[M][N] Default Suspicions Mafia

On February 19 2014 20:51 marvellosity wrote:
this playerlist is a kinda beautiful blend of old and new actually. i like it.

On February 20 2014 03:10 Grackaroni wrote:
I told you Palmar is scum. Look at the meta evidence. Has he ever told kids to get off his lawn as town? NOPE

Indisputable meta right there.

On February 20 2014 09:18 VIVAX420 wrote:


##vote toad

im not playing i want this addressed.

On February 20 2014 09:29 Koshi wrote:

Let's play "Who is the Smurf"

I think DarthPunk and marv knows it.

On February 20 2014 09:39 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:

Do you think Rayn is scum for it? You're saying it's pointless and you have no idea why he's talking about it, yet you continue to talk about it without asking any questions or having any follow up in your post. Everything you've said has already been said too. What is this post meant to accomplish?

On February 20 2014 09:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Do you agree with prplhz's vote on me?

Actually this goes to everyone.

On February 20 2014 09:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
When marv comes in, he'll explain my posts to everyone. Trust me, he has do to that, even as mafia. Then we lynch mafia.

On February 20 2014 09:43 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:

So basically he could be town or scum for it and all you've done is waffle things that have either already been posted or could be extrapolated within a second.

On February 20 2014 09:43 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:

But your post said nothing prplhz hasn't already said. You've given your thoughts on this and your conclusion was that it's a null tell, or you haven't followed up on it with any questions geared towards Rayn. Why did you feel the need to address this from all the things in the thread when you both consider it useless and don't come to a conclusion from it?

On February 20 2014 09:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Now this is the point. I already did. Why are you not reading?

On February 20 2014 09:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:
It puts pressure on people who are considered lynch targets. And yes, if you are not pushing a lynch or have a stance on the current lynch targets you should vote for yourself then.

On February 20 2014 09:49 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:

You have pointed out something that had already been pointed out and didn't conclude anything alignment indicative from it, nor did you attempt to inquire further into Rayn until I and Rayn called you out on it.



I don't think you can reach a conclusion from it. On it's own it's not enough to say he's scum. That doesn't mean I'm going to shy away from talking about it.

Also I don't think what we're discussing now is useless. I think the plan itself was useless, but discussing the thought process that made rayn come up with the plan is extremely useful.

On February 20 2014 09:53 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:
Why am I pressuring a scumread? Gee, I wonder.
Is that a serious question?

On February 20 2014 09:58 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:
I saw no point in your initial comments, and with a lack of a follow up to continue on them I saw them as fluff as they added nothing new to the table.

On February 20 2014 09:58 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:You have given potential scenarios rather than ask Rayn to explain himself, so if your intention was to read him, it seems like a horrendous way of approaching it.

On February 20 2014 09:42 Palmar wrote:


How about you explain your idea yourself? I mean I posted the two options I saw, but you can probably elaborate better than I on your intentions.

On February 20 2014 09:58 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:Therefore since you already have a read I'd like to hear it so that it may make my read on you more accurate. I'm more interested in hearing thoughts from you rather than Rayn right now.

On February 20 2014 10:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:

How can you agree with prplhz's vote if you don't think i am necessarily scum?

On February 20 2014 10:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
My problem is that there are now at least 4 people who have no interest in thinking of my motives behind my posts. I'll make a clarification after marv posts anyways, but there is something i want out of marv first. I'll explain that too after.

On February 20 2014 10:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:

You are supposed to make educated guesses about my motives and post your conclusions about them. Apparently you don't understand them. That's technically fine. What's not fine is you blindly soft +1 prplhz and Toad while saying you don't understand what's going on.

On February 20 2014 10:18 marvellosity wrote:
The point of that being that Palmar will talk about things like you've been constantly attacking him for talking about things. And it doesn't mean very much. That's just how he talks about stuff.

On February 20 2014 10:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So here we go (marv i would have expected a bit more from you, i am sad):

There are three possibilities about my motives and here they are:

1) I am town and this is my thought process; I misunderstood the setup as i have already explained and thought the votes from previous days are added to the current days votes. That's why i made my plan in the first place. Now this would have been the most pro-town plan because i would have later on brought up the fact that we should treat this as a majority lynch and at the end of the day people who are not in the majority wagon put their votes on themselves. In that way we would have eliminated any cons for the town in setup we possibly can, which is pretty much everything other than the randomness which we can't eliminate.

