Catastrophe Mafia

On March 28 2014 00:32 Palmar wrote:
oh and:

Wotc: hydras

Much rather deal with Foolishness posting relatively little than the hydra thing. I think hydras make games worse.

On April 02 2014 00:03 Koshi wrote:
Europe wont be leading the lynch. wow. scary stuff.

On April 03 2014 09:27 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Robik your read on Wave is wrong.

On April 03 2014 09:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:

srsbznz. i don't joke on reads, ever.

On April 03 2014 09:51 yamato77 wrote:
Dandel's post makes me want to kill him, too.

Rayn's reads are shitty because there's no reason to go "YEP HE'S TOWN" 5 minutes into the game unless you're mafia trying to make friends.

On April 03 2014 09:55 IAmRobik wrote:
oh...dandelion still fucking sucks at this game. There's a fucking shocker.

On April 03 2014 10:01 IAmRobik wrote:
I mean...he's prolly town again, but that doesn't mean that he's playing well or that he's right. He was pretty obvious town at some point in foundations too...that didn't mean that all he wanted to do all game was lynch townies

On April 03 2014 10:03 IAmRobik wrote:

He started the game by quoting every one of my posts and saying that I'm scum for them. He's clearly just bitter about the fact that I called him out for being a d-bag last game and he's continuing the fucking feud cause he has nothing better to do with his life.

On April 03 2014 10:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:

I have reasoning for my reads and yamato is not interested in finding out why i say stuff i do.

On April 03 2014 10:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Also Koshi wants something.. I think candies...
yes candies..

On April 03 2014 11:29 raynpelikoneet wrote:



This whole conversation is weird because why i read Wave as town should be more clear than why i read Robik as town and i don't know why JAT is interested in my Wave read and not on my Robik read.

On April 03 2014 11:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Why do i have a townread on him?

On April 03 2014 11:49 Killing wrote:


Can you explain what this means?

On April 03 2014 11:58 Killing wrote:


So you think gut reads are better than just saying nothing and random lynching yet you've said nothing? I think everything you've said so far has been incredibly fluffly. You had the smiley read that was incredibly random and then your explanation for why you asked the reasoning for WoS vs Robik was bad as well. You stated that you asked for the reason on the WoS read because robik opened the exact same way.



Then why do you prod him about it if you get where he's coming from. After that you go into traffic cop mode trying to settle the dispute between DI and Rob. You're my top scumread so far so I'd love to actually hear some content rather than all of this fluff.

On April 03 2014 12:06 Oatsmaster wrote:
I think its completely useless to talk about the button now. Stop.

On April 03 2014 12:14 Killing wrote:


You wanted to know the reasoning of the WoS read but never asked for the robik one. I never said that you read them the same way. It seemed that you were curious about the WoS read but then you didn't really care about why he read Rob town. Your only read has been that you liked the smiley thing so I wouldn't agree than "that is more than most people here did".

On April 03 2014 12:21 Killing wrote:


You care about the reasoning of one but not the other is weird.

On April 03 2014 12:23 LSB wrote:

Excellent point VE, it is important to establish lexiconically that CATASTROPHE is the official correct way to describe the result of pressing the button. Catashrophe is acceptable as a short hand, as well as "The town initiative for a better tomorrow"

For example:

We must push the town button so we can cause CATASTROPHE for the betterment of the town.

On April 03 2014 12:27 Killing wrote:


There's a few possible scenarios if you're scum. You could be waiting for someone to give a read that might end up being wrong in the end if they flip scum, you might want to pidgeon hole them into a read that you hope will make them look scummy. You're still my top scum read because of the amount of fluff and the feigning participation you've done.

On April 03 2014 12:31 Killing wrote:


I don't think it's stupid at all. I do that shit all the time. If you're town, you should move on and play townie because that's the only thing that will change my mind tbh.

On April 03 2014 12:38 Killing wrote:


Dude, you called my reasoning stupid and I really could give a shit if you think it's stupid. I'm not interested in arguing over it at this point.

