• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:11
CEST 03:11
KST 10:11
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 2 - RO4 & Finals Results (2025)0Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week0Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer8Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.8Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)14
StarCraft 2
General
How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer Rain's Behind the Scenes Storytime Code S Season 2 - RO4 & Finals Results (2025) Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Echoes of Revolution and Separation Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 32742 users

World Heavyweight Championship mafia - Page 81

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 79 80 81 82 83 155 Next
Oatsmaster
Profile Joined October 2012
United States16628 Posts
October 04 2013 18:52 GMT
#1601
I do not counterclaim doctor. Most definitely. Nope. Never. Dream on.
No gg, No skill.
Oatsmaster
Profile Joined October 2012
United States16628 Posts
October 04 2013 18:52 GMT
#1602
And Im going to sleep.
Good night.
:>
No gg, No skill.
Holyflare
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United Kingdom30774 Posts
October 04 2013 18:53 GMT
#1603
but oats don't you need to post your night actions?
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
October 04 2013 18:58 GMT
#1604
Oh shit I just remembered I haven't checked my pm all game
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
October 04 2013 18:59 GMT
#1605
Hey look it says marv is town!
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
Dirkzor
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
Denmark1944 Posts
October 04 2013 19:02 GMT
#1606
Last post before D2.

Right now: Lynch sloosh.

Later: Doesn't matter. We won. Look. Sloosh isn't really trying. He is just waiting for us town to shit eachother over until we decide to vote someone else. Just stop and lynch Sloosh.

(but if I had to choose, its sloosh, oats then Marv.)
"HOW THE FUCK ARE YOU ON TOP AGAIN???? HOW DO YOU KEEP DOING THIS????" -Julmust (also, thats what she said)
Risen
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States7927 Posts
October 04 2013 19:22 GMT
#1607
So I'm relaxing and thinking and I know I said I'm immune to too crazy to be scum, but that's all I can get that I can't explain about marc. Oats is playing so anti town. Like what is this? He's so cocky for no reason. If I want to punch Marc I want to lynch oats, because holy cow what is he doing to help town is all I can think. His objective should be to establish himself as town but he isn't even concerned with it. So why would scum do that, because meta. And now why is he trying so hard to play crazy instead of actually help. I think his partner got lynched and so now his plan is just to troll the entire game so no one will lynch him.

I know sloosh isn't doing anything, but why is that scum him and town oats. To me it reads as oats trying to "meta"and sloosh just... being. He's not anti our pro, he's null. I would really like marv or Oats to be lynched, though. Lynch people who play anti town
Pufftrees Everyday>its like a rifter that just used X-Factor/Liquid'Nony: I hope no one lip read XD/Holyflare>it's like policy lynching but better/Resident Los Angeles bachelor
Holyflare
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United Kingdom30774 Posts
October 04 2013 19:24 GMT
#1608
On October 05 2013 04:22 Risen wrote:
So I'm relaxing and thinking and I know I said I'm immune to too crazy to be scum, but that's all I can get that I can't explain about marc. Oats is playing so anti town. Like what is this? He's so cocky for no reason. If I want to punch Marc I want to lynch oats, because holy cow what is he doing to help town is all I can think. His objective should be to establish himself as town but he isn't even concerned with it. So why would scum do that, because meta. And now why is he trying so hard to play crazy instead of actually help. I think his partner got lynched and so now his plan is just to troll the entire game so no one will lynch him.

I know sloosh isn't doing anything, but why is that scum him and town oats. To me it reads as oats trying to "meta"and sloosh just... being. He's not anti our pro, he's null. I would really like marv or Oats to be lynched, though. Lynch people who play anti town


but you have to admit that Dirk's case on sloosh is pretty damning right? The trolling could just be because it is SO obvious already?
Risen
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States7927 Posts
October 04 2013 19:29 GMT
#1609
On October 05 2013 04:24 Holyflare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 05 2013 04:22 Risen wrote:
So I'm relaxing and thinking and I know I said I'm immune to too crazy to be scum, but that's all I can get that I can't explain about marc. Oats is playing so anti town. Like what is this? He's so cocky for no reason. If I want to punch Marc I want to lynch oats, because holy cow what is he doing to help town is all I can think. His objective should be to establish himself as town but he isn't even concerned with it. So why would scum do that, because meta. And now why is he trying so hard to play crazy instead of actually help. I think his partner got lynched and so now his plan is just to troll the entire game so no one will lynch him.