However, that was not the case. Now, i still stand behind my "if you "unvote", vote yourself" plan because of this. If we do not push this policy it leads to possibly stupid and irrelevant questions like "you don't think this dude is scum anymore, why is your vote still on him?". We don't want that because we benefit from clarity and it's beneficial we know exactly WHEN and WHY people drop their scumreads and where they head next. If they don't have next target they should inform that by voting for themselves. This prevents mafia from misrepresenting people because you can always back up your thoughts with your actions in thread (most importantly voting). Having no possibility to unvote is pro-mafia, if you't agree with that you need to explain me why. It's never irrelevant where your vote is at.

On February 20 2014 10:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Why did you not try to see what i was/am trying to do and how that would make me whatever alignment. What you did is you took some posts from me and painted them scummy without no thinking behind it. I want to know why.

On February 20 2014 10:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
If what i was doing was (1), then i am town.
If what i was doing is (2), you can't tell my alignment.
If what i was doing is (3), then you are saying i am some random noob which this post already proves i am not because i would have came up with a decent explanation on the fly.

So again, why am i mafia? Especially prplhz and Toad?

On February 20 2014 10:32 marvellosity wrote:

you can't say

1) "I'm not going after him seriously"
and
2) "but I need to hear from him about this"

1) is backing out of it and yet you're pushing it with 2)

my vote stands while I go to bed

On February 20 2014 10:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Palmar the problem is not that if you make it clear or not. It's if other people think you are being clear or not which is not always so easily said. You know how this shit works, scum misrepresent everything people do because that's how you lynch townies. Why not reduce the possible amount of misrepresentations by an easy policy that does no harm in any case?

On February 20 2014 10:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Toadesstern do you think being able to unvote in general is pro-town or pro-mafia?

On February 20 2014 11:00 suki wrote:


Here's how I see it. Because you're forced to vote someone, you can't unvote and remain without an opinion (well, except with this stupid plan). This is pro-town. If someone voted Koshi and said, 'I don't think Koshi is scum anymore' but kept his vote on Koshi, then pressuring that person to take a stance on someone else IS pro-town because they can't just unvote and say 'I dont know I'm thinking'.

It forces accountability, and mafia hate being accountable for their actions. This outweighs scum possibly misrepresenting someone because they didn't take off their vote.

On February 20 2014 11:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
suki is probably mafia.

On February 20 2014 11:25 suki wrote:


Koshi tell me why you are reading these two as town, and why you feel the need to express this so strongly to the thread.

On February 20 2014 11:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Also this is why prplhz is mafia. It's an obvious contradiction that makes no sense.

##unvote
##Vote: prplhz

On February 20 2014 11:44 prplhz wrote:

top kek

You don't think there was ever a scum who was like "Shit, I need to get my vote off of this guy because this vote is a little silly and it's attracting attention to me. I guess I'll try to do it in a townie way."

The whole "scum act like town so we can never catch them"-idea is silly. Scum can't perfectly act like town and the more we force them to act the less they look like town (ideally).

On February 20 2014 18:27 Oatsmaster wrote:
What are you doing palmar? Are you pressuring anyone with that set of posts? It seems totally useless man. Why dont you finish reading then consolidate a push against someone

On February 20 2014 18:37 Koshi wrote:
@rayn
prplhz contradiction is something I don't perceive as scummy btw. But I can give him a scummy point.

On February 20 2014 14:04 Oatsmaster wrote:
suki's post about rayn's policy was really bad because it served no purpose, nobody was asking her what she thought and she just comments on it that it doesnt make Rayn scum or town. Completely useless and not what a townie thinks about at all.

Toad because of his wishywashyness on rayn and his inconsistant stance on rayn.

Basically what other people said.

On February 20 2014 18:50 Koshi wrote:
yay. Now let's brainstorm.