On April 03 2014 12:47 Keirathi wrote:
It seems like Killing's basic argument boils down to something like this:

*Teacher puts 2 math problems on the board*

Guy 1: "Can you explain that first one again? I don't get it."

Teacher: "Okay, here you go!"

Guy 1: "Thanks, I got it now."

...................

Guy 2: "Wait, why didn't you ask for the explanation to both the problems? WHAT IS GOING ON WHY ARE YOU FAKING IT?"

Guy 1: "Because I only didn't understand the first one."

Guy 2: "DIE SCUM LIAR".

On April 03 2014 12:51 VisceraEyes wrote:

He's not a tool he's just spirited! Don't be rude.

On April 03 2014 12:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:
But how does the situation differ if the teacher put the problem on a table instead?

On April 03 2014 20:31 Koshi wrote:
I am currently on page 16 and there is a giant cat holding a taxi. I will be looking at that picture for the next 5 hours. Then I will be able to read the thread.

On April 03 2014 20:25 Holyflare wrote:


Let's win then!

Tell me what the most fun tl game mechanic was!

On April 03 2014 21:36 Holyflare wrote:


What is the most fun tl mafia game mechanic jat?

On April 03 2014 21:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I dunno. I don't think Robert is mafia. marv will be clearer read laterz.
But austin.. man dat red star!

On April 03 2014 21:45 Palmar wrote:

Palmar doesn't forget, palmar intentionally leaves out.

On April 03 2014 21:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Could you point out where did i defend marv?

On April 03 2014 22:02 marvellosity wrote:

I noticed this too and found it pretty strange. But I don't see why it's mafia-strange. austin is prone to making really stupid reads based on nothing (sorry my love). And of all the things to give a townread for, that one seems particularly stupid. So stupid in fact that making it as mafia seems far-fetched, because surely it's going to get you flak.

So while I can agree that the paragraph is poo-poo, you'll have to tell me exactly why it's red poo-poo.

On April 03 2014 22:05 Palmar wrote:

Why not I am helpful!

On April 03 2014 22:16 Palmar wrote:
Townies who are also good at this game:

snb
hf
palmar
iamp
wos
scraps

Jesters:

rayn

Scum:

marv
ve
robik

On April 03 2014 23:24 marvellosity wrote:

NO. I am *so* bored of mafia rolling over.

On April 03 2014 23:53 Holyflare wrote:


No i actually think you are though

On April 04 2014 00:09 IAmRobik wrote:

Killing is DEFINITELY town. If you think otherwise, go read Foundations.

On April 04 2014 00:08 strongandbig wrote:

if it didnt come across in my sandrojism comment

i dont like people like that

syllo is playing for real so far this game though so i should stop needling him. my b



anyway i still don't think killing is town. who's with me?

On April 04 2014 00:17 marvellosity wrote:

It's precisely the reason I have him marked as light town as well, actually

On April 04 2014 00:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:

He thought he found something and got caught in the moment of distraction. Pretty obvious.

On April 04 2014 00:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:

That's not true.

On April 04 2014 00:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Just because he is wrong / you think he is stupid and/or saying bad doesn't mean he didn't explain himself because he quite clearly did.

On April 04 2014 00:41 Dandel Ion wrote:
at this point in time i should add

On April 04 2014 00:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:

He said you caring about the reasoning on one read but not the other is weird.
Then he said you might be scum for it because you could be waiting for someone to give a read that might end up being wrong in the end if they flip scum, you might want to pidgeon hole them into a read that you hope will make them look scummy. You're still my top scum read because of the amount of fluff and the feigning participation you've done.

I think that's a pretty clear explanation to what he thinks.

On April 04 2014 00:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
EBWOP: ..or does it make sense or not. That was not where i was commenting on because i don't think he was on the same page with you. But he DID explain himself, that's what i was saying, not that he made sense..

On April 04 2014 00:52 Dandel Ion wrote:
from my experience, what you should be looking for is whether he does something next or not

On April 04 2014 00:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Well maybe you are on page 1 he is on page 2 and i am on page 3. idk.
Anyways if you have a problem with him ask him.

lynch austin? i have a really good case on him.

