|
On January 08 2014 14:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
No you actually do the opposite and answer all the cases there are and give opinions on them so definitely does not make you scum based on meta.
What? I don't understand this post.
|
On January 08 2014 15:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 14:56 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 14:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:On January 08 2014 14:50 WaveofShadow wrote:
As for yours his explanation is a little convoluted but where you say it's only possible for scum to do what he did, I say it is entirely possible for town to lose thought processes/lie/have shitty explanations for things as well. If anything I'd be more inclined to know from thrawn why he felt the need to continually try to bait reactions in the first place?
Okay so do you think it's reasonable to lose your train of thought in 14 minutes as thrawn is suggesting happened? Also do you buy his explanation of being too stoned and how does it make sense because before the argument yamato politely asked thrawn to not post if he does not have a clear head? Well the second sentence is meh because if one doesn't have a clear head in the first place they're bound not to follow instructions like that  As for the first one I suppose you have a point...? But then you're suggesting I guess that his original entire excuse and way to defend himself was 'guise I'm too high to play mafia' which seems like a terrible thing to do as scum. People have been lynched for way less. And i have only been lynched as mafia because i was too drunk. 
lol posts like this make me want to policy lynch you every game so eventually you can't say that anymore
|
On January 08 2014 15:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 14:56 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 14:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:On January 08 2014 14:50 WaveofShadow wrote:
As for yours his explanation is a little convoluted but where you say it's only possible for scum to do what he did, I say it is entirely possible for town to lose thought processes/lie/have shitty explanations for things as well. If anything I'd be more inclined to know from thrawn why he felt the need to continually try to bait reactions in the first place?
Okay so do you think it's reasonable to lose your train of thought in 14 minutes as thrawn is suggesting happened? Also do you buy his explanation of being too stoned and how does it make sense because before the argument yamato politely asked thrawn to not post if he does not have a clear head? Well the second sentence is meh because if one doesn't have a clear head in the first place they're bound not to follow instructions like that As for the first one I suppose you have a point...? But then you're suggesting I guess that his original entire excuse and way to defend himself was 'guise I'm too high to play mafia' which seems like a terrible thing to do as scum. People have been lynched for way less. And i have only been lynched as mafia because i was too drunk.
Actually this is not true, i forgot the ##'s game where i legitmately fucked up and got caught.
|
On January 08 2014 15:00 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 14:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
No you actually do the opposite and answer all the cases there are and give opinions on them so definitely does not make you scum based on meta. What? I don't understand this post.
I read your D1 in Les.
|
On January 08 2014 15:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 15:00 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 14:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
No you actually do the opposite and answer all the cases there are and give opinions on them so definitely does not make you scum based on meta. What? I don't understand this post. I read your D1 in Les.
I gambled and won!
But wait, for bonus points, did I not do that in this game?
|
On January 08 2014 15:07 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 15:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:On January 08 2014 15:00 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 14:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
No you actually do the opposite and answer all the cases there are and give opinions on them so definitely does not make you scum based on meta. What? I don't understand this post. I read your D1 in Les. I gambled and won! But wait, for bonus points, did I not do that in this game?
No you didn't, which is more scummy than what you did in Les.
Anyways meta does not "prove" you are scum because of it, it does not prove you are town either.
|
You are either lazy or scum and you should stop being lazy if you are town.
|
On January 08 2014 15:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
You are either lazy or scum and you should stop being lazy if you are town.
Wat.
How exactly am I lazy aside from asking you to link a case for me? I don't think I've been lazy in the slightest.
And I'm not following where the 'or scum' comes from either.
|
On January 08 2014 15:12 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 15:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
You are either lazy or scum and you should stop being lazy if you are town. Wat. How exactly am I lazy aside from asking you to link a case for me? I don't think I've been lazy in the slightest. And I'm not following where the 'or scum' comes from either.
Because town players are interested in figuring out stuff and commenting on most interesting topics there are in the thread. Regardless of your alignment you either think my case is not good or for some other reason you did not want to comment on it. When i specifically asked you to comment on it you didn't even remember the case and wanted me to point out where the case was.
