• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:49
CEST 16:49
KST 23:49
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview25Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL46Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30
Community News
[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates7GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th12Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0EWC 2025 Regional Qualifier Results26Code S RO12 Results + RO8 Groups (2025 Season 2)3
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Magnus Carlsen and Fabi review Clem's chess game. BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th
Tourneys
Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Cheeseadelphia 2025 - Open Bracket LAN!
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void
Brood War
General
Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans? BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion I made an ASL quiz [BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 2 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 1
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread What do you want from future RTS games? Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Cognitive styles x game perf…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Poker
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 26790 users

II Titanic Mini Mafia

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Normal
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
November 25 2013 13:52 GMT
#21
/in
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 05 2013 16:07 GMT
#69
On December 05 2013 20:13 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
I won't have much time before monday to spend on this game, so I'd prefer it to start then.

x2
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 10 2013 04:49 GMT
#399
K, I'm here for a bit before sleep. I'll be here all day tomorrow but gonna post my thoughts on some stuff first:


On December 10 2013 10:10 Holyflare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 10 2013 09:42 sidesprang wrote:
Ok, so a lot of things going on. I agree we should not let lurkers stay silent, and should poke anyone that stays silent for to long. But there is a lot of value in not spamming down the thread if you are town, that will only make the scummy post harder to see. I'm mainly looking at you Xatalos, as you are on your third page in filter with like half of the post being oneliners. Even if town you will be detrimental to the town if you keep this up! There are others aswell, just used you as an example.


--------

About Cora there are a few things I did not like and caught my eye. His opening post is not good, and if he's mafia hes basically just buying himself an excuse to lurk for day 1 and then come out day 2 and bring chaos onto the town.

He also deflected a lot in his defence and basically just said "look at X he's scummier than me".

And lastly he asked for people to vote for him if they found him scummy, which is very Anti-Town.


I do not feel cora is mafia yet at least, but definetly worth to look at.


-------

@Kish, can anyone that have played with him earlier say something about how he plays. He is deffo playing the most anti town atm, but he's also doing it on purpose which is frustrating.




I really really do not like this post as an entry post:

A) Sheeps everthing I have mentioned on Cora.
B) Uses a big chunk of his entry post saying why cora is displaying mafia associated traits but won't vote him yet?
C) Mentions Xatalos in a completely non-inquisitive manner, no justification on a read based on Xan's posts or anything.

Agree completly w/ holy here. I had the same thoughts reading it. Also worth mentioning is how that first paragraph says absolutely nothing. Just obvious stuff like lurking is bad and people shouldn't spam. It's not like he's using it to call out Xatalos since he says he's just using him as an example. It's just a safe non-confrontational post.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 10 2013 04:56 GMT
#403
Also I think the case on cora isn't very good. Most of it seems to stem from his opening post which seemed just fine to me. He said he wants to pressure lurkers and he said he wasn't gonna be super active for two days. People are making it like it's a complete contradiction when it really isn't. If he was actually lurking then maybe you could make a case.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 10 2013 05:05 GMT
#406
On December 10 2013 08:32 Spaghetticus wrote:
I am not shifting my vote until slam does something useful to make up for his spam. I'm giving him until 6pm my time (7.5 hours from now) to do so or my vote is not changing at all regardless of anything that comes afterwards.

Pressure? yes.
Policy? yes.
Serious? yes.

Very scummy post. You're actually saying that you may sit on your vote regardless of what happens in the thread? Basically giving yourself an built-in excuse to make your vote not matter (and unable to be analyzed) if slam isn't one of the leading wagons?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 10 2013 05:29 GMT
#409
FOSing Xatalos. I agree w/ the whole flinging poo analysis. And this post:
On December 10 2013 07:10 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 10 2013 07:06 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 10 2013 07:04 Alakaslam wrote:
On December 10 2013 07:00 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
I don't like Xatalos right now and I'm curious if anyone sees what I see before I say why.

Gladly oblige.

Quick to hop on someone really really unreasonably early and with not the greatest logic in the world?

My behavior right off is worse but he votes cora

I am so bad I am useful to scum in the lategame, so he would rather mislynch cora who though not perfect, is definitely better at being town than me.

Probably not exactly your point but I think you are also seeing the quick to lynch attitude. And the slightly unreasonable aggressiveness.

I'm seeing a scattershot that's flinging poo everywhere and found someone to whom it will stick. I don't feel like he's trying to discern anyone's alignment, but rather start chaos and find a nice lynch target.
##Vote Xatalos


Well, that's one way to look at it. The other is that I'm always relatively aggressive as town.

Just really seems like he's trying to explain how he's trying to play to his town meta and he's pissed that Artan isn't seeing it that way.


I'm also noticing that he's giving alot of his reads a qualifier. A bunch of "this guy is scummy but he could be town too" or vice versa.

Check these:
On December 10 2013 07:30 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 10 2013 07:26 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 10 2013 07:24 Xatalos wrote:
On December 10 2013 07:16 Spaghetticus wrote:
Xatalos do you think Artanis' point about you scatter-shotting is a good one? Artanis has a good eye.


Maybe I ought to calm down a bit. However, I'm tired of slow first days. It feels good to get something going fast.

Do you think my pressure on you is indicative of my alignment?


Hard to say. I'd say slightly leaning town based on the fact that you're apparently trying to unravel my alignment. But I think you're a veteran player? How many games have you played? In that sense, it could possibly be almost anything.

On December 10 2013 07:36 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 10 2013 07:33 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Oh wait I can just click profile here. 15.


OK. Well, it's definitely possible that this is a "play" to get town credit. But then again, the more likely scenario is that you're town and trying to figure out the game. Your experience makes the former option more likely, but still less likely than the later option, I'd say.

On December 10 2013 08:09 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 10 2013 08:01 Holyflare wrote:
On December 10 2013 07:42 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 10 2013 07:36 LSB wrote:
On December 10 2013 07:24 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 10 2013 07:21 LSB wrote:
On December 10 2013 07:19 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 10 2013 07:17 LSB wrote:
I think we need to calm down. My "townie on townie day 1 shitstorm" sense is tingling.

That speaking, oddly enough it does encourage a Xatalos lynch

Whom do you feel are townies from this and why? It hasn't really been one on one. It's been HF and Xatalos against Cora, and myself, Alakaslam and you against Xatalos. If you feel it's townie on townie, then you'd think Xatalos was town.

So far I think I am townie, I haven't really thought past that. I just don't think this day 1 attitude is gonna be very productive.

The whole entire Xatalos suspicion does require a meta read on Xatalos to see if he is brilliant enough to try for the plan on day 1, or does he just play like this.

I just skimmed through the filter he linked and I don't think it looks like the start of this game at all. He's far more aggressive here. What were you trying to say exactly with your initial post if you didn't mean to give anyone a town read but yourself? I'm confused. I don't think a plan other than "starting shit" is required for scum. That's always a good thing.

In my opinion natural scum play is to stay low, especially on day 1, the town tends to self destruct anyways day 1. This whole entire "starting shit" strat is actually pretty good, even though it is counterintuitive to the idea of trying to not draw attention. Thus I assumed this strat is not very obvious, especially since I personally never considered it.

This is all pure speculation. Something more grounded is that Xatalos is definably acting very different from before, and in my eyes less of a townie

I don't feel like Xatalos put himself in the spotlight as much as trying to put others in the spotlight. Corazon put himself in the spotlight without any scum gain. When you look at his post from a scum point of view, it doesn't make sense for them to make it. I can see a scum agenda behind Xatalos' posts. That said, I do like his view on my pressure on him in that it was nuanced rather than trying to score town points. The rest of the day should provide more information.
On December 10 2013 07:36 Holyflare wrote:
Nobody going to discuss cora's mindset or are you going to dismiss it outright for xantos discussion some more?

On December 10 2013 06:52 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Holy, I don't feel like his response is that different. I also don't think he'd put himself out there so much at the start of the game. No reason to draw attention to yourself like that as scum.


Given you quoted me I take it you'd like a response from me? I don't find Corazon scummy at this point in time because he drew attention to himself without any scum benefit.


Is it not also a scum mindset to heavily defend themselves when attacked, unnaturally so? Also while defending themselves to then deflect upon another person? Why are you only looking for the people that are "starting shit"? I only know a few scum that play that way. Have you any scum meta on Xatalos that suggests he plays like he is?

I don't like how you're so dismissive over cora without discussion when with Xantos you skim the filters to discuss him further.

On December 10 2013 06:52 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Holy, I don't feel like his response is that different. I also don't think he'd put himself out there so much at the start of the game. No reason to draw attention to yourself like that as scum.


On December 10 2013 07:24 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 10 2013 07:21 LSB wrote:
On December 10 2013 07:19 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 10 2013 07:17 LSB wrote:
I think we need to calm down. My "townie on townie day 1 shitstorm" sense is tingling.

That speaking, oddly enough it does encourage a Xatalos lynch

Whom do you feel are townies from this and why? It hasn't really been one on one. It's been HF and Xatalos against Cora, and myself, Alakaslam and you against Xatalos. If you feel it's townie on townie, then you'd think Xatalos was town.

So far I think I am townie, I haven't really thought past that. I just don't think this day 1 attitude is gonna be very productive.

The whole entire Xatalos suspicion does require a meta read on Xatalos to see if he is brilliant enough to try for the plan on day 1, or does he just play like this.

I just skimmed through the filter he linked and I don't think it looks like the start of this game at all. He's far more aggressive here. What were you trying to say exactly with your initial post if you didn't mean to give anyone a town read but yourself? I'm confused. I don't think a plan other than "starting shit" is required for scum. That's always a good thing.


Look at the difference between these two points - on the one hand (cora) is dismissed by saying "I don't think scum plays that way" whereas the second (Xatalos) is "I have skimmed it briefly and think it's different because X,Y,Z. Question, question.



_____________________________

In regards to the point that you made about cora, I don't think he's "putting himself out there" like you suggest, he said that he couldn't dedicate some time towards the game but would still post actively and got picked up on it and was like OMGNUUWRONGRAWRRR!!!!!! and then didn't discuss why with people further or indicate that he had reads on other people because of what happened. He left the thread and then returned when people started mentioning Xatalos and piggybacked upon that with no new reasoning other than what people had said before. He mentions how people in the thread were piggybacking previously (me, etc.) and had qualms with them but then does the same thing here:

On December 10 2013 07:10 Corazon wrote:
I do feel like Slam was right as well. If Xatalos was using good logic and pushing me like a townie, I wouldn't have a problem with him. However, he is using faulty logic on purpose and trying to pass it off as correct when in fact his conclusions only come about because he needs to fake pressure on me.


This is contradictary with his previous approach of disliking people that piggybacking and is essentially +1ing another players points.





Take this in B2B for example, people had a bad read on him and he DISCUSSED why it was bad:
On November 21 2013 01:00 Corazon wrote:
When did I say that sciberia was bad town? Please find a post where I said he was bad town.

I didn't vote for sciberia because 0% of wagons in the first 2 hours of a game actually get to the deadline? None. What is the point of vote-jumping? It just allows people to skim my cases once they see the bold vote and only really look at it once it's my turn to be under the gun. Voting for people at this stage is pretty useless because it's not going to get a lynch going. I guarantee you that our reads and opinions are going to change before the deadline and it's useless to lock yourself in (or at least making a statement saying you are going to) 2 hours into a game.

That case was confirmation bias because you took 1-2 decent points about me (which alone are not enough to justify a vote or my lynching) and then supplemented them with saying "Corazon is doing stuff that he always does in every game, he has to be scum for it in this one".


He mentions WHY the case was bad etc etc, discusses it and outlines why he thinks it was bad croming from X player. Where is that here? It was a dissmissal of a case from me and a sheep onto townish consesus Xatalos.


__________________________________________

I don't like how these things are most definitely brushed off for simplicity that "I don't think scum do this" when there is a body of evidence that suggests a player does not play like this. Vote Cora for best lynch.


These are definitely some good points. It's surely premature to declare Corazon as today's lynch, but it would be a good pick in the current situation.

I dislike Artanis's dismissal of Corazon's play as well, but I doubt Artanis and Corazon would be scum together. It would seem risky to make a connection like that. That's WIFOM, though.

On December 10 2013 08:16 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 10 2013 08:15 Alakaslam wrote:
On December 10 2013 08:12 Xatalos wrote:
On December 10 2013 08:04 Spaghetticus wrote:
Slam is actively obfuscating his intentions with spam. I don't like.

Corazon is a candidate for lynch day one, I'm waiting to see how he responds.

I am suspicious of you, but I think that is more a product of you being in the spotlight rather than any real problems I've got with you so far. I will continue to pay attention to your responses.


Hmm, okay. When you say you don't "like", do you mean as in scummy or annoying?

Dunno, Thanatos.

What do you think?


Judging by his vote, probably scummy. But it could be just an empty vote, I guess.

On December 10 2013 08:25 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 10 2013 08:20 Alakaslam wrote:
On December 10 2013 08:16 Xatalos wrote:
On December 10 2013 08:15 Alakaslam wrote:
On December 10 2013 08:12 Xatalos wrote:
On December 10 2013 08:04 Spaghetticus wrote:
Slam is actively obfuscating his intentions with spam. I don't like.

Corazon is a candidate for lynch day one, I'm waiting to see how he responds.

I am suspicious of you, but I think that is more a product of you being in the spotlight rather than any real problems I've got with you so far. I will continue to pay attention to your responses.


Hmm, okay. When you say you don't "like", do you mean as in scummy or annoying?

Dunno, Thanatos.

What do you think?


Judging by his vote, probably scummy. But it could be just an empty vote, I guess.

Be not dodging the question as askt

What do you think?


I think you're being suicidal if you're scum, so it's a bit more likely that you're town, but overall somewhat null so far.

Does he have any reads he's confident about?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 10 2013 15:16 GMT
#727
On December 10 2013 14:05 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 10 2013 08:32 Spaghetticus wrote:
I am not shifting my vote until slam does something useful to make up for his spam. I'm giving him until 6pm my time (7.5 hours from now) to do so or my vote is not changing at all regardless of anything that comes afterwards.

Pressure? yes.
Policy? yes.
Serious? yes.

Very scummy post. You're actually saying that you may sit on your vote regardless of what happens in the thread? Basically giving yourself an built-in excuse to make your vote not matter (and unable to be analyzed) if slam isn't one of the leading wagons?

So never got an answer to this Spag. And how come when you finally came back to the thread, you totally ignore slam? Did you find his posts in that time to be usefull?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 10 2013 15:31 GMT
#734
On December 10 2013 09:42 sidesprang wrote:
And lastly he asked for people to vote for him if they found him scummy, which is very Anti-Town.

OK this sentence just reeks of a scum mindset w/ the knowledge that cora is town. Because yes, asking someone to vote for yourself is anti-town when you are actually town. But if you're scum then it's just a kinda dumb, ballsy move. But it isn't anti-town.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 10 2013 15:40 GMT
#737
On December 11 2013 00:30 Spaghetticus wrote:
Why do you think it more scummy that I would policy vote scummy play, than someone effortfully attempting to break the too scummy to be scum barrier?
The scummy part is what I bolded. Saying that your vote "is not changing at all regardless of anything that comes afterwards." is what's scummy.

Like, what if nobody else is voting slam close to the deadline? Are you planning on wasting it and leaving it on him?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 10 2013 15:58 GMT
#742
On December 11 2013 00:46 Spaghetticus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 11 2013 00:40 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 11 2013 00:30 Spaghetticus wrote:
Why do you think it more scummy that I would policy vote scummy play, than someone effortfully attempting to break the too scummy to be scum barrier?
The scummy part is what I bolded. Saying that your vote "is not changing at all regardless of anything that comes afterwards." is what's scummy.

Like, what if nobody else is voting slam close to the deadline? Are you planning on wasting it and leaving it on him?


I don't see the issue. Well... I see it, but I don't see why you see it as such a big deal. It's sort of a minor offense, considering the caliber of misdemeanor hoodie-swaggering around the thread.
You keep pussyfooting around my question w/o giving me a direct answer. So I'm gonna say that this is basically you saying: YES, you plan on wasting your vote if slam isn't one of the leading wagons.

Feel free to correct me if I'm misinterpreting.

I don't understand how you can say that you don't see that as a big deal.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 10 2013 16:33 GMT
#754
On December 11 2013 01:17 Spaghetticus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 11 2013 00:58 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 11 2013 00:46 Spaghetticus wrote:
On December 11 2013 00:40 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 11 2013 00:30 Spaghetticus wrote:
Why do you think it more scummy that I would policy vote scummy play, than someone effortfully attempting to break the too scummy to be scum barrier?
The scummy part is what I bolded. Saying that your vote "is not changing at all regardless of anything that comes afterwards." is what's scummy.

Like, what if nobody else is voting slam close to the deadline? Are you planning on wasting it and leaving it on him?


I don't see the issue. Well... I see it, but I don't see why you see it as such a big deal. It's sort of a minor offense, considering the caliber of misdemeanor hoodie-swaggering around the thread.
You keep pussyfooting around my question w/o giving me a direct answer. So I'm gonna say that this is basically you saying: YES, you plan on wasting your vote if slam isn't one of the leading wagons.

Feel free to correct me if I'm misinterpreting.

I don't understand how you can say that you don't see that as a big deal.


Your play, you are niggling over and over on a thing that doesn't feel right to you. You are self confident in a non-scum way "lol look at him squirm" since inciting a big fight with a townie is counter productive to scum agenda and I am a big fan of your answer when I asked you why you didn't build up a case you didn't flounder you simply stated that you didn't know what was right, only what was wrong. It suggested someone who was objectively reading cases and, if they had an issue with that case, making the issue known. All in all it seems likely that you are town. If you are scum you are one of the top scum players I've ever seen. So I'm going to assume that ockham had it right and you are town.

+ Show Spoiler +

I plagiarised the above paragraph on the offchance Slam is a lazy town. I don't want him to click the spoiler and thought it less likely if there was more volume to my post, and if it felt like something he'd read before.

FFS. How am I supposed to pressure someone into playing the game if you won't leave me alone? I was posturing to get him to actually do something. Maybe he won't bother clicking the spoiler... He probably will. The vote is a non-issue. Votes don't mean anything until someone actually hangs. If you are town, you should have let me do this then jumped me D2. The amount of posturing bullshit that goes on and you decide to tunnel mine... You have my attention now, this doesn't seem to have been conducted with a townie mind-set.

OK, but it's unnecessary. If he doesn't stop playing that way. Then he'll get vigged or lynched. Your vote should be enough. The whole thing about not moving it no matter what isn't needed.

The reason I wanted to get you to take a firm stance is because if you're scum, then come deadline time, you have a conveinient excuse to not vote if it doesn't look like your team needs it. And if your vote is needed then you can go ahead and say that you were just "posturing to get [slam] to actually do something".