On April 04 2014 01:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:

What's wrong in my case?

On April 04 2014 01:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:

I pointed out behavior that shows austin is giving his thoughts on something he doesn't even think through properly. That is scummy. Not necessarily enough to make him 100% mafia but him showing this exact same behavior in his last mafia game points even more towards him being mafia.

On April 04 2014 01:21 marvellosity wrote:
rayn is pretty town.

On April 04 2014 01:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:

You shouldn't have said this Plammer is gonna put you into scumpile.

On April 04 2014 01:36 Keirathi wrote:

I don't love it when you do it. Faker!

On April 04 2014 01:37 Palmar wrote:

I am foreigner too.

Much to learn in this language. I must pledge myself to my studies. I must not falter, one day I will become like my master...

... OatsMASTER.

On April 04 2014 02:40 Koshi wrote:

I am going to make sure my vote is on correct place. I will just be not very active. Living on the edge.

On April 04 2014 04:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I told jat and marv, who were following the last game, that in my opinion they should pay more attention to what i say.
Not that it makes you scum austin. my case is what it is.

It is that you comment on things that you have not thought through. You make conclusions based on something you have not read properly. If you post conclusions on somthing i would expect you to think why people say what they do (in this case yamato and me). You are clearly not doing so, but you are STILL posting conclusions.

On April 04 2014 05:23 marvellosity wrote:

I am extremely comfortable.

On April 04 2014 19:34 Koshi wrote:
I never have a townfeeling on JAT.

On April 04 2014 19:39 marvellosity wrote:
I'm fairly sure it was Noir.

On April 04 2014 23:00 marvellosity wrote:

So how do you view Holyflare?

On April 04 2014 23:02 marvellosity wrote:

Holyflare may or may not remain sandro's preferred lynch, so I suggest you try to find an idea.

On April 04 2014 23:03 Koshi wrote:

It's not a lie. I am pretty sure I didn't have one on you in Noir or Hogwarts.
I don't remember any other games we played in, other than the one you were scum in and I totes called you scum.

So. where is lie?

On April 04 2014 23:06 Koshi wrote:

ah yes. We were totes bros there.

On April 04 2014 23:09 marvellosity wrote:

My filter really is amazing

On April 04 2014 23:10 marvellosity wrote:
It happened less than an hour ago, so how you missed it on your catchup of the thread is anyone's guess.

On April 04 2014 23:12 Holyflare wrote:

So you're going to neglect reading me because....? There's votes one me. You just stated that my argument with dandel is useless so you have no idea what I've done but you don't want to bother looking into me...?

On April 04 2014 23:28 marvellosity wrote:
The people I won't lynch today under any circumstances:

rayn/Dandel/syllogism/iamp/IAmRobik/sandroba/jat*

*jat purely because he made me lol re: holy's filter, not because i find him particularly townie.

syllogism doesn't look amazingly townie but i don't think he's as useless as people are suggesting and there's no way i take that risk on day 1 based on what i've seen.

On April 04 2014 23:40 Koshi wrote:

You also don't want to lynch the guy that is already dead? nice.

On April 04 2014 23:43 kitaman27 wrote:


Change on read town read to null? Not a huge deal to me.

On April 04 2014 23:54 kitaman27 wrote:


How is he my third scummiest dude? These players are higher up on the chopping block for me:

iamp
Amiko
Hope
killing
syllo
Keirathi
and maybe Koshi
(VE?)

On April 04 2014 23:55 Koshi wrote:

nha Keirathi is evul.

On April 04 2014 23:55 justanothertownie wrote:

Keirathi and iamp... I heavily disagree here.

On April 04 2014 22:05 Palmar wrote:
I will not vote townbuddy scrapspaper

On April 05 2014 00:38 Palmar wrote:

Oatsmaster the emperor asked me to vote.

Only rayn the prophet can make me change my mind now.