I know sloosh isn't doing anything, but why is that scum him and town oats. To me it reads as oats trying to "meta"and sloosh just... being. He's not anti our pro, he's null. I would really like marv or Oats to be lynched, though. Lynch people who play anti town


but you have to admit that Dirk's case on sloosh is pretty damning right? The trolling could just be because it is SO obvious already?

Yes, but I'm running into a problem of "there are too many people I see as scum in this game"
Pufftrees Everyday>its like a rifter that just used X-Factor/Liquid'Nony: I hope no one lip read XD/Holyflare>it's like policy lynching but better/Resident Los Angeles bachelor
Risen
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States7927 Posts
October 04 2013 19:29 GMT
#1610
EBWOP: I mean, I'll be the first one to call out doing nothing as scummy, but more scummy than filler is having actual anti-town stuff in your filter.
Pufftrees Everyday>its like a rifter that just used X-Factor/Liquid'Nony: I hope no one lip read XD/Holyflare>it's like policy lynching but better/Resident Los Angeles bachelor
Holyflare
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United Kingdom30774 Posts
October 04 2013 19:30 GMT
#1611
On October 05 2013 04:29 Risen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 05 2013 04:24 Holyflare wrote:
On October 05 2013 04:22 Risen wrote:
So I'm relaxing and thinking and I know I said I'm immune to too crazy to be scum, but that's all I can get that I can't explain about marc. Oats is playing so anti town. Like what is this? He's so cocky for no reason. If I want to punch Marc I want to lynch oats, because holy cow what is he doing to help town is all I can think. His objective should be to establish himself as town but he isn't even concerned with it. So why would scum do that, because meta. And now why is he trying so hard to play crazy instead of actually help. I think his partner got lynched and so now his plan is just to troll the entire game so no one will lynch him.

I know sloosh isn't doing anything, but why is that scum him and town oats. To me it reads as oats trying to "meta"and sloosh just... being. He's not anti our pro, he's null. I would really like marv or Oats to be lynched, though. Lynch people who play anti town


but you have to admit that Dirk's case on sloosh is pretty damning right? The trolling could just be because it is SO obvious already?

Yes, but I'm running into a problem of "there are too many people I see as scum in this game"


Conserve energy, vote sloosh. If he flips town then you can do some more.
Clarity_nl
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands6826 Posts
October 04 2013 19:44 GMT
#1612
On October 05 2013 04:29 Risen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 05 2013 04:24 Holyflare wrote:
On October 05 2013 04:22 Risen wrote:
So I'm relaxing and thinking and I know I said I'm immune to too crazy to be scum, but that's all I can get that I can't explain about marc. Oats is playing so anti town. Like what is this? He's so cocky for no reason. If I want to punch Marc I want to lynch oats, because holy cow what is he doing to help town is all I can think. His objective should be to establish himself as town but he isn't even concerned with it. So why would scum do that, because meta. And now why is he trying so hard to play crazy instead of actually help. I think his partner got lynched and so now his plan is just to troll the entire game so no one will lynch him.

I know sloosh isn't doing anything, but why is that scum him and town oats. To me it reads as oats trying to "meta"and sloosh just... being. He's not anti our pro, he's null. I would really like marv or Oats to be lynched, though. Lynch people who play anti town


but you have to admit that Dirk's case on sloosh is pretty damning right? The trolling could just be because it is SO obvious already?

Yes, but I'm running into a problem of "there are too many people I see as scum in this game"


I can relate to this.
FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT AGAINST STUPIDITY CLARITY, I BELIEVE IN YOU! - Palmar
slOosh
Profile Joined October 2009
3291 Posts
October 04 2013 22:19 GMT
#1613
Big post inc.
slOosh
Profile Joined October 2009
3291 Posts
October 04 2013 22:30 GMT
#1614
Hey guys, I've been mulling it over, and these feels a lot like Catch 22. Scum topple, and then we hunt some dudes, and then it turns out there was some tunneling. I know because I made it to LYLO and almost lost the game.