So sorry if you're town and I ruined your plan but I think it's important to know that you are taking responsibility for where your vote will end up.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 10 2013 17:04 GMT
#759
On December 11 2013 01:49 Spaghetticus wrote:
Yes, but if I'm scum I'll be even more accountable once I've actually committed an action like that, and you have more chance of catching me.
Did you read what I wrote? My whole point was that you could either stick w/ your stance or change it and both would look fine for you. I made you commit ahead of time so you couldn't base your decision on who the main wagons were gonna be @ the deadline.

On December 11 2013 01:49 Spaghetticus wrote:
I think it's fair to say that the bulk of your contribution is getting me to explain some meaningless D1 play. You're a more experienced player than I, what would your opinion be if someone else had done the same as you have? Would you think them red?
Silly question. Obviously I don't think my play is scummy.

On December 11 2013 01:49 Spaghetticus wrote:
Do you think me red? If so, have you any reason other than the possibility that I was looking to negate my vote?
I think you look better now that you admitted that you're not gonna keep your vote locked.

[B]On December 11 2013 01:49 Spaghetticus wrote:[/B
]Do you have any other reads?
I've posted reads. Is there someone specific you'd like me to comment on?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 10 2013 17:23 GMT
#766
On December 11 2013 02:14 Spaghetticus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 11 2013 02:04 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 11 2013 01:49 Spaghetticus wrote:
Yes, but if I'm scum I'll be even more accountable once I've actually committed an action like that, and you have more chance of catching me.
Did you read what I wrote? My whole point was that you could either stick w/ your stance or change it and both would look fine for you. I made you commit ahead of time so you couldn't base your decision on who the main wagons were gonna be @ the deadline.

On December 11 2013 01:49 Spaghetticus wrote:
I think it's fair to say that the bulk of your contribution is getting me to explain some meaningless D1 play. You're a more experienced player than I, what would your opinion be if someone else had done the same as you have? Would you think them red?
Silly question. Obviously I don't think my play is scummy.

On December 11 2013 01:49 Spaghetticus wrote:
Do you think me red? If so, have you any reason other than the possibility that I was looking to negate my vote?
I think you look better now that you admitted that you're not gonna keep your vote locked.

[B]On December 11 2013 01:49 Spaghetticus wrote:[/B
]Do you have any other reads?
I've posted reads. Is there someone specific you'd like me to comment on?


Really? You don't think a 10post filter scummy at this point? You don't think zeroing in on one relevant but minor detail for half of these isn't worth talking about?

You've made other reads? Would you mind copy-pasting them in their entirety for dramatic effect? (it shouldn't take long)
No, a 10 post filter isn't scummy at this point. People can post @ different times of the day. when I'm @ work (right now) is when I'm most available. Furthermore I think my posts all have pretty good content. It's not like I'm posting spammy one-liners.

Yes, I think zeroing in a minor detail is scummy. I don't think what I was zeroing in on was minor. You obviously disagree. And if you gave me your simple answer when I asked for it, I wouldn't have mentioned it again.

You can click my filter if want the reads I've already made.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 10 2013 18:03 GMT
#785
On December 11 2013 02:44 kushm4sta wrote:
another post from bum with 0 town indicative content.
Why is speghetti scum?
Mind answering this bum?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 10 2013 18:53 GMT
#814
On December 11 2013 00:31 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 10 2013 09:42 sidesprang wrote:
And lastly he asked for people to vote for him if they found him scummy, which is very Anti-Town.

OK this sentence just reeks of a scum mindset w/ the knowledge that cora is town. Because yes, asking someone to vote for yourself is anti-town when you are actually town. But if you're scum then it's just a kinda dumb, ballsy move. But it isn't anti-town.

Any comments on this? @ least would like to hear what people think of sidespring.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 10 2013 19:12 GMT
#821
On December 11 2013 03:56 kushm4sta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 11 2013 03:53 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 11 2013 00:31 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 10 2013 09:42 sidesprang wrote:
And lastly he asked for people to vote for him if they found him scummy, which is very Anti-Town.

OK this sentence just reeks of a scum mindset w/ the knowledge that cora is town. Because yes, asking someone to vote for yourself is anti-town when you are actually town. But if you're scum then it's just a kinda dumb, ballsy move. But it isn't anti-town.

Any comments on this? @ least would like to hear what people think of sidespring.


i think it's equally dumb as either alignment, 100% alignment neutral. What is your point sir?

btw voting you now based on on your scummy posting pattern.
Also you bring up your shit point and want people to comment on it like its gold.

##unvote
##vote jarjar

My point was that I wanted to know if anyone had comments on it and I wanted to know people thought of sidespring. Pretty sure that was implied.

I'm reading sidespring as scum and would like to know if other people are as well.

You think that asking people vote for yourself is alignment nuetral? Great, I agree that a person doing that doesn't help tell you what their alignment is.

What I'm saying though is that it's anti-(whatever alignment that person is). So to say it's anti-town seems to imply that the person saying it is town.

So before you call my point shit, make sure you understand what I'm saying.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 10 2013 19:39 GMT
#825
On December 11 2013 04:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
JJD i don't think that's alignment indicative. Mafia can be (and actually is) anti-town too.
What do you think of Grack & purple?

Grack isn't scummy to me. Null I'd say.

Leaning scum on Purple after a reread. His whole thing w/ "asking if LSB wanted him to reveal his identity and then calling him scum when he says sure" seems contrived to me. Like I'm not sure why he voted LSB (or unvoted him for that matter) in the first place.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 10 2013 20:29 GMT
#838
On December 11 2013 05:26 VayneAuthority wrote:
remember that pandain is in college and probably taking finals right now, so I expect him to be pretty afk regardless of alignment
Got any reads?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 10 2013 20:47 GMT
#846
On December 11 2013 05:37 sidesprang wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 11 2013 04:12 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 11 2013 03:56 kushm4sta wrote:
On December 11 2013 03:53 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 11 2013 00:31 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 10 2013 09:42 sidesprang wrote:
And lastly he asked for people to vote for him if they found him scummy, which is very Anti-Town.

OK this sentence just reeks of a scum mindset w/ the knowledge that cora is town. Because yes, asking someone to vote for yourself is anti-town when you are actually town. But if you're scum then it's just a kinda dumb, ballsy move. But it isn't anti-town.

Any comments on this? @ least would like to hear what people think of sidespring.


i think it's equally dumb as either alignment, 100% alignment neutral. What is your point sir?

btw voting you now based on on your scummy posting pattern.
Also you bring up your shit point and want people to comment on it like its gold.

##unvote
##vote jarjar

My point was that I wanted to know if anyone had comments on it and I wanted to know people thought of sidespring. Pretty sure that was implied.

I'm reading sidespring as scum and would like to know if other people are as well.

You think that asking people vote for yourself is alignment nuetral? Great, I agree that a person doing that doesn't help tell you what their alignment is.

What I'm saying though is that it's anti-(whatever alignment that person is). So to say it's anti-town seems to imply that the person saying it is town.

So before you call my point shit, make sure you understand what I'm saying.


Exactly I currently view everyone as town, people have done scummy things. But no one are scum In my eyes yet, if so I would have voted for em. So why I would phrase that in any other way I really do not know, and tbh you just seem desperate to find something that is not there.

This sentence:
On December 10 2013 09:42 sidesprang wrote:
And lastly he asked for people to vote for him if they found him scummy, which is very Anti-Town.

Please tell me your reason for stating it. Does cora voting for himself make him more likely to be scum? Cause that's what I assummed you were getting at.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 14:05 GMT
#1051
Hey, just want to apologize for my inactivity. I hate when people people give real life excuses so I wont. I'll just say sorry and I'll try to make up for it going forward.

Been following loosely the last bunch of pages. Gonna catch up for real and will post my thoughts shortly.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 14:36 GMT
#1070
K, first I'll comment on Slam:

I don't think he should be policy lynched. I'll agree w/ people that say he should be a vig shot instead. Hopefully any vig wont decide to go rogue since it's almost unanimous that he should be killed. And I know if I was a vig, I wouldn't want to risk going against will of the town and finding out Slam really was scum.


Xatalos touched on this but policy lynches suck for gaining information. Nobody needs to make a scum case. There's usually not gonna be a competing wagon. It's a waste of a lynch as far as an information gathering tool.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 15:03 GMT
#1087
On December 11 2013 23:59 Spaghetticus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 11 2013 23:53 Plutarch wrote:
On December 11 2013 23:48 Spaghetticus wrote:
On December 11 2013 23:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yes i am steering the town into lynching you because you have made 70 posts that say absolutely nothing. All you have to say is someone is mafia because of some assumed connection because they tried to guess someone's identity. Every other post you have made is an OMGUS to call out people who are telling you to go scumhunt or telling you why your logic does not make sense. You are not really trying to find mafia and your attitude towards people in this game gives out you are working under fear, pressure, insecureness and inherent guilt.

##Vote: Spaghetticus


Hmm... this is frustrating. Up until recently I had you green. I still think you probably green though I'm beginning to doubt myself. This attack is... too specific. I'm not the scummiest person here, your vote seems motivated by something other than lynching the scummiest player.

OMGUS? Yes I have a tendency to attack people that attack me. Where better to start? To dismiss my points as OMGUS though... I haven't been illogical, and I've attacked people for legitimate reasons.


I find it incredible that you are casting suspicion on two of the most clearly town people in the game.


Also typical of my style. See every game in my filter ever.
Wait, so you agree that they're "two of the most clearly town people in the game"?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 15:16 GMT
#1093
IDK, it really sounds like spag isn't making cases based on who he thinks is scum. More like he's trying to just trying to make cases that scum would be too ballsy to make.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 15:24 GMT
#1096
yeah ##vote Spaghetticus

Like Plu said: He's almost comes right out and said that he's making scum cases to prove his own towniness

And then he pretty much admits that he's casting suspicion on townie looking people because it's "typical of [his] style". So again, he's pointing out how what he's saying makes him town.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 15:31 GMT
#1100
On December 12 2013 00:27 Spaghetticus wrote:
Shit JarJar that's pathetic.

Maybe if you twist my words just a little I'll just come out and say "I'm scum"

There is a difference between who I think is town and who I think others think are town. That this is what sways your vote is disappointing. Why not look at Pluto's meta-case, that's a lot more convincing.

Srsly, I'd FOS you bit I'm running out of fingers. Logic plz.
What caused you to reneg ur Kush case?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 15:42 GMT
#1105
On December 12 2013 00:36 Spaghetticus wrote:
It's also worth noting that he came out of the woodwork when shit got real. He had every opportunity to remain wildcard.
Isn't more of a scumtell to sit back and hide unless you're being pressured?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 15:46 GMT
#1106
I mean, I could understand saying something like "OK, I like Kush's last few posts. I'm gonna call him null for now."

But to go from making a full case on him to "Kush is almost definitely town" based on a few one line posts is hard to swallow.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 16:24 GMT
#1118
On December 12 2013 01:09 Spaghetticus wrote:
The way I played that game was really bad. It's my only game as scum, you think I wouldn't adjust my style? I didn't stand a chance!
Uh Ok, but would that make you play that style when you're town.

Haven't read that filter yet. Just think that's a wierd response for a townie to have. Like what would adjusting your scum playstyle have to do w/ this game?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 17:27 GMT
#1163
On December 12 2013 02:14 VayneAuthority wrote:
I have one goal today and one goal only. If you think I would help town get rid of alakaslam as scum I can't help you.
Is there that much of a difference between him making shitposts so he can't be read and you refusing to play or give your thoughts on anyone?

You're being just as useless.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 17:50 GMT
#1177
On December 12 2013 02:41 kushm4sta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 02:39 VayneAuthority wrote:
it's not ridiculous at all if you consider how I play mafia. I KILL these kind of players at night because I find it more enjoyable to play with people that can actually scumhunt and try to trick them. Between that and my blue kill sniping I don't see how it is farfetch'd at all.


So you would never push a mislynch on slam because he is so bad for town, but you would nk him??/ that makes no sense.


##unvote
##vote VayneAuthority


Complete contradiction

On December 12 2013 02:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:20 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:14 VayneAuthority wrote:
I have one goal today and one goal only. If you think I would help town get rid of alakaslam as scum I can't help you.

That's actually quite an interesting comment Vayne.
What you very well know is that even if Slam doesn't get lynched he will most likely get shot on N1. Why would you not help get rid of him as scum, regardless of his alignment?


On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.


I've already pretty much answered all of this

In this game the thread sentiment actually suggests vigi's WILL shoot useless people. Let's consider a scenario where you are scum.

If Slam is scum you:
1) can reasonably assume a vigi will shoot him on N1 anyways so
2) when you lynch him instead you gain towncredit
3) even if you don't succeed, you gain town credit when he flips red
4) you don't need to contribute anything useful

If Slam is town you:
1) can't be held responsible for anything scummy because it's a pro-town thing to suggest a policy lynch on him anyways
2) you don't need to contribute anything useful

So, why again is it unreasonable to assume you would vouch for his lynch as mafia?


because I would never, ever help town get rid of somebody so detrimental to town. He adds another scumplayer to my team, why would I want to get rid of him ever? I could just sheep you on spag or something dumb like that. I know exactly what it looks like.

JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 18:36 GMT
#1216
Also, I think this is a slip:
On December 12 2013 02:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:20 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:14 VayneAuthority wrote:
I have one goal today and one goal only. If you think I would help town get rid of alakaslam as scum I can't help you.

That's actually quite an interesting comment Vayne.
What you very well know is that even if Slam doesn't get lynched he will most likely get shot on N1. Why would you not help get rid of him as scum, regardless of his alignment?


On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.


I've already pretty much answered all of this

In this game the thread sentiment actually suggests vigi's WILL shoot useless people. Let's consider a scenario where you are scum.

If Slam is scum you:
1) can reasonably assume a vigi will shoot him on N1 anyways so
2) when you lynch him instead you gain towncredit
3) even if you don't succeed, you gain town credit when he flips red
4) you don't need to contribute anything useful

If Slam is town you:
1) can't be held responsible for anything scummy because it's a pro-town thing to suggest a policy lynch on him anyways
2) you don't need to contribute anything useful

So, why again is it unreasonable to assume you would vouch for his lynch as mafia?


because I would never, ever help town get rid of somebody so detrimental to town. He adds another scumplayer to my team, why would I want to get rid of him ever? I could just sheep you on spag or something dumb like that. I know exactly what it looks like.



Then when rayn calls him out about it, he says:
On December 12 2013 02:33 VayneAuthority wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 02:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:20 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:14 VayneAuthority wrote:
I have one goal today and one goal only. If you think I would help town get rid of alakaslam as scum I can't help you.

That's actually quite an interesting comment Vayne.
What you very well know is that even if Slam doesn't get lynched he will most likely get shot on N1. Why would you not help get rid of him as scum, regardless of his alignment?


On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.


I've already pretty much answered all of this

In this game the thread sentiment actually suggests vigi's WILL shoot useless people. Let's consider a scenario where you are scum.

If Slam is scum you:
1) can reasonably assume a vigi will shoot him on N1 anyways so
2) when you lynch him instead you gain towncredit
3) even if you don't succeed, you gain town credit when he flips red
4) you don't need to contribute anything useful

If Slam is town you:
1) can't be held responsible for anything scummy because it's a pro-town thing to suggest a policy lynch on him anyways
2) you don't need to contribute anything useful

So, why again is it unreasonable to assume you would vouch for his lynch as mafia?


because I would never, ever help town get rid of somebody so detrimental to town. He adds another scumplayer to my team, why would I want to get rid of him ever? I could just sheep you on spag or something dumb like that. I know exactly what it looks like.

Fair enough, just wanted to be sure what you meant.
Are you suggesting Spaghetticus is town?


Yea he was one of the first to want to lynch Slam so I have him as town until further notice.


A few moments earlier when kush asked him what he thought of spag and cora, he refused to answer. Why not say you have a townread on someone that is picking up votes? It only became something he was willing to discuss to cover up his slip.


and yes I realize that this likely makes spag town.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 18:48 GMT
#1229
On December 12 2013 03:39 Plutarch wrote:
I don't think Vsynr contradicting himself like that means he has to be scum. I think it is a null tell.

I think it shows that he doesn't actually believe what he's saying about policy lynching Slam. He's using it as way to not participate or give reads so as to not have any accountability.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 18:54 GMT
#1236
On December 12 2013 03:47 kushm4sta wrote:
##unvote
##vote speghetti
On December 12 2013 02:53 kushm4sta wrote:
@rayn I'm back to townreading spghetti.
That he has one of the longer filters in the game makes him lean town.
Also I think it's not so much that he hasn't gotten into this game, but more like he thinks he is so awesome now for getting nk on night 1 that he doesn't even have to try. That is indicated by this quote:
Show nested quote +
This isn't why I've scaled back, but it also doesn't help my motives that I was NKed early that game.

So that's why he is active but sucks hard compared to previous towngames.

what happened?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 19:01 GMT
#1240
On December 12 2013 03:52 VayneAuthority wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 03:51 Grackaroni wrote:
On December 12 2013 03:47 VayneAuthority wrote:
not to mention that it isn't even a contradiction to begin with, YOU SEE ME GETTING RID OF ALAKASLAM IN THE THREAD. YOU DON'T KNOW THAT I GOT RID OF HIM IF I'M MAFIA. good lord.

it is a contradiction if you say you are town for getting rid of the 4th mafia and that you would leave him in as scum. Then you admit that you would get rid of him because you like a real game. Night killing him for the hell of it is no different than lynching him for the hell of it when you could get a better lynch from 'dumping your vote on spaghetti"


I don't think you realize the difference between pushing somebody in thread and night killing them. Hint: one can be seen by everybody, the other cannot.

Lmao

"He adds another scumplayer to my team, why would I want to get rid of him ever?"

That's your quote right there bud. Explain why you'd want to nightkill a scumplayer if you were scum. Or don't since like you said: You'd never want to get rid of him ever.

That's pretty definate statement right there. Saying that you would NK him as scum is a 100% contradiction. You're saying that Slam is a scum asset that scum would want to stay in the game no matter what.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 20:30 GMT
#1279
On December 12 2013 05:11 purpletrator wrote:
before slam gets too far, active lurkers (theres gotta be like 10 of us), who is scummier, cora or spag?
I haven't thought cora was scummy all game. But I have to admit, something feels off about this whole notes thing. He asks "Do you want to see them?" and then he's all: Uh I don't have em w/ me. I'll be very curious to see them as well.

I really don't like all this movement to Spag as soon as Vayne has the vote lead. Pretty sure scum is trying to keep vayne alive. Which would make spag town.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 20:35 GMT
#1281
On December 12 2013 05:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 05:30 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:11 purpletrator wrote:
before slam gets too far, active lurkers (theres gotta be like 10 of us), who is scummier, cora or spag?
I haven't thought cora was scummy all game. But I have to admit, something feels off about this whole notes thing. He asks "Do you want to see them?" and then he's all: Uh I don't have em w/ me. I'll be very curious to see them as well.

