II Titanic Mini Mafia

On July 27 2013 10:24 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:
Alright men. I have successfully managed to get on board, and I have a feeling that the captain of this ship is a complete imbecile and needs to be replaced. Therefore, I plan to democratically elect myself to be captain.

##Captain: Captain Jack Sparrow

I promise you that good things will happen if you all do this. What could go wrong? I'm Captain Jack Sparrow!

On another note, lynching a lurker sounds like a great plan if we all want to get thrown off the boat. I don't want to get thrown off the boat, I'm a wanted man in the water, and it's always really cold, and there's no rum. But worse of all, there is no rum out in the middle of nowhere. So I think Oatsmaster has to try a bit harder to come up with a half-functioning plan.

On December 10 2013 16:03 xigxag wrote:


Like these high quality posts which were all attempts at looking like he was doing something. And not at all similar to how he has been posting this game?

On December 10 2013 16:34 xigxag wrote:


Why do you prefer a policy lynch on Alakaslam over an attempt to lynch scum. What benefit do you see town gaining from this policy lynch over an honest attempt to find scum.

On December 10 2013 09:15 VayneAuthority wrote:
I would rather enjoy myself and lose then not enjoy it, hence why I am voting you alakaslam, scum or not. I do not care about lynching scum if im not having fun in the first place, that comes first.

On December 10 2013 16:52 xigxag wrote:


So why did you bring it up as a comparison? What is it you were trying to convey with the reference to that game and immediate retraction of the same.

Look Plutarch. I would like to think you are scum for this but I don't. Which means you are trying to incite an angry response from me to see how genuine my emotions feel. Cool. Since you seem town and I am town can I suggest that if you truly think I am scum you don't post useless one liners about it. They damage thread atmosphere and will not help an eventual town victory. If you truly think I am scum make a case and convince others. While you do that I am going to continue to try to figure out if what Vayne is doing is because he is scum or because I have no idea how his brain works.

On December 11 2013 05:29 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Got any reads?

On December 11 2013 10:32 Holyflare wrote:


That's what I'm getting at, since we called him out on hit he actually switched his playstyle to a more coherent one and contributed and then reverted back to the old play intertwined with it. I see that as more of a wanting to use a strategy to discover information than survival tactics.

On December 11 2013 10:48 Holyflare wrote:


Well I'd agree but the last 2 pages of his filter are coherent and thoughts, it is only that last post that was quoted that was an out of the blue revert but as LSB said that was to illicit a reaction out of someone (stop ruining plans lsb)! So, in actuality he is contributing - or more to the fact that he isn't being detrimental like he was at the start.

On December 11 2013 11:20 Holyflare wrote:





Do scum admit they are winging everything they say?



If anything it looks like slam is genuinely in a struggle to get to grips with how to recover back to townie status. I like his general direction from the end of page 3 to now. He is showing that he is willing to drop his previous state to get into the game rather than continue with an act that nobody liked. While certain aspects need to be polished, I don't think he's a great lynch for today.

On December 11 2013 13:29 Pandain wrote:

It's scummy as shit if you aren't clearly aggravated and have reads, actual reads, like holy has.

We are 46 pages in, one guy out of 18 isn't a big deal and he's probably town

Coming from someone who is often the target of policy lynches I'm surprised at your approach

On December 12 2013 02:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:

That's actually quite an interesting comment Vayne.
What you very well know is that even if Slam doesn't get lynched he will most likely get shot on N1. Why would you not help get rid of him as scum, regardless of his alignment?

On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.

On December 12 2013 02:27 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Is there that much of a difference between him making shitposts so he can't be read and you refusing to play or give your thoughts on anyone?

You're being just as useless.

On December 12 2013 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:

In this game the thread sentiment actually suggests vigi's WILL shoot useless people. Let's consider a scenario where you are scum.

If Slam is scum you:
1) can reasonably assume a vigi will shoot him on N1 anyways so
2) when you lynch him instead you gain towncredit
3) even if you don't succeed, you gain town credit when he flips red
4) you don't need to contribute anything useful

If Slam is town you:
1) can't be held responsible for anything scummy because it's a pro-town thing to suggest a policy lynch on him anyways
2) you don't need to contribute anything useful

So, why again is it unreasonable to assume you would vouch for his lynch as mafia?

On December 12 2013 02:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Fair enough, just wanted to be sure what you meant.
Are you suggesting Spaghetticus is town?

On December 12 2013 02:20 VayneAuthority wrote:




I've already pretty much answered all of this

On December 12 2013 03:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Dude i am not scum. You know i like to vote and pressure people with voting. You just left the statement unanswered and claimed you will not post any more rayn and kush iare scum ggnore. What does that accomplish?

I don't care about Slam. He'll get vigged unless the vigi is retarded. I would like you to explain the statement because i really do not understand why you did say what you did. Also could you tell who is mafia?

On December 12 2013 03:51 Grackaroni wrote:

it is a contradiction if you say you are town for getting rid of the 4th mafia and that you would leave him in as scum. Then you admit that you would get rid of him because you like a real game. Night killing him for the hell of it is no different than lynching him for the hell of it when you could get a better lynch from 'dumping your vote on spaghetti"

On December 12 2013 04:01 JarJarDrinks wrote:

"He adds another scumplayer to my team, why would I want to get rid of him ever?"