That said, I retract my initial desire to 1 for 1 for marv. Not that I'm definite that he is town, but neither am I that confident that he is scum, and it is entirely possible that I'm making a similar kind of oversight this game as well. So I'm scratching the slate and starting over. Feel free to input thoughts and whatnot as I review the game - humor me, if you will.


(Oats, this is really big post, so feel free to skip it all and call me scum )
+ Show Spoiler +

9 player game, 1 dead rayn, 1 (soon to be dead doctor) BH. 1 me. That leaves 6 players I get to give a good look at, only 1 is scum. So all interactions in the thread include at least 1 town (beside those with rayn).

Oats, Dirk, marv, Risen, clarity, Holyflare

On October 02 2013 10:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Hey let's lynch Oats, seems reasonable.
dundundun.

This is rayn's first (well second post). It actually is echoing HolyFlare's vote on Oats, bringing focus upon it. Don't think rayn would be so quick to point out his partner's problematic posts, but it does seem like he is drunk or something. Chalk it up as a slight town tell for HF by association.

pg 5~10 and I feel good about Oats. It's rapid fire unadulterated thoughts into the thread, and there is focus to his posts (as a whole). Feeling moderate to strong town on Oats.

On October 02 2013 18:55 marvellosity wrote:
Ok now I read it. He provides two quotes as contextual evidence for his non-read on Oats, and none with his scumread on Holyflare. Seems like my vote is quite good.
On October 02 2013 19:11 marvellosity wrote:
That's totally different reasoning to the reasoning you used last page.

At least you've taken to providing contextual evidence to your scumread instead of your null read now. Yay!
On October 02 2013 20:27 marvellosity wrote:
So you voted a scumread based on evidence that didn't exist? Your claim was effectively that he was sheeping BH and unoriginal, and now having "checked" his filter, he is in fact not sheeping BH and original after all.

At this point I feel really stupid. Marv's arguments are solid. Paranoia says that scum marv would punish poor town play like this, but I'm realizing my paranoia is not the good kind. I recall marv revisiting this interaction, especially with the quote "clinically clean". I can see what he means by this. Dirk's claim is sloppy. Either HF is doing nothing, or he is doing scummy things (sheeping BH etc.) Then he says HF is clean, indicating a lack of substance, but not noting actively scummy things.

At this point I give marv a solid town read and Dirkzor a slight red read. Maybe I'll just emphatic b/c he says it's his first game in a year. Moving on,

Getting bored of coloring things in.

pg 16 Clarity is prodding me about my bad townread on Dirk. That's sensible. You see something strange, you call that out and you probe.

pg 18 rayn enters the thread and hones in on the BH / Oats thing. Does not mention me or dirk. I understand this reflects poorly on me. Cool.

pg 21 rayn gives dirk an out. I believe by now I'm already prone to confirmation bias into thinking dirk is the last scum. Feel free to disregard such statements.

On October 03 2013 16:32 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 03 2013 16:26 Dirkzor wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On October 03 2013 16:06 Clarity_nl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 03 2013 15:46 Dirkzor wrote:
On October 03 2013 03:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am trying to find out myself if i believe his "feel reads" are legit or if he is scum.
Dirkzor if you base your early day 1 reads on feels, why did you say somthing completely different in your post where you voted for HF? If it's a gut read why frame it to something else?

I don't believe I framed it to be anything other then a feel read. I wrote how I felt about him. Him posting rubbish and following BH. After re-reading to stand up for my belief I got another feeling because there really wasn't any evidence..

And people have been noticing how I made 2 quotes of Oats and then voted HF with only a few lines attached. That was because BH said oats was scummy and I wanted to weigh in on that. The post ended up going another way though.



This is an outright lie.

Show nested quote +
On October 02 2013 18:38 Dirkzor wrote:
I believe BH's rng post was meant to be what it turned out to be. Discussion starter. It worked. Great. Now lets move on and find scum.

