE AND EVEN IF WE'RE ON THE RIGHT TRAILS WE'RE NOT DOING WELL WITH OUR VOTING. Fair enough. I'm down like a clown with lynching Oats. I think we've given Palmar plenty of time and he hasn't delivered, as well. RoL is a fine lynch but honestly I've learned not to expect much from him. The foolishness lynch is, well, utter foolishness. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On May 01 2014 06:20 Foolishness wrote: I'll reiterate that on day 1 I thought Koshi was town (just based off his posting and thread presence, I never did a hard analysis or anything). tehpoofter brings up some good points though that can't be ignored. I don't think Koshi should be lynched today (and probably not tomorrow either) because there's a handful of other people that need to be taken care of first (myself, Palmar, Oats, RoL, Caller, etc.). Foolishness is right in that there are bigger fish to fry. Look, I think we can say pretty certainly there's scum amongst the people who like never contributed, voted, and weren't on main wagons at the end of D1, right? We don't want these people alive at LYLO, and our vigis would have shot them by now if they were going to. Realistically speaking I think a guy like Gumshoe is NOT going to play well as town ANYWAYS so even if by some longshot he's town, he was a liability regardless. That being said, as always I am willing to consolidate. We have just a few hours left now so we should all say who we're willing to vote for so we can get an idea of what's possible. Remember, it's majority lynch here. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
##unvote: Gumshoe ##vote: Oatsmaster | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
1) posting reads and cases 2) responding to situations and not ignoring them 3) actually reading the thread and interacting with things that happen in the thread. 4) not being afk Of which all his reads are not doing. Like, I want you guys to contemplate what you're doing here. There's tons of like lurkers who aren't reading, writing cases, making reads, responding to situations, interacting with the thread. They're all being afk or "being afk" and here's foolishness actually playing the game and everyone's like "yeah clearly this guy, the guy actually playing the game, is scum" how serious are you here ._. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
Vote oats. Even if he's town we need to see the flip at this point objectively | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
All of my wat | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
Cephiro, I do not for a moment believe you are actually the parity cop. The lack of checkcrumbs is prefectly fine but your choice of targets is atrocious. A Parity cop first and foremost does NOT want to be in a situation where he claims Day 3 (also, wtf is with the early claim? ._.) with "different" checks on two players whose alignments are murky. Individually, the check on the claimed masoner and the alakaslam both make sense, but your second check (or more reasonably, your first check) as a parity cop is always on someone whose alignment you know. The goal of the cop is to check people who will be alive later, the goal of the parity cop is basically that but you want one of your dudes to be shot or lynched so you know what's what. So then the question is, what the fuck are you doing here, cephiro? If you're the parity cop, night 1 you should have checked someone who was obviously town. And though I am a great player, night 1 that was NOT me. all you have to do is read the thread and Jat's jubfollowers. Now, maybe night 2 you were planning to make your anchor check, maybe on someone like austinmcc, or odinofpergo or something, right? WRONG. Your checks don't make sense, and you were town you'd know weren't in danger of getting nked with other, better players alive, and even if you were a checkcrumb would be easy. SO easy. Claiming so early? checks make no sense? oh yes, I can see it now. Me and slam are both town. one of us gets lynched, and you say "ah hah! looks like the other one is scum!" and that one gets lynched, and now suddenly town has mislynched twice. We go from 15 players down to 11 (assuming 1 nk per night) and this could easily be a game could be a 5-scum game. By the time we lynch you, we're potentially at lylo. With a town like this, we wouldn't make it after 2 more mislynches. Nice try, but the claim doesn't hold water. ##vote cephiro /dunked | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
![]() | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
Plus you gotta admit everything about this claim smells wrong | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On May 02 2014 15:43 prplhz wrote: ##Vote Foolishness oh COME ON. Read the thread, man. There's a cop claim. On May 02 2014 15:38 WaveofShadow wrote: Not really. I don't think the checks were bad at all honestly, and even if not checking a 'sure town' is sort of a misplay, I could see myself making the same one. Is Ceph known for being good at bluerole use? The unfortunate part is that the scenario that Ceph is traitor (or another scum) fakeclaiming to try and get us to use two lynches is quite realistic. Especially if at this point he is in fact the traitor and was recruited by the scumteam and they planned all this shit out. I'm trying to consider how to use JAT's shot to deal with this atm---I don't know if this can be let go in any way. I also wonder if we have a coroner of any sort---I'm assuming not since I feel like it would have/should have been used already. I hadn't considered Ceph as a traitor, but that actually brings up a very interesting point. Suppose Ceph IS the traitor, but he hasn't been recruited. A Traitor typically gets one chance in the game to guess at least half the scumteam, right? If he gets it right, he gets into the scum QT, and if he gets it wrong, he doesn't, but he still wins with scum. So maybe Ceph waits until N2 to try to get his reads together, since he doesn't want to screw up. In a 23 person game, you could concievably have 4 scum + 1 traitor, so Ceph submits two names-- me and Slam. Hosts PM him back and say "sorry, no dice" Now, he knows that of me and slam, at least ONE is innocent. So he claims Pcop. Either we're both town and he dies after getting 2 mislynches (probably the best he could hope for at this point) or, one of us is scum and the other is town, and after we both get lynched he can swing one more mislynch. That could be it. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
