On February 28 2014 01:28 Xatalos wrote: Even if you think it's more beneficial to share reads right now, just as NK decisions are being made, it's blatantly false to say that there's "literally no reason" not to.
So the reason is that instead of playing the game, you pussy about doing nothing? that helps town. a lot.
To be fair, I've shared more of my reads so far than you have...
On February 27 2014 23:01 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Oats also keeps going on the offensive whenever he's attacked for something and twists whatever he's attacking. Xatalos asking Oats why his scumread is town, rescinds the request, and despite Oats saying beforehand that it's good to share scumreads he goes and says sharing scumreads is good without sharing why he thinks BH is supertown.
yes good artanis town. Nice. I did it intentionally to see who would pick up on it.
How is noticing your lack of logic in any way alignment indicative? And what could you possibly achieve by "baiting" town by playing irrationally?
to find out who is paying attention and who doesnt give a shit. You clearly pay less attention than Artanis.
Or it could be that I'm trying not to share all my reads and observations yet.
We concluded that sharing scumreads is probably a good idea. Are you saying you observed what I did but purposefully didn't share it?
We never came to any clear conclusion about how we should handle our reads before N0 deadline. I still don't think it's the correct action to share everything unless it's RIGHT before the deadline that you want to do that.
Actually Oats did share his reason, but the reason was just plain bad. So I concluded that A) he's scum and trying to justify a read without any true reasoning B) there's more to it (a blueread or something else that he doesn't want to share yet).