Shit I don't even know what to write... Been so looong.

Oats seem either weird, confused or scummy. Not sure which yet.

On October 02 2013 13:16 Oatsmaster wrote:
Stifling discussion is top scum play for calling someone scummy when they are being agressive and shit.
Holyflare is the right lynch!.

The first sentence still doesnt make sense to me after reading it 5 times (Hungover so might be my fault). it also baffles me that he seems so sure about who to lynch so early. There are other examples:
On October 02 2013 14:01 Oatsmaster wrote:
All those words. That dont mean anything.
it's the top scum play to stifle discussion. With his sure stance on me being scum and despite me resonding why I posted what I did is it not he who is in fact stifling the discussion?

I meant saying that someone is stifling discussion is what scum always like to do.
The fact that you say everyone else agrees with you in this thread is just testament to the fact that you have put no effort or thought into your stance and are just going with the flow to follow up for an 'easy' lynch.

Everyone else thinks that you are scummy. Therefore I cant do anything more to convince people at this point of time.

COME ON HOLYFLARE. STOP POSTING LONG POSTS. NOT GOOD.

You and BH are probably not on the same scumteam but I have a way more sure read on you than on BH.
BH, is Holyflare a noob or not?

This whole posts is nonsense aswell.

But through all this I somewhat still think he is town... hmm...

HF's rambling about meta and being weak is rubbish. Him jumping the rng wagon, as pointed out by Risen, without any good reason is rubbish. After this, despite that BH think he have been posting better, he havent really done anything. He has sheeping BH and using BH arguments to push oats.

##Vote Holyflare


Your case says he has not contributed at all and sheeping.

Show nested quote +
On October 02 2013 19:10 Dirkzor wrote:
Yes he have been posting, but when I read it I don't really see any meat. Might just be me but that's how I see it. Some of his posts seems to be just for the sake of posting.

+ Show Spoiler +
On October 02 2013 12:52 Holyflare wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 02 2013 12:51 Oatsmaster wrote:
On October 02 2013 12:48 Holyflare wrote:
Risen, in a game of 9 players in which I know nothing about any of the players there is no better system to accept straight off than RNG. Obviously there are ways to get my attention drawn to other people, however, in a 'world heavyweight championship' as you so lovingly pointed out, is it really going to be that obvious when people screw up? I think not. Like I said in my original post, however, I am open to peoples opinions on other players.

except that we have 48 hours to find scum and its only 2/9 chance that we get scum. And probably another 4/9 that we hit an obvious townie that is obvious town after 48 hours. Now its not so useful is it?


Do you even read what is posted?

Show nested quote +
On October 02 2013 12:18 Blazinghand wrote:
Also to all the RNG doubters: RNG has a 2/7 chance of hitting scum today! Not 2/9 as you might think. Why is that?

Well, first off, I'm talking to people who aren't Oats and are town. You personally know that of the 8 non-you players, 2 are scum. So you'd think it would be a 2/8 chance of an RNG hitting scum. Pretty lame right? WRONG. If the RNG is on the doctor and the lynch starts to gather steam, he'll surely claim. This means that the doctor isn't even in the lynch pool, and we can roll again for a new RNG. this means we can discount one town player from our odds, meaning that you have a 2/7 (over 30%!) chance of lynching scum with RNG!


On October 02 2013 14:05 Holyflare wrote:
Stop posting long posts??? It's called analysis of a player. The fact that even after I've posted that you aren't asking me anything, aren't trying to discover whether I am in fact town or not and aren't trying to decipher other peoples motives is just rubbing me the wrong way. It's easy to jump on a player because he played the noob card but there are 2 scum in this game not just one. If i were to be lynched and did indeed flip town then wouldn't you regret not pressuring other people on why they think i'm a sure fire scum?



When I read through his filter it feels clinicly clean. Don't know how to describe it really... it like trying to get rotten wood look fresh on the surface.


When pressured you come up with a variation of "his posts feel constructed"

Why did you switch from reasons to "feel"? It's because your original reason got debunked by marv and you were forced to backtrack.