On April 05 2014 00:47 Holyflare wrote:
and i don't care if antagonising robik was terrible he was a dick and full of himself last game and i relish in the opportunity to anger those kinds of people

On April 05 2014 00:49 Koshi wrote:
So radiation. Good or bad?
I think bad.

Also my supercool cult QT is still not talking.
I give them 1 more hour before I spill the beans.

On April 05 2014 00:51 Koshi wrote:

why?

On April 05 2014 01:09 Killing wrote:
Does this game take place on a ranch?

On April 05 2014 01:35 marvellosity wrote:

You do realise he claimed that he came across an item that required him to write backwards, right? So at the very least he would be lying in order to write backwards?

On April 05 2014 01:38 marvellosity wrote:
well Killing seems to be missing that whole thing when he says "people are implying that his role requires it" when he specifically wrote the reasoning in the thread.

On April 05 2014 02:20 Koshi wrote:
I really can't shoot djodref though. Last game I lynched him on the same day his cat died. Really sad stuff.

On April 05 2014 02:43 Killing wrote:


The guy claimed horse. I'm not a horse. Are you a horse?

On April 05 2014 02:47 Killing wrote:


Well if you're not a horse then you have no idea what the implications of being a horse have on this game. That should make you AFRAID and/or NERVOUS as what they could do to you. Maybe they can pull town to Transylvania or some shit i don't know this game is crazy.

On April 05 2014 02:51 Killing wrote:


I am town
I am not horse
Other town have not claimed horse
Other horse have not claimed town
One horse claimed anti-town

How can you just write exactly? Exactly what? We know nothing about horses. Can a horse tell us what makes them horses?

On April 05 2014 02:56 Killing wrote:


He's not scum, he's probably 3p.



That's why I assume VA's role is bad for us. Because he said so.

On April 05 2014 03:00 Amiko wrote:
Robik
I don't feel his play lines up much with his play in Newbie LIV. I observed that game and was pretty attentive.
For one, he seemed reluctant to fake claim a role; that is one of the reasons I felt he was serious about being immune to nightkills.
His aggression varies a lot from game to game. In my first newbie game I played with Robik and he was pretty pleasant, but I've seem him go aggro in other games.
I still think he is most likely to be a 3rd party, potentially scum, so I wouldn't want to kill him. @IAmRobik let's win together?

On April 05 2014 03:09 Amiko wrote:
@JAT
I feel Robik is unlikely to be town because he claimed to be immune to nightkills. If he is town, he should want mafia to target him to soak KP.

I feel Robik's claim was not joking for a few reasons, but among them it's because I feel he is a player who is reluctant to fakeclaim. Another reason: it feels more believable since kita also claimed to be immune to nightkills.

So, I feel he is 3p or scum, more likely 3p because I don't think scum would claim it so early.
I don't see why town would claim it at all.

On April 03 2014 22:14 IAmRobik wrote:

Ummmm, what else. Oh right. If I'm alive tonight, I'm going to be using my night action on Joey (it's nothing bad). I suggest no one target Joey or myself. It might turn out poorly for you.

On April 05 2014 03:39 Amiko wrote:


- Mafia deter shots from themselves via this claim from vigis/3p. So, vigis shooting are more likely to hit town.
- 3p same thing; except they probably don't care who dies. (rayn's roleclaim suggested he needed some other 3p though)
- 3p indicates their alignment to prepare to joint win

By the way, pretty much everything I am saying about Robik also applies to kitaman27 and generally, I think.

On April 05 2014 03:45 Amiko wrote:
I tend to think he is immune because in the only scum game I read of Robik he considered fakeclaiming but then hesitated and ultimately didn't do so. I think that reflects some discomfort with fakeclaiming, so I don't think he is likely to do so d1 when he doesn't have to do so.

Nothing specific I can think of to say about robik/killing right now, sorry.

On April 05 2014 03:53 LSB wrote:

Mafia has much more KP than town, though in this case there is probably zero chance that mafia would waste KP on him. So I wouldn't call it alignment indicative

On April 05 2014 03:54 Koshi wrote:
Foolishness. I am going to shoot somebody you dislike.