That suggests to me you are not reading the thread closely (as you did not remember the case at all) which means you are lazy, or that you for some reason didn't want to either +1 my case or tell me you think the case is bad or does not make thrawn mafia. If it is "for some reason" i can't think of a townie reason and if you were not lazy i think you are scum.
|
Seriously, why do i even need to explain this to you?
|
On January 08 2014 15:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 15:12 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 15:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
You are either lazy or scum and you should stop being lazy if you are town. Wat. How exactly am I lazy aside from asking you to link a case for me? I don't think I've been lazy in the slightest. And I'm not following where the 'or scum' comes from either. Because town players are interested in figuring out stuff and commenting on most interesting topics there are in the thread. Regardless of your alignment you either think my case is not good or for some other reason you did not want to comment on it. When i specifically asked you to comment on it you didn't even remember the case and wanted me to point out where the case was. That suggests to me you are not reading the thread closely (as you did not remember the case at all) which means you are lazy, or that you for some reason didn't want to either +1 my case or tell me you think the case is bad or does not make thrawn mafia. If it is "for some reason" i can't think of a townie reason and if you were not lazy i think you are scum.
Your bias because you noticed I didn't specifically comment on your case or remember it doesn't make me scum OR lazy.
How do I have to point that out to you?
Like wtf is this? Just because I don't comment or agree with you I immediately must be working against you?
|
11589 Posts
Let's see here:
On January 08 2014 00:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
He is trying to figure out my alignment and does not give a shit what everyone (including me) thinks about it.
He is doing stuff his own way, which is not what he does as mafia.
This is accurate.
On January 08 2014 00:46 mkfuba07 wrote:
The weather outside is frightful -_- Just popping in while I have a few minutes before my first class of the quarter :D
yamato: do you still think my argument about cora makes no sense after I elaborated?
rayn: You said my post made perfect sense, but cora isn't on your scumread list. Por que?
Makes sense once you elaborated. As an aside, I do find Cora a somewhat decent lynch target for today given the way he's ridden his "attack" of me as a real contribution to the game. But more on that later when I elaborate on my reads.
On January 08 2014 09:32 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 09:27 Corazon wrote:
It's hard to talk to you, WBG. You act like a giant dickwad when some disagrees with you. No. I acted like a dickwad to both you and JAT because you're both proving you can't fucking read. in your case it's probably because you're scum. Kush deserves mountains of shit for being a completely worthless player.
I do love WBG, I'm pretty confident he's town. He could be tryharding mafia, but there's no point in him getting worked up and putting in so much effort when so many players in this game are not doing so UNLESS he is town.
On January 08 2014 10:28 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:23 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 08 2014 10:20 Corazon wrote:On January 08 2014 10:14 iamperfection wrote:
and corzan can you explain how bugs is scum when he decided to go on a huge rant with everyone look at me attitude. Sure seems like to me a non scum thing to do. It's easy for scum to fake that. His logic was not even good. He started calling me dumb because I asked him to actually contribute when he said he wouldn't until I did. He blatantly admitted to not have read the thread and he decided to attack kush, who at the time had 0 posts, and called him stupid until he did some random 180 and called kush town (while keeping his vote on him). He then OMGUSs me when I call him out for it. To me, it looks faked and it looks like he just wants to survive. I'm sorry, what? Most of this shit is just blatantly wrong or misleading. On January 08 2014 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bring it, suckas.
JAT:
Until prodded endlessly by WBG, he contributed nothing to the thread besides the nitpicking of other people's posts and reads and providing none of his own. Not a huge fan of his posting thus far---a little too 'fence-sitty' for my liking but whateva.
Iamp can I have a looky at you next? Yamato, please. I want to hear your thoughts on him. I'd lynch him atm actually. ##Vote: yamatoI'm used to WAY more effort from him on any given D1 at this point. Too much one-liner, too much shutting down of discussion and negativity---and while he's capable of this as town, he's also capable of better play and I don't mind punishing him. Seriously threatening him is also often a good way to get something good out of him one way or another; see LXIII or LXI for examples. Yamato LOVES being tha D1 lynch.
This is an absolute shit reason for voting for me. He doesn't think I'm mafia (nor will he call me mafia), but he's content voting me, and perhaps even lynching me, as punishment for "poor play". This is the second time he's mentioned this exact reasoning, yet it now comes with a vote attached as other players begin to jump on the wagon. Coincidence?
WoS will join Corazon in an exposition post later on. Also joining them will be the surprise secret guest, whom I will push a lynch on! Because he's mafia!
|
On January 08 2014 15:35 yamato77 wrote:Let's see here: Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 00:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
He is trying to figure out my alignment and does not give a shit what everyone (including me) thinks about it.
