A Quiet Game of Mini Mafia - Page 36

On January 08 2014 23:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:
That's not what he is saying.

On January 08 2014 23:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
He is saying he played intentionally slowly (which =/= scummy) and that your reasoning for votehopping from yamato -> WoS -> yamato looks like you are looking for a lynch target rather than figuring out what people's alignments are.

I actually agree with him to some extent, especially because of your actions regarding voting / unvoting WoS.

On January 08 2014 23:29 wherebugsgo wrote:
Here's what I don't understand about Yamato (who, by the way, is clearly not reading the thread properly, as can be seen by one single thing that in fact makes his case on iamp completely pointless)

He comes back and posts a bunch of stuff on Cora and WoS. The stuff on Cora is fine, the stuff on WoS is also mostly fine but probably not exactly entirely true in the context of the game (read: it sounds like a filtercase) and the stuff on iamperfection, while partly true, is...lol. The amount of evidence there to call iamp scum is honesty vastly underwhelming compared to yamato's description of Cora's play.

Yet, the most important part is that Yamato voted iamp. But he did one thing, and put it into spoilers. The host did not count the vote. If Yamato were reading the thread and truly were interested in killing iamperfection, wouldn't he revote after there were two indications that his vote had not been counted? There was both a host message and a vote count. Smells like he's not reading the thread.

On January 08 2014 23:35 wherebugsgo wrote:
The other thing that is completely scummy as fuck is that he took so much time to come back with something so underwhelming.

If he truly were interested in killing iamp he'd be scrambling for us to voteswitch, yet he basically did juuuust enough to throw suspicion off himself. The day ends in like 9 hours, surely Yamato is not dumb enough to have missed that. So, why did he pop back in, vote, and then leave? No push to convince people that they are wrong about him and, more importantly, wrong about iamperfection? If he were reading the thread wouldn't he know how townish several people have labeled iamp (I myself said something about it). If he actually cared, he'd definitely have noticed that his vote didn't count.

Instead he just disappeared right after posting. That's something scum do.

How many times have you all played scum to have a teammate say, "Oh hey, just make a post so we can get the heat off you." Making a case and then not following through on it is what scum do, not town.

On January 08 2014 23:37 yamato77 wrote:

I'm still here.

Post invalidated.

On January 08 2014 23:26 iamperfection wrote:

bs i stated my reasons for voting wos when i did i reacted to what i saw. That is not scummy in the slightest.

On January 08 2014 23:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Your vote on WoS was reasonable because i thought the same thing you and kush did when you reacted to his post. The thing i find scummy is when WoS interacted with people after that you retracted from the vote back to yamato for reasons that were "well at least WoS is here talking but yamato is not".

If you really thought WoS is scummy why didn't you keep your vote on him and pressure him about his scummy post(s)? This is exactly what i was trying to say to WBG, you did the exact thing i was worried about people voting for yamato when he earlier on promised to contribute when he had more time.

To me that seems like you did not even care about WoS' alignment, because why would you not keep your vote on him if you think he did something scummy? Why did you not want to hear more from him? If you give him a "free pass" by rectracting your pressure/vote what does that achieve?

On January 08 2014 23:37 iamperfection wrote:

then what do you have to say your case is bad and you should feel bad about it and why did you clam up for like 20 mins when i showed up?

On January 08 2014 23:40 yamato77 wrote:

Was watching agdq, now going to dentist. We'll sort this out later. In the mean time, you should be thinking about other people you'd rather see lynched, because at the moment, I'm less interested in lynching you.