I really don't like all this movement to Spag as soon as Vayne has the vote lead. Pretty sure scum is trying to keep vayne alive. Which would make spag town.

So who do you suggest is scum then if that's the case?

Maybe Art. Maybe Purple. I think you're OK. Probably Purple.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 20:38 GMT
#1285
On December 12 2013 05:35 Alakaslam wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 05:30 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:11 purpletrator wrote:
before slam gets too far, active lurkers (theres gotta be like 10 of us), who is scummier, cora or spag?
I haven't thought cora was scummy all game. But I have to admit, something feels off about this whole notes thing. He asks "Do you want to see them?" and then he's all: Uh I don't have em w/ me. I'll be very curious to see them as well.

I really don't like all this movement to Spag as soon as Vayne has the vote lead. Pretty sure scum is trying to keep vayne alive. Which would make spag town.

They are scum together. I can switch to vayneauthority I it would make you comfortable but believe me spag is scummier. Vayneauthority might just be SK actually.
Vayne basically scumslipped that Spag is town. A Scum Vayne means that Spag is p much confirmed town.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 20:44 GMT
#1300
@Cora

when you take notes, you use font color tags?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 20:48 GMT
#1307
On December 12 2013 05:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:
At least Vayne was able to say he thinks me and kush are scum.
Spag didn't get that far with ~100 posts.
Yeah, after Vayne was close to getting lynched, he dedided to start playing the game. Even though he told us he wasn't gonna do anything else besides try to get slam lynched.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 20:51 GMT
#1311
On December 12 2013 05:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 05:48 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:
At least Vayne was able to say he thinks me and kush are scum.
Spag didn't get that far with ~100 posts.
Yeah, after Vayne was close to getting lynched, he dedided to start playing the game. Even though he told us he wasn't gonna do anything else besides try to get slam lynched.

Actually he didn't really start playing rofl.
He threw a personal attack on me and idk what to kush.

Yeah, no clue why he chose you and kush and not me when all 3 of us pointed out his contradiction. Kush hadn't even voted for him yet.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 20:55 GMT
#1317
On December 12 2013 05:52 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 05:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:49 Xatalos wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:41 Xatalos wrote:
I really don't like the Spag wagon. It has both Artanis and purple... And neither of them provided any reasoning for voting him.

The problem is not the voters. I have the same problem (well not really with purple, as he basically chose between spag/vayne)...

It's that Spag is so fucking scummy and the evidence is far better than on vayne.


I'm not still sure why VA is #2 in votes. Apparently he contradicted himself, but why is he scum just for that? It's not like he needed to talk about how he'd love to NK / lynch Alakaslam.

Yes he needed, did you read?
I confronted him about his thoughts on lynching Slam.


I read through pretty fast. Gonna reread that portion.

ALso this:
On December 12 2013 04:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Here is another one.
Show nested quote +
On December 11 2013 13:03 VayneAuthority wrote:
I hope he flips town so I am actually justified in saying that he is hindering the game. If he's scum he can do whatever the fuck he wants. Read that portal game by greymist if you want to see how hard it is to lynch this guy as scum. His entire team bussed him and he still barely got lynched. nuff said.

Show nested quote +
On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.

... i really don't get it.. i really don't...

JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 20:58 GMT
#1325
On December 12 2013 03:36 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Also, I think this is a slip:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 02:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:20 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:14 VayneAuthority wrote:
I have one goal today and one goal only. If you think I would help town get rid of alakaslam as scum I can't help you.

That's actually quite an interesting comment Vayne.
What you very well know is that even if Slam doesn't get lynched he will most likely get shot on N1. Why would you not help get rid of him as scum, regardless of his alignment?


On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.


I've already pretty much answered all of this

In this game the thread sentiment actually suggests vigi's WILL shoot useless people. Let's consider a scenario where you are scum.

If Slam is scum you:
1) can reasonably assume a vigi will shoot him on N1 anyways so
2) when you lynch him instead you gain towncredit
3) even if you don't succeed, you gain town credit when he flips red
4) you don't need to contribute anything useful

If Slam is town you:
1) can't be held responsible for anything scummy because it's a pro-town thing to suggest a policy lynch on him anyways
2) you don't need to contribute anything useful

So, why again is it unreasonable to assume you would vouch for his lynch as mafia?


because I would never, ever help town get rid of somebody so detrimental to town. He adds another scumplayer to my team, why would I want to get rid of him ever? I could just sheep you on spag or something dumb like that. I know exactly what it looks like.



Then when rayn calls him out about it, he says:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 02:33 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:20 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:14 VayneAuthority wrote:
I have one goal today and one goal only. If you think I would help town get rid of alakaslam as scum I can't help you.

That's actually quite an interesting comment Vayne.
What you very well know is that even if Slam doesn't get lynched he will most likely get shot on N1. Why would you not help get rid of him as scum, regardless of his alignment?


On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.


I've already pretty much answered all of this

In this game the thread sentiment actually suggests vigi's WILL shoot useless people. Let's consider a scenario where you are scum.

If Slam is scum you:
1) can reasonably assume a vigi will shoot him on N1 anyways so
2) when you lynch him instead you gain towncredit
3) even if you don't succeed, you gain town credit when he flips red
4) you don't need to contribute anything useful

If Slam is town you:
1) can't be held responsible for anything scummy because it's a pro-town thing to suggest a policy lynch on him anyways
2) you don't need to contribute anything useful

So, why again is it unreasonable to assume you would vouch for his lynch as mafia?


because I would never, ever help town get rid of somebody so detrimental to town. He adds another scumplayer to my team, why would I want to get rid of him ever? I could just sheep you on spag or something dumb like that. I know exactly what it looks like.

Fair enough, just wanted to be sure what you meant.
Are you suggesting Spaghetticus is town?


Yea he was one of the first to want to lynch Slam so I have him as town until further notice.


A few moments earlier when kush asked him what he thought of spag and cora, he refused to answer. Why not say you have a townread on someone that is picking up votes? It only became something he was willing to discuss to cover up his slip.


and yes I realize that this likely makes spag town.

And the last part of the Vayne Case. How does he know that scum could just sheep the Spag vote w/o knowing what spags alignment is?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 21:18 GMT
#1357
On December 12 2013 06:15 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 06:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 06:04 Xatalos wrote:
Hmmm.

That was a mess of a deadline. I'm sure the vote swings tell something though (unlike with a Alakaslam lynch).

So do you or do you not think vayne is mafia? Or wtf is this about?


Not really at the moment.
So then what makes you think all the vote swings @ the deadline mean something?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 21:23 GMT
#1360
On December 12 2013 03:54 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 03:47 kushm4sta wrote:
##unvote
##vote speghetti
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 02:53 kushm4sta wrote:
@rayn I'm back to townreading spghetti.
That he has one of the longer filters in the game makes him lean town.
Also I think it's not so much that he hasn't gotten into this game, but more like he thinks he is so awesome now for getting nk on night 1 that he doesn't even have to try. That is indicated by this quote:
This isn't why I've scaled back, but it also doesn't help my motives that I was NKed early that game.

So that's why he is active but sucks hard compared to previous towngames.

what happened?
Kush, please answer this when you return.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 11 2013 21:35 GMT
#1365
On December 12 2013 06:23 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 03:54 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 12 2013 03:47 kushm4sta wrote:
##unvote
##vote speghetti
On December 12 2013 02:53 kushm4sta wrote:
@rayn I'm back to townreading spghetti.
That he has one of the longer filters in the game makes him lean town.
Also I think it's not so much that he hasn't gotten into this game, but more like he thinks he is so awesome now for getting nk on night 1 that he doesn't even have to try. That is indicated by this quote:
This isn't why I've scaled back, but it also doesn't help my motives that I was NKed early that game.

So that's why he is active but sucks hard compared to previous towngames.

what happened?
Kush, please answer this when you return.


Just to add to this. I just reread your filter and I have no idea how you ended up w/ your vote on spag.

On December 11 2013 23:58 kushm4sta wrote:
that case was too fucked up for speghetti to be scum I think

On December 12 2013 00:02 kushm4sta wrote:
I think scum are going to make more obvious cases and attack generalized scumtells, like wishy washiness. Or they would go after players like alakaslam or purple (easy targets). Speghetti's case is just odd and I can't see scum ever making it.

On December 12 2013 01:48 kushm4sta wrote:
rayn i see what you are saying about spaghetti. i think he is just off this game. He already said he's not invested yet. My read is pretty thin so it's more of a hunch.

Anyone read corazon's last post? The ratio of size to content of that post is the highest in the game.

On December 12 2013 02:53 kushm4sta wrote:
@rayn I'm back to townreading spghetti.
That he has one of the longer filters in the game makes him lean town.
Also I think it's not so much that he hasn't gotten into this game, but more like he thinks he is so awesome now for getting nk on night 1 that he doesn't even have to try. That is indicated by this quote:
Show nested quote +
This isn't why I've scaled back, but it also doesn't help my motives that I was NKed early that game.

So that's why he is active but sucks hard compared to previous towngames.

Why did you defend him so much and then vote him?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 04:02 GMT
#1399
On December 12 2013 12:58 Plutarch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 12:52 bumatlarge wrote:
On December 12 2013 12:41 Plutarch wrote:
On December 12 2013 12:37 bumatlarge wrote:
On December 12 2013 12:33 Plutarch wrote:
Anyway. I feel like I should take responsibility for the mis-lynch. Reading back on the way things went down I think I should have seen signs of spag's townieness but I just didn't. Anyway I'm going to post something about the way the wagon went down later. It felt like there was a lot of opportunistic jumping on to the wagon at the last minute.

The key is took look at which reasoning and voting appears to be genuine and which appears to be faked.

I'll write a big post and post it before the night ends.

I'll also be around on and off for the next 10- hours or so if anyone want's to chat.


I do!

On December 11 2013 23:17 Plutarch wrote:
Also, Never ever ever make association cases before people have flipped.


Do you really stand by this? Would you consider association cases and interactions to be that different?


Yes. Association cases before flips are just dumb. I consider analyzing interactions to be an important part of scum hunting, but if a case only works if both of the associations are scum and neither have flipped the case is worthless until one of them flips.


Sweet, have you looked at jarjar?


A little. He seemed to bandwagon easily and without much justification at the end of the day.
Go read again
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 04:07 GMT
#1402
On December 12 2013 10:59 kushm4sta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 06:23 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 12 2013 03:54 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 12 2013 03:47 kushm4sta wrote:
##unvote
##vote speghetti
On December 12 2013 02:53 kushm4sta wrote:
@rayn I'm back to townreading spghetti.
That he has one of the longer filters in the game makes him lean town.
Also I think it's not so much that he hasn't gotten into this game, but more like he thinks he is so awesome now for getting nk on night 1 that he doesn't even have to try. That is indicated by this quote:
This isn't why I've scaled back, but it also doesn't help my motives that I was NKed early that game.

So that's why he is active but sucks hard compared to previous towngames.

what happened?
Kush, please answer this when you return.


blame rayn
Really? That's your answer?

Reposting this again + Show Spoiler +
On December 12 2013 06:35 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 06:23 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 12 2013 03:54 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 12 2013 03:47 kushm4sta wrote:
##unvote
##vote speghetti
On December 12 2013 02:53 kushm4sta wrote:
@rayn I'm back to townreading spghetti.
That he has one of the longer filters in the game makes him lean town.
Also I think it's not so much that he hasn't gotten into this game, but more like he thinks he is so awesome now for getting nk on night 1 that he doesn't even have to try. That is indicated by this quote:
This isn't why I've scaled back, but it also doesn't help my motives that I was NKed early that game.

So that's why he is active but sucks hard compared to previous towngames.

what happened?
Kush, please answer this when you return.


Just to add to this. I just reread your filter and I have no idea how you ended up w/ your vote on spag.

Show nested quote +
On December 11 2013 23:58 kushm4sta wrote:
that case was too fucked up for speghetti to be scum I think

Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 00:02 kushm4sta wrote:
I think scum are going to make more obvious cases and attack generalized scumtells, like wishy washiness. Or they would go after players like alakaslam or purple (easy targets). Speghetti's case is just odd and I can't see scum ever making it.

Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 01:48 kushm4sta wrote:
rayn i see what you are saying about spaghetti. i think he is just off this game. He already said he's not invested yet. My read is pretty thin so it's more of a hunch.

Anyone read corazon's last post? The ratio of size to content of that post is the highest in the game.

Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 02:53 kushm4sta wrote:
@rayn I'm back to townreading spghetti.
That he has one of the longer filters in the game makes him lean town.
Also I think it's not so much that he hasn't gotten into this game, but more like he thinks he is so awesome now for getting nk on night 1 that he doesn't even have to try. That is indicated by this quote:
This isn't why I've scaled back, but it also doesn't help my motives that I was NKed early that game.

So that's why he is active but sucks hard compared to previous towngames.

Why did you defend him so much and then vote him?



So basically, not only did you never have spag as a scumread, but you defended him a whole bunch throughout the day.

There's no way to interpret that other than: You voted for someone that you believed to be town. Do you deny this?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 04:25 GMT
#1414
On December 12 2013 13:02 VayneAuthority wrote:
Do you know of his meta btw? He likes to tunnel people as scum. I have confirmation bias so look at it objectively and see if you find him tunneling me then not giving a shit about the lynch once it's clear that me or spag is lynched. He doesn't try to argue that I should be lynched at all after a certain point, just let's it happen.

Explain how I tunneled you. I was making cases on other people all throughout the day. I only focused on you the last few hours. That is NOT a tunnel.

And really? You're saying I didn't give a shit about the lynch and I didn't try to argue for you to be lynched?
On December 12 2013 05:30 JarJarDrinks wrote:
I really don't like all this movement to Spag as soon as Vayne has the vote lead. Pretty sure scum is trying to keep vayne alive. Which would make spag town.

On December 12 2013 05:38 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 05:35 Alakaslam wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:30 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:11 purpletrator wrote:
before slam gets too far, active lurkers (theres gotta be like 10 of us), who is scummier, cora or spag?
I haven't thought cora was scummy all game. But I have to admit, something feels off about this whole notes thing. He asks "Do you want to see them?" and then he's all: Uh I don't have em w/ me. I'll be very curious to see them as well.

I really don't like all this movement to Spag as soon as Vayne has the vote lead. Pretty sure scum is trying to keep vayne alive. Which would make spag town.

They are scum together. I can switch to vayneauthority I it would make you comfortable but believe me spag is scummier. Vayneauthority might just be SK actually.
Vayne basically scumslipped that Spag is town. A Scum Vayne means that Spag is p much confirmed town.

On December 12 2013 05:48 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 05:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:
At least Vayne was able to say he thinks me and kush are scum.
Spag didn't get that far with ~100 posts.
Yeah, after Vayne was close to getting lynched, he dedided to start playing the game. Even though he told us he wasn't gonna do anything else besides try to get slam lynched.

On December 12 2013 05:51 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 05:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:48 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:
At least Vayne was able to say he thinks me and kush are scum.
Spag didn't get that far with ~100 posts.
Yeah, after Vayne was close to getting lynched, he dedided to start playing the game. Even though he told us he wasn't gonna do anything else besides try to get slam lynched.

Actually he didn't really start playing rofl.
He threw a personal attack on me and idk what to kush.

Yeah, no clue why he chose you and kush and not me when all 3 of us pointed out his contradiction. Kush hadn't even voted for him yet.

On December 12 2013 05:55 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 05:52 Xatalos wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:49 Xatalos wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:41 Xatalos wrote:
I really don't like the Spag wagon. It has both Artanis and purple... And neither of them provided any reasoning for voting him.

The problem is not the voters. I have the same problem (well not really with purple, as he basically chose between spag/vayne)...

It's that Spag is so fucking scummy and the evidence is far better than on vayne.


I'm not still sure why VA is #2 in votes. Apparently he contradicted himself, but why is he scum just for that? It's not like he needed to talk about how he'd love to NK / lynch Alakaslam.

Yes he needed, did you read?
I confronted him about his thoughts on lynching Slam.


I read through pretty fast. Gonna reread that portion.

ALso this:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 04:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Here is another one.
On December 11 2013 13:03 VayneAuthority wrote:
I hope he flips town so I am actually justified in saying that he is hindering the game. If he's scum he can do whatever the fuck he wants. Read that portal game by greymist if you want to see how hard it is to lynch this guy as scum. His entire team bussed him and he still barely got lynched. nuff said.

On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.

... i really don't get it.. i really don't...


On December 12 2013 05:58 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 03:36 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Also, I think this is a slip:
On December 12 2013 02:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:20 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:14 VayneAuthority wrote:
I have one goal today and one goal only. If you think I would help town get rid of alakaslam as scum I can't help you.

That's actually quite an interesting comment Vayne.
What you very well know is that even if Slam doesn't get lynched he will most likely get shot on N1. Why would you not help get rid of him as scum, regardless of his alignment?


On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.


I've already pretty much answered all of this

In this game the thread sentiment actually suggests vigi's WILL shoot useless people. Let's consider a scenario where you are scum.

If Slam is scum you:
1) can reasonably assume a vigi will shoot him on N1 anyways so
2) when you lynch him instead you gain towncredit
3) even if you don't succeed, you gain town credit when he flips red
4) you don't need to contribute anything useful

If Slam is town you:
1) can't be held responsible for anything scummy because it's a pro-town thing to suggest a policy lynch on him anyways
2) you don't need to contribute anything useful

So, why again is it unreasonable to assume you would vouch for his lynch as mafia?


because I would never, ever help town get rid of somebody so detrimental to town. He adds another scumplayer to my team, why would I want to get rid of him ever? I could just sheep you on spag or something dumb like that. I know exactly what it looks like.



Then when rayn calls him out about it, he says:
On December 12 2013 02:33 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:20 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:14 VayneAuthority wrote:
I have one goal today and one goal only. If you think I would help town get rid of alakaslam as scum I can't help you.

That's actually quite an interesting comment Vayne.
What you very well know is that even if Slam doesn't get lynched he will most likely get shot on N1. Why would you not help get rid of him as scum, regardless of his alignment?


On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.


I've already pretty much answered all of this

In this game the thread sentiment actually suggests vigi's WILL shoot useless people. Let's consider a scenario where you are scum.

If Slam is scum you:
1) can reasonably assume a vigi will shoot him on N1 anyways so
2) when you lynch him instead you gain towncredit
3) even if you don't succeed, you gain town credit when he flips red
4) you don't need to contribute anything useful

If Slam is town you:
1) can't be held responsible for anything scummy because it's a pro-town thing to suggest a policy lynch on him anyways
2) you don't need to contribute anything useful

So, why again is it unreasonable to assume you would vouch for his lynch as mafia?


because I would never, ever help town get rid of somebody so detrimental to town. He adds another scumplayer to my team, why would I want to get rid of him ever? I could just sheep you on spag or something dumb like that. I know exactly what it looks like.