He is doing stuff his own way, which is not what he does as mafia. This is accurate. Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 00:46 mkfuba07 wrote:
The weather outside is frightful -_- Just popping in while I have a few minutes before my first class of the quarter :D
yamato: do you still think my argument about cora makes no sense after I elaborated?
rayn: You said my post made perfect sense, but cora isn't on your scumread list. Por que? Makes sense once you elaborated. As an aside, I do find Cora a somewhat decent lynch target for today given the way he's ridden his "attack" of me as a real contribution to the game. But more on that later when I elaborate on my reads. Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 09:32 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 08 2014 09:27 Corazon wrote:
It's hard to talk to you, WBG. You act like a giant dickwad when some disagrees with you. No. I acted like a dickwad to both you and JAT because you're both proving you can't fucking read. in your case it's probably because you're scum. Kush deserves mountains of shit for being a completely worthless player. I do love WBG, I'm pretty confident he's town. He could be tryharding mafia, but there's no point in him getting worked up and putting in so much effort when so many players in this game are not doing so UNLESS he is town. Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:28 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 10:23 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 08 2014 10:20 Corazon wrote:On January 08 2014 10:14 iamperfection wrote:
and corzan can you explain how bugs is scum when he decided to go on a huge rant with everyone look at me attitude. Sure seems like to me a non scum thing to do. It's easy for scum to fake that. His logic was not even good. He started calling me dumb because I asked him to actually contribute when he said he wouldn't until I did. He blatantly admitted to not have read the thread and he decided to attack kush, who at the time had 0 posts, and called him stupid until he did some random 180 and called kush town (while keeping his vote on him). He then OMGUSs me when I call him out for it. To me, it looks faked and it looks like he just wants to survive. I'm sorry, what? Most of this shit is just blatantly wrong or misleading. On January 08 2014 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bring it, suckas.
JAT:
Until prodded endlessly by WBG, he contributed nothing to the thread besides the nitpicking of other people's posts and reads and providing none of his own. Not a huge fan of his posting thus far---a little too 'fence-sitty' for my liking but whateva.
Iamp can I have a looky at you next? Yamato, please. I want to hear your thoughts on him. I'd lynch him atm actually. ##Vote: yamatoI'm used to WAY more effort from him on any given D1 at this point. Too much one-liner, too much shutting down of discussion and negativity---and while he's capable of this as town, he's also capable of better play and I don't mind punishing him. Seriously threatening him is also often a good way to get something good out of him one way or another; see LXIII or LXI for examples. Yamato LOVES being tha D1 lynch. This is an absolute shit reason for voting for me. He doesn't think I'm mafia (nor will he call me mafia), but he's content voting me, and perhaps even lynching me, as punishment for "poor play". This is the second time he's mentioned this exact reasoning, yet it now comes with a vote attached as other players begin to jump on the wagon. Coincidence? WoS will join Corazon in an exposition post later on. Also joining them will be the surprise secret guest, whom I will push a lynch on! Because he's mafia!
Oh rearry yamato?
Show me who else was on the yamato wagon when I 'jumped on.'
|
11589 Posts
On January 08 2014 15:37 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 15:35 yamato77 wrote:Let's see here: On January 08 2014 00:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
He is trying to figure out my alignment and does not give a shit what everyone (including me) thinks about it.
He is doing stuff his own way, which is not what he does as mafia. This is accurate. On January 08 2014 00:46 mkfuba07 wrote:
The weather outside is frightful -_- Just popping in while I have a few minutes before my first class of the quarter :D
yamato: do you still think my argument about cora makes no sense after I elaborated?
rayn: You said my post made perfect sense, but cora isn't on your scumread list. Por que? Makes sense once you elaborated. As an aside, I do find Cora a somewhat decent lynch target for today given the way he's ridden his "attack" of me as a real contribution to the game. But more on that later when I elaborate on my reads. On January 08 2014 09:32 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 08 2014 09:27 Corazon wrote:
It's hard to talk to you, WBG. You act like a giant dickwad when some disagrees with you. No. I acted like a dickwad to both you and JAT because you're both proving you can't fucking read. in your case it's probably because you're scum. Kush deserves mountains of shit for being a completely worthless player. I do love WBG, I'm pretty confident he's town. He could be tryharding mafia, but there's no point in him getting worked up and putting in so much effort when so many players in this game are not doing so UNLESS he is town. On January 08 2014 10:28 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 10:23 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 08 2014 10:20 Corazon wrote:On January 08 2014 10:14 iamperfection wrote:
and corzan can you explain how bugs is scum when he decided to go on a huge rant with everyone look at me attitude. Sure seems like to me a non scum thing to do. It's easy for scum to fake that. His logic was not even good. He started calling me dumb because I asked him to actually contribute when he said he wouldn't until I did. He blatantly admitted to not have read the thread and he decided to attack kush, who at the time had 0 posts, and called him stupid until he did some random 180 and called kush town (while keeping his vote on him). He then OMGUSs me when I call him out for it. To me, it looks faked and it looks like he just wants to survive. I'm sorry, what? Most of this shit is just blatantly wrong or misleading. On January 08 2014 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bring it, suckas.
