EPTWhite Flag Mafia - Page 23
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Grackaroni
United States9835 Posts
| ||
Mig
United States4714 Posts
On November 02 2013 06:13 Grackaroni wrote: What do you think of Oats/Grack? Grack- lean town. You have done somethings that I would consider anti-town (spamming the thread, repeating the same argument over and over, appearing ready to vote for LJ because he was useless and not because you felt he was scum (not totally sure how serious this was) ) but that being said I agree with you that mafia are generally more concerned about image and not ruffling feathers. Especially your argument with LJ, while I think it was anti-town it is the sort of thing I expect to see more often from a townie. Oats- Not a fan of anything he has done. Claiming to be bad (or even just not that good) as an excuse is never good. He also has provided pretty much 0 scum hunting for the town. In general however, I don't agree with lynching active veterans day1 unless there is an incredibly strong case against them. We have the least information day1 it is better to wait on lynching people who can potentially be an asset for town until we have more information and can make more accurate decisions. I will add if hz is red I would probably go for Oats next. He was the first person to try and deflect attention away from him. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
Mig is town because he's like the only one making really really good points, and he has pur | ||
|
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
Grack I would expect you to be defending you more, if anything for our friendship. Yes you're right, if I was mafia, I would've made up some sort of excuse, deflected attention. I wouldn't have been so abrupt; I do have values of morality which I could not have just thrown my scummates to the dust. Mig is town because he's like the only one making really really good points, and he has purpose behind all of his posts. I expect him to be a shot target so doctors please take note. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
On October 31 2013 22:00 JarJarDrinks wrote: Hey all. First off I'll add my name to the very much against random lynching list for the exact reasons Oats posted. Also, I'm suspicious of the people pushing for it. Most notably hzflank because he only said he was for it after people brought it up. Like, even though it's only a 30% chance, if I'm scum and someone talks about random lynching my first thought is probably something like "Oh god, what if one of us gets chosen? There'd be nothing we could do." So he makes his post saying he'd be for a RNG lynch to show everyone that he's not afraid of it. Even going as far as sayingHow in the world could his odds actually be worse than random? Even if he had no scumhunting skill whatsoever, it would be @ worst equal to random. What is this post? He says he's against RNG and then criticizes someone for being for it by arguing that they're not really for it? On October 31 2013 23:01 JarJarDrinks wrote: ##vote hzflank Might as well untill I see a better choice. Seemed like there's a decent amount of support for a hzflank lynch "Might as well" indicates caution, caution indicates scum. He gets way too caught up in the RNG discussion , it dominates like his first ten posts. That's scummy to me because it's not really relevant to finding scum and his connections to scum are very flimsy. On November 01 2013 04:15 JarJarDrinks wrote: OK, you're saying that you were being sarcastic in that post as well as the following one. Didn't understand that's what you were saying. If that's the case then it didn't come across that way to me at all but I can definately see it that way now. Since that was the bulk of my case: ##unvote hzflank This back-off just seems weird to me, but I would like it if he explained it to me. On November 01 2013 12:22 JarJarDrinks wrote: I think I'm not liking laughing jack right now. Go look @ his posts. He pretty much attacks me and that's it. Like he tells me my posts are fluff because I don't reach a conclusion about the RNG thing (even though I did). And then when I ask him outright what his position on it is, he dodges the question. The rest of his posts are him asking other people their opinions. Weak suspicion with generic mafia reasons On November 01 2013 23:30 JarJarDrinks wrote: So, I think we should lynch a lurker. There's like 7 of em so odds are pretty good that there's scum among em. Odin and hermeane haven't posted anything so they should probably be exempt. Mig and fuba have like 2 posts each. And they both went after hzflank which seemed like an easy bandwagon @ the time tehpoofter, Pandain, Bereft and Asinine can't have posted much either. I'm gonna go through their filters now. Another generic mafia tactic, lynch lurkers I actually don't know if he's mafia, but here are my thoughts on him. Looking into others | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
So who do you actually want to lynch? | ||
|
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