Fair enough, just wanted to be sure what you meant.
Are you suggesting Spaghetticus is town?


Yea he was one of the first to want to lynch Slam so I have him as town until further notice.


A few moments earlier when kush asked him what he thought of spag and cora, he refused to answer. Why not say you have a townread on someone that is picking up votes? It only became something he was willing to discuss to cover up his slip.


and yes I realize that this likely makes spag town.

And the last part of the Vayne Case. How does he know that scum could just sheep the Spag vote w/o knowing what spags alignment is?


All those are from when spag took the lead. It was clear that I was trying to convince people that you were the better lynch. Your last statement is an outright lie.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 04:27 GMT
#1415
On December 12 2013 13:08 Plutarch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 13:02 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 12:58 Plutarch wrote:
On December 12 2013 12:52 bumatlarge wrote:
On December 12 2013 12:41 Plutarch wrote:
On December 12 2013 12:37 bumatlarge wrote:
On December 12 2013 12:33 Plutarch wrote:
Anyway. I feel like I should take responsibility for the mis-lynch. Reading back on the way things went down I think I should have seen signs of spag's townieness but I just didn't. Anyway I'm going to post something about the way the wagon went down later. It felt like there was a lot of opportunistic jumping on to the wagon at the last minute.

The key is took look at which reasoning and voting appears to be genuine and which appears to be faked.

I'll write a big post and post it before the night ends.

I'll also be around on and off for the next 10- hours or so if anyone want's to chat.


I do!

On December 11 2013 23:17 Plutarch wrote:
Also, Never ever ever make association cases before people have flipped.


Do you really stand by this? Would you consider association cases and interactions to be that different?


Yes. Association cases before flips are just dumb. I consider analyzing interactions to be an important part of scum hunting, but if a case only works if both of the associations are scum and neither have flipped the case is worthless until one of them flips.


Sweet, have you looked at jarjar?


A little. He seemed to bandwagon easily and without much justification at the end of the day.


Do you know of his meta btw? He likes to tunnel people as scum. I have confirmation bias so look at it objectively and see if you find him tunneling me then not giving a shit about the lynch once it's clear that me or spag is lynched. He doesn't try to argue that I should be lynched at all after a certain point, just let's it happen.


He also afk's as scum as you should well know by being scum with him in Les Mafia.
FYI: I was just lynched as town in my last game for inactivity.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 04:35 GMT
#1416
On December 12 2013 13:05 bumatlarge wrote:
I was on the Vayne train, but I couldn't convince myself after reading this.

Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 02:50 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:41 kushm4sta wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:39 VayneAuthority wrote:
it's not ridiculous at all if you consider how I play mafia. I KILL these kind of players at night because I find it more enjoyable to play with people that can actually scumhunt and try to trick them. Between that and my blue kill sniping I don't see how it is farfetch'd at all.


So you would never push a mislynch on slam because he is so bad for town, but you would nk him??/ that makes no sense.


##unvote
##vote VayneAuthority


Complete contradiction

On December 12 2013 02:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:20 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:14 VayneAuthority wrote:
I have one goal today and one goal only. If you think I would help town get rid of alakaslam as scum I can't help you.

That's actually quite an interesting comment Vayne.
What you very well know is that even if Slam doesn't get lynched he will most likely get shot on N1. Why would you not help get rid of him as scum, regardless of his alignment?


On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.


I've already pretty much answered all of this

In this game the thread sentiment actually suggests vigi's WILL shoot useless people. Let's consider a scenario where you are scum.

If Slam is scum you:
1) can reasonably assume a vigi will shoot him on N1 anyways so
2) when you lynch him instead you gain towncredit
3) even if you don't succeed, you gain town credit when he flips red
4) you don't need to contribute anything useful

If Slam is town you:
1) can't be held responsible for anything scummy because it's a pro-town thing to suggest a policy lynch on him anyways
2) you don't need to contribute anything useful

So, why again is it unreasonable to assume you would vouch for his lynch as mafia?


because I would never, ever help town get rid of somebody so detrimental to town. He adds another scumplayer to my team, why would I want to get rid of him ever? I could just sheep you on spag or something dumb like that. I know exactly what it looks like.



I think contradictions are awesome to find, but comparing these two is reaching. Hard. Even if Vayne felt two different ways about the way he plays in two different posts, you need to build off that to actually get a read. I know JJD was against policy lynching slam, but I found this vote very telling that he is willing to do so if it gives him an easier explanation.

I thought it would be worth pointing out
OMG Reaching?? Vanye says that he would never ever kill alaskaslam if he was scum and then says if he was scum he'd kill alaskaslam. I don't think I could come up with more contradictory statements if I tried.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 04:40 GMT
#1419
On December 12 2013 07:02 VayneAuthority wrote:
To be clear we don't have time to waste on alakaslam now so I'm ignoring him from now on scum or not. Real game starts after the flip tomorrow, see you then.
So when you said this:
On December 10 2013 09:15 VayneAuthority wrote:
I would rather enjoy myself and lose then not enjoy it, hence why I am voting you alakaslam, scum or not. I do not care about lynching scum if im not having fun in the first place, that comes first.
what did you mean exactly?

I guess now you don't care about having fun?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 04:48 GMT
#1421
On December 12 2013 13:36 Plutarch wrote:
Do you believe only scum contradict themselves?
Obviously townies can make contradictory statements. But that one is bad. And it wasn't the only one he made. And as I've said, I think it shows that he didn't want to lynch Slam for policy. He wanted to lynch him because it was a nice safe place for him to park his vote.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 05:36 GMT
#1424
confirmed vayne?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 05:40 GMT
#1426
On November 24 2013 07:11 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
II Titanic Mini Mafia: Possible Roles

13 UED Forces (Town) - win when SK and scum are dead

Civilian (Vanilla Townie)


-You are living the UED life! Except you have only 40 hitpoints, no armor, and no means of attack. Still, strength in numbers, and when you identify a potential Zerg, one of your more well-armed buddies can kill him. What's that? They all got lynched and/or nightkilled? Well you... somehow still can do it. Kick the target in the nuts or something.

You have voting rights and no other power. You win with town.

Medic (Doctor)

-You have a doctorate from MIT (Mar Sara Institute of Technology). It's actually a doctorate in art history, but your patients don't need to know that. Besides, you're not a doctor. A doctor heals people, a medic just makes them feel more comfortable when they die.

Luckily your optimism can save lives occasionally. Every night you can visit someone and save them from any and all killing actions for that night. You cannot target the same person twice, and you cannot target yourself.

Alexei Stukov (Alignment Cop)

-You're the only one who knows what's going on and is willing to take risks to find out more. Every night you can check to see if a player is UED or Zerg or Crab. Simple as that.

Gerard Dugalle (Vigilante)

-You are the admiral of the entire Terran Navy and you can unleash the fury of the UED onto anyone you wish. Unfortunately the Titanic people don't allow weapons (or battlecruisers) on board, so all you have is an unloaded pistol and a bullet shoved up your ass.

During the night you may choose to fire your ass-bullet and kill someone (PM-based, not in-thread).

4 Zerg (Scum) - win when they outnumber town or nothing can stop that from happening, and when SK is dead

Samir Duran (Godfather)


-You are a cool guy who the UED doesn't suspect. Luckily Stukov doesn't know you're a smelly Zerg yet and will think you're town if he checks. Work with your team to kill everyone who isn't you.

Jim Raynor (Roleblocker)

-You're not a Zerg, but you sure as hell hate the UED. Or actually you don't, but Kerrigan is a master at pussywhipping, so you just tag along with her shenanigans and think (because you're told to) you hate the UED.

Once per night you can silence a player since you're human looking enough to convince them to put the gun/medicgun/magnifying glass down.

Infested Kerrigan (Janitor)

-You run the show and the UED doesn't know it yet. You have three abilities and can only use one of them during the entire game.

You can Cloak, which hides the role and alignment flip for that night's mafia kill since they are invisible (that is, nothing other than the name will be revealed to the town). Or, you can Ensnare, which is an undetectable roleblock (Ensnare slows down brain speed, so the target doesn't realize they're ensnared). Finally you can opt to cast Psionic Storm, which has a 50% chance to kill the target, depending on if they can dodge the storm fast enough. You will be notified if Psi Storm hits or misses.

Zergling (Goon)

-You are a zergling with no interesting powers. Except being mafia, that's pretty cool.

1 Sebastian the Crab (Serial Killer) - win when everyone else is dead

-You are a crab that likes to sing songs and has an obsession with how awesome it is under the sea. In fact, so awesome, that you want everyone to go down with the ship. Every night you can use your giant crabclaws to kill someone.

You may choose at the beginning of the game to be one of the following but not both by PMing the hosts:

1. Because you are a cute and cuddly crab, nobody suspects you of being Zerg (because you're not a Zerg, you're a crab), and you flip town to alignment checks. However your cuddliness makes you susceptible to Zerg claws.

2. You are immune to the night-kill because your carapace withstands Zerg claws, but not to the night-vig because an assbullet actually pierces your shell which scatters the fragments within your body and makes you die of severe internal bleeding. However you are no longer cute and cuddly and will flip SK.

Soooo..... ur lying?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 13:44 GMT
#1528
Lol, I expect wake up and expect to see everyone just debating on the who the remaining scum is since Vayne and Coag got straight up caught in a lie. I was even thinking that maybe we'd get shortened days since our next 2 lynches (or 1 lynch/1 vig shot) are already set in stone.

But no one is even discussing it. Vayne is all like: Oh we were just J/King Yo. And everyone just accepts it?

Look @ the posts and tell me that they were just joking. link

I mean, Vayne is under a ton of pressure, He was close to being voted out yesterday. And he thinks it's ok to go along w/ some joke where he claims scum w/ another player who's alignment he can't possibly know?

They obviously made the play w/o realizing that the setup wasn't open. When I call them out on it, 20 minutes go by and they finally post 3 minutes apart. Most likely they were discussing what their course of action was gonna be and I guess they decided to go w/ the claim being true.

Then like and hour goes by and after Plu says he PMed the hosts about the setup, Vayne decides to "come clean".
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 13:53 GMT
#1531
On December 12 2013 22:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Well that's quite a stretch JJD.
Why would someone lie about being a mason in a game where there are no masons?
Well like I said, I don't think they realized it. Not sure what the benefit would be but I've seen alot of pretty terrible fake scum claims for seemingly no benefit.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 13:53 GMT
#1532
On December 12 2013 22:48 Holyflare wrote:
It's a running joke from LXIII where grack said he masoned coag and he didn't.

Well that's something I was unware of. Guess that changes things.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 13:55 GMT
#1533
My original reasoning for Vayne being scum still stands. Coag is OK for now.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 13:59 GMT
#1534
On December 12 2013 21:19 Xatalos wrote:
Wait a second...

Kush actually wanted to lynch VA.

Why the heck did he end up lynching his townread Spag?

This definitely doesn't look good.


Yeah, I already pointed all this out.

+ Show Spoiler +
On December 12 2013 06:35 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 06:23 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 12 2013 03:54 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 12 2013 03:47 kushm4sta wrote:
##unvote
##vote speghetti
On December 12 2013 02:53 kushm4sta wrote:
@rayn I'm back to townreading spghetti.
That he has one of the longer filters in the game makes him lean town.
Also I think it's not so much that he hasn't gotten into this game, but more like he thinks he is so awesome now for getting nk on night 1 that he doesn't even have to try. That is indicated by this quote:
This isn't why I've scaled back, but it also doesn't help my motives that I was NKed early that game.

So that's why he is active but sucks hard compared to previous towngames.

what happened?
Kush, please answer this when you return.


Just to add to this. I just reread your filter and I have no idea how you ended up w/ your vote on spag.

Show nested quote +
On December 11 2013 23:58 kushm4sta wrote:
that case was too fucked up for speghetti to be scum I think

Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 00:02 kushm4sta wrote:
I think scum are going to make more obvious cases and attack generalized scumtells, like wishy washiness. Or they would go after players like alakaslam or purple (easy targets). Speghetti's case is just odd and I can't see scum ever making it.

Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 01:48 kushm4sta wrote:
rayn i see what you are saying about spaghetti. i think he is just off this game. He already said he's not invested yet. My read is pretty thin so it's more of a hunch.

Anyone read corazon's last post? The ratio of size to content of that post is the highest in the game.

Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 02:53 kushm4sta wrote:
@rayn I'm back to townreading spghetti.
That he has one of the longer filters in the game makes him lean town.
Also I think it's not so much that he hasn't gotten into this game, but more like he thinks he is so awesome now for getting nk on night 1 that he doesn't even have to try. That is indicated by this quote:
This isn't why I've scaled back, but it also doesn't help my motives that I was NKed early that game.

So that's why he is active but sucks hard compared to previous towngames.

Why did you defend him so much and then vote him?





JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 15:12 GMT
#1543
On December 13 2013 00:06 Corazon wrote:
Maybe it's because I have to deal with people like you who kill my will of playing with stupid accusations that I get pestered with all game
Cora, Ur the only player that plays this way. Every other player that gets pressured argues civilly for the most part. You didn't listen last game when the entire town tried to explain this to you. It's YOU that's the problem. Not everyone else.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 15:17 GMT
#1544
On December 12 2013 13:40 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 07:02 VayneAuthority wrote:
To be clear we don't have time to waste on alakaslam now so I'm ignoring him from now on scum or not. Real game starts after the flip tomorrow, see you then.
So when you said this:
Show nested quote +
On December 10 2013 09:15 VayneAuthority wrote:
I would rather enjoy myself and lose then not enjoy it, hence why I am voting you alakaslam, scum or not. I do not care about lynching scum if im not having fun in the first place, that comes first.
what did you mean exactly?

I guess now you don't care about having fun?

Would like an answer to this Vayne. And why haven't you @ least been arguing for a vig to shoot @ Slam during this night phase?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 15:41 GMT
#1550
Actually Cora, I'm confused. I thought you had HF as a scumread. You did in ur notes @ least. How can he be confirmation biased then?

If you really think HF is scum then why would you be pissed off that he's trying to get you lynched? How would you like him to act?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 15:58 GMT
#1554
On December 13 2013 00:43 Holyflare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2013 00:41 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Actually Cora, I'm confused. I thought you had HF as a scumread. You did in ur notes @ least. How can he be confirmation biased then?

If you really think HF is scum then why would you be pissed off that he's trying to get you lynched? How would you like him to act?


That's why he is scum and knows that I am town.
If I didn't just play a game w/ cora where he played the scummiest game I've ever seen a townie play I'd say that he was practically confirmed scum @ this point.

I just can't get past the fact that this is just how he plays as town. Does anyone have a scum game of his I can check out?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 16:32 GMT
#1558
Yeah I only skimmed it but I don't think it really tells me anything since it doesn't look like he was pressured all that much that game. Just leaning slightly on the scummy side on him for now. Still gonna want to lynch Vayne tomorrow (assumming we don't have a vig that thinks likes me)
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 16:43 GMT
#1560
On December 13 2013 00:58 JarJarDrinks wrote:
I just can't get past the fact that this is just how he plays as town.

JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 16:44 GMT
#1561
I would like to hear how he addresses that though. Cause yeah, it's pretty bad.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 17:26 GMT
#1579
On December 13 2013 01:54 Corazon wrote:
Why don't you actually read the bullshit that HF writes instead of just nodding your head and agreeing. Read it.
Who's nodding their head and agreeing? I thought I was having a good discussion w/ HF.

It's not bullshit what he's writing. You do realize that if he is scum all your doing is making him look better for wanting to lynch you. You need to engage in an actual discussion and refute or explain the points against you.

On December 13 2013 01:54 Corazon wrote:
If I said right now that HF was scum, you guys would say that I am OMGUSing. When you say that it's weird I call him confirmation-biased, you are putting me into a box.
OK, then explain why you're so pissed off at him? Scum need to get townies lynched. You do understand that right?

On December 13 2013 01:54 Corazon wrote:
Do you guys think I'm an asset to town with my usual play?
Well I've only played one game w/ you so far and I think I made it pretty clear that I've never seen a townie be less of an asset then you were in that game.

An asset doesn't get pressured and say "Just vote me out. I'm done". Notice in that last game that I got mislyched. Did I act like a giant douche? No, I spent the last few hours of the day making cases and trying to help give the town direction after my flip. Yeah I was somewhat angry. But I still played to my wincon to the best of my ability.

If you are town, please change your playstyle.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 17:53 GMT
#1584
On December 13 2013 02:44 Corazon wrote:
I thought my notes were up to page 21 but I guess I forgot to count the 4 pages that happened when I went to Tae Kwon Do (inbetween taking notes and the Xatalos case).
The Xalatos Case was on page 18.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 18:26 GMT
#1590
On December 13 2013 03:01 Alakaslam wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2013 02:53 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 13 2013 02:44 Corazon wrote:
I thought my notes were up to page 21 but I guess I forgot to count the 4 pages that happened when I went to Tae Kwon Do (inbetween taking notes and the Xatalos case).
The Xalatos Case was on page 18.

What does that have to do with anything?

Well holy questioned why cora said he took notes up to page 21 when he only had the notes up to 17. Cora said he forgot about the 4 pages between then and his Xala case. But the case was on page 18.

Not a huge deal but it's worth mentioning since it is curious how he got the number 21.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 18:34 GMT
#1592
Cora, I read the post. I thought what I mentioned is worth commenting on. I even said it wasn't a huge deal.

U need to chill the F out.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 18:59 GMT
#1595
On December 13 2013 03:36 Corazon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2013 03:34 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Cora, I read the post. I thought what I mentioned is worth commenting on. I even said it wasn't a huge deal.

U need to chill the F out.

So you have zero reaction to anything else I've said? Thanks....
What do you want me to say? I think it's good that you're actually trying to discuss the points brought up against you. Do you want praise for playing the game the way it should be played?

It's not like I'm the one making the case against you.


On December 13 2013 03:36 Corazon wrote:
And while I have you here, was there ever a point in D1 where you thought Spag was town? It seemed like you were very set on Spag's lynch until Vayne made his contradictory post. After that, you didn't mention anything about Spag. Can you walk me through your process of switching votes from Spag to VA?
Yes, I made very clear that I believe Vayne scumslipped that Spag was town. And I also figured that all the vote switching off of Vayne to Spag meant that spag was town. Here's some of the points I made:
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 12 2013 03:36 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Also, I think this is a slip:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 02:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:20 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:14 VayneAuthority wrote:
I have one goal today and one goal only. If you think I would help town get rid of alakaslam as scum I can't help you.

That's actually quite an interesting comment Vayne.
What you very well know is that even if Slam doesn't get lynched he will most likely get shot on N1. Why would you not help get rid of him as scum, regardless of his alignment?


On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.


I've already pretty much answered all of this

In this game the thread sentiment actually suggests vigi's WILL shoot useless people. Let's consider a scenario where you are scum.