I'm sure that no matter how I rage If Ceph checks VE before we lynch into me/slam, though, things get much more interesting. His charade will be harder to maintain. And if he's really the pcop? We have everything to gain and nothing to lose. Today was a shit day for a pcop to claim anyways (as I'm sure you're now all realizing...) | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On May 03 2014 06:03 prplhz wrote: @Blazinghand Why VisceraEyes and not Foolishness? Foolishness is way more likely to be town but for some reason literally nobody agrees with me about this | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On May 03 2014 06:05 austinmcc wrote: What happens if we go with (2) and Cephiro gets got? Town in a better/worse spot tomorrow? (I agree that VE is not the choice for a check tonight if BH wants to get from a check what BH wants to get from a check, he said, using a sentence that is difficult to read and understand) If Ceph is town and gets shot, he would have been shot anyways, and we can lynch into me/slam with the assurance that one of us is scum. In fact, another reason waiting a day is good is because we don't KNOW he's lying about the claim, and if he IS telling the truth scum is gonna clear that up for us by shooting him. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On May 03 2014 06:08 prplhz wrote: Literally nobody? Or just a few people who are generally being ignored? Does anybody agree with you on VisceraEyes? Well, not literally nobody. Just nobody who's really loud. ...Foolishness agrees with me on VE. ._. I feel like everyone this game has shit reads except me | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On May 03 2014 06:13 justanothertownie wrote: VE could totally be town but that you would chose him over someone like austin is just plain retarded/scummy in my eyes. And you scummers might just not shoot Cephiro tonight. What then? Especially since he claims to not get a new check before night 4. I have private reasons for choosing VE over Austin that I can't share with you. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
If I end up getting lynched before slam, my wish is now that slam be lynched next, not cephiro. Claim is believable. ##unvote ##vote alakaslam I am the OG Mason. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
I'll deal with him in private. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
Look, I haven't played great, and I've been on the wrong side of the D1 lynch and looked for shenannies on the D2 Lynch. I'll admit it! But when it comes down to it, I've actually been putting in effort to this game. I haven't had amazing reads, but that's all in the past. I could still catch scum here. It'll be even easier if slam is the scum and not ceph. The level of detail in ceph's claims and the weirdness in his role (though it's consistent with previous ver games) leads me to believe it's a real claim. Like, the whole thing abou this target choices and claim timing make sense because a D4 claim doesn't let him bring more info to the table than a D3 claim and this kind of parity cop, the kind Ver uses, doesn't benefit from anchoring checks. It makes sense. I'll offer a bit of defense that I think is worthwhile. 1. Foolishness Defense: If I were a scum masoner and not a town masoner, it would not make a lot of sense to recruit Foolishness D1 then hard-defend him. If he's town, scum-me wouldn't want to defend him QUITE so hard. I stuck my neck in the noose with his to get him out, and that's because I really do think the guy is town. If I get lynched for that, at least he's alive and I got something done. I don't see any advantage for me to do this as scum. And if Foolishness is somehow my scumbuddy and I recruited him D1, it would be supremely obvious to my subsequent mason-buddies that he and I were scum together. We've genuinely done good work together. Or at least bounced ideas. Maybe as scum I'd still recruit a town Foolishness and hard defend him, but not like this. Not in a way that turns the entire town against me and makes them want to lynch me before him. You can WIFOM this all you want but really, my hard defenses (like GK that one time I was scum and he was town) as scum don't put my life in danger like this. I'm typically the most valuable member of any scumteam. 