JAT:
Until prodded endlessly by WBG, he contributed nothing to the thread besides the nitpicking of other people's posts and reads and providing none of his own. Not a huge fan of his posting thus far---a little too 'fence-sitty' for my liking but whateva.
Iamp can I have a looky at you next? Yamato, please. I want to hear your thoughts on him. I'd lynch him atm actually. ##Vote: yamatoI'm used to WAY more effort from him on any given D1 at this point. Too much one-liner, too much shutting down of discussion and negativity---and while he's capable of this as town, he's also capable of better play and I don't mind punishing him. Seriously threatening him is also often a good way to get something good out of him one way or another; see LXIII or LXI for examples. Yamato LOVES being tha D1 lynch. This is an absolute shit reason for voting for me. He doesn't think I'm mafia (nor will he call me mafia), but he's content voting me, and perhaps even lynching me, as punishment for "poor play". This is the second time he's mentioned this exact reasoning, yet it now comes with a vote attached as other players begin to jump on the wagon. Coincidence? WoS will join Corazon in an exposition post later on. Also joining them will be the surprise secret guest, whom I will push a lynch on! Because he's mafia! Oh rearry yamato? Show me who else was on the yamato wagon when I 'jumped on.'
Plenty of people had called me mafia or stated suspicion of me by the time you decided to vote for me.
But still, the main point is just how scummy your reasoning is. You don't even necessarily think, that how i'm playing makes me mafia, you just want to lynch me for it. It sounds like a circular way for a mafia player to justify voting for a player they know is town.
Plus, I'm apparently your only read in this game and the rest of your posts have been extraordinarily useless, as Rayn has been nice enough to point out.
|
i cant wait for the huge omgus reaction from the surprise guest
|
On January 08 2014 15:42 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 15:37 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 15:35 yamato77 wrote:Let's see here: On January 08 2014 00:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
He is trying to figure out my alignment and does not give a shit what everyone (including me) thinks about it.
He is doing stuff his own way, which is not what he does as mafia. This is accurate. On January 08 2014 00:46 mkfuba07 wrote:
The weather outside is frightful -_- Just popping in while I have a few minutes before my first class of the quarter :D
yamato: do you still think my argument about cora makes no sense after I elaborated?
rayn: You said my post made perfect sense, but cora isn't on your scumread list. Por que? Makes sense once you elaborated. As an aside, I do find Cora a somewhat decent lynch target for today given the way he's ridden his "attack" of me as a real contribution to the game. But more on that later when I elaborate on my reads. On January 08 2014 09:32 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 08 2014 09:27 Corazon wrote:
It's hard to talk to you, WBG. You act like a giant dickwad when some disagrees with you. No. I acted like a dickwad to both you and JAT because you're both proving you can't fucking read. in your case it's probably because you're scum. Kush deserves mountains of shit for being a completely worthless player. I do love WBG, I'm pretty confident he's town. He could be tryharding mafia, but there's no point in him getting worked up and putting in so much effort when so many players in this game are not doing so UNLESS he is town. On January 08 2014 10:28 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 10:23 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 08 2014 10:20 Corazon wrote:On January 08 2014 10:14 iamperfection wrote:
and corzan can you explain how bugs is scum when he decided to go on a huge rant with everyone look at me attitude. Sure seems like to me a non scum thing to do. It's easy for scum to fake that. His logic was not even good. He started calling me dumb because I asked him to actually contribute when he said he wouldn't until I did. He blatantly admitted to not have read the thread and he decided to attack kush, who at the time had 0 posts, and called him stupid until he did some random 180 and called kush town (while keeping his vote on him). He then OMGUSs me when I call him out for it. To me, it looks faked and it looks like he just wants to survive. I'm sorry, what? Most of this shit is just blatantly wrong or misleading. On January 08 2014 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bring it, suckas.
JAT:
Until prodded endlessly by WBG, he contributed nothing to the thread besides the nitpicking of other people's posts and reads and providing none of his own. Not a huge fan of his posting thus far---a little too 'fence-sitty' for my liking but whateva.