On February 20 2014 18:27 Oatsmaster wrote:
What are you doing palmar? Are you pressuring anyone with that set of posts? It seems totally useless man. Why dont you finish reading then consolidate a push against someone

On February 20 2014 20:06 marvellosity wrote:
Seriously wish you'd let Balla answer first T.T

Agree with you about Koshi - Koshi my love, you can't just hang off me/rayn's coat-tails. You should know by now I only protect you when I have good reasons to think you're town... :>

On February 20 2014 20:21 marvellosity wrote:
I'm not that interested in convincing you right now, Palmar, simply because it's so early and I can easily be wrong at this stage (especially suki I think - the continued attack on rayn's reasoning I found terrible, but then I found suki's incredulation at being rayn's scumread pretty genuine) and we have a tonne of time.

Agree with you on kush+Smurf as it stands.

This game has been much easier to get involved in and I feel kinda inclined to wait and see what a couple of my unknowns are going to do through the day

On February 20 2014 20:22 Koshi wrote:

Because marv looked town to me.
I don't know. That's why it is called sheeping.

On February 20 2014 20:23 marvellosity wrote:

Given I've advanced reasoning for Toad to be mafia, do you not have an opinion on the reasoning I gave?

On February 20 2014 21:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Has anyone ever played with prplhz in a game where he is actually pro-active from the start as town? Because i can't remember one.

On February 20 2014 21:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So if you read prpl's posts can you tell what he really thinks now? Because i can't. I don't know if he thinks my plan was scummy or not (btw that was not his reasoning in the first place for voting for me).

On February 20 2014 21:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Palmar why do you think kush is town?

On February 20 2014 09:13 VIVAX420 wrote:


wait so you are implying that scum is going to be afraid of the default votes enough to come up with a plan like that?

On February 20 2014 10:36 VIVAX420 wrote:
toad you are backtracking so hard. it's not serious, yet you gave shitty but serious reasons for it.

On February 20 2014 12:06 VIVAX420 wrote:
why vote prpl? just because of the contradiction in that post you quoted? it wasn't so much a contradiction as it was a realization that marv had a good point.

On February 20 2014 12:09 VIVAX420 wrote:
rayn nvm that garbage you are pushing. I think you are misunderstanding the intentions behind that post. It's like "hmmm this was my argument, but then again marv has a good point"
prpl seems really pro town so far.
~~
What do you think of toad?

On February 20 2014 21:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
btw if sidesprang does not do stuff we lynch him on D1. I am sick of this shit where people don't play.

On February 20 2014 22:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Do you know that when kush is mafia he loves nothing more than being right?
If prplhz is town and Toad is scum oh boy how that fits into scum!kush.

On February 20 2014 22:02 marvellosity wrote:
lol. Weren't you talking about policy lynching and shit last game Palmar?

On February 20 2014 22:33 prplhz wrote:


First he's okay with raynpelikoneet's plan.



Then he doesn't understand it?

On February 20 2014 23:22 Koshi wrote:

3 people find this a problem. hmm.

The first time I might have thought we all voted ourselves to show neutrality. But then he start talking about standard votes and I might have been confused for moment.

On February 20 2014 23:25 marvellosity wrote:
Ok. marv's proposal:

I don't think we're going to get any further with Toad on this. How about we leave him be and let him scumhunt and do his thing in peace for a while. I think that'll be more useful than keep going over the same things that aren't going to change no matter how much we talk about them.

On February 20 2014 23:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:

also read the last sentence in suki's post.

On February 20 2014 23:56 suki wrote:
From my previous experience with Koshi, these posts are more likely to come from scum Koshi than town Koshi.

This is just off the top of my head because I've gotta go in 10 mins. In Shadowed: The Reboot, Koshi was town and he was active from the start, putting down votes, pressuring, calling out contraditions. In the original Shadowed game, he just talked random shit and wasn't interested in making reads for at least the first part of Day 1.

Koshi's behaviour makes me feel like he's not interested in finding who is scum but is just happy to sheep. Regardless of my meta read on him, his contributions to this thread haven't been more than sheeping and weak accusations.

Also Koshi I have definitely done more than you this game. At the very least my reads have reasons.

I'll be back later.

On February 20 2014 23:57 marvellosity wrote:

Since when do mafia openly state they will sheep? Have you ever come across that?

Can you provide evidence of mafia-Koshi doing that like he has in this game?

On February 21 2014 00:38 Oatsmaster wrote:
yeah i really dont like the koshi case #bandwagon
##vote suki
marv, stop bitching about my absence, ill post when I want to.

On February 21 2014 01:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
also comment on the same stuff I asked marv to comment. please, thanks!