On April 05 2014 03:58 Koshi wrote:

foolishness won my hearth.

On April 05 2014 04:25 VisceraEyes wrote:
Well, as fervently as I expect Foolishness to participate, sure. Do you disagree?

On April 05 2014 04:28 VisceraEyes wrote:

How about with the qualifier that he is working within the confines of a posting restriction (self-imposed or no)?

On April 05 2014 04:35 VisceraEyes wrote:
K then I'm just not gonna pseudo-defend Foolishness anymore. K?

On April 05 2014 04:38 Koshi wrote:
Question.
Is marv/Jat more fun then rayn/koshi?

Answer.
No

On April 05 2014 05:10 Paperscraps wrote:
.up this brought t'haven Robik ,Killing ,Tehpoofter surprised am I .wolves the to sheep lead and mafia as town pro super play I .now right me before kneeling by all would you ,mafia was I if that realize do guys You

On April 05 2014 05:14 Paperscraps wrote:
.bros open more be to have You .1 day scum lynch to going are you how not is That .on going bias confirmation of tons have and minded-closed are You .site this on linear so play you of lot A

On April 05 2014 05:20 Paperscraps wrote:
.bad = thinking linear/Static .said I Like .player a as developed have I since changed as play mafia My

On April 05 2014 05:26 Paperscraps wrote:


?lynched be to about are they when do to scum for tactic smart a is that think you Do

On April 05 2014 06:37 IAmRobik wrote:
OK. I'm about to catch up. The only thing I want everyone to note is that foolishness is complaining a lot about the spam, but like 95% of the words that he posts are just filler. He BARELY gives opinions on anything -- the only real stances that I can remember him taking were 1) iamp being mafia and 2) he read someone town earlier, but I forget who it was.

Please do not be fooled by the long "newspaper" posts that he's making. THEY HAVE VERY VERY LITTLE SUBSTANCE TO THEM!

On April 05 2014 06:51 marvellosity wrote:
maybe we should honour the dead rayn and lynch austin :o

On April 05 2014 07:07 IAmRobik wrote:

Cool. Let's just roll scum like we did in Heavyweight Champ. Remember, I am the shepherd and you are my sheep

On April 05 2014 07:45 Killing wrote:


Same.

On April 05 2014 07:49 IAmRobik wrote:

There's no lynch if we don't have 15 votes? Why wouldn't it just go to the highest target? That's so dumb/bad/blah/etc. I can't imagine us lynching correctly then

On April 05 2014 07:49 Paperscraps wrote:
.nose my off skin No .t'don or yourself Convince

On April 05 2014 08:17 Holyflare wrote:

That's totally what mafia do. Call someone 3p/unlikely mafia but then claim mafia. Right? Right?

On April 05 2014 08:18 Keirathi wrote:
Ugh we need a town hero to step up and make a decision.

On April 05 2014 08:22 Keirathi wrote:

Wait what? You've been saying Joey (Killing, right?) was town the whole game? Typo I assume, but just making sure.

On April 05 2014 08:38 Holyflare wrote:


So you don't find it odd that he never mentions paperscraps at all until i point it out at which point he makes a whole narrative about him and paperscraps 3 hours before the deadline saying paperscraps most likely town?

On April 05 2014 08:42 Holyflare wrote:


I asked about the qt because of the narrative, it actually looked plausible that they were in a qt. Now i know they aren't it makes Foolishness weird for saying all of that so late in the day.

On April 05 2014 08:44 marvellosity wrote:
we're going to lynch Amiko

On April 05 2014 09:05 marvellosity wrote:
with sandroba on gumshoe and others afk, i think he's our best chance at a lynch

and poisoner is a scummy kinda role anyway. even though role doesn't equal alignment, i'm reaching ;D

On April 05 2014 09:11 Holyflare wrote:
Please switch paperscraps item with foolishness just so everyone's eyes can bleed

On April 05 2014 18:33 Holyflare wrote:
Pretty odd that gumshoe got a majority in 20 mins that was higher than the majority on paperscraps that was there all day.