2. Oatsmaster stuff: Look, 100% Oats was gonna get lynched. He was the 2ndary wagon D1 and the primary wagon flipped town. His scumbuddies knew that his lynch was inevitable. Yes, I was on the wrong side and had ugly timing on all the Oats wagons. I guarantee you though that as scum I would either hard bus him. The shennanies were weak and shitty, but that's mostly because shenannies rely on lots of little posts and organizing an active town, ideally in a plurality, not majority game. As scum, I would position myself not to look quite so disgusting after an oats flip. Look at me. I'm BH. Do you really think I consider Oats' life ANYWHERE near as valuable as mine? Of course not. As scum, I'd bus him in a heartbeat. I might do it for no reason just to get rid of the guy. He can't be relied on. Now, if I'm scum right now, I could be saying this to throw you off, but if I'm scum 100% I bus oats, not because I think it's some great strat, but because I disdain him. He is trash. He doesn't deserve to share a QT with a god. You know me. I'm the guy who claims survivor and sticks to it after another guy flips survivor. I'm the guy who talks about emotional breakdowns to get out of the noose. I don't care about my scumteammates, all I care about is winning, and since I'm the best player, that means bussing, not putting myself in the noose to save anyone. Not Foolishness, and certainly not Oats. Really guys, you think I tried to save Oats? 3. Cephiro. Ok, yes, I admit, I was overly suspicious of his claim. But at the time he claimed it, you gotta admit: It was a shit claim. If he was a normal parity cop, those checks would be shit checks and this would be a shit time to claim. He'd be scum. Since he's a Verparity cop, or Verity cop as I call them, then his claim makes sense. But you know who didn't question Ceph's claim? Slam. Slam just accepted it, voted me, and gave away posts. Just like he KNEW that the claim was true, and he KNEW that our alignments are different, because he's scum. When I'm town, I'm a paranoid motherfucker. I don't trust anyone. I double-check everything. I have been supremely careful about who I let in the QT, and I am pretty sure it's actually all town in there. The only guy who I didn't super check out was this last guy we added, but he's so town it hurts. Look: I doubted the claim, and I did so not cause I'm scum, but because if you were me and in my shoes and that claim came through, looking dodge as fuck, you would question it too. Slam knew the claim was real immediately, because he's scum and knows I'm town. This is my mindset, and it's just how I operate. I don't trust people. You know that about me. You know I'd lie for any reason to win a mafia game, and that's how I view others, and that's how I viewed this claim before the extra deets. All of these points you're gonna look at and thing "oh BH is saying it though"-- but stop for a minute and take an outside view and look at it objectively. It's not "too scummy to be scum", it's "too strategically ineffective at furthering scum goals to be scum". I doubt people. I put my neck out for a guy I thought was town (remember, I thought he was town enough to MASON him). I soft-defended a guy who flipped scum, but that guy was Oatsmaster, possibly the most useless player that I don't WoTC. Maybe my mindset seems foreign to you, but those of you who know me: this aint my scum play. Vote slam. I'll have an extra 96 hours as conftown, since scum is presumably shooting ceph first. I'll make it worth your while. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
![]() | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On May 04 2014 09:30 justanothertownie wrote: 1. As long as nobody confirms this and there is something brought to the thread about your qt (you don't need to include roles) this defense is invalid. Also you didn't put your life in danger with it. You are on the chopping block mainly because of the cop check. You couldn't know it would turn out this way. 2. WIFOM. Also your attitude just makes me want to lynch you even more. honestly JAT I have zero respect for you as a human being so not even gonna bother with you | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On May 04 2014 09:45 austinmcc wrote: Anyone in particular pushed you in a scummy manner? Defended you in a scummy manner? I'll leave some instructions behind for my QT brothers that they can use. Ultimately, I shouldn't be drawing associative tells between unflipped players anyways ![]() | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On May 22 2014 12:38 justanothertownie wrote: He guessed 3/3 scum correctly night 1 and got recruited afaik. Yeah, Foolishness lynch is mainly his own fault. Yeah this was one of my good games. Too bad I rolled traitor. At least I got to wow scum N1. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
Props to JAT for opposing me in all things. I wish I had rolled town, I had pretty great reads this game. I think as scum we were lucky to get as far as we did, and foolish not to win when we could. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On May 23 2014 13:12 prplhz wrote: On another note, I really really enjoyed this post restriction thing. I think it would be awesome if we tried having more of these on TLMafia. I don't think it hurt this game at all and made it a lot easier for people to keep up. 7 day 20 player game with only 110 pages? That's pretty nice. I also enjoyed the post restriction thing and thought it was well enforced PS here is the scumteam trying to fire their bullets-- dayvigi OR nk ![]() Do you have no idea what's going on here? welcome to the club | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
By making it 10 posts per 24 hours, but then giving everyone a 1-page "buffer" we ensure: 1. it's not "use it or lose it"-- if you come in to the game late or lurk for a few days and need to catch up and make posts in a short span, you can. 2. in addition to the gradual linear post progression, you also have a 20-post buffer you can dip in to. This is kind of the opposite of the previous point, but basically if you have been making 10 posts per 24 hours and need to make more posts, you can. E: an ideal setup targets spammers (like me rofl) and people who just do a ton of activity. Like, in a game you might have 6 or 7 players with 10 page filters, then like 2 dudes with 30 page filters who account for like half the game. We really only need to worry about the 2 dudes imo. we want a solution which targets them and lets normal people play normally | ||
| ||