If Slam is scum you:
1) can reasonably assume a vigi will shoot him on N1 anyways so
2) when you lynch him instead you gain towncredit
3) even if you don't succeed, you gain town credit when he flips red
4) you don't need to contribute anything useful

If Slam is town you:
1) can't be held responsible for anything scummy because it's a pro-town thing to suggest a policy lynch on him anyways
2) you don't need to contribute anything useful

So, why again is it unreasonable to assume you would vouch for his lynch as mafia?


because I would never, ever help town get rid of somebody so detrimental to town. He adds another scumplayer to my team, why would I want to get rid of him ever? I could just sheep you on spag or something dumb like that. I know exactly what it looks like.



Then when rayn calls him out about it, he says:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 02:33 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:20 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:14 VayneAuthority wrote:
I have one goal today and one goal only. If you think I would help town get rid of alakaslam as scum I can't help you.

That's actually quite an interesting comment Vayne.
What you very well know is that even if Slam doesn't get lynched he will most likely get shot on N1. Why would you not help get rid of him as scum, regardless of his alignment?


On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.


I've already pretty much answered all of this

In this game the thread sentiment actually suggests vigi's WILL shoot useless people. Let's consider a scenario where you are scum.

If Slam is scum you:
1) can reasonably assume a vigi will shoot him on N1 anyways so
2) when you lynch him instead you gain towncredit
3) even if you don't succeed, you gain town credit when he flips red
4) you don't need to contribute anything useful

If Slam is town you:
1) can't be held responsible for anything scummy because it's a pro-town thing to suggest a policy lynch on him anyways
2) you don't need to contribute anything useful

So, why again is it unreasonable to assume you would vouch for his lynch as mafia?


because I would never, ever help town get rid of somebody so detrimental to town. He adds another scumplayer to my team, why would I want to get rid of him ever? I could just sheep you on spag or something dumb like that. I know exactly what it looks like.

Fair enough, just wanted to be sure what you meant.
Are you suggesting Spaghetticus is town?


Yea he was one of the first to want to lynch Slam so I have him as town until further notice.


A few moments earlier when kush asked him what he thought of spag and cora, he refused to answer. Why not say you have a townread on someone that is picking up votes? It only became something he was willing to discuss to cover up his slip.


and yes I realize that this likely makes spag town.

On December 12 2013 05:30 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 05:11 purpletrator wrote:
before slam gets too far, active lurkers (theres gotta be like 10 of us), who is scummier, cora or spag?
I haven't thought cora was scummy all game. But I have to admit, something feels off about this whole notes thing. He asks "Do you want to see them?" and then he's all: Uh I don't have em w/ me. I'll be very curious to see them as well.

I really don't like all this movement to Spag as soon as Vayne has the vote lead. Pretty sure scum is trying to keep vayne alive. Which would make spag town.

On December 12 2013 05:38 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 05:35 Alakaslam wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:30 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:11 purpletrator wrote:
before slam gets too far, active lurkers (theres gotta be like 10 of us), who is scummier, cora or spag?
I haven't thought cora was scummy all game. But I have to admit, something feels off about this whole notes thing. He asks "Do you want to see them?" and then he's all: Uh I don't have em w/ me. I'll be very curious to see them as well.

I really don't like all this movement to Spag as soon as Vayne has the vote lead. Pretty sure scum is trying to keep vayne alive. Which would make spag town.

They are scum together. I can switch to vayneauthority I it would make you comfortable but believe me spag is scummier. Vayneauthority might just be SK actually.
Vayne basically scumslipped that Spag is town. A Scum Vayne means that Spag is p much confirmed town.

JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 19:06 GMT
#1598
On December 13 2013 04:03 Corazon wrote:
Ok, fair enough JJD. So you want a Vayne lynch D2?
Very much so.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 19:40 GMT
#1601
On December 13 2013 04:07 Corazon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2013 04:06 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 13 2013 04:03 Corazon wrote:
Ok, fair enough JJD. So you want a Vayne lynch D2?
Very much so.

Good, good. In the event a Vayne lynch doesn't happen, who would you be ok lynching?
IDK who my #2 is right now. There's a few people I wouldn't mind lynching but none nearly as much as Vayne. And a red vayne means the day 1 lynch gives us a ton of info.

I haven't really been crazy about purple this game. He'd probably be a good lynch.

And I can't get over Kush voting spag after defending him a whole bunch. But other than that I've mostly thought he was ok this game

Also, I thought sidespring was scummy early game and all he's done since then is lurk.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 19:48 GMT
#1602
How about u cora? Who do you wanna lynch tomorrow? What's ur take on the people I mentioned?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 20:25 GMT
#1606
On December 10 2013 06:02 Corazon wrote:
If you are town and you are lurking, expect to be under the gun during the game and expect me to not be very nice to you post-game. I will be weighing activity a lot heavier in my voting decision this game than I have in the past. You all are warned. If you are going to take a sieste the entire time and not participate, I am going to be on you until you do so.

......
On December 13 2013 05:07 Corazon wrote:
I do agree that sidespring needs to contribute more but I do how he explained his vote. His explanation for voting Vayne was a lot better then a lot of other explanations for votes. I'd like to give him a chance.


Wow you really let him have it. U realize he has like 10 posts this game?

I find it funny how u rant and rave like a madman @ anyone that calls you scummy. But ur sweet as pumpkin pie to a lurker when you put all lurkers on notice @ the start of the game.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 20:38 GMT
#1611
On December 13 2013 05:31 Corazon wrote:
I love how you yell at me for getting mad at people yet get mad at me when I don't agree with you.

How am I mad at you and what are u not agreeing w/ me about?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 20:40 GMT
#1614
and FWIW cora, I did like ur scumread post. Some of it mirrors my thoughts.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 20:46 GMT
#1619
On December 13 2013 05:40 JarJarDrinks wrote:
and FWIW cora, I did like ur scumread post. Some of it mirrors my thoughts.
Specifically about purple and a little about Xatalos. HF is pretty town to me so I definately dont agree w/ you there. NOt sure about the grack case. Gonna reread him.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 20:59 GMT
#1632
On December 13 2013 05:46 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Jar why do you think Kush is okay other than voting for Spag? He's intentionally made himself very difficult to read, which can only correspond with a scum agenda.

I don't think scum would come out an say "I'm doing a lurk strat this game".

I thought his push on bumatlarge was very genuine (speaking of which, bum is another person I wanna look closer @)

I thought how he voted for me and unvoted me after rereading my filter seemd pretty natural as well.

I just haven't seen anything that I'd call scummy...EXCEPT the whole voting for spag thing. That's just so bad and almost negates everything else.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 21:06 GMT
#1643
On December 13 2013 05:59 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
Holyflare the Medic has been shot by an ass-bullet!

does this mean he was vig shot?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 21:14 GMT
#1659
On December 13 2013 06:08 VayneAuthority wrote:
so yea HF got doublestacked by mafia and our vig, too strong
Well my first thought was that the mafia kill got healed. But I guess you'd know who mafia shot @.

##vote VayneAuthority
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 21:21 GMT
#1665
On December 13 2013 06:15 VayneAuthority wrote:
the tunnel continues. down syndrome tends to have that affect
You do realize that Downs Syndrome is an affliction that affects real people. Maybe you should consider the possibility that some of the people reading this has friends or family that are affected by it before you starting throwing it around as a insult. Don't be so ignorant.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 12 2013 21:52 GMT
#1690
Who could possibly read this:
On December 13 2013 05:59 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
Holyflare the Medic has been shot by an ass-bullet!
and come to the conclusion that he was double killed. My first thought was "Do we have a town roleblocker?" then when I realized we didn't, I was like: Oh I guess scum shot was healed. It didn't even cross my mind that "shot by an ass-bullet" could mean that he was shot by both vig and scum.

And I checked w/ Sent. He confirmed that it could indeed mean that he was double shot.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 13 2013 04:37 GMT
#1722
Plu. Save it for the postgame. This isn't helping.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 13 2013 04:53 GMT
#1728
On December 13 2013 13:45 Plutarch wrote:
What do you two think of LSB?

Going to bed now. I'll reread him tomorrow but I don't think I've found him scummy at all so far though. I do like his scumreads (which I believe are purple and sidesprung)

Ur thoughts on Vayne?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 13 2013 13:33 GMT
#1783
On December 13 2013 21:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I will not vote for anyone but Plutarch today. My case proves he is scum because he is using the same information to form a different read. I stopped listening other people last night.
Rayn stop. Plu has been scumhunting all game. He's nowhere near the scummiest person right now. Even if you're right and he's scum, he's not the only one and he's unlikely to get lynched today. Please don't shit up the vote.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 13 2013 14:47 GMT
#1785
So none of y'all thinks it's scummy that vayne knows that HF was doubleshot?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 13 2013 15:26 GMT
#1787
On December 13 2013 23:31 purpletrator wrote:
I'm looking at rayn, LSB and sidesprang for lynch today.

Plutarch is the towniest player in the thread. Friendship points for whoever points it out first.
Just checked ur filter and this is the first time you've mentioned sidespring. What don't you like about him?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 13 2013 16:41 GMT
#1799
On December 14 2013 00:26 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2013 23:31 purpletrator wrote:
I'm looking at rayn, LSB and sidesprang for lynch today.

Plutarch is the towniest player in the thread. Friendship points for whoever points it out first.
Just checked ur filter and this is the first time you've mentioned sidespring. What don't you like about him?
Anyway, my reasoning for questioning this is it feels like a "Lemme throw a scumbuddy's name in my suspect list" type of post.

Purple has been pretty scummy to me all game and has only gotten worse.

Sidesprung is still on < 1 page of filter and the few posts he made are scummy.

I could lynch either of these guys if the vayne lynch isn't happening. Don't like any of the other names being thrown out there.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 13 2013 18:06 GMT
#1803
Hey, anyone feel like talking about todays lynch?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 13 2013 18:53 GMT
#1837
On December 14 2013 03:37 Xatalos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 14 2013 03:35 LSB wrote:
Your point is?


You really just keep tunneling sidesprang for that one suspicious move at the very start of the game?

Don't you have anything to add about him? Or why don't you even TRY convincing anyone that he should be lynched?

Maybe you're just scum and you don't really care.
Sidesprigs has 2 posts in the last 3 days. What exactly would you like him to talk about? Like his "suspicious move at the very start of the game" is all he's done this game.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 13 2013 19:06 GMT
#1848
@Rayne - Where are you w/ Vayne? You didn't seem to like him yesterday when he was the alternate wagon. Now that Spag flipped town, shouldn't you be MORE suspicious of Vayne?

And especially since you don't seem to like Purple and Art and they were both a huge part of the switch to Spags which saved Vayne.

That being said, I'd support a purple vote. Art looks mostly OK to me.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 13 2013 19:28 GMT
#1871
On December 14 2013 04:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
In case two different shots occur on same person will it be notified in flavor?
I already said this. I PMed Sent shortly after the NK and he said that the flavor we were given could also mean that he was doublestacked.

Please respond to my Vayne question.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 13 2013 19:30 GMT
#1872
Here ya go:
On December 13 2013 06:52 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Who could possibly read this:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2013 05:59 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
Holyflare the Medic has been shot by an ass-bullet!
and come to the conclusion that he was double killed. My first thought was "Do we have a town roleblocker?" then when I realized we didn't, I was like: Oh I guess scum shot was healed. It didn't even cross my mind that "shot by an ass-bullet" could mean that he was shot by both vig and scum.

And I checked w/ Sent. He confirmed that it could indeed mean that he was double shot.

JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 13 2013 19:46 GMT
#1878
On December 14 2013 04:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2013 06:14 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 13 2013 06:08 VayneAuthority wrote:
so yea HF got doublestacked by mafia and our vig, too strong
Well my first thought was that the mafia kill got healed. But I guess you'd know who mafia shot @.

##vote VayneAuthority

Hmm that's actually interesting point.
Vayne how did you reach to this conclusion?
Yeah, look about 5 posts up. I word it alot better.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 13 2013 19:55 GMT
#1883
On December 14 2013 04:44 VayneAuthority wrote:
I realized after that medic could have also saved but I had thought HF one of the more townie people day 1 so I figured he was just double shot since it is more likely then a save.

Simple probability

OK, but it specifically said "Shot by an ASS-bullet".

So basically, there were 2 deaths. One says that the person was vig-killed, the other says the person was SK-killed.

Why would you not assume that a person killed by mafia would get a similiar cause of death?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 13 2013 20:02 GMT
#1889
On December 14 2013 05:01 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 14 2013 04:58 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 14 2013 04:55 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 14 2013 04:44 VayneAuthority wrote:
I realized after that medic could have also saved but I had thought HF one of the more townie people day 1 so I figured he was just double shot since it is more likely then a save.

Simple probability

OK, but it specifically said "Shot by an ASS-bullet".

So basically, there were 2 deaths. One says that the person was vig-killed, the other says the person was SK-killed.

Why would you not assume that a person killed by mafia would get a similiar cause of death?


I don't particularly follow? this is like an alakaslam post, english please

This is what he is saying:
hosts tells us vig shot HF from the kill flavor
hosts tells us SK shot bum from the kill flavor.
Why wouldn't the hosts tell us who mafia shot? (I think they would.)
Sent said that it's possible that "Shot by an ASS-bullet" could mean doublestacked.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 13 2013 20:07 GMT
#1894
On December 14 2013 05:05 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 14 2013 05:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 14 2013 05:01 Grackaroni wrote:
On December 14 2013 04:58 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 14 2013 04:55 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 14 2013 04:44 VayneAuthority wrote:
I realized after that medic could have also saved but I had thought HF one of the more townie people day 1 so I figured he was just double shot since it is more likely then a save.

Simple probability

OK, but it specifically said "Shot by an ASS-bullet".

So basically, there were 2 deaths. One says that the person was vig-killed, the other says the person was SK-killed.

Why would you not assume that a person killed by mafia would get a similiar cause of death?


I don't particularly follow? this is like an alakaslam post, english please

This is what he is saying:
hosts tells us vig shot HF from the kill flavor
hosts tells us SK shot bum from the kill flavor.
Why wouldn't the hosts tell us who mafia shot? (I think they would.)

Well if you believe this you should be lynching JJD because he is lying then.

I don't see where he is lying.

I PMed the host and they confirmed. So believe me when I say that the NK could have meant doublestacked. Which means Vayne knew that when he'd have no reason to.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 13 2013 20:17 GMT
#1901
On December 14 2013 05:09 VayneAuthority wrote:
you really need to take a step back and realize that you are basing your entire game off of something that isn't alignment indicative at all.
Stop. Ur very aware I voted you yesterday and have been trying to get you lynched well before this latest scumslip.

On December 14 2013 05:09 VayneAuthority wrote:I always post a stream of consciousness after a phase ends without thinking much about what I am saying.
So now your excuse is that you weren't thinking much about what you're saying? A second ago you said that you used simple probablity and thought that HF was shot because he was so townie.

On December 14 2013 04:44 VayneAuthority wrote:
I realized after that medic could have also saved but I had thought HF one of the more townie people day 1 so I figured he was just double shot since it is more likely then a save.

Simple probability



So which is it?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 13 2013 22:16 GMT
#1936
On December 14 2013 07:03 Blazinghand wrote:
by "caught" do you mean "dead and flipped scum" or "this is my personal scumread and right now the leading wagon has 3 votes"

please advise

By "caught" he means probably town.

I find the last bunch of posts from kush to be incredibly contrived since the day has been mostly a clusterfuck and there's nowhere near a consensus as to who is the best lynch today.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 14:40 GMT
#2050
On December 14 2013 22:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Btw all the votes on Vayne are lazy as fuck.
I assume u mean "All except JJD" since I've been working on getting vayne lynched forever.

But FWIW I agree w/ you about the other votes. Xigxag didn't give any reason @ all and I really don't like sidesprings explaination. Like, sides reasonig was really weak. I gave a bunch of great reasons throughout the last few days for vayne being scummy and all he could come up w/ is: He tunneled slam/He hasn't scumhunted.

He's clearly not reading the thread and just did a quick filter read of Vayne. But he could easily be a townie doin that.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 14:49 GMT
#2053
This LSB wagon sucks people. Can we please find a new target. People I'd rather lynch than LSB:

Vayne, Purple, Sidespring, Xatalos, Kush

Can we switch to one of those? Preferaby Vayne since ya know, he was almost lynched yesterday and he was saved last minute.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 16:00 GMT
#2057
The Vayne Case


This is to consolodate what U've already said and there's also some new stuff. Please read.





Point 1 - His policy Lynch of Slam

Here's where he explains why he's willing to vote for Slam whether or he's scum or not:
On December 10 2013 09:15 VayneAuthority wrote:
I would rather enjoy myself and lose then not enjoy it, hence why I am voting you alakaslam, scum or not. I do not care about lynching scum if im not having fun in the first place, that comes first.


OK, so here he says that winning is only his 2nd goal. Having fun comes first. OK, nothing really alignment indicative in that.

He wants to policy lynch slam becase Slam being in the game prevents him from having fun... But for some reason, that only applies to day one:
On December 12 2013 07:02 VayneAuthority wrote:
To be clear we don't have time to waste on alakaslam now so I'm ignoring him from now on scum or not. Real game starts after the flip tomorrow, see you then.


Why couldn't he just ignore him on day 1 as well? Or why is he now all of a sudden letting enjoying the game take a back seat to winning?





Point 2 - He know Spag was town

Here's where I first post about it:
On December 12 2013 03:36 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Also, I think this is a slip:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 02:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:20 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:14 VayneAuthority wrote:
I have one goal today and one goal only. If you think I would help town get rid of alakaslam as scum I can't help you.

That's actually quite an interesting comment Vayne.
What you very well know is that even if Slam doesn't get lynched he will most likely get shot on N1. Why would you not help get rid of him as scum, regardless of his alignment?


On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.


I've already pretty much answered all of this

In this game the thread sentiment actually suggests vigi's WILL shoot useless people. Let's consider a scenario where you are scum.

If Slam is scum you:
1) can reasonably assume a vigi will shoot him on N1 anyways so
2) when you lynch him instead you gain towncredit
3) even if you don't succeed, you gain town credit when he flips red
4) you don't need to contribute anything useful

If Slam is town you:
1) can't be held responsible for anything scummy because it's a pro-town thing to suggest a policy lynch on him anyways
2) you don't need to contribute anything useful

So, why again is it unreasonable to assume you would vouch for his lynch as mafia?


because I would never, ever help town get rid of somebody so detrimental to town. He adds another scumplayer to my team, why would I want to get rid of him ever? I could just sheep you on spag or something dumb like that. I know exactly what it looks like.



Then when rayn calls him out about it, he says:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 02:33 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:20 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:14 VayneAuthority wrote:
I have one goal today and one goal only. If you think I would help town get rid of alakaslam as scum I can't help you.

That's actually quite an interesting comment Vayne.
What you very well know is that even if Slam doesn't get lynched he will most likely get shot on N1. Why would you not help get rid of him as scum, regardless of his alignment?