On February 21 2014 01:18 Oatsmaster wrote:

its not my fault you dont check meta >.>

On February 21 2014 01:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What's wrong in suki's case is that she says basically same stuff me, Palmar and prplhz talked about earlier. She is not interested in why we do not think that makes Koshi scummy, instead she makes a case where she already knows the stuff she is going to say is "right", it's a safe case because it's already agreed on before it's even posted. But in the end she expresses the thought "i know my case might not be good enough so i'll vote for Toad later on if you guys want to".

I don't see the "this is why Koshi is mafia" type of thing.
I see "here is a safe contribution".

That's my interpretation of that post.

On February 21 2014 01:19 Oatsmaster wrote:



These 2.

On February 21 2014 01:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am kinda interested why you didn't want to be friends with me earlier Palmar.

On February 21 2014 01:34 marvellosity wrote:

Nor would I, unless I was in a particularly vindictive policy-y type mood, or suddenly everyone I thought was mafia looks town at deadline.

On February 21 2014 01:44 marvellosity wrote:
well suki has quite a lot of time to prove herself. She's usually quite useful as town and plays a decent mafia game. I think if she's town she's quite capable of showing us, is what i'm getting at

On February 21 2014 01:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Well that's an interesting interpretation..

On February 21 2014 02:23 Balla24 wrote:


Why? I want him to post. This is definitely his waking hours he should have posted something meaningful already.

On February 21 2014 02:12 Toadesstern wrote:
Balla24
needs some lynching:

Quick summary: I checked out Newbie Mini Mafia LI, Normal Mini Mafia: Episode 1 and TL Mafia LXIV: The Restart:. If there's some more recent town game I'd be happy to take a look at that but couldn't find him in the Database at all (?!?) and looked at the games linked in his profile. That being said, from what I've seen so far it looks like Balla is a somewhat atypical kind of player. He's someone who plays calm and tries to avoid confrontation when rolling town while playing a lot more in your face when rolling mafia. I don't want to call it trolly because that's not it but ballsy might fit as well. Usually it's the other way around as people, especially new guys, are scared to post when rolling mafia but that does not seem to be the case for Balla24.

Explaining his town-behavior is with a limited amount of posts could be possible but I think it's much better if you look through this yourself: Newbie Mini Mafia LI and see for yourself how reserved and understand he's posting when rolling town. I could give you a couple of posts but it's all over the place.

This doesn't look like what he's done in Normal Mini Mafia: Episode 1, TL Mafia LXIV: The Restart: or in this game so far at all.
Take a look at Normal Mini Mafia: Episode 1:
+ Show Spoiler [open me up!] +
He does not give a crap about what people think about him, or wants to make it look that way. He's playing a lot more ballsy than when he rolled town. This looks nothing like his town game above.
The second game I looked into is a bit harder to pinpoint the same things in single point but it still looks nothing like he town game, just not that extreme as he's no, if I had to it's be something like
but that's a cherrypick. But same as the towngame, go through the filter yourself click me! and you'll see it looks nothing like his calm, understanding, good-cop approach he's taking when he's town
Just compare his mafia posts with stuff like this from his town-game and like I said, this may be cherrypicked but that kind of stuff it ALL OVER his filter:


Now that that's out here's what I'm seeing him do this game:
+ Show Spoiler +

Add to that that he has questional posts just by himself like:


That kind of behavior is incredibly hypocritical but whatever, could be anything, right? I don't see that kind of thing happening in his town game. He just does stuff himself and no "hey let's maybe do some shit, right? right?"

Balla24 needs lynching
##vote Balla24

On February 21 2014 07:34 prplhz wrote:

what did kush do to make you think he is town

On February 21 2014 07:25 Balla24 wrote:


Can you answer suki here about why you did vote kush in the first place?

On February 21 2014 11:54 Oatsmaster wrote:

I dont think palmar is making 'bad' associative reads, I think that associative reads day 1 are bad but Palmar is perfectly justified for not being sure when like all of his scumreads jump on someone he thinks is scum.

On February 21 2014 19:16 marvellosity wrote:
stop trolling Palmar

On February 21 2014 19:19 marvellosity wrote:
no, I'm telling you to stop trolling which is nothing to do with that, stop being a prick.