Show nested quote +
On October 02 2013 20:11 Dirkzor wrote:
On October 02 2013 19:22 Clarity_nl wrote:
On October 02 2013 19:17 Dirkzor wrote:
On October 02 2013 19:13 Clarity_nl wrote:
Would still like your thoughts on oats, marv.

And i would like your thought on me instead of "Oh i'll take that ##Vote"


I could quote marvs posts if you'd like but they're right there. #Sheeple

You spend 4 paragraphs on a null read yet your scumread is hardly explained. Saying HF has done nothing means you haven't read the thread carefully enough. Reading him as most likely to be scum is bleh.

Thank you.

Ok. So I went back to find evidence that HF have been sheeping BH. Not much was found...

Only little thing was this (and it's not really worth noting in the sheeping department):
On October 02 2013 13:56 Holyflare wrote:
-snip-

Not to mention;
On October 02 2013 13:42 Oatsmaster wrote:
the point i'm getting at here isn't that having a strong stance early on is scummy. THIS IS NOT MY POINT. STOP LYING AND STATING THAT IT IS MY POINT. my point is the lack of follow-up, the lack of interaction with the guy being voted or the guy not voting him. After all, if I REALLY do think holyflare is scummy, you should be all over me trying to refine my scumread on him. I shouldn't have to twist your arm to get you to do this.

So you vote for someone then you ask him to explain? If I think a guy is scum, then why do I have to have interaction with him? And if everyone else in the thread thinks the same way, then why do I have to have interaction with them?
If you think (you said you KNEW) a person was scum, your orientation as a townsman should be to prove to your allies that the person is in fact scum. If you do not interact with the person at all how can you garner anymore information than the one post you base your entire 'analysis' on? The fact that you say everyone else agrees with you in this thread is just testament to the fact that you have put no effort or thought into your stance and are just going with the flow to follow up for an 'easy' lynch.

On October 02 2013 13:47 Blazinghand wrote:
On October 02 2013 13:42 Oatsmaster wrote:
the point i'm getting at here isn't that having a strong stance early on is scummy. THIS IS NOT MY POINT. STOP LYING AND STATING THAT IT IS MY POINT. my point is the lack of follow-up, the lack of interaction with the guy being voted or the guy not voting him. After all, if I REALLY do think holyflare is scummy, you should be all over me trying to refine my scumread on him. I shouldn't have to twist your arm to get you to do this.

So you vote for someone then you ask him to explain? If I think a guy is scum, then why do I have to have interaction with him? And if everyone else in the thread thinks the same way, then why do I have to have interaction with them?


The answer seems obvious to me. Your goal is to establish the alignment of the guy you have a scumread on. Sure, you think he's scum, but you don't KNOW. So you talk with him. You talk with other players and try to convince them. Maybe they support you, maybe they point out how he's scummier or townier than you thought. In these interactions, most people betray what alignment they are through how they think-- be they town or scum. The goal is to develop a co-operative discourse in which people all have solid reads on each other. It involves an acknowledgement that part of what writing a case and voting is, is pressure-- it's developing your read.

On October 02 2013 13:44 Oatsmaster wrote:
Its funny that you played with me all these games with me BH, and you still dont know I exaggerate the hell out of my stuff.


When you lie, I will call you a liar. Quote me instead of putting words in my mouth.

Other then that HF have been more original then I said he had been. Hmm.. That clashes with my previous belief. After re reading I'm also leaning more scum on oats. But I'm not sure it is entirely because of re-reading or just because I now think HF looks less scum.

The problem with oats is that he have done some wierd shit as I pointed out earlier. But the feel I get when reading his filter is of someone who cares...


After that you kind of retract your read on HF, but instead of saying that you immediately go back to your old faithful "well, oats could be scum or town". The same thing you

Show nested quote +
On October 02 2013 22:00 Dirkzor wrote:
On October 02 2013 21:03 marvellosity wrote:
I mean seriously, if you're going to vote for someone like that, you should probably check that what you're saying about them is actually true, don't you think?

Or is the truth not important when attached to a vote?