On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.


I've already pretty much answered all of this

In this game the thread sentiment actually suggests vigi's WILL shoot useless people. Let's consider a scenario where you are scum.

If Slam is scum you:
1) can reasonably assume a vigi will shoot him on N1 anyways so
2) when you lynch him instead you gain towncredit
3) even if you don't succeed, you gain town credit when he flips red
4) you don't need to contribute anything useful

If Slam is town you:
1) can't be held responsible for anything scummy because it's a pro-town thing to suggest a policy lynch on him anyways
2) you don't need to contribute anything useful

So, why again is it unreasonable to assume you would vouch for his lynch as mafia?


because I would never, ever help town get rid of somebody so detrimental to town. He adds another scumplayer to my team, why would I want to get rid of him ever? I could just sheep you on spag or something dumb like that. I know exactly what it looks like.

Fair enough, just wanted to be sure what you meant.
Are you suggesting Spaghetticus is town?


Yea he was one of the first to want to lynch Slam so I have him as town until further notice.


A few moments earlier when kush asked him what he thought of spag and cora, he refused to answer. Why not say you have a townread on someone that is picking up votes? It only became something he was willing to discuss to cover up his slip.


and yes I realize that this likely makes spag town.


He say's that if he was scum, he would just sheep the case against spag. How exactly does he know that Spag is town and why hasn't he mentioned it before?

Then he answers vaynes question by saying he figured Spag was town because he "was one of the first to want to lynch Slam". Well why would him wanting to lynch your policy lynch make he town?





Point 3 - The Contradiction

This is all well documented. SO just gonna repost what I've said already:

On December 12 2013 02:50 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 02:41 kushm4sta wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:39 VayneAuthority wrote:
it's not ridiculous at all if you consider how I play mafia. I KILL these kind of players at night because I find it more enjoyable to play with people that can actually scumhunt and try to trick them. Between that and my blue kill sniping I don't see how it is farfetch'd at all.


So you would never push a mislynch on slam because he is so bad for town, but you would nk him??/ that makes no sense.


##unvote
##vote VayneAuthority


Complete contradiction

Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 02:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:20 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 02:14 VayneAuthority wrote:
I have one goal today and one goal only. If you think I would help town get rid of alakaslam as scum I can't help you.

That's actually quite an interesting comment Vayne.
What you very well know is that even if Slam doesn't get lynched he will most likely get shot on N1. Why would you not help get rid of him as scum, regardless of his alignment?


On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.


I've already pretty much answered all of this

In this game the thread sentiment actually suggests vigi's WILL shoot useless people. Let's consider a scenario where you are scum.

If Slam is scum you:
1) can reasonably assume a vigi will shoot him on N1 anyways so
2) when you lynch him instead you gain towncredit
3) even if you don't succeed, you gain town credit when he flips red
4) you don't need to contribute anything useful

If Slam is town you:
1) can't be held responsible for anything scummy because it's a pro-town thing to suggest a policy lynch on him anyways
2) you don't need to contribute anything useful

So, why again is it unreasonable to assume you would vouch for his lynch as mafia?


because I would never, ever help town get rid of somebody so detrimental to town. He adds another scumplayer to my team, why would I want to get rid of him ever? I could just sheep you on spag or something dumb like that. I know exactly what it looks like.


On December 12 2013 04:01 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 03:52 VayneAuthority wrote:
On December 12 2013 03:51 Grackaroni wrote:
On December 12 2013 03:47 VayneAuthority wrote:
not to mention that it isn't even a contradiction to begin with, YOU SEE ME GETTING RID OF ALAKASLAM IN THE THREAD. YOU DON'T KNOW THAT I GOT RID OF HIM IF I'M MAFIA. good lord.

it is a contradiction if you say you are town for getting rid of the 4th mafia and that you would leave him in as scum. Then you admit that you would get rid of him because you like a real game. Night killing him for the hell of it is no different than lynching him for the hell of it when you could get a better lynch from 'dumping your vote on spaghetti"


I don't think you realize the difference between pushing somebody in thread and night killing them. Hint: one can be seen by everybody, the other cannot.

Lmao

"He adds another scumplayer to my team, why would I want to get rid of him ever?"

That's your quote right there bud. Explain why you'd want to nightkill a scumplayer if you were scum. Or don't since like you said: You'd never want to get rid of him ever.

That's pretty definate statement right there. Saying that you would NK him as scum is a 100% contradiction. You're saying that Slam is a scum asset that scum would want to stay in the game no matter what.



And another similiar contradiction:
On December 12 2013 05:55 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 05:52 Xatalos wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:49 Xatalos wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 12 2013 05:41 Xatalos wrote:
I really don't like the Spag wagon. It has both Artanis and purple... And neither of them provided any reasoning for voting him.

The problem is not the voters. I have the same problem (well not really with purple, as he basically chose between spag/vayne)...

It's that Spag is so fucking scummy and the evidence is far better than on vayne.


I'm not still sure why VA is #2 in votes. Apparently he contradicted himself, but why is he scum just for that? It's not like he needed to talk about how he'd love to NK / lynch Alakaslam.

Yes he needed, did you read?
I confronted him about his thoughts on lynching Slam.


I read through pretty fast. Gonna reread that portion.

ALso this:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2013 04:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Here is another one.
On December 11 2013 13:03 VayneAuthority wrote:
I hope he flips town so I am actually justified in saying that he is hindering the game. If he's scum he can do whatever the fuck he wants. Read that portal game by greymist if you want to see how hard it is to lynch this guy as scum. His entire team bussed him and he still barely got lynched. nuff said.

On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.

... i really don't get it.. i really don't...








Point 4 - He tried to say that the Alaska vote was more than just a policy vote and then abandoned it.

On December 11 2013 13:10 VayneAuthority wrote:
Considering the decent resistance in this game at the day 1 stage I would say there is actually a decent chance for him to flip scum combined with the points I have already made. There is quite a group of people that have pretty much ignored him altogether, which is what I usually do. I would like a better reason on why we shouldn't lynch him besides "lol vigi" because we all know nobody uses their vig shots like that; they always end up being hero vig shots.

On December 11 2013 13:11 VayneAuthority wrote:
As I said earlier, this isn't policy lynch anymore btw. I am now starting a real discussion on why he is a good lynch.

On December 11 2013 13:34 VayneAuthority wrote:
Let's try this the other way around

can anyone explain to me why alakaslam will not flip scum besides probability? that's one thing he has going for him.

On December 12 2013 02:16 VayneAuthority wrote:
yes, because he doesn't actually post things that can be read. The only time he will ever get lynched is if his entire team throws him under the bus for cred like in portal


Then as I pointed out above he says that we don't have time to waste on slam anymore. Why not pursue your scum read anymore? ESPECIALLY since it's someone you want out of the game based on policy.





Point 5 - The scum slip.

This is also something I already talked alot about so will just repost what I've said:
On December 13 2013 06:14 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2013 06:08 VayneAuthority wrote:
so yea HF got doublestacked by mafia and our vig, too strong
Well my first thought was that the mafia kill got healed. But I guess you'd know who mafia shot @.

##vote VayneAuthority

On December 13 2013 06:52 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Who could possibly read this:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2013 05:59 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
Holyflare the Medic has been shot by an ass-bullet!
and come to the conclusion that he was double killed. My first thought was "Do we have a town roleblocker?" then when I realized we didn't, I was like: Oh I guess scum shot was healed. It didn't even cross my mind that "shot by an ass-bullet" could mean that he was shot by both vig and scum.

And I checked w/ Sent. He confirmed that it could indeed mean that he was double shot.

On December 14 2013 04:55 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 14 2013 04:44 VayneAuthority wrote:
I realized after that medic could have also saved but I had thought HF one of the more townie people day 1 so I figured he was just double shot since it is more likely then a save.

Simple probability

OK, but it specifically said "Shot by an ASS-bullet".

So basically, there were 2 deaths. One says that the person was vig-killed, the other says the person was SK-killed.

Why would you not assume that a person killed by mafia would get a similiar cause of death?



And then he tried to cook up 2 different excuses for it:
On December 14 2013 05:17 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 14 2013 05:09 VayneAuthority wrote:
you really need to take a step back and realize that you are basing your entire game off of something that isn't alignment indicative at all.
Stop. Ur very aware I voted you yesterday and have been trying to get you lynched well before this latest scumslip.

Show nested quote +
On December 14 2013 05:09 VayneAuthority wrote:I always post a stream of consciousness after a phase ends without thinking much about what I am saying.
So now your excuse is that you weren't thinking much about what you're saying? A second ago you said that you used simple probablity and thought that HF was shot because he was so townie.

Show nested quote +
On December 14 2013 04:44 VayneAuthority wrote:
I realized after that medic could have also saved but I had thought HF one of the more townie people day 1 so I figured he was just double shot since it is more likely then a save.

Simple probability



So which is it?





Can anyone really tell me that there's a better case for LSB (or anyone else for that matter)?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 18:47 GMT
#2071
@rayne - U think Vayne is town. U think I'm town. I make a huge case against Vayne which has some real good points.

Where are all the scum sheep votes? No scum wants to bandwagon such a thought out case from a townie? There's just too much resistance for vayne to be town.

Or Maybe you think scum already has a person voting vayne?

On December 14 2013 23:20 Aquanim wrote:
VayneAuthority (3): JarJarDrinks, xigxag, sidesprang

You can't tell me that you believe town is making a case against town and 2 townies are the only people on the wagon. Someone is scum in that group.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 19:02 GMT
#2077
On December 15 2013 01:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
JJD the problem is i kinda get Vayne. He uses a lot of absolutes in his posts and when he explained those "scumslips" he meant it differently than how we read it. It's also his behavior. Vayne is way more tryhard and cooperative as mafia. When he is town he does like policy lynches, especially Slam, i totally get that from him and the whole attitude towards Slam. When people accuse him he basically says "fuck you" to all of them and does not even try to be reasonable. He goes "lynch me fuckers, here are my reads i don't care if you listen to me or not and i am not going to defend myself".

That's exactly what he is doing in this game, and it's not what he does as mafia. As mafia he cares about his team winning and pushes scum agenda and that's definitely not what he is doing here.
That's not the meta read I have on vayne. I was his scumbuddy once and basicallly what happened was he was under alot of pressure early game and he pretty much lashed out and insulted people and town sentiment changed to "Oh he's too scummy to be scum" and then he took a backseat and stayed out of the spotlight and made it to the endgame.

Not sure where u'r read is coming from but was he under alot of pressure in whatever game it's from?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 19:04 GMT
#2078
Here's it is:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=410972

You were even in it. I believe we NK'd u night 1.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 19:49 GMT
#2111
BTW, How bad does all this disagreement make these Kush posts look?

On December 14 2013 06:45 kushm4sta wrote:
too late bh because this game is already near solved

On December 14 2013 06:59 kushm4sta wrote:
i said near solved.
2 scum have been caught IMO.

On December 14 2013 07:06 kushm4sta wrote:
i dare you to tell me lsb and xatalos aren't scum.



I already said that these posts look contrived but man, even if he truly believes that "2 scum have been caught" (though I don't know how), how can he say something like the game is almost solved when the entire town is is such disagreement.

I wouldn't mind a Kush lynch. His vote for spag after totally defending is one of the scummiest things to happen this game and his explaination was weak @ best.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 20:13 GMT
#2135
On December 15 2013 05:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Why is everyone thinking purple is scummy but noone wants to lynch him?
Cause there's alot scummier people. I'll vote for purple if it ends up between him and any of (LSB, Art, xigxag). Not sure which horse I'd back between Purple and Xatalos (who I think are both scummy but @ the bottom of my list).

But I'd prefer not to have to make that decision. Vayne is best Lynch, then Kush, then probably sidespring.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 20:19 GMT
#2143
On December 15 2013 05:15 Alakaslam wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2013 05:13 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 15 2013 05:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Why is everyone thinking purple is scummy but noone wants to lynch him?
Cause there's alot scummier people. I'll vote for purple if it ends up between him and any of (LSB, Art, xigxag). Not sure which horse I'd back between Purple and Xatalos (who I think are both scummy but @ the bottom of my list).

But I'd prefer not to have to make that decision. Vayne is best Lynch, then Kush, then probably sidespring.

Jarjardrinks If it is coming from me does "you are tunneling vayne emotionally" hold any strength?

How am I tunnelling? He's my top scumread and I want him lynched. I've posted plenty about other people.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 20:23 GMT
#2148
On December 15 2013 05:12 Xatalos wrote:
What's the situation here? I have no idea who has voted who and who's even leading in votes atm.

Yeah, I'm trying to figure it out too.

Page 96 has a votecount from aqua and a link to the spreadsheet from from sent and they don't match each other. One has LSB w/ 6 votes, one has him w/ 3.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 20:27 GMT
#2156
On December 15 2013 05:24 VayneAuthority wrote:
not like we need to know the votecount, vote who you think is scum and be done with it. The only reason to want to know it is to manipulate the voting. What's done will be done
Can we please lynch this guy?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 20:38 GMT
#2174
I will vote purple if it looks like LSB will be in the lead over Vayne.

But jeez people. Look how hard it's been to lynch vayne for 2 days straight now. This is a mirror of the Spag vote. LSB is gonna flip town.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 20:47 GMT
#2197
On December 15 2013 05:22 Grackaroni wrote:
lol nobody knows who is going to be lynched.
If it is LSB or Vayne then I'm voting LSB.
WHy did you vote Vayne yesterday?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 20:52 GMT
#2211
@Alakaslam what r u doing w/ ur vote?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 21:12 GMT
#2281
K, guess I was wrong about vayne. No way that was a 2 scum race.

Slam looks pretty terrible after trying to vote snipe. I think Grack looks pretty bad too wasting his vote when he was clearly here.

Rayn and Plu obv town. Post all Ur reads tonight since one of u is prob gonna die.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 21:27 GMT
#2296
On December 15 2013 06:09 VayneAuthority wrote:
purple and LSB have association tells galore in his filter, I don't see why we don't lynch LSB too

You think the whole smurf vote thing between them was contrived?

On December 10 2013 07:33 purpletrator wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 10 2013 07:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 10 2013 07:18 Alakaslam wrote:
On December 10 2013 07:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 10 2013 06:44 purpletrator wrote:
On December 10 2013 06:43 LSB wrote:
##Vote: purpletrator
Scum are mafia pretending to be someone else.
Smurfs are players pretending to be someone else.
Smurfs = Mafia.
Flawless mafia. Lynch all Smurfs

You could at least start in alphabetical order. What if I reveal my identity? Would you change your vote to a different smurf?

Worst post in thread.
##Vote: purpletrator

Kusplain?

Hello sir, I promise not to get mad at you this game

If purpletrator can reasonably explain what he is going to achieve with that post i'm going to unvote.
Now i gotta sleep! cya tomorrow.

Please don't be useless Alakaslam ok?

You mean to tell me you have no concern over the erroneous logic LSB used to vote me? You honestly think my response is worse than "smurfs=mafia"?
To actually answer your question, I'm wondering why LSB is wasting my time and wanted to see if he's actually trying to get a response or just trolling. When he ignored my response I chalked it up to 'just trolling'. Then you called me out, he noticed my response and now wants to fish for my identity. Now it looks scummy.
Show nested quote +
On December 10 2013 07:18 LSB wrote:
Missed this post

On December 10 2013 06:44 purpletrator wrote:
On December 10 2013 06:43 LSB wrote:
##Vote: purpletrator
Scum are mafia pretending to be someone else.
Smurfs are players pretending to be someone else.
Smurfs = Mafia.
Flawless mafia. Lynch all Smurfs

You could at least start in alphabetical order. What if I reveal my identity? Would you change your vote to a different smurf?

Ya, sure. Reveal please!

It was a hypothetical. I'm not revealing my identity. Good to know you dont give a shit about the lynch.

##Vote: LSB

JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 21:32 GMT
#2306
Also I guess we know that Plu was in fact targetted and healed last night.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 21:36 GMT
#2310
On December 15 2013 06:33 Plutarch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2013 06:32 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Also I guess we know that Plu was in fact targetted and healed last night.


How?
Cause he basically scumslipped that it happened when he quoted HFs breadcrumb and called you confirmed town.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 14 2013 22:00 GMT
#2325
On December 15 2013 03:12 Alakaslam wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2013 01:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
JJD the problem is i kinda get Vayne. He uses a lot of absolutes in his posts and when he explained those "scumslips" he meant it differently than how we read it. It's also his behavior. Vayne is way more tryhard and cooperative as mafia. When he is town he does like policy lynches, especially Slam, i totally get that from him and the whole attitude towards Slam. When people accuse him he basically says "fuck you" to all of them and does not even try to be reasonable. He goes "lynch me fuckers, here are my reads i don't care if you listen to me or not and i am not going to defend myself".

That's exactly what he is doing in this game, and it's not what he does as mafia. As mafia he cares about his team winning and pushes scum agenda and that's definitely not what he is doing here.

Well and not to mention pregame bitterness, Rayne... He is obviously town almost on the same level as Blazinghand.

JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 15 2013 18:34 GMT
#2486
As much as I'd like the fact that I pushed hard for a townie lynch 2 days in a row to be false, I don't understand how Vayne can be scum anymore.

Purple tried to vote Vayne last minute. What purpose could that serve? I was pretty much the only person that thought Vayne was scum. Meanwhile the whole town suspected purple. Why would scum sacrifice Vayne to keep the very scummy Purple in the game?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 15 2013 18:56 GMT
#2492
On December 15 2013 03:12 Alakaslam wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2013 01:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
JJD the problem is i kinda get Vayne. He uses a lot of absolutes in his posts and when he explained those "scumslips" he meant it differently than how we read it. It's also his behavior. Vayne is way more tryhard and cooperative as mafia. When he is town he does like policy lynches, especially Slam, i totally get that from him and the whole attitude towards Slam. When people accuse him he basically says "fuck you" to all of them and does not even try to be reasonable. He goes "lynch me fuckers, here are my reads i don't care if you listen to me or not and i am not going to defend myself".

That's exactly what he is doing in this game, and it's not what he does as mafia. As mafia he cares about his team winning and pushes scum agenda and that's definitely not what he is doing here.

Well and not to mention pregame bitterness, Rayne... He is obviously town almost on the same level as Blazinghand.
K, already pointed this out but I don't understand how Slam can say that Vayne is almost as obviously town as the confirmed vig and then vote him for any reason whatsoever.

Here's his explaination:
On December 15 2013 06:31 Alakaslam wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2013 06:06 VayneAuthority wrote:
k now some one try and explain what alakaslam just tried to do, plz.

Tried to make sure you were lynched before LSB if it was gonna be those wagons. I didn't have confidence in Rayne, his word is now strong with me.
Well not sure why he'd want Vayne lynched before LSB. Did he have an even bigger townread on LSB?