Iamp can I have a looky at you next? Yamato, please. I want to hear your thoughts on him. I'd lynch him atm actually. ##Vote: yamatoI'm used to WAY more effort from him on any given D1 at this point. Too much one-liner, too much shutting down of discussion and negativity---and while he's capable of this as town, he's also capable of better play and I don't mind punishing him. Seriously threatening him is also often a good way to get something good out of him one way or another; see LXIII or LXI for examples. Yamato LOVES being tha D1 lynch. This is an absolute shit reason for voting for me. He doesn't think I'm mafia (nor will he call me mafia), but he's content voting me, and perhaps even lynching me, as punishment for "poor play". This is the second time he's mentioned this exact reasoning, yet it now comes with a vote attached as other players begin to jump on the wagon. Coincidence? WoS will join Corazon in an exposition post later on. Also joining them will be the surprise secret guest, whom I will push a lynch on! Because he's mafia! Oh rearry yamato? Show me who else was on the yamato wagon when I 'jumped on.' Plenty of people had called me mafia or stated suspicion of me by the time you decided to vote for me. But still, the main point is just how scummy your reasoning is. You don't even necessarily think, that how i'm playing makes me mafia, you just want to lynch me for it. It sounds like a circular way for a mafia player to justify voting for a player they know is town. Plus, I'm apparently your only read in this game and the rest of your posts have been extraordinarily useless, as Rayn has been nice enough to point out.
My posts have not in any way been extraordinarily useless. I have given reads on multiple people (WBG/fuba/iamp/Cora), commented on cases and done a shit ton more than you have. Don't you DARE lecture me on usefulness just because you've finally decided to show your ass up and actually play the game.
So scumteam is me Cora and surprise guest?
GG guys, we'd better concede, yamato wins.
|
11589 Posts
On January 08 2014 15:49 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 15:42 yamato77 wrote:On January 08 2014 15:37 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 15:35 yamato77 wrote:Let's see here: On January 08 2014 00:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
He is trying to figure out my alignment and does not give a shit what everyone (including me) thinks about it.
He is doing stuff his own way, which is not what he does as mafia. This is accurate. On January 08 2014 00:46 mkfuba07 wrote:
The weather outside is frightful -_- Just popping in while I have a few minutes before my first class of the quarter :D
yamato: do you still think my argument about cora makes no sense after I elaborated?
rayn: You said my post made perfect sense, but cora isn't on your scumread list. Por que? Makes sense once you elaborated. As an aside, I do find Cora a somewhat decent lynch target for today given the way he's ridden his "attack" of me as a real contribution to the game. But more on that later when I elaborate on my reads. On January 08 2014 09:32 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 08 2014 09:27 Corazon wrote:
It's hard to talk to you, WBG. You act like a giant dickwad when some disagrees with you. No. I acted like a dickwad to both you and JAT because you're both proving you can't fucking read. in your case it's probably because you're scum. Kush deserves mountains of shit for being a completely worthless player. I do love WBG, I'm pretty confident he's town. He could be tryharding mafia, but there's no point in him getting worked up and putting in so much effort when so many players in this game are not doing so UNLESS he is town. On January 08 2014 10:28 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 10:23 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 08 2014 10:20 Corazon wrote:On January 08 2014 10:14 iamperfection wrote:
and corzan can you explain how bugs is scum when he decided to go on a huge rant with everyone look at me attitude. Sure seems like to me a non scum thing to do. It's easy for scum to fake that. His logic was not even good. He started calling me dumb because I asked him to actually contribute when he said he wouldn't until I did. He blatantly admitted to not have read the thread and he decided to attack kush, who at the time had 0 posts, and called him stupid until he did some random 180 and called kush town (while keeping his vote on him). He then OMGUSs me when I call him out for it. To me, it looks faked and it looks like he just wants to survive. I'm sorry, what? Most of this shit is just blatantly wrong or misleading. On January 08 2014 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bring it, suckas.
JAT:
Until prodded endlessly by WBG, he contributed nothing to the thread besides the nitpicking of other people's posts and reads and providing none of his own. Not a huge fan of his posting thus far---a little too 'fence-sitty' for my liking but whateva.
