EPT[M][N] Default Suspicions Mafia - Page 18
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
VIVAX420
556 Posts
On February 20 2014 09:09 Toadesstern wrote: Why are you actively looking for a way to pseudo-unvote? I don't even see a reason why someone should care about that. thoughts on that? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
Could you clarify the question? I don't understand what do you want. | ||
|
VIVAX420
556 Posts
| ||
|
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
Vote count when I get home tonight. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
VIVAX420
556 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
VIVAX420
556 Posts
On February 20 2014 13:02 Oatsmaster wrote: Hi!!!! Suki and toad both look pretty scummy. why oats? | ||
|
VIVAX420
556 Posts
| ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 20 2014 08:42 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote: First scumread of the day too! The Kenpachi method only works if the person questioning it actually tries to paint the original poster as scum. Balla asked it in a curious way rather than look for an opening. Why is the fact that he misused said method scummy? Why did your 1st scumread get no pressure after this even though there was plenty said and he even did a few things. Also why is me being curious->townie? That doesn't really make sense considering if it's genuine curiousness why wouldn't I ask the same question as scum? On February 20 2014 12:06 VIVAX420 wrote: well when suki is scum, she constantly bitches about how stressful it is to be scum. Her early game back and forth with koshi makes her look very town to me. ~~ why vote prpl? just because of the contradiction in that post you quoted? it wasn't so much a contradiction as it was a realization that marv had a good point. Maybe she bitches in the scum QT but not in thread. The back and forth with Koshi was almost all joking until she thought I was being scummy why is that townie? It's a similar opening to how she opened in her last town game but its not alignment indicative. As before that game she never opened like that at all. On February 20 2014 09:52 suki wrote: I think the reactions that are garnered from your stupid entry is a positive direction for town and that Balla's reaction to it specifically makes me think he is scum. As for you specifically, I think you can open this way as scum or town. Where did I even react to rayn's entry and why is it bad? I find half of your initial reasoning for pressuring me somewhat silly (i'm not being playful) and the other half somewhat deserved, but I don't think you're being consistent here: At first you were saying i'm scummy for being in "policy talk mode" and i was actively lurking and not pressuring people. But here you're saying it's because of my reaction which you didn't even reference or comment on before. | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 20 2014 10:10 raynpelikoneet wrote: My problem is that there are now at least 4 people who have no interest in thinking of my motives behind my posts. I'll make a clarification after marv posts anyways, but there is something i want out of marv first. I'll explain that too after. Also rayn, did you still want to explain why you wanted marv to explain first? | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On February 20 2014 13:22 Balla24 wrote: Where did I even react to rayn's entry and why is it bad? I find half of your initial reasoning for pressuring me somewhat silly (i'm not being playful) and the other half somewhat deserved, but I don't think you're being consistent here: At first you were saying i'm scummy for being in "policy talk mode" and i was actively lurking and not pressuring people. But here you're saying it's because of my reaction which you didn't even reference or comment on before. Your reaction: On February 20 2014 09:17 Balla24 wrote: I see what rayn was thinking though. He thought the votes were permanent thus the people with 3 votes would be easier to lynch whereas the people with no votes would be much harder to lynch. That would actually be a cool mechanic. Once it was cleared up though it basically means nothing so the "plan" doesn't do anything. So yeah. Policy talk mode. Not pressuring. Your 'reaction' to rayn's case was just a sort of backing-up rayn by explaining his point of view from your point of view. Let's get those gears moving Balla! What do you think of prplhz's pressure on rayn? Who do you find scummy right now? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On February 20 2014 13:33 Balla24 wrote: Also rayn, did you still want to explain why you wanted marv to explain first? If marv does not understand what i mean then i can get other people do not aswell. | ||
| ||