But let's forget about his vayne townread for a minute. So he wanted to make sure Vayne got lynched before LSB did? Well here's the votecount when he made his switch:
On December 15 2013 05:56 Aquanim wrote:
Vote Count


purpletrator (6): raynpelikoneet, Plutarch, ArtanisXp, VayneAuthority, Alakaslam, Xatalos

VayneAuthority (4): JarJarDrinks, xigxag, sidesprang, LSB

LSB (2): Kushm4sta, Coagulation

xigxag (1): Blazinghand

Xatalos (1): Grackaroni

raynpelikoneet (1): purpletrator

NOT VOTING: Nobody

Currently Purpletrator is set to be lynched.

Let me know if I missed anyone!

Deadline is in

WTF? LSB had 2 votes. And Slam didn't even change his vote to Vayne. He changed it to xigxag.

I just can't see any reason for that vote change other than trying to save purple.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 15 2013 18:59 GMT
#2493
And that votecount was posted on the same page as his switch. So he should have been aware of how the votes stood.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 15 2013 19:08 GMT
#2494
On December 15 2013 05:54 Alakaslam wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2013 05:52 JarJarDrinks wrote:
@Alakaslam what r u doing w/ ur vote?

Making sure if it is equal between vayne and LSB it winds up being vayne. I would prefer purple and cig.
Again. If he'd prefer purple, then why would he take his vote off him when he has the lead?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 15 2013 20:48 GMT
#2503
Purple wasn't forced to vote Vayne. He could have just stayed away from the thread. He showed up last minute to try and save himself.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 15 2013 20:50 GMT
#2504
Also, my money is on Grack as SK. Since he really hasn't seemed to care about the lynches. As evidenced by the fact that he voted for vayne day 1 but on day 2 he specifically said he refused to do so w/o giving any reason.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 16 2013 02:59 GMT
#2560
On December 16 2013 05:51 Plutarch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2013 05:48 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Purple wasn't forced to vote Vayne. He could have just stayed away from the thread. He showed up last minute to try and save himself.


He showed up, tried to save himself, and then was forced to vote for vayne last minute.

sure he could have stayed away. Also he could have corssvoted vayne to try and make vayne look good. Which is what he was doing.

How did he try to save himself? He showed up 4 minutes before lynchtime. There was no alternative wagon. There was zero benefit to him showing up and voting his scumbuddy. Vayne was already gonna look great after the lynch.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 16 2013 03:02 GMT
#2563
Oh, well cop claim changes things. Now I'm less inclined to believe vayne.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 16 2013 03:03 GMT
#2565
I'm confused. Are u claiming cop or not?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 16 2013 03:05 GMT
#2568
On December 16 2013 12:03 VayneAuthority wrote:
i was, but as he pointed out it doesn't make any sense at all. so guess ill just die

So, ur claiming scum?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 16 2013 03:08 GMT
#2571
On December 16 2013 12:06 VayneAuthority wrote:
No im 100% town. just trying to figure out ways I can avoid being lynched
And you think fakeclaiming cop was a good idea? You didn't consider the possibility of getting countered and outing the real cop?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 16 2013 03:10 GMT
#2573
SO now ur claiming SK?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 16 2013 03:27 GMT
#2584
Vayne, how old are you? You can't be older than like 15 right?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 16 2013 03:37 GMT
#2585
Anyway. Can't get anymore scummy than the fake cop claim. I think he's way more likely to flip SK though

##vote Vayne
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 16 2013 04:15 GMT
#2589
Going to bed. Will check out Xat tomorrow. I've had him as scummy most of this game but never really near the top of my reads. So that might actually make sense for a SK. Other people I think we should consider lynching: sidesprig, Grack, Slam.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 16 2013 18:19 GMT
#2612
@Xat - You really think all that Purple/LSB interaction was faked? LSB pushed really hard for Purps lynch.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 16 2013 20:19 GMT
#2642
On December 17 2013 04:49 LSB wrote:
Current Scum Team Reads willing to bandwagon anyone in this list who is put up to the lynch:
Xatalos/SideSprang/Alakaslam/purpletrator
This is exactly what I have too.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 16 2013 20:21 GMT
#2643
W/ Grack as SK for what I pointed out about how he voted vayne day 1 but day 2 refused to do so w/o giving any reason and then let his vote just waste even though he was in thread @ the deadline.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 04:57 GMT
#2694
On December 17 2013 11:12 Plutarch wrote:
Trust me guys. I am really really positive that Xatalos is the correct lynch.

Yeah, I agree. ##Vote Xatalos

Slam has actually changed my mind w/ his last batch of posts. I think I may be leaning town on him now.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 14:06 GMT
#2766
Like I said, I'm not so sure about Slam anymore. The vote switch was a dumb risk for him to take. Like he coordinated w/ his scumbuddy to vote snipe which not only would look incredibly suspicious, but after rechecking, it didn't actually help save purple @ the time.

@ no point after purple took the lead was vayne is danger of being lynched. Purple was up in votes 6 to 4. After Slam and Purple switched, it became 5 to 5 w/ purple still set to be lynched.


Since Slam was making such a risky scum play, why wouldn't he have switched to vayne to actually try and save purple?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 15:22 GMT
#2790
On December 18 2013 00:13 Plutarch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2013 00:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I don't think JJD would have been so vocal about asking the hosts if scum could have hit HF aswell if he was mafia. This is also interesting and could implicate SK:
On December 15 2013 06:12 JarJarDrinks wrote:
K, guess I was wrong about vayne. No way that was a 2 scum race.

Slam looks pretty terrible after trying to vote snipe. I think Grack looks pretty bad too wasting his vote when he was clearly here.

Rayn and Plu obv town. Post all Ur reads tonight since one of u is prob gonna die.

Why does he assume one of us is going to die on N2, the medic was dead and there was no reason to assume 2 medics.


Cause he is thinking in terms of having one KP and he is going to hit one of the towniest members cause he is scum. He doesn;t know who SK is going to hit. because SK may not want to hit town at that point.

Rayn. JJD is mafia. 100%
I'm confused. How is it not incredibly obvious that scum is gonna go after one of you 2? I don't understand how this indicates a scum mindset.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 15:37 GMT
#2798
On December 18 2013 00:26 Plutarch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2013 00:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 18 2013 00:15 Plutarch wrote:
On December 18 2013 00:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I mean it does not make sense that purple "scumslips" and JJD does the opposite.
If JJD was scum it would be trrible scum miscoordination because JJD basically has to at least on some level accuse purple after that.


It was only mentioned after purple was lynched so it was meaningless.

No man, it wasn't. It was mentioned way before noone was even voted for purple.
JJD had posted that in thread before i accused you and purple & Artanis went crazy on me.


Why would he call that 'basically a scumslip' then? when purple hadn't flipped and simply pointed a holyflare post out. That makes JJD look even worse than I thought.

It was after Purple Died I believe. I was calling Vaynes post about being doublestacked a scumslip before purple died.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 15:38 GMT
#2799
On December 18 2013 00:24 Plutarch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2013 00:22 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 18 2013 00:13 Plutarch wrote:
On December 18 2013 00:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I don't think JJD would have been so vocal about asking the hosts if scum could have hit HF aswell if he was mafia. This is also interesting and could implicate SK:
On December 15 2013 06:12 JarJarDrinks wrote:
K, guess I was wrong about vayne. No way that was a 2 scum race.

Slam looks pretty terrible after trying to vote snipe. I think Grack looks pretty bad too wasting his vote when he was clearly here.

Rayn and Plu obv town. Post all Ur reads tonight since one of u is prob gonna die.

Why does he assume one of us is going to die on N2, the medic was dead and there was no reason to assume 2 medics.


Cause he is thinking in terms of having one KP and he is going to hit one of the towniest members cause he is scum. He doesn;t know who SK is going to hit. because SK may not want to hit town at that point.

Rayn. JJD is mafia. 100%
I'm confused. How is it not incredibly obvious that scum is gonna go after one of you 2? I don't understand how this indicates a scum mindset.


It doesn't. all the other things I have posted make you confirmed scum though.

Lol, scum not mentioning me? Well how the hell can I defend myself from that?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 15:40 GMT
#2801
On December 18 2013 00:39 Plutarch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2013 00:37 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 18 2013 00:26 Plutarch wrote:
On December 18 2013 00:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 18 2013 00:15 Plutarch wrote:
On December 18 2013 00:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I mean it does not make sense that purple "scumslips" and JJD does the opposite.
If JJD was scum it would be trrible scum miscoordination because JJD basically has to at least on some level accuse purple after that.


It was only mentioned after purple was lynched so it was meaningless.

No man, it wasn't. It was mentioned way before noone was even voted for purple.
JJD had posted that in thread before i accused you and purple & Artanis went crazy on me.


Why would he call that 'basically a scumslip' then? when purple hadn't flipped and simply pointed a holyflare post out. That makes JJD look even worse than I thought.

It was after Purple Died I believe. I was calling Vaynes post about being doublestacked a scumslip before purple died.


Either way you are scum.

No, I'm not.

There, now I made a defense that's @ least as good as your case against me.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 15:49 GMT
#2809
On December 18 2013 00:42 Plutarch wrote:
You can't. You made a case on Xatalos and he does not mention you despite that. You don't mention or push xatalos despite making a case on him day one. You haven't done any serious scum hunting or made concerted pushes all game despite having decent activity.
Bullshit. Are you actually reading my filter cause I've done a ton of scumhunting. Vayne was my top scumread all game so he's the person I've been voting and pushing. I've had other people as scumreads and I've always said I'd vote for them if it came down to a vote between them and someone I didn't have a scum read on. It just so happens that Vayne has been a leading wagon all game.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 15:59 GMT
#2816
On December 18 2013 00:51 Plutarch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2013 00:49 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 18 2013 00:42 Plutarch wrote:
You can't. You made a case on Xatalos and he does not mention you despite that. You don't mention or push xatalos despite making a case on him day one. You haven't done any serious scum hunting or made concerted pushes all game despite having decent activity.
Bullshit. Are you actually reading my filter cause I've done a ton of scumhunting. Vayne was my top scumread all game so he's the person I've been voting and pushing. I've had other people as scumreads and I've always said I'd vote for them if it came down to a vote between them and someone I didn't have a scum read on. It just so happens that Vayne has been a leading wagon all game.


Yeah all you have done all game is half hardheartedly push the scummiest townie in the game. Despite calling out actual scum day one and then ignoring them mysteriously till the end of day two.

I ignored him cause he hadn't done anything I thought was too scummy since then and I had a scumread on Vayne. Don't forget, that once purple flipped, I was pretty confident that Vayne was town. And I argued against his lynch (even though you were pretty much 100% sure he was scum also). How easy would it have been for me to just have kept my scumread on him and secure a mislynch?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 16:05 GMT
#2826
On December 18 2013 00:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:
JJD:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2013 13:15 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Going to bed. Will check out Xat tomorrow. I've had him as scummy most of this game but never really near the top of my reads. So that might actually make sense for a SK. Other people I think we should consider lynching: sidesprig, Grack, Slam.

Show nested quote +
On December 17 2013 05:19 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 17 2013 04:49 LSB wrote:
Current Scum Team Reads willing to bandwagon anyone in this list who is put up to the lynch:
Xatalos/SideSprang/Alakaslam/purpletrator
This is exactly what I have too.

Where did Grack go`?


On December 17 2013 05:21 JarJarDrinks wrote:
W/ Grack as SK for what I pointed out about how he voted vayne day 1 but day 2 refused to do so w/o giving any reason and then let his vote just waste even though he was in thread @ the deadline.

JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 16:08 GMT
#2830
On December 18 2013 01:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yeah you definitely argued that Vayne is town. Here is your last post where you argue against Vayne lynch before he got modkilled:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2013 12:37 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Anyway. Can't get anymore scummy than the fake cop claim. I think he's way more likely to flip SK though

##vote Vayne

Totally town.
Well, duh. After he fake claimed, I didn;t think he was a townread anymore. Gimme a sec and I'll dig up me defending him.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 16:12 GMT
#2834
Actually, I'm not gonna dig it up. It's there. No reason to post it when it's gonna be dismissed as looking for towncred.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 16:14 GMT
#2835
On December 18 2013 01:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2013 01:08 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 18 2013 01:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yeah you definitely argued that Vayne is town. Here is your last post where you argue against Vayne lynch before he got modkilled:
On December 16 2013 12:37 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Anyway. Can't get anymore scummy than the fake cop claim. I think he's way more likely to flip SK though

##vote Vayne

Totally town.
Well, duh. After he fake claimed, I didn;t think he was a townread anymore. Gimme a sec and I'll dig up me defending him.

I am sorry if i have missed something but why did you think vayne's alignment had anything to do with purple's after D2 lynch?
On December 16 2013 03:34 JarJarDrinks wrote:
As much as I'd like the fact that I pushed hard for a townie lynch 2 days in a row to be false, I don't understand how Vayne can be scum anymore.

Purple tried to vote Vayne last minute. What purpose could that serve? I was pretty much the only person that thought Vayne was scum. Meanwhile the whole town suspected purple. Why would scum sacrifice Vayne to keep the very scummy Purple in the game?

JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 16:33 GMT
#2845
On December 18 2013 01:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Let's entertain an idea that Vayne is scum. Did they sacrifice Vayne if Vayne was scum?

No, but they risked it for absolutely no reason.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 16:50 GMT
#2850
@Vayne and Cora

Please take note of how an adult behaves when he's falsely being accused of being scum. Notice how I won't rage and get modkilled. I'm actually still gonna help my team win. Crazy I know!
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 17:23 GMT
#2876
Grack pretty much has to be telling the truth here. I'm on phone but will post more when I get to a computer.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 18:29 GMT
#2931
On December 18 2013 02:20 Plutarch wrote:
You all got caught. you are trying some power play or something. there is no way when it comes down to your word against mine are we lynching me first.
So as I said. We lynch Xatalos first. Then we lynch you tomorrow and prove you are the liar that you are.
Gee, I wonder why you want to lynch Xat and not Grack first.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 18:38 GMT
#2944
On December 18 2013 03:29 Plutarch wrote:
Also which cop in their right mind would check me night two after the purple lynch? I should be one of the last checks you would make as cop after that wagon went down.
That's actually a good point. Though I never got the impression that Grack has been paying to much attention to the game.


Here's what should happen:

We lynch Xat today.

If Grack is lying then the real cop should counterclaim @ the very end of the night phase. Like w/ a minute remaining.

If there's no claim, then we kill Plu, otherwise we kill Grack.

JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 18:40 GMT
#2945
Does that work for u Plu?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 19:48 GMT
#3048
On December 18 2013 03:41 Plutarch wrote:
No. The cop should not claim. Just lynch grack cause he is a liar and scum. if he flips town I will lynch myself.

The cop should claim when they are ready or have anything to report. we still have 1 lynch to play with.
See, this how you can tell Plu is lying. Unless you believe that he's completely stupid and doesn't understand simple math.

- We're @ 7/3/1.

- We Lynch Xat today and go to 7/2/1

- Assuming 2 townies die tonight it goes to 5/2/1

- Now if we lynch Grack and he's the cop, it goes to 4/2/1

- 2 NKs make it 2/2/1



Him Saying
On December 18 2013 03:41 Plutarch wrote:
if he flips town I will lynch myself.
is him claiming SK.

Like is there a bigger scumtell than saying "Just lynch this guy. If he's town then U can lynch me tomorrow." Plu seems rasonably intelligent. Why would he make this statement when he knows that if grack is telling the truth and we lynch him, we lose?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 19:59 GMT
#3063
On December 18 2013 04:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
And how does this make sense? He'll lose in your scenario 100%.

Well he pretty much lost as soon as Grack claimed. But he doesn't lose 100% in this scenario. He can tie or he can win if town plays kingmaker.

On December 18 2013 04:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
And what would he say if he is town?
He would try his darndest to get Grack Lynched TODAY. This way everything is cleared up and we have scum to lynch tomorrow. The longer he keeps Grack alive, the more likely he makes it to the endgame.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 20:01 GMT
#3066
On December 18 2013 04:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
JJD you have yet to answer, who do you want to lynch today?
Xatalos. He's 100% scum while there's a chance I'm wrong about Plu.

But on the next day, if you people lynch a an uncountered cop than we deserve to lose.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 20:02 GMT
#3067
On December 18 2013 05:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2013 04:59 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 18 2013 04:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
And how does this make sense? He'll lose in your scenario 100%.

Well he pretty much lost as soon as Grack claimed. But he doesn't lose 100% in this scenario. He can tie or he can win if town plays kingmaker.

On December 18 2013 04:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
And what would he say if he is town?
He would try his darndest to get Grack Lynched TODAY. This way everything is cleared up and we have scum to lynch tomorrow. The longer he keeps Grack alive, the more likely he makes it to the endgame.

yeah no.
No to what?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 20:07 GMT
#3071
On December 18 2013 05:03 Plutarch wrote:
And yet you are saying that I am sk cause I want to lynch grack TOMORROW.
Of course. If we lynch Grack today, you will be lynched tomorrow and you will lose the game. If we lynch Grack tomorrow, U have a shot.

See and this is why Ur SK. Cause u know my analysis above is correct and you're pretending you don't.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 20:10 GMT
#3072
On December 18 2013 05:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2013 05:01 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 18 2013 04:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
JJD you have yet to answer, who do you want to lynch today?
Xatalos. He's 100% scum while there's a chance I'm wrong about Plu.

But on the next day, if you people lynch a an uncountered cop than we deserve to lose.

So why the fuck are you arguing about this now unless you are scum?
What are you trying to do? Tell us who we need to lynch tomorrow? Why?

Uh why not? Should we all just AFK untill the flip?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 20:22 GMT
#3090
On December 18 2013 05:14 Plutarch wrote:
If we lynch grack tomorrow if I am the serial killer I get lynched the following day and lose. But If I am town and we lynch grack tomorrow town almost certainly wins.

NO. And you know this isn't true so stop lying.

I already explained but if this is the case then on the next day it likely becomes:

2 town
2 scum
1 SK


We cant lynch you or we lose. So please explain why you're lying.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 20:25 GMT
#3098
On December 18 2013 05:24 Plutarch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2013 05:22 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 18 2013 05:14 Plutarch wrote:
If we lynch grack tomorrow if I am the serial killer I get lynched the following day and lose. But If I am town and we lynch grack tomorrow town almost certainly wins.

NO. And you know this isn't true so stop lying.

I already explained but if this is the case then on the next day it likely becomes:

2 town
2 scum
1 SK


We cant lynch you or we lose. So please explain why you're lying.


I would still lose as the SK cause town would lynch me. You keep making these arguments based on my true, town, win condition and then calling me the sk. Really dumb.

Why would town lynch you? You're saying that the town would lynch you knowing for a fact that as soon as you flip, the game ends and we lose?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 20:28 GMT
#3101
On December 18 2013 05:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2013 05:24 Plutarch wrote:
On December 18 2013 05:22 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 18 2013 05:14 Plutarch wrote:
If we lynch grack tomorrow if I am the serial killer I get lynched the following day and lose. But If I am town and we lynch grack tomorrow town almost certainly wins.