That's your quote right there bud. Explain why you'd want to nightkill a scumplayer if you were scum. Or don't since like you said: You'd never want to get rid of him ever.

That's pretty definate statement right there. Saying that you would NK him as scum is a 100% contradiction. You're saying that Slam is a scum asset that scum would want to stay in the game no matter what.

On December 12 2013 06:09 Alakaslam wrote:

The explosion was my doing, I take responsibility. I threw gas from my hand and it cloned back and burned me.

Thou art so disgruntled that you are equally aiding scum. How does this fact evade you?

On December 12 2013 12:58 Plutarch wrote:


A little. He seemed to bandwagon easily and without much justification at the end of the day.

On December 12 2013 13:08 Plutarch wrote:


He also afk's as scum as you should well know by being scum with him in Les Mafia.

On December 12 2013 04:10 VayneAuthority wrote:


you have down syndrome. If I said that and then night killed him you would think im town as a result. hence the difference between seeing and not seeing. Go away.

On December 08 2013 13:38 Holyflare wrote:
I dunno, a lot of people in this game seemed to pick up on "scum tells" that aren't real scum tells. Like misrepresenting someone isn't a tell, it's just being forgetful or misunderstanding sometimes. It's one thing to lie but to lie about something so obviously fact checkable is a thing i don't think scums would ever do.

On December 13 2013 06:21 JarJarDrinks wrote:
You do realize that Downs Syndrome is an affliction that affects real people. Maybe you should consider the possibility that some of the people reading this has friends or family that are affected by it before you starting throwing it around as a insult. Don't be so ignorant.

On December 13 2013 13:45 Plutarch wrote:
What do you two think of LSB?

On December 14 2013 04:55 JarJarDrinks wrote:

OK, but it specifically said "Shot by an ASS-bullet".

So basically, there were 2 deaths. One says that the person was vig-killed, the other says the person was SK-killed.

Why would you not assume that a person killed by mafia would get a similiar cause of death?

On December 14 2013 05:01 Grackaroni wrote:

This is what he is saying:
hosts tells us vig shot HF from the kill flavor
hosts tells us SK shot bum from the kill flavor.
Why wouldn't the hosts tell us who mafia shot? (I think they would.)

On December 11 2013 13:45 VayneAuthority wrote:
I find holy's reasoning or lack of it townie considering I found him to be a paranoid player from the time to die scum qt. he would not let something like that tarnish his image as scum. He just spent pages arguing against a slam lynch and then opts to vote him. does he do that as scum? doubtful.

On December 14 2013 05:07 JarJarDrinks wrote:

I PMed the host and they confirmed. So believe me when I say that the NK could have meant doublestacked. Which means Vayne knew that when he'd have no reason to.

On December 14 2013 05:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Like i know you think he is scum and one of me/Artanis, but i don't know why you think he is scum.

On December 15 2013 05:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:

...???

I don't think LSB is scum. What do you think will happen on D3 if we lynch LSB and he flips town?

On December 15 2013 05:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:

It does not make him town. It does not make him scum either.
Look at what you are doing atm, the same thing, voting for him and not considering other options because it might kill you.

I don't like the fact everyone here right now thinks purple is scummy but noone wants to vote for him.
We have like ~8 ppl here ugh.. This lynch does not look good imo. :/

On December 15 2013 05:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:

You will not get lynched.
I'll make sure of it.

Now vote for purple, if the vote is not enough we switch to LSB. but purple is scum.

On December 15 2013 05:54 Alakaslam wrote:

Making sure if it is equal between vayne and LSB it winds up being vayne. I would prefer purple and cig.

On December 12 2013 02:14 purpletrator wrote:
hey kush, why did/do you have me as green?

On December 15 2013 06:25 Artanis[Xp] wrote:

Claiming is terrible until a cop checks scum. The cop should just hint in his reads if he finds town players.

On December 15 2013 06:27 JarJarDrinks wrote:

You think the whole smurf vote thing between them was contrived?

On December 15 2013 05:58 purpletrator wrote:
what defense could i have?

Reads:
Rayn xata lsb sidesprang

On December 15 2013 06:31 Alakaslam wrote:

Tried to make sure you were lynched before LSB if it was gonna be those wagons. I didn't have confidence in Rayne, his word is now strong with me.

On December 15 2013 06:02 VayneAuthority wrote:


and then you and purple vote to try and kill me.

On December 16 2013 03:46 kushm4sta wrote:
yeah but what you did was terrible regardless of if it was a joke

On December 16 2013 05:47 kushm4sta wrote:
he had to do it so you woulnd't look ultra scummy

On December 16 2013 11:28 Alakaslam wrote:

What am I to do sir, the FoS of the Blazinghand is upon thee!

Indeed I fear I am next if you are town. Whatever they say about LSB.

How on earth is him pointing out that this is a policy lynch a "scum tell"?

On December 22 2013 12:52 DarthPunk wrote:


I <3 you even if you called me bad and a cum dumpster.