On February 21 2014 19:22 marvellosity wrote:
Shame you stopped playing yesterday evening then, right?

On February 21 2014 19:23 Palmar wrote:


Quiz time.

I trolled, sure. I did a few things (specifically those that suki asked me about) that are sort of strange. What was the real "troll" move, as in which action or post is the one I did only to see what would happen if I did it?

On February 21 2014 19:53 Koshi wrote:

you bad.
your day 1 is bad.
you should feel bad.

marv I got a new list

Toad/Kush/Palmar

On February 20 2014 10:30 Toadesstern wrote:
I voted him because I like voting rayn after the last game we had together, just look at the post I quoted while voting him. I think that was the first game we had together so no I don't really know how he plays considering that I ragequited because of him on d2. At least I don't recall any other game.

Do you honestly think I'm going after him in all seriousness right now instead of just taking sidestabs at him for last game?

On February 20 2014 10:30 Toadesstern wrote:

I had the same idea as prplhz had and said I can't think of a reason why a town would want to proppose this and I'd still like to see his reasoning for all this.

On February 21 2014 11:13 prplhz wrote:
i don't think i gave a read on toad so let me say that i never really understood the case (rayn's 3 options and that stuff) at all but i don't think he did a lot this game so i'm not opposed to a toad lynch at all

On February 21 2014 20:01 Koshi wrote:
Palmar wtf are you currently doing?

On February 21 2014 20:15 Koshi wrote:

I agree that your posts are quite mafia.

On February 21 2014 20:15 Toadesstern wrote:

Like this is the 4th time I mention this but I apparently have to: I specifically mentioned that I will try to not play as hypno-toad and will play more thought through so no I'm not going to call you 100% mafia without a second of a thought or any checking up on it because that's EXACTLY what I'm trying to get rid off.

On February 21 2014 20:23 Toadesstern wrote:

Have you ever tried to get rid of a mistake you're doing repeatedly?

On February 21 2014 20:22 marvellosity wrote:
you've had some bad luck quoting people with broken tags this game Palmar

On February 21 2014 20:50 Koshi wrote:

Biggest filter & Driven.
Calling you mafia does not make him mafia even if you say he does it when he is mafia. Not this game. He was also too smug about it. Is he normally smug about it?

On February 21 2014 20:45 Koshi wrote:
And people that put themselves in their lists are silly. Many people do this silly thing though.

On February 21 2014 21:19 Koshi wrote:
that doesn't even make sense.

On February 21 2014 21:22 marvellosity wrote:
I like the effort with the formatting. Nice distinctions between the levels.

On February 21 2014 22:05 VIVAX420 wrote:
yeah but if you read his posts close he never really indicates that he has a strong inclination that rayn is scum.

On February 21 2014 22:19 VIVAX420 wrote:
you cannot lynch me for owning you palmar.

On February 21 2014 22:22 VIVAX420 wrote:


so it's scummy to want a read on someone now?

On February 21 2014 22:49 suki wrote:




Palmar any reason why you're lynching your 'vigi please' tier over me when you clearly are focused on lynching either me or Toad today?

On February 21 2014 23:04 marvellosity wrote:
you thought he was scummy yesterday and now you're hopping on his lynch

On February 21 2014 23:05 suki wrote:
Palmar tell me why my case is bad and why that makes me scummy.

And marv, if he does say 'oops I forgot about you' and then continues to push my lynch then there's some dissonance going on there. Because if he feels so strongly about me being scum but he's willing to lynch two 'vigi please' people over me (since vigi please is higher on the list), then his story and his actions don't check out.

On February 21 2014 23:05 suki wrote:
Palmar tell me why my case is bad

On February 21 2014 23:05 suki wrote:
and why that makes me scummy.

On February 21 2014 23:07 prplhz wrote:
he was never scum tier material, i just thought he was acting a little odd but i accept that it could just have been a "vote this and lets see what happens" kind of thing, i think he's done that plenty of times before

he seems like he's in a very jolly mood and i think that points at town. i think he likes town more than scum. he's also really smart and amazing

also this toad lynch is more yours than his

On February 21 2014 23:09 suki wrote:
you could at least spell my name right

On February 21 2014 23:16 prplhz wrote:

it wasn't really an attack, it was just a "bah i don't like railroading anyone, not even toad, lets see if something odd is happening that i can prod at" and then palmar did something odd and i pointed it out.

maybe he is championing it but i really still consider it your lynch because he's using your arguments. i guess in reality it the arguments' lynch but they're your arguments so it's kind of your lynch. doesn't matter all that much whose lynch it is though i guess.

what do you think about oats? is he another "leave him be and we'll figure him out"?

