|
On March 01 2014 01:54 Xatalos wrote:
Oats hasn't even considered the possibility of Sylencia being Mafia, by the way. He just immediately started pushing me and continued the tunneling ever since. With weak or outright anti-town arguments, I might add.
By weak or outright anti-town you mean what arguments exactly?
|
If u think syl could be scum then whey did u vote xata in an INSTANT MAJORITY LYNCH game?
|
On March 01 2014 01:57 Sn0_Man wrote:
If u think syl could be scum then whey did u vote xata in an INSTANT MAJORITY LYNCH game?
because my 1 vote + 2 scum votes = not hammer.
|
Hey Syl if u could check oats tonight i'd be much obliged.
If ur town you should wish to be read as easily as possible and it may be hard to read you if you check somebody random. Checking oats should be very helpful in determining your alignment thanks 
Scum will never shoot oats because he's either their best mislynch candidate or scum one of the 2 imo, so it's not unreasonable to have both "cops" checking him tonight.
Thx again.
|
On March 01 2014 01:56 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 01:54 Xatalos wrote:
Oats hasn't even considered the possibility of Sylencia being Mafia, by the way. He just immediately started pushing me and continued the tunneling ever since. With weak or outright anti-town arguments, I might add. By weak or outright anti-town you mean what arguments exactly?
1) Me wanting to no-lynch
2) Me claiming early in the day
Etc.
|
On March 01 2014 02:03 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 01:56 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 01 2014 01:54 Xatalos wrote:
Oats hasn't even considered the possibility of Sylencia being Mafia, by the way. He just immediately started pushing me and continued the tunneling ever since. With weak or outright anti-town arguments, I might add. By weak or outright anti-town you mean what arguments exactly? 1) Me wanting to no-lynch 2) Me claiming early in the day Etc.
No-lynching now makes no difference and it loses a possible nolynch where its more beneficial later.
You claiming early in the day is indicative of a mindset that wants to claim, not townie..
|
On March 01 2014 01:58 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 01:57 Sn0_Man wrote:
If u think syl could be scum then whey did u vote xata in an INSTANT MAJORITY LYNCH game? because my 1 vote + 2 scum votes = not hammer.
What if some townie had a mental collapse and voted me? If you were town, scum would just insta-win. I don't really see any reason to immediately vote me and keep your vote on me all day. Unless you're Mafia, of course.
|
On March 01 2014 02:05 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 02:03 Xatalos wrote:On March 01 2014 01:56 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 01 2014 01:54 Xatalos wrote:
Oats hasn't even considered the possibility of Sylencia being Mafia, by the way. He just immediately started pushing me and continued the tunneling ever since. With weak or outright anti-town arguments, I might add. By weak or outright anti-town you mean what arguments exactly? 1) Me wanting to no-lynch 2) Me claiming early in the day Etc. No-lynching now makes no difference and it loses a possible nolynch where its more beneficial later.You claiming early in the day is indicative of a mindset that wants to claim, not townie..
............What.
|
Well technically we could have lynched yesterday and then no-lynch tomorrow if we felt the need.
I disagree that postponing it helps though.
|
On March 01 2014 02:06 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 01:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 01 2014 01:57 Sn0_Man wrote:
If u think syl could be scum then whey did u vote xata in an INSTANT MAJORITY LYNCH game? because my 1 vote + 2 scum votes = not hammer. What if some townie had a mental collapse and voted me? If you were town, scum would just insta-win. I don't really see any reason to immediately vote me and keep your vote on me all day. Unless you're Mafia, of course.
Or you might want to look at LXIV the restart. town oats. almost insta votes Bum.
Oh right maybe Im town again.
|
On March 01 2014 02:09 Sn0_Man wrote:
Well technically we could have lynched yesterday and then no-lynch tomorrow if we felt the need.
I disagree that postponing it helps though.
I dont know what info can help you make the decision between Xata and Syl.
|
Ah, yeah. Although lynching me would have just ended the game.
And it's pretty unlikely to be more beneficial to focus on gathering information AFTER a lynch rather than BEFORE a lynch (especially since no mislynches are allowed).
|
tell me Xata, if we had lynched scum today, would the info gathered be the same as the info that we will get after tmr's lynch?
How does it differ if it does differ?
|
On March 01 2014 02:14 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 02:09 Sn0_Man wrote:
Well technically we could have lynched yesterday and then no-lynch tomorrow if we felt the need.
I disagree that postponing it helps though. I dont know what info can help you make the decision between Xata and Syl.
I dunno, maybe their cop checks come 24hrs from now? Should be interesting to see what they come up with.
|
Its gonna be 1 red 1 green on oats
|
On March 01 2014 02:19 Oatsmaster wrote:
Its gonna be 1 red 1 green on oats
Daaaaamn son dat scum qt planning
|
On March 01 2014 02:16 Oatsmaster wrote:
tell me Xata, if we had lynched scum today, would the info gathered be the same as the info that we will get after tmr's lynch?
How does it differ if it does differ?
The problem is if we mislynch and lose because we lack some crucial information. You might even be town for example. Or who knows, maybe Sylencia is town and fakeclaimed to troll and scum didn't feel the need to fakeclaim (lol). More information is never bad.
|
On March 01 2014 02:21 Sn0_Man wrote:Daaaaamn son dat scum qt planning
heh.
One day I will roll scum and wreck face because I suddenly dont play like shit.
|
On March 01 2014 02:22 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 02:16 Oatsmaster wrote:
tell me Xata, if we had lynched scum today, would the info gathered be the same as the info that we will get after tmr's lynch?
How does it differ if it does differ? The problem is if we mislynch and lose because we lack some crucial information. You might even be town for example. Or who knows, maybe Sylencia is town and fakeclaimed to troll and scum didn't feel the need to fakeclaim (lol). More information is never bad.
How would we know from the night actions that Im town?
|
On March 01 2014 02:23 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2014 02:22 Xatalos wrote:On March 01 2014 02:16 Oatsmaster wrote:
tell me Xata, if we had lynched scum today, would the info gathered be the same as the info that we will get after tmr's lynch?
How does it differ if it does differ? The problem is if we mislynch and lose because we lack some crucial information. You might even be town for example. Or who knows, maybe Sylencia is town and fakeclaimed to troll and scum didn't feel the need to fakeclaim (lol). More information is never bad. How would we know from the night actions that Im town?
Well we have a cop and he's checking you atm...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