On April 05 2014 19:59 Holyflare wrote:
You can ignore dandel, marv and holyflare because conversation took place about gumshoe when all were present.

On April 06 2014 00:00 Holyflare wrote:


Well that's lovely jat but i was around during the only convo on gumshoe and actively agreed with those reasons. Hence you shouldn't waste your time on me. Which was the point of my post. It's a town lynch and i was present for the reasons why my vote was there same with marv/dandel.

I'm telling you to look into the people with 0 reasons. 0 posts about gumshoe, maybe even town reading gumshoe etc. It's not meant to be a leave me alone never look at me, that's the point of a vote analysis

On April 06 2014 00:22 Koshi wrote:

wow. My hero doesn't know which mafia I should shoot.

On April 06 2014 02:32 Koshi wrote:

It's life or dead.

Literally.

We lost the game if you are wrong.

You are allowed to pass.

But you would be seen as a wus.

On April 06 2014 02:45 sandroba wrote:
Clearly it wasn't me. It was marv actually.

On April 06 2014 03:47 Tehpoofter wrote:


I don't think he is mafia anymore by the way hes playing this is what I expected from his town so I disagree that he is mafia.

On April 06 2014 04:31 Koshi wrote:
WoS should I shoot syllo?

On April 06 2014 15:34 LSB wrote:
I'm just an innocent little townie. Why don't we focus on other people? Most importantly, JustAnotherTownie?

A promised, I will provide more reads! And it is Soontm!

---

Hopeless1der - Just click http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/447045-catastrophe-mafia?user=Hopeless1der&view=all]His filter. Hopeless1der starts with spam and still haven't stopped. I am not entirely sure what he is doing but it doesn't even look like he is trying to play this game.

I will add him to my ever growing list of "obv mafia". Djodref, sandroba, VayneAuthority, Hopeless1der. Unfortunatly there just seems to be too many "obv mafia" for all of them to be mafia

justanothertownie - Active without saying much. I always like to say one of the easiest ways (if you have the time) to play as a mafia member is to be very active and be the 'town discussion leader'. You get to ask a lot of questions, and make it seem like you are contirbuting without saying much yourself. To me, JAT's filter is a classic example of this. It consist of so many one line responses or questions to other players, although he has an 8 page filter, I can count the amount of times he wrote more than two lines with my fingers

But JAT just plays this way! I want you to compare this to his town play in Foundation Mafia. Yes he is active, but notice that he actually has posts with more than two lines. It also contains direct accusations of scums and his own opinions.

---

And your Third Party Reminder
Amiko - Claimed Third Party Bulletproof Survivor. Amiko has a little too much setup related talk which makes me suspcious of him. However Amiko is new and I would be hypocritical if I said that playing setup focus is mafia. Unfortunatly I really don't want to waste a lynch on this, so if any of the vigs would like to policy kill amiko I would be greatful

On April 06 2014 16:31 sandroba wrote:
lsb you need to roleclaim to me. you are on the list of people about to get murdered.

On April 06 2014 21:26 Koshi wrote:
rayn ded
marv ded
Foolishness ded

I don't like this game anymore.

On April 07 2014 00:28 syllogism wrote:

We aren't lynching me ever and in fact are lynching at least one player outside that list.

On April 07 2014 00:50 Koshi wrote:
I told you people I am superprotown awesome.

now minions.

Lynch.Revenge.Search.
↑wrong order. But do it how you like.

On April 07 2014 00:53 syllogism wrote:

There is no case for me being mafia other than the lack of effort. Fortunately I don't actually have to do anything now that this is a PM game and I can just discuss the game with Sandro. Besides that, for reasons that will be obvious soon.

On April 07 2014 00:55 Koshi wrote:

You funny minion. You funny.

On April 07 2014 01:40 syllogism wrote:

Lets hear it then why he decided to target Kita and how that ability makes sense for a survivor who supposedly just wins by staying alive.