On February 21 2014 23:17 marvellosity wrote:

yes it's irrelevant, i was explaining why i said his. ergo you said palmar was shady and palmar was championing toad. literally nothing more to it.

i have no idea about oats at all. not sure we'll figure him out eventually either.

On February 21 2014 23:19 marvellosity wrote:
problem is you get lynched in that scenario palmar

On February 21 2014 23:22 marvellosity wrote:
I wouldn't even rage though, it'd be no fun.

On February 21 2014 23:31 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:

That's because I didn't really have any scumreads at the end. Strongest suspicion was on Suki. Currently it's on Toad. Too many scummy things, something that happened in Shadow as well yet everyone decided to not lynch him for it. The contradiction and his focus on defending himself, calling you a liar but not scum, all counts in for it.

##Unvote
##Vote Toadesstern

On February 21 2014 23:38 suki wrote:
Great. You go ahead and sheep your way to victory. I should try that some time instead of wasting all this effort.

On February 21 2014 23:43 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:

I thought suki and Toad were suspicious, but I didn't have a strong inclination at the time which was why my vote was on myself. Is that so strange?

On February 22 2014 00:03 suki wrote:
I don't like oats.

On February 22 2014 00:08 suki wrote:


What's the point in you and marv bringing this up?

On February 22 2014 00:08 marvellosity wrote:
TOO SLOW

On February 22 2014 00:11 VIVAX420 wrote:
I will quit mafia forever if toad is town

On February 22 2014 00:17 prplhz wrote:

the lynch palmar gogogoo was ironic

On February 22 2014 00:27 VIVAX420 wrote:
Omg Palmer you tried to sound smart and you failed

On February 22 2014 00:29 prplhz wrote:
i didn't know either so i looked it up on wiktionary which says that irony can be "A statement that, when taken in context, may actually mean something different from, or the opposite of, what is written literally; the use of words expressing something other than their literal intention, often in a humorous context." and the then i thought that the "different from, or the opposite of" part fitted quite well

On February 22 2014 02:12 Oatsmaster wrote:
What do you think of smurf being so super sure that palmar is town?


Like if palmar is scum then this point is totally moot but smurf never mentions palmar at all which is interesting considering his read is so strong.

On February 22 2014 03:03 Balla24 wrote:
haha ok whatever~

##vote toadesterrn

On February 22 2014 03:06 Balla24 wrote:
I already posted my list palmar are you not reading?

On February 22 2014 03:12 Balla24 wrote:
Palmar are you ever going to answer? If not you need to tell me why not because it's very obnoxious.

On February 22 2014 03:16 Oatsmaster wrote:

YOU HAVENT SEEN ME PLAY SCUM DUDE WHATTTTTT. CLEARLY IF I ALWAYS PLAY THE SAME THEN IM TOWN RIGHT....

On February 22 2014 03:14 Balla24 wrote:


i mean... the whole post was a list... just providing indepth reasoning for the mafia/town part and little reasoning for the questionable people and why they arent in the mafia and town section

On February 22 2014 04:32 Balla24 wrote:
@Palmar, how come you switched off kush because "scummy people are voting" for him yet you aren't switching off toad?

On February 22 2014 06:13 prplhz wrote:
this thread is no fun right now

On February 22 2014 06:41 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:
Palmar why do you want to lynch me?

On February 22 2014 06:43 Balla24 wrote:
Palmar why do you keep not answering my questions?

On February 22 2014 06:44 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:

I'm not though. I'm very entertaining.
Do you think I'm scum?

On February 22 2014 06:46 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:

Could you expand on why? It'd be appreciative if I didn't have to play the dentist here.

On February 22 2014 06:47 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:

Will posting random gifs help make me entertaining?

On February 22 2014 06:49 marvellosity wrote:
you're the dude on the right Palmar. Sexy.

On February 22 2014 09:08 Koshi wrote:
imo suki scumslipped.