EPT[M][N] "SMB" Mini Mafia - Page 24
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Mig
United States4714 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On January 17 2014 04:11 Toadesstern wrote: why do you keep on trying to fasttalk people like that? When I got in the thread again, instead of adressing anything I did you said something like that as well if I recal correctly. You're doing this shit again, now with Mig because there's a difference of opinion here? No, because Mig usually comments on actually important stuff in thread, not on bullshit like the case on Sn0, which is terrible. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 17 2014 04:23 raynpelikoneet wrote: No, because Mig usually comments on actually important stuff in thread, not on bullshit like the case on Sn0, which is terrible. 1) again, the case might be terrible but that's to be expected early on. Doesn't change the fact that something in it still had something to it and therefore is worth talking about. 2) if you think so, say so instead of throwing mud without anything that even resembles an explanation. People might believe there's something to what you say when someone like you writes stuff like that... There might be something to it but it'd be a lot cooler if you could at least give an abridged version of an explanation when calling someone bad so people can make up their own minds. Otherwise people might show up and blame you for abusing your vet status for getting people to sheep you. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
On January 17 2014 04:21 Mig wrote: Anyway sno, who do you think is scum? Saying everyone focusing you isn't productive is bullshit. The way people go about pressuring/building their cases shows you a lot about alignment. Half the thread could be scum. Actually more than half. I still don't have anything I think is worth putting together into a concentrated effort to lynch. As you are so eager to point out, its still somewhat early day 1. Like, if I had to snap-lynch somebody right now it would probably actually be grack, but thats mostly because I prefer lurker lynches day 1. In terms of who is most likely to be scum, Hopeless i guess, skan/kush are up there too. Day 1 sucks. People making cases on me makes it a fuckton harder for ME to read the thread as mentioned because not only does a ton of bias creep in to my reads whenever it happens, but also it competes with discussions that are actually geared towards catching scum. So I dislike it, especially when they are so ridiculous. | ||
|
Mig
United States4714 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On January 17 2014 04:32 Toadesstern wrote: 1) again, the case might be terrible but that's to be expected early on. Doesn't change the fact that something in it still had something to it and therefore is worth talking about. 2) if you think so, say so instead of throwing mud without anything that even resembles an explanation. People might believe there's something to what you say when someone like you writes stuff like that... There might be something to it but it'd be a lot cooler if you could at least give an abridged version of an explanation when calling someone bad so people can make up their own minds. Otherwise people might show up and blame you for abusing your vet status for getting people to sheep you. 1) What is that something? I still don't see it. I don't see anyone reasonably explaining why Sn0 is mafia. 2) I am saying so.. rofl. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
You've jumped into the thread and spoke of nothing except "omg sno scum lynchzorz". I'd like something more to read YOU by if you would be so kind. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 17 2014 04:36 Hopeless1der wrote: Toad, rayn has already explained at great length why skanjabs case is bad and how it could indicate a mafia mindset. He then went and read Hogwarts and concluded that skanjab is bad. The reasons are there if you choose to read them. Are you still in catch up mode or something? You're constantly not reading the thread properly. I've caught up, and no I've read that. I know that he called most of the case bad and I agreed with him at least 3 times yet and every time I said that however bad it might be there is this one point at the end of it that is a great pick up, even rayn agreed on that but ended up concluding that it might be something but it's too risky according to him. Also wether ska is bad or not has nothing to do with wether someone in his case might be correct or not. It explains why the majority of it isn't alignmnent indicative at all but it has nothing to do with the actual topic: those small parts that people like Mig and me seem to agree with. So please do me a favor and actually read what I posted, and Mig as well I might add because you're talking about the stuff noone is talking about. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On January 17 2014 04:35 Mig wrote: Rayn, you still havent explained why there is no way Sno is mafia. Because this is exactly what he does as town. Also about half of the players are attacking him and noone is even talking about anything else besides me, so unless me and him are both mafia there is no way he is mafia as mafia is just letting town to attack one of their own. I am not mafia so fuck the above. Do you think kush is scum or not? Why is he giving up in this game? | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 17 2014 04:36 Hopeless1der wrote: Toad, rayn has already explained at great length why skanjabs case is bad and how it could indicate a mafia mindset. He then went and read Hogwarts and concluded that skanjab is bad. The reasons are there if you choose to read them. Are you still in catch up mode or something? You're constantly not reading the thread properly. Once you wipe rayn's semen off of your eyes go back and read and see that his reasons for thinking the points on my case were wrong are based on a misunderstanding | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On January 17 2014 04:42 Skanjab1s wrote: Once you wipe rayn's semen off of your eyes go back and read and see that his reasons for thinking the points on my case were wrong are based on a misunderstanding That's not what i said. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 17 2014 04:39 raynpelikoneet wrote: 1) What is that something? I still don't see it. I don't see anyone reasonably explaining why Sn0 is mafia. 2) I am saying so.. rofl. 1) the way he's posting. The very last part of his "case" 2) yes, after I told you to... | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
I know, it doesn't matter what you said, it only matters what is right. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
1) "The way he is posting" is a bullshit argument. It's an argument people use when they can't make real arguments. It's just like saying "his tone is scummy". Look at his past games, come back and tell me how does it differ. All the games, not just one. 2) No, i have been saying it all the time. Explain, with quotes. All the time, after Mig posted, i have said his posts are suspicious. If you are talking about something else here explain what and elaborate properly. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On January 17 2014 04:45 Skanjab1s wrote: I know, it doesn't matter what you said, it only matters what is right. Then why the fuck do you say otherwise in your first post? | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 17 2014 04:41 Toadesstern wrote: I've caught up, and no I've read that. I know that he called most of the case bad and I agreed with him at least 3 times yet and every time I said that however bad it might be there is this one point at the end of it that is a great pick up, even rayn agreed on that but ended up concluding that it might be something but it's too risky according to him. Also wether ska is bad or not has nothing to do with wether someone in his case might be correct or not. It explains why the majority of it isn't alignmnent indicative at all but it has nothing to do with the actual topic: those small parts that people like Mig and me seem to agree with. So please do me a favor and actually read what I posted, and Mig as well I might add because you're talking about the stuff noone is talking about. rephrasing the last part because I just reread it and it sounded ambiguous and people might misunderstand: So please do me a favor and actually read what I posted, and Mig as well I might add because you're talking about the stuff noone is talking about was supposed to be something along the lines ofplease read what mig and I are actually commenting on and not "mig please read what I am posting" | ||
|
Mig
United States4714 Posts
Half your defense of him was this Because this is exactly what he does as town. And then you called my case against him bullshit when I actually posted quotes from his previous game, that look very different to this game. Touch hypocritical? | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 17 2014 04:47 raynpelikoneet wrote: Toad: 1) "The way he is posting" is a bullshit argument. It's an argument people use when they can't make real arguments. It's just like saying "his tone is scummy". Look at his past games, come back and tell me how does it differ. All the games, not just one. 2) No, i have been saying it all the time. Explain, with quotes. All the time, after Mig posted, i have said his posts are suspicious. If you are talking about something else here explain what and elaborate properly. About 2) I didn't see any quotes or explanations in the post I quoted. Just a one- or twoliner that looked like throwing mud. About 1) it's exactly what got Xatalos got lynched in the failgame. It's essentially the same thing because it's not a thing that is limited to Xatalos but a LOT of mafias. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On January 17 2014 04:42 Skanjab1s wrote: Once you wipe rayn's semen off of your eyes go back and read and see that his reasons for thinking the points on my case were wrong are based on a misunderstanding Stop the personal attacks | ||
| ||