Iamp can I have a looky at you next? Yamato, please. I want to hear your thoughts on him. I'd lynch him atm actually. ##Vote: yamatoI'm used to WAY more effort from him on any given D1 at this point. Too much one-liner, too much shutting down of discussion and negativity---and while he's capable of this as town, he's also capable of better play and I don't mind punishing him. Seriously threatening him is also often a good way to get something good out of him one way or another; see LXIII or LXI for examples. Yamato LOVES being tha D1 lynch. This is an absolute shit reason for voting for me. He doesn't think I'm mafia (nor will he call me mafia), but he's content voting me, and perhaps even lynching me, as punishment for "poor play". This is the second time he's mentioned this exact reasoning, yet it now comes with a vote attached as other players begin to jump on the wagon. Coincidence? WoS will join Corazon in an exposition post later on. Also joining them will be the surprise secret guest, whom I will push a lynch on! Because he's mafia! Oh rearry yamato? Show me who else was on the yamato wagon when I 'jumped on.' Plenty of people had called me mafia or stated suspicion of me by the time you decided to vote for me. But still, the main point is just how scummy your reasoning is. You don't even necessarily think, that how i'm playing makes me mafia, you just want to lynch me for it. It sounds like a circular way for a mafia player to justify voting for a player they know is town. Plus, I'm apparently your only read in this game and the rest of your posts have been extraordinarily useless, as Rayn has been nice enough to point out. My posts have not in any way been extraordinarily useless. I have given reads on multiple people (WBG/fuba/iamp/Cora), commented on cases and done a shit ton more than you have. Don't you DARE lecture me on usefulness just because you've finally decided to show your ass up and actually play the game. So scumteam is me Cora and surprise guest? GG guys, we'd better concede, yamato wins.
Patronizing me is useless. You're not going to bait me into arguing with you.
Also, you're repeatedly dodging the fact that you have shit reason for voting me. Good stuff.
|
Cry about it.
I'm off to bed.
|
still want to lynch wos lol. im pretty much going to leave my vote on him for the whole game until he gets lynched.
|
On January 08 2014 15:34 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 15:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:On January 08 2014 15:12 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 15:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
You are either lazy or scum and you should stop being lazy if you are town. Wat. How exactly am I lazy aside from asking you to link a case for me? I don't think I've been lazy in the slightest. And I'm not following where the 'or scum' comes from either. Because town players are interested in figuring out stuff and commenting on most interesting topics there are in the thread. Regardless of your alignment you either think my case is not good or for some other reason you did not want to comment on it. When i specifically asked you to comment on it you didn't even remember the case and wanted me to point out where the case was. That suggests to me you are not reading the thread closely (as you did not remember the case at all) which means you are lazy, or that you for some reason didn't want to either +1 my case or tell me you think the case is bad or does not make thrawn mafia. If it is "for some reason" i can't think of a townie reason and if you were not lazy i think you are scum. Your bias because you noticed I didn't specifically comment on your case or remember it doesn't make me scum OR lazy. How do I have to point that out to you? Like wtf is this? Just because I don't comment or agree with you I immediately must be working against you?
Lemme try to be as clear as possible as i think you have misuderstood something.
Here's what happened. I made a case on thrawn. you did not comment on it in any way. That's not necessarily alignment indicative, but i wanted to know what you thought about the case because it helps me in getting a better read on you and to some extent on thrawn by proxy, as i could be making a bad case, but in any way i think my case is important because otherwise i would not have made it.
I am expecting one of three different answers:
1) "I think your case is good, i agree with it."
In this case you are probably scum because if you thought the case was good then why did i need to prod you into answering it in the first place?
2) "I think your case is not good, i disagree with it because of XYZ."
In this case i consider if your reasons for debunking my case are good enough which makes you town, or if they are bullshit in which case you are scum.
3) "What case?"
In this case you are clearly not reading the thread properly because by default, if you have read the thread, you would remember i have made a case on thrawn. This could be because you are lazy and just didn't read the thread or you are mafia and for some reason are avoiding to comment on the case.
The answer you gave me was (3). Okay, next thing i want to know is if you are lazy or scum. I point out where the case is and ask you to comment on it. Then we go back to (1) or (2), with same outcomes, but with a difference that if you give answer (1) you are definitely scum because townies never forget there was a good case in thread and not comment on it. If you give answer (2) i don't know if you are scum or town, because i can't be sure if you were just lazy or if you are lying about not reading properly and just did not want to comment on it.
So, my conclusion is, that you were lazy or that you are bullshitting and you are mafia. It's impossible to tell which one is true. However, i told you to not be lazy any more if you are town because that's not how townies should play, so if you are lazy in the future i am inclined to think you are not playing towards town's win condition and are scum.
If you do scummy stuff in the future this argument between us should be revisited and re-examined and judged amongst other things you have done in this game. Right now it is a null tell.
That's my thought process. Hope you understand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