NO. And you know this isn't true so stop lying.

I already explained but if this is the case then on the next day it likely becomes:

2 town
2 scum
1 SK


We cant lynch you or we lose. So please explain why you're lying.


I would still lose as the SK cause town would lynch me. You keep making these arguments based on my true, town, win condition and then calling me the sk. Really dumb.

Actually that's not true if that was the situation because at this point town needs to lynch mafia.
I've pointed this out 3 times and Plu just keeps repeating the same lie . Do you honestly believe that Plu doesn't understand this? You must have no respect for his game if you think he's just being dumb.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 20:30 GMT
#3104
On December 18 2013 05:27 Plutarch wrote:
That is true but he also assumes the SK would be shooting town which I don;t think is true at this point either.

What are you talking about? We just established that if ur the SK and you shoot town, the town can't lynch you. WHy would you shoot @ scum and allow yourself to be lynched?

Is there even a single person that is buying this?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 20:36 GMT
#3115
On December 18 2013 05:30 Plutarch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2013 05:28 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 18 2013 05:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 18 2013 05:24 Plutarch wrote:
On December 18 2013 05:22 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 18 2013 05:14 Plutarch wrote:
If we lynch grack tomorrow if I am the serial killer I get lynched the following day and lose. But If I am town and we lynch grack tomorrow town almost certainly wins.

NO. And you know this isn't true so stop lying.

I already explained but if this is the case then on the next day it likely becomes:

2 town
2 scum
1 SK


We cant lynch you or we lose. So please explain why you're lying.


I would still lose as the SK cause town would lynch me. You keep making these arguments based on my true, town, win condition and then calling me the sk. Really dumb.

Actually that's not true if that was the situation because at this point town needs to lynch mafia.
I've pointed this out 3 times and Plu just keeps repeating the same lie . Do you honestly believe that Plu doesn't understand this? You must have no respect for his game if you think he's just being dumb.


I honestly just haven't thought a lot about night kills or the SK win condition. Too busy catching your whole scum team. Hue.

OK, now that I've shot down your entire argument so hard that the best defense you can come up with is "Golly gee, I guess I just wasn't paying attention"

I will state again that the only way Grack gets voted off tomorrow is if he gets countered. Anyone that thinks that keeping the cop secret when it could mean the town losing the game is not interested in winning.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 20:42 GMT
#3122
On December 18 2013 05:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So JJD if Grack is cop and you are town who are the rest of the scumteam?

Sorry forgot to answer this: Sidespring, and then either Slam or xigxag.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 20:45 GMT
#3124
Why would Grack make this play as scum? To save someone that claimed scum? Think, people!
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 20:51 GMT
#3132
On December 18 2013 05:47 Plutarch wrote:
Cause you only need one mislynch to win?
Can you just admit that this is a lie now to save me the time it will take to prove you wrong, have you deny that I proved you wrong 3 times, and then eventually admit I was right and then u can claim "Golly gee, I guess I just wasn't paying attention"?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 20:59 GMT
#3153
On December 18 2013 05:54 Plutarch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2013 05:51 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 18 2013 05:47 Plutarch wrote:
Cause you only need one mislynch to win?
Can you just admit that this is a lie now to save me the time it will take to prove you wrong, have you deny that I proved you wrong 3 times, and then eventually admit I was right and then u can claim "Golly gee, I guess I just wasn't paying attention"?


If town mislynches we are pretty much done. I don't care about the pedantry of it. So no.

OK, that's twice now that you lied, were proven wrong, and admitted it.


So I ask again:
On December 18 2013 05:45 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Why would Grack make this play as scum? To save someone that claimed scum? Think, people!

JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 21:01 GMT
#3158
On December 18 2013 05:47 Plutarch wrote:
he is getting counterclaimed so further discussion is pointless now you outed yourselves completely.
Calling it right now that Plu is gonna have some bullshit reason when this doesn't happen.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 21:20 GMT
#3176
On December 18 2013 06:07 Plutarch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2013 06:06 Grackaroni wrote:
On December 18 2013 06:06 Plutarch wrote:
On December 18 2013 06:05 Grackaroni wrote:
On December 18 2013 06:03 Plutarch wrote:
On December 18 2013 05:59 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 18 2013 05:54 Plutarch wrote:
On December 18 2013 05:51 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 18 2013 05:47 Plutarch wrote:
Cause you only need one mislynch to win?
Can you just admit that this is a lie now to save me the time it will take to prove you wrong, have you deny that I proved you wrong 3 times, and then eventually admit I was right and then u can claim "Golly gee, I guess I just wasn't paying attention"?


If town mislynches we are pretty much done. I don't care about the pedantry of it. So no.

OK, that's twice now that you lied, were proven wrong, and admitted it.


So I ask again:
On December 18 2013 05:45 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Why would Grack make this play as scum? To save someone that claimed scum? Think, people!



Because he is desperate or bad or both.

Why would he do it as town? He could have said nothing, got another check off I would not have been night killed like scum planned in thread and bam easy lynch.

Why a real cop check me night two after I was a major contributor to lynching scum?

Why would a real cop not claim until 4 hours before the lynch?

Why would a real cop place breadcrumbs 1 hour before he claims?

Because I wasn't going to claim and then I got annoyed with your response and decided I'd just lynch you. It's all been explained.


It was rhetorical. A real cop would not do any of those things. You don't need to answer me scum.

A real cop just did all of those things.


I don;t see why you bother when you are going to get counter claimed.

Keep laying it on thick so u can act real surprised when it doesn't happen.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 21:38 GMT
#3178
On December 18 2013 05:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2013 05:45 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Why would Grack make this play as scum? To save someone that claimed scum? Think, people!

You should ask why would he make this play if he is town and is not trying to get the SK lynched?
Ok people, really think about this.

Here's Plu's response:
On December 18 2013 05:47 Plutarch wrote:

Cause you only need one mislynch to win? and you were in the shit so you went for a gambit.
OK aside from the fact that we already established that this is blatenly untrue, I'd like to point something else out:

If Grack is scum then there was absolutely no way this play could have worked no matter what.

If people actually moved their vote off the claimed scum to lynch Plu (however unlikely), then the real cop counters. It's that simple. No cop is gonna allow a mislynch to happen.

Now sure, scum finds out who the cop is, but they'd out Grack to do so. Explain to me in what universe is this a scum play?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 17 2013 21:43 GMT
#3179
And I bet I know what's gonna happen after all this. After we lynch Plu tomorrow due to there being no cop claim, everyone is gonna be all "How did JJD know that Grack was telling truths? He must be scum". I don't wanna hear that shit. It's pretty obvious once u give it some thought.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 18 2013 03:19 GMT
#3190
On December 18 2013 12:01 Plutarch wrote:
If grack does not 'check' Xigxag we should lynch him.
Wait, Ur not gonna push Gracks lynch regardless?

Seems like a wierd statement to make about someone that you know for a fact is scum.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 18 2013 04:49 GMT
#3227
BTW, Plu wants Grack to check Xigxag because Plu thinks Xigxag is town. Which makes it more unlikely that scum kills Grack. Plu is afraid that if Grack doesn't telegraph who he's checking, scum will kill him to prevent a red check.

Unless someone else has another idea why Plu would be so concerned about who Grack says he's checking?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 18 2013 05:04 GMT
#3237
On December 18 2013 13:52 Blazinghand wrote:
JJD, of the 6, which 3 in your opinion should be the group that Grack checks into?
sidesprang and alakaslam are my top 2 picks for sure. Then I guess art since I have townreads on rayne and LSB.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 18 2013 13:26 GMT
#3270
On December 18 2013 19:00 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2013 14:04 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 18 2013 13:52 Blazinghand wrote:
JJD, of the 6, which 3 in your opinion should be the group that Grack checks into?
sidesprang and alakaslam are my top 2 picks for sure. Then I guess art since I have townreads on rayne and LSB.

Can I ask what your motivation is for having a townread on LSB over me
I've said a few times that I don't think the purple/LSB interaction early game was faked. And LSB went after purple quite a bit this game.

Furthermore, LSB has had pretty much identical reads to me this game for the most part.

On December 18 2013 19:00 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
and why you left XigXag out of this list?
Simple answer to that. BH said to pick from this list:
On December 18 2013 13:47 Blazinghand wrote:
artanis
lsb
jjd
sidesprang
rayn
alakaslam
I don't think you're scum. But I really don't think think Rayn or LSB is.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 18 2013 13:39 GMT
#3272
On December 18 2013 22:29 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2013 22:26 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 18 2013 19:00 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On December 18 2013 14:04 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 18 2013 13:52 Blazinghand wrote:
JJD, of the 6, which 3 in your opinion should be the group that Grack checks into?
sidesprang and alakaslam are my top 2 picks for sure. Then I guess art since I have townreads on rayne and LSB.

Can I ask what your motivation is for having a townread on LSB over me
I've said a few times that I don't think the purple/LSB interaction early game was faked. And LSB went after purple quite a bit this game.

Furthermore, LSB has had pretty much identical reads to me this game for the most part.

On December 18 2013 19:00 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
and why you left XigXag out of this list?
Simple answer to that. BH said to pick from this list:
On December 18 2013 13:47 Blazinghand wrote:
artanis
lsb
jjd
sidesprang
rayn
alakaslam
I don't think you're scum. But I really don't think think Rayn or LSB is.

What interaction between LSB-Purple make you feel that LSB is less likely to be scum from it than my interactions with Xatalos?
That's a good point and actually havent went back and reread since the Xat flip/scumclaim. But like I said, I don't think you're scum. I'd rather replace U w/ xigxag but BH wanted 3 from that so I had to pick someone.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 18 2013 19:10 GMT
#3301
On December 19 2013 04:02 Grackaroni wrote:
BH what do you think about Rayn? potential scummer?

Rayn got purple lynched. If it wasn't for Rayne, that lynch would not have happened. Yes, there's always the possibility of a bus for towncred but it's incredibly unlikely. There's a difference between a bus and completely getting the town to lynch your teammate.

And the fact that there's a SK in this game and rayne could easily just get NKed and it's just not worth entertaining the thought.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 18 2013 19:39 GMT
#3311
On December 18 2013 06:01 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 18 2013 05:47 Plutarch wrote:
he is getting counterclaimed so further discussion is pointless now you outed yourselves completely.
Calling it right now that Plu is gonna have some bullshit reason when this doesn't happen.

JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 18 2013 19:51 GMT
#3320
Rayn and BH. You do both agree that if there's no counterclaim, we kill Plu correct?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 18 2013 20:32 GMT
#3389
On December 19 2013 05:15 Blazinghand wrote:
yeah in general I am in favor of lynching Grack, even if he's not counterclaimed
Then Ur terrible @ this game.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 18 2013 20:35 GMT
#3392
On December 19 2013 05:33 Plutarch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2013 05:32 JarJarDrinks wrote:
On December 19 2013 05:15 Blazinghand wrote:
yeah in general I am in favor of lynching Grack, even if he's not counterclaimed
Then Ur terrible @ this game.


Here is the other scum leaping to the defense of his buddy.

How many times will he claim scum today?

Stay tuned to find out!
Keep laying in on. I cant to see how you fake your shock when there's no counterclaim.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 18 2013 20:54 GMT
#3445
##vote Grack

well shoot. @ least you know I can't be scum.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 18 2013 21:05 GMT
#3452
On December 19 2013 05:45 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
It is Day 4, there are 8 of you
I count 7. AM I missing someone?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 18 2013 21:32 GMT
#3473
On December 19 2013 06:22 Grackaroni wrote:
He fell for the "why would he do this as scum" trap lol

Well I mean, It was an absolutely terrible play as scum that couldn't possibly work and outed you for no reason. I'll probably fall into that trap everytime.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 19 2013 04:15 GMT
#3525
On December 19 2013 13:00 LSB wrote:
Actually this really sucks that Xigxag got modkilled. It would have been an ez town victory if he showed up and did nothing but sheep. Now I gotta convince you guys that JJD is SK

Town gets a mislynch if my math is correct. Convince em to lynch me and u still die.

we're @ 5/1/1

lynch grack, goes to 5/0/1

town dies 4/0/1

mislynch 3/0/1

town dies 2/0/1

Lynch real SK


Town wins. GG?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 19 2013 04:45 GMT
#3529
On December 19 2013 13:00 LSB wrote:
Actually this really sucks that Xigxag got modkilled. It would have been an ez town victory if he showed up and did nothing but sheep. Now I gotta convince you guys that JJD is SK
also, why not sidesping?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 19 2013 05:01 GMT
#3535
On December 19 2013 13:55 Alakaslam wrote:
Now?
Yeah, otherwise we don't have a mislynch.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 19 2013 05:02 GMT
#3536
anyone else in favor of going w/ a shortened day here?
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 19 2013 13:46 GMT
#3540
On December 19 2013 20:18 sidesprang wrote:
Also is it possible to shorten the days? I kinda feel we got the game almost solved and we dont need to use a week or whatever on finding out who is SK between us 3.
I was only asking about today since we have a claimed scum. Days going forward I'd still like to keep as full days. Especially w/ the weekend coming up.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 19 2013 14:38 GMT
#3541
My thoughts on remaining people.

Grack - scum duh. No clue if he's actually trying to help us win and gave us real info we can use or not. Kinda leaning towards believing him.

BH - vig duh.

Rayne - If we believe Grack then Rayne is town. Regardless, no way we lynch Rayne @ this point. If he's SK then I'd say he deserves to win.

Slam - Again, Grack says Slam is good. Not sure if we can believe him but I still think I'm leaning town @ this point.

LSB - Good chance of being the SK. I don't think I would have thought so if he didn't so easily believe Grack and go into defense mode. Like when Grack said that scum blocked rayn and slam, my first thought was "Can I really believe him?". LSB's first thought was "Well I guess I have to convince the town to lynch JJD."

sidesprig - Also a good chance of being the SK I'd say. The thing that points to sidesprong is the SK NKs. It just seems so random and Side has clearly not been following the game. Like why The F was bum killed? Or either of the other guys for that matter? I just get the impression that the SK isn't someone that has been following the game vary closely. And furthermore, unlike Rayne, if sidespring is the SK then does NOT deserve to win. I think it would be a travesty if he was allowed to solo win this game w/ a 2 page filter.


Obviously I know what my alignment but since other people can't rule me out, feel free to ask any questions.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 19 2013 14:53 GMT
#3544
On December 19 2013 23:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:
If we could rule out one of sidespring/LSB/JJD it would be cool because it would ensure we win..

Yep, which means if any of us 3 is cop, we should claim. I obviously would have done so already, so feel free to rule me out.

And LSB wouldn't have said he needs to convince the town that I'm the SK if he was cop. He would have just claimed.

So sidespank, if you're cop, claim and it's GG.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 19 2013 14:56 GMT
#3545
And Unfortunately we can't rely on a cop Rayne or Slam to prove someone's towniness (assuming they make it through the night) since the SK has the flip town option. They would need to see to actually see that the person was SK.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 19 2013 15:36 GMT
#3548
On December 18 2013 15:24 LSB wrote:
On phone, so no quotes.

In case I get killed, I really think plutarch is sk. He is just flailing about way to much. He is acting extreamly defensive and started to switch to personal insults to illustrate his points.

The most telling thing for me is his insitance on organizing the DT check by grack. If he we town, he knows that grack isnt dt, and the whole entire exchange would not matter. However his insitance in trying to make sure grack checks 'the right person' is absurd if he was town.

The only case in which I can see killing grack first as an acceptable move for town is if a mafia dies tonight, bringing the total mafia members to 1, or a DT counterclaim. Thus town has a lot more wiggle room

If you are a DT I would highly suggest checking Plutarch tonight. 5 blue roles is entirely reasonable in this game and your existance does not mean that grack is lying. Likewise a check on grack is meaningless as he could be the godfather
Possibly LSB trying to keep the cop away from him.

Regardless I think this means that a cop should check LSB tonight. Because it seems likely that if he's SK, he didn't use the flip town option.
JarJarDrinks
Profile Joined March 2013
United States1302 Posts
December 19 2013 15:53 GMT
#3552
On December 10 2013 02:39 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 10 2013 02:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
As the OP states "possible roles";

Is every role guaranteed to be in a game?
Can there be more than 1 of any role?
Is the SK guaranteed to be in the game?

Yes

x3

Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
SC Evo League
12:00
#13
BRAT_OK 98
EnkiAlexander 63
LiquipediaDiscussion
Bellum Gens Elite
10:00
Stara Zagora 2025 Day 4
Zoun vs SerralLIVE!
Clem vs TBD
Bellum Gens Elite3587
ComeBackTV 1447
TaKeTV 578
IndyStarCraft 337
3DClanTV 164
Rex163
CosmosSc2 160
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Bellum Gens Elite3587
Hui .354
IndyStarCraft 337
Rex 163
CosmosSc2 160
BRAT_OK 98
ProTech82
MindelVK 27
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 51670
Bisu 1727
Jaedong 945
Hyuk 893
Aegong 578
Mini 393
ZerO 390
actioN 348
BeSt 268
Soulkey 239
[ Show more ]
Hyun 171
sorry 103
Last 101
JYJ69
PianO 50
Sacsri 25
Yoon 24
ToSsGirL 23
sas.Sziky 16
Terrorterran 14
Rock 14
IntoTheRainbow 12
soO 9
SilentControl 8
ajuk12(nOOB) 8
Hm[arnc] 2
Dota 2
Gorgc6378
qojqva2618
XcaliburYe337
LuMiX1
League of Legends
Trikslyr22
Counter-Strike
olofmeister3275
fl0m1028
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King149
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor292
Other Games
singsing2192
B2W.Neo1155
Beastyqt500
Lowko307
ArmadaUGS100
XaKoH 93
KnowMe67
ZerO(Twitch)21
rubinoeu5
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream12814
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream612
Other Games
BasetradeTV91
StarCraft 2
angryscii 20
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 15
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• Ler88
League of Legends
• Nemesis5011
• Jankos1598
Upcoming Events
Fire Grow Cup
1h 11m
CSO Contender
2h 11m
BSL: ProLeague
3h 11m
StRyKeR vs MadiNho
Cross vs UltrA
TT1 vs JDConan
Bonyth vs Sziky
Replay Cast
9h 11m
SOOP Global
12h 11m
Creator vs Rogue
Cure vs Classic
SOOP
18h 11m
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
19h 11m
AllThingsProtoss
20h 11m
Fire Grow Cup
1d
BSL: ProLeague
1d 3h
HBO vs Doodle
spx vs Tech
DragOn vs Hawk
Dewalt vs TerrOr
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
1d 9h
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Replay Cast
4 days
GSL Code S
4 days
herO vs TBD
Classic vs TBD
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
GSL Code S
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 1
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
2025 GSL S2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.