On April 07 2014 02:01 syllogism wrote:

You don't make demands from me. I am just like every other player allowed to invest as much or as little time into the game as I want.

He was tracked to a kill and his role is almost certainly nonsense. It makes no logical sense. Look at his supposed abilities. His win con is to survive until the end of the game and he can either steal items or just self-protect every cycle. Then he also has a one-shot that disables item use and swaps items between players. How does any of that, self-protecting aside, make sense for a survivor? Even if he could just self-protect, he could basically claim and afk until the end of the game since no one is going to waste two kp on a claimed survivor.

On April 07 2014 02:05 syllogism wrote:

Do you mean parallel worlds? In that game Marv's win con was to use all the abilities, at which point he would be removed from the game. He actually claimed that role.

On April 07 2014 02:12 Killing wrote:


Does this not sound really similar to the sort of horsemen situation? They are masoned together and probably win if they make it to end game or some shit.

On April 07 2014 02:35 Koshi wrote:
You misspelled Koshi.
And nobody cares about Sandroba. He can easily be scum.

Go for iamp and Hopeless.

On April 07 2014 02:37 Koshi wrote:
iamp and Amiko is also fine for me. Unless Amiko proves town. Then we lynch syllo.

On April 07 2014 02:39 Koshi wrote:

tbh I only read marv his posts and I haven't paid any attention to what sandroba actually wrote this game.

On April 07 2014 02:40 syllogism wrote:

It does somewhat weaken the idea that the abilities should be survival oriented, but why would Greymist design a role that can either choose to self-protect every cycle or do random things that aren't likely to further the win con in anyway. The role you linked had a passive ability that helped it to survive and in addition to that an active one. More importantly, why would choose to steal from Kita and do you really think this is just a coincidence?

On April 07 2014 07:09 Dandel Ion wrote:

does not compute

On April 07 2014 07:23 WaveofShadow wrote:

SHH I WAS

On April 07 2014 08:49 Koshi wrote:

Yeah... I am certain I said I would do it but some1 told me to not do it. I forgot who and cant look atm. Maybe JAT.

On April 08 2014 00:36 Oatsmaster wrote:
man i was inordaintly happy for a moment there robik.

On April 08 2014 01:23 Oatsmaster wrote:

You have no love in your heart.

On April 08 2014 01:40 Hopeless1der wrote:

death just shepherds the dead people to hell. He has to occupy his time with other stuff in the meantime.

On April 08 2014 02:12 Holyflare wrote:
9. syllogism
10. iamperfection
12. Oatsmaster
15. austinmcc
16. Amiko
18. justanothertownie
20. LSB
22. Killing
24. VayneAuthority

i present to you the very likely, almost 85% sure scum team!

On April 08 2014 02:16 Holyflare wrote:


then point out who is wrong on my town list instead

On April 08 2014 02:18 Holyflare wrote:


you said it's the wrong number of people? how are you sure on that?

On April 08 2014 02:25 Holyflare wrote:
and you're saying there couldn't have been 5 kp?

On April 08 2014 02:26 Holyflare wrote:
why would there even have to be 5kp :o what if someone got healed or rb'd

On April 08 2014 02:27 Holyflare wrote:
there could be 3kp with roles that kill once or twice or 4 kp or anything, why is that relevant?

On April 08 2014 02:29 Holyflare wrote:
but even so, if we believe amiko is 3p then that's still the correct number of ppl

On April 08 2014 02:32 Holyflare wrote:


huh............?

On April 08 2014 02:37 Holyflare wrote:


so you think there's less than 7 people vs 23 other people?

On April 08 2014 02:40 IAmRobik wrote:

Austin?

On April 08 2014 02:42 Palmar wrote:
Why does Holyflare think I am town, what magic is this? Are we looking at information beyond what is present here?

On April 08 2014 02:45 Holyflare wrote:
the simple fact is jat, 4 townies/random people died last night and nobody claimed the shot, that's likely meaning that's 4 kp for scum because those shots would be retarded for townies to make