|
On March 01 2014 02:49 Sn0_Man wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2014 14:56 Sylencia wrote:On February 27 2014 14:27 Oatsmaster wrote: dont be so pessimistic. Whos most likely scum? Not pessimistic, just realistic. Pretty sure no lynch gives us more info anyways unless the doctor dies n0. At the moment I've only got sn0 as his n0 contribution was pretty lackluster but that's pretty thin reasoning. I'd like to point out that Syl is advocating a no-lynch here yet didn't vote no-lynch when the day actually rolled around. I'd like to point out that information has changed.
|
On March 01 2014 02:49 Sn0_Man wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2014 14:56 Sylencia wrote:On February 27 2014 14:27 Oatsmaster wrote: dont be so pessimistic. Whos most likely scum? Not pessimistic, just realistic. Pretty sure no lynch gives us more info anyways unless the doctor dies n0. At the moment I've only got sn0 as his n0 contribution was pretty lackluster but that's pretty thin reasoning. I'd like to point out that Syl is advocating a no-lynch here yet didn't vote no-lynch when the day actually rolled around.
And he obediently followed whatever Oatsmaster said and ignored other players such as his greencheck and Artanis/JJD.
|
Alright Syl clearly understands why nolynching is good as shown by the following post: (note the excellent timestamp). This is post-claim and counter-claim. No new info after this btw. + Show Spoiler +On February 28 2014 13:37 Sylencia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2014 12:47 Oatsmaster wrote: Why nolynch guys wtf. What advantage does it give us? No advantage. +1 cop check, potential save on a cop kill if the doc does their job properly, and that will give us: - 2 checks hopefully - 1 cop hopefully - 1 doctor which in theory gives us enough confirmed town to at least incriminate someone tomorrow, if not both scummers. Then, not very long afterwards, without giving any reasoning whatsoever, + Show Spoiler +On February 28 2014 14:04 Sylencia wrote: :| Don't worry about me, I'm too naive about scum fake checks.
##Vote Xatalos Yeah okay.
|
On February 28 2014 14:04 Sylencia wrote: :| Don't worry about me, I'm too naive about scum fake checks.
##Vote Xatalos
This also includes "playing the noob card" and "not having any conviction in your own ideas whatsoever".
|
I need artanis's self restraint.
Currently waiting on Syl to say/do anything (or even just break 1 page of filter). JJD too I guess since there exist situations where I have to evaluate him.
|
Actually, if Oats is town, then I'm the most likely NK (since then JJD could easily get Oats mislynched without my check). But that seems pretty unlikely.
|
On February 28 2014 23:42 Sylencia wrote:Proper readup tomorrow - karaoke has me drained. However, I noticed one post that stuck out from Xat for me: Show nested quote +On February 28 2014 19:35 Xatalos wrote: Actually one of the best scenarios would be if I flipped. In that case you and Sylencia would be pretty much confirmed scum. It's a valiant attempt to gain town cred by trying to martyr, but if you think about it from his perspective it doesn't really show much towniness does it? If he was the town cop, if he died, we'd gain +1 scum in me, but then town would have 66% chance to lose if the NK is the doc/non-protected guy. Doesn't really sound like a good tradeoff to me. However, he's been pushing for a no lynch because it's apparently better to have us completely confused over the cop checks even more on day 2 if there are differing results. Basically he offers the self-sacrifice yet pushes no lynch. That's scum yo.
Lolz. How does Sylencia go from thinking that it's beneficial for town to no-lynch to soon use my stance of no-lynching as proof of me being scum? This is such a radical and complete change in his views that it can't be real.
|
Man. Nights as a Vanilla Town sure are boring.
|
This question has come up. There are minimal notifications this game. That means that if a save should happen, neither the doc, nor the target saved, will be notified anything special happened.
|
Well, if nobody dies, then most likely someone was saved... And the Doc will know who.
|
Like I said, my favourite wifom is "nobody dies" wifom.
Although Artanis's "I'm VT" wifom was solid too.
|
Indeed
|
What did you think about my "something interesting" WIFOM last night?
|
Although it's no longer really relevant.
|
Your wifom was solid Xata. I hope I'll be able to match it. Also I won't be around on saturday until late at night. Please don't do something stupid and give scum a chance to insta hammer anyone. No votes until I get back by anyone that isn't claiming cop allowed.
|
What you mean is
ABSOLUTELY NO VOTES TOMORROW until town has come to consensus since literally ONE vote by a towny on a towny results in a loss if scum are present to hammer.
Period. There's simply no acceptable reason for a town player to vote early.
|
No, the cops voting eachother are fine because they are confirmed scum to eachother.
|
Okay I suppose. I'm not necessarily even that inclined to lynch a cop claim tomorrow but we'll see.
|
What I mean is there's absolutely no harm in them voting each other because they're confirmed to be opposite alignments.
|
If I get Oats as a redcheck I might vote for him first, though, since I'd be only 99.9999% certain about Sylencia and 100% certain about Oats.
|
|
|
|