EPTI'm a cop you idiot mafia 2 - Page 9
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On February 27 2014 08:10 Xatalos wrote: Hm. I just somehow dislike his very tryhard and focused early play. My recent memories of him being town are him being completely useless. FINE THEN SAY HELLO TO USELESS BH | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
Anyways, I suggest not checking me or Artanis. I'm pretty sure we're both town. I'm even fairly sure about myself. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
INPUT ON SHARING SCUMREADS GO | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
Oh God no... But there's no way you can win, is there  | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On February 27 2014 08:32 Xatalos wrote: Oh God no... But there's no way you can win, is there EZ WAY TO WIN = LYNCH SCUM HUE | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On February 27 2014 08:32 Artanis[Xp] wrote: BH INPUT ON SHARING SCUMREADS GO It's fine, just don't go naming townreads unless they're people you're okay with them dying | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On February 27 2014 08:38 Xatalos wrote: That's overblown. You're never quite like *that*. It's just that your early posts all made sense and were constructive. It feels weird to hold that against someone, but......... You know.... It feels weird. "BH is being helpful, making sense and constructed" -> "BH is scum" ._. ._____________. ._______________________________________. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On February 27 2014 08:40 Blazinghand wrote: "BH is being helpful, making sense and constructed" -> "BH is scum" ._. ._____________. ._______________________________________. That's why I said you can't win, didn't I?  | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
On February 27 2014 08:37 Blazinghand wrote: It's fine, just don't go naming townreads unless they're people you're okay with them dying On reflection I feel the same way. Good way to get reads out before you die too, given there's a 20% chance for all of us dying. What do you make of Xatalos? I'm actually a bit worried with how easily he posted the list giving townreads. Could get other people to comment/address them which would give scum a better picture of whom to shoot (if they're not bluesniping) or try to lynch. He pretty much had to townread me or I'd know he's scum from our previous game. The reasoning he gave for calling you scum was something that makes me doubt it though. Doesn't seem like the kind of justification scum would use. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
 Perhaps later you may win over my companionship. Also turns out I'm really bad at following my own policy. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
On February 27 2014 08:51 Xatalos wrote: By the way, why wouldn't scum use an argument like that on BH? Because on a superficial level it looks really bad. Scum would want to pad it with something more substantial. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On February 27 2014 08:53 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Because on a superficial level it looks really bad. Scum would want to pad it with something more substantial. Hmm, that seems like a fine reason. I also agree that it was careless to name you as a townread (although I guess it was already implied earlier on). I also agree that you're pretty bad at following your own policy | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
Presuming you're not going to claim scum would you have done anything differently if you were scum? | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 27 2014 07:48 Blazinghand wrote: Yes, if scum is about to be lynched, he WILL claim doctor. Do you disagree?We WILL mislynch if there is no doc claim? Wat. We can lynch just fine if there's no doc claim. The fact of the matter is, if the doc claims and we mislynch we 100% lose N1. You're the one putting all the eggs in one basket by not giving us a second shot at a lynch in case we screw up | ||
| ||
