EPTNewbie Mini Mafia LI
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
| ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
/in | ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
same :\ | ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
| ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On January 03 2014 07:36 JonnyLaw wrote: Dunno why balla cares so much anyway. He's confirmed scum. 66% scum rate so far. Stats don't lie. | ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
| ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On January 06 2014 07:34 chinstrap wrote: Sounds like overeager towncred grabbing scum play to me. ##Vote: Balla24 I think you might be jumping the gun a little bit on this one. Don't get me wrong, Balla plays a scary mafia because he looks town almost the entire game, but in the game he was town he was very active and led the town by making lots and lots of posts. So his MO is always being active regardless of alignment. | ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
My main goal this game is to be more active and contribute meaningful analysis to the town. This may seem basic, but I've failed at it the last couple games so I'm hoping to actually follow through with it this time. | ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On January 06 2014 07:59 chinstrap wrote: I was mid drafting a post very similar to your second paragraph but the NFL playoffs can be distracting. Anti lurking environment is great, randomly policy lynching lurkers is not. However a policy debate is also highly distracting. So lets get past that and concentrate on finding dem sucummers. Ps. I never mess around! Are policy debates generally considered to be distracting? I find analyzing people's opinions on policy and trying to find scum based on that more productive than just lynching lurkers. | ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On January 06 2014 11:22 Balla24 wrote: Ok, seems reasonable that i'm overthinking it and it's not an attempt to pocket me but more him actually being disappointed with the IC's play so far. Anyways, him attempting to pocket me isn't really something i see him doing from my experience with him. I'm not familiar with the term pocketing. I didn't realize he was joking so I defended you. We've played with some confrontational players in these last few newb games so I thought he was just being super aggro. I'm not comfortable with a Derrida lynch Day 1 just yet. I think his inexperience is showing more than his scumminess. He was gone for a large portion of the day and was trying to make up for his inactivity by posting a lot of information. Unfortunately it's really easy to sheep when there has already been so much discussion prior to posting. Although now that I refresh the page I see that the discussion has sort of shifted away from Derrida. My main scum reads at the moment are Dragoon and Day_Walker. They seem to be interacting a decent amount, which isn't inherently scummy, but they go out of there way to distance themselves from each other. Dragoon says "For the record, I want to make it clear that I never said I completely trust Day_Walker," Then Day_Walker says: On January 06 2014 21:03 Day_Walker wrote: At the risk of playing into the "Day_Walker and theDragoon are protecting each other because they are both scum" read, what do you make of theDragoon standing up for Asuna? Off the top of my head I can think of only two scenarios where this is consistent with theDragoon scum AND Asuna townie: 1) Scum are protecting some townies to make things harder to read. 2) Scum are trying to make it easier to play the "I'm a newbie" card. I understand wanting to get out ahead of these accusations, but that doesn't mean we should ignore it simply because he pushed Dragoon slightly. These just seem like they are trying to distance themselves early so if either if them go down we don't suspect them as a scum pair. | ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On January 07 2014 05:28 Balla24 wrote: That's exactly how i was thinking OWB... however i'm trying to avoid thinking about scum pairs atm, as it IS day 1 and we have no confirmed scum yet. It is good to note though. Yeah, I realize I might be jumping the gun, but I saw a chance to present some new analysis so I took it. That said I'm comfortable voting for Dragoon. ##vote theDragoon | ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
| ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
| ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
| ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On January 07 2014 05:59 Asuna wrote: Huh, I wasn't expecting dragoon to instavote owb after a small timeline messup (since votes are understood to be 100% serious). Not sure what to think about that... I'm assuming dragoon is one, but who's #2? And what's this about o.O confused D: chinstrap called JonnyLaw JonnyLax in a post on the last page. If my theory hold true #2 would be Day_Walker | ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On January 07 2014 06:36 Balla24 wrote: So you don't find it suspicious that he was so enamored with Day_walker and that he came up with a NULL read on you? What about his read on me, you're becoming more suspicious of me so is what he said aligned with your thinking? @OWB: Was Day_walker/Dragoon the only connection you found? Let's hear anything else in regards to connections like that since that was how you seemed to be hunting. I found a few more weak connections, but i'd like you to prove that you were actually hunting and you didn't just find ONE thing to latch onto. I know it's not the answer you want to hear, but that's the only real pair that stood out to me. I didn't start hunting with the goal of finding pairs, that one just sort of happened. I'm glad you think I'm capable of doing good analysis, but nothing else really stood out to me (or at least nothing that hadn't already been said). Don't think I didn't take my time to formulate my analysis on Day_Walker and Dragoon though | ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
| ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On January 07 2014 07:02 theDragoon wrote: What do you think of Derrida giving Day_Walker the green light and have COMPLETE TRUST in him? You label Day_Walker and I as scum because I "seemingly trusted and turned by back on him so we can distance ourselves". I don't think you're reading my posts at all since I have never trusted Day_Walker ONCE. I'll know when you start reading my posts when you remove that vote on me. I still want you to prove the part where I gave my trust in Day_Walker and pinpoint the exact moment where I try to "distance myself" from him. I'm of the mindset that Derrida's initial reads were pretty bad and I'm not reading too much into them. I did something almost exactly the same in my first game where I agreed with people fairly blindly and I didn't really have solid reasons for why I did. It looks scummy but I think it's just be bad town play. He is right though, he doesn't specifically say he trusts Day_Walker. He is distancing himself but it may just be a result of people calling him out for trusting him in the first place. I'm leaving my vote for now but I'm open to the idea of lynching another target if one presents itself. Possibly Day_Walker since he hasn't responded to these accusations, might just be lurking since our focus is on Dragoon. | ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
| ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
| ||
| ||