On October 31 2013 23:19 Laughing Jack wrote: I think we should be one Jarjar less at the end of this day. ##Vote: JarjarDrinks I really like this post, it's retarded and would be scary for mafia to make. He's a smurf so he can't rely on being a troll persona. Being funny while doing something bold = town because you're not really afraid of suspicions while mafia would be. I don't want to quote other posts, but I really like how care-free blunt he is. I'm giving him a town read even more confident then Grack, though not mig. | ||
|
Mig
United States4714 Posts
##Vote hzflank I will say though fuba has also been totally useless and his one post coming back to the game didn't make him look any better. I have to go now but I will try to be back 30 min before lynch to check what is going on (no promises tho). | ||
|
OdinOfPergo
United States840 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9835 Posts
| ||
|
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
On November 01 2013 03:09 mkfuba07 wrote: Actually, I think I'm going to vote for him. He's talked quite a bit, but always ends with a noncommittal statement. He kind of narrates the thread, but doesn't give a conclusion. As far as his involvement in the rng debate, the apparent inconsistency in his position is the most concerning thing to me, though I'm not even sure there is one. I think rng-ing would be bad play, so advocating for it or opposing it are pretty null. I agree with jjd that he appears to be supporting it in one post, then the next one appears to be agreeing with the first. However, I guess it could be interpreted the way hzflank says he meant it, so overall that just makes me lean slight scum on him. Altogether, I feel pretty confident with a vote on hzflank. ##Vote: hzflank So apathetic. Not going to argue for anyone, just this. Only post afterwards is him defending himself. On November 02 2013 05:46 mkfuba07 wrote: dat omgus My main issue with hzflank has always been that while he was posting a lot, he wasn't coming to conclusions. He was throwing accusatory statements around, then ending with the equivalent of "... but I don't know if he's scum or not." It gets suspicions out there but insulates him from the consequences of a mislynch. My entire second paragraph was there because I'd spent a bit of time thinking about the rng discussion, and came to the conclusion that it made me only lean slightly scum on him. I often get bitched out for my first posts not being related to the ongoing discussion, and didn't want to sidetrack the thread by not commenting on the silly rng discussion that took over up to that point. So long-story-short, my main reason for finding him scummy was that he was posting in a scummy manner, and my thoughts on him haven't changed a lot since then. And then this: On November 01 2013 01:58 mkfuba07 wrote: Would scum, knowingly voting for someone to look good, openly state that they're placing the vote because many others appear willing to do so? So apathetic, not following up on questions, and too defensive. ##Unvote ##Vote mkfuba07 | ||
|
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
On November 02 2013 06:55 Grackaroni wrote: I don't think Mig is right Pandain. I loudly pushed Oats and only Laughing Jack jumped on the train and people haven't been very adamant in pushing up other targets of their own. I'd bet mafia are either almost entirely afk or content with a hzflank lynch. I honestly haven't read his posts but he's showing clear effort in the way he's outlining and going about posting. So that's enough to not vote him day one. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9835 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9835 Posts
##Vote: Mkfuba07 | ||
|
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
| ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
On November 02 2013 06:54 Mig wrote: This combined with my earlier read on him is enough for my vote. But you previously decided that you would vote for me, anyway. On November 02 2013 06:37 Mig wrote: I will add if hz is red I would probably go for Oats next Anyway, you claim to have read my previous games and that I was confident and made cases as town, but not as scum. The fact is that I was pretty damn dominating in that scum game that I linked. I made large cases and pushed them hard. I was so confident that right before the SK took me out I made a huge case on someone with a lot of town cred because I thought he was the SK and thought I could push the lynch through hard over the next 48 hours. Your points are rubbish. Whatever reasons you have for voting for me and not the reasons that you state. | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
Vote Count Oatsmaster(0): Pandain(3): hzflank(3): JarJarDrinks(1): Laughing Jack, mkfuba07(3): hzflank, Pandain, Grackaroni Pandain is currently set to be lynched. The deadline is at 00:00 GMT (+00:00) in . | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
| ||
|
OdinOfPergo
United States840 Posts
##Vote mkfuba | ||
| ||