Truth is important. I was wrong I admit that. But I don't always go back and re-read just to be sure right before posting. I read the thread and was I got from it was that HF had sheeped BH so i wrote that. That turned out to be wrong after more careful scrutiny. Worse then that it puts me back as for as reads go.

I don't understand why he is an easy place to put my vote. It would have been so much easier just to vote rayn if I wanted to do that.


You emphasize here that your HF read is now gone.

Show nested quote +
On October 02 2013 22:45 Dirkzor wrote:
I was thinking about voting myself as a placeholder. After my HF fuckup I don't really have a clear read so I decided just to let it stay put...

If I'm scum I wouldn't draw that much attention to myself. Meh...


After all that you go "welp, I guess I have no reads."

tl;dr
*Makes a case based on fiction
*Backtracks when called out and says it's a feel read
*THEN he retracts the read entirely because his reasons didn't hold up, DESPITE it being a feel read
*Claims he has never "framed it as anything but a feel read"
*Has not given analysis on anyone other than Oats or HF. Everyone else has basically been ignored, with the exception of a sentence or two.


You're entire case revolves around me changes my opinion... I don't see that as a problem to be honest.

my tl:dr version:
*makes a case based on first read through and the feeling i got*
*when called out re-read to find evidence, explain and convince*
*doesn't find evidence*
*Can see reasons for being wrong by people the calling him out*
*changes his veiw based on this*

I never said I had no read. Neither have I stated that I now think HF is town. Some of the things that I thought was scummy about him have just changed and thus I didn't have a clear read I could target.


Your vote is still on him btw. I realize you made the post about voting yourself as placeholder. You are aware you can simply unvote?

Who have you looked at recently other than HF/Oats and did you develop a read out of looking at them?
On October 03 2013 16:52 Dirkzor wrote:
I recently looked into sloosh (and found a gem I think). I am waiting for him to answer... Also in Rayn after BH asked and his case. But you would know if you read the thread as you so kindly advocated earlier that people do before asking questions...

I know my vote is on him. So?

Wat? That's not a response. That's an evasion. "Opinions on HF/ Oats or anyone?" *in snarky tone* "I've obviously been looking at rayn and slOosh. dummy."

K by this point either I'm onto something or I have confirmation bias and so instead I'll focus on the remaining players to see how they are.

~pg 24 marv and clarity doing lots of intertwining. KISS -> they are both town.

pg 25, I guess Oats was the first one to pick up the nuances of Dirk's 180.

pg 26 rayn votes Dirk. Hrmph.

pg 27 rayn drops everything starting with a small portion of HF's post. He really brings on the pressure, and HF doesn't buckle. Plus points for HF.

contrast with pg 30 where rayn is all nice nice with Dirk. You guys can probably just stop reading here without missing anything

Only person I haven't really looked into is Risen, probably because he hasn't posted as frequently. He has posted two big cases but it's hard to evaluate them. Maybe the more recent content will be helpful.

pg 42, Risen comes in with a case on rayn, when there are no votes on him. So could be scum doing a false push, or town who is on the right track. Let's see how he follows up on this one.

Risen's case is surprisingly solid. I apologize Risen. Maybe if you took out the parts where you point out filler (because most filters will have filler), it would have been easier to realize.

In either case, Risen started his case, and received poor feedback from marv / clarity.

Shameless self plug:
On October 04 2013 06:23 slOosh wrote:
Alright, someone who was there when it happened, maybe you can clear this up for me.

Show nested quote +
On October 04 2013 02:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Well i do not think Sloosh is necessarily mafia. I do not think Risen is mafia.
I think Dirkzor is mafia.

I hope i am gonna be back before the deadline. cya fuckers!

Regarding rayn, how did I go from 2nd scum read to "not necessarily mafia", despite not having posted (and from what I've skimmed no one really argued well for my towniness)?

Show nested quote +
On October 04 2013 01:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay so, i need to decide my vote now.
I prefer Dirkzor. Clarity you are bad or scum.
I guess my other options are Risen and Sloosh?

If i should switch marv tell me now who to switch on. I trust you the most. I don't wanna lynch Risen, i don't wanna lynch Sloosh either.. because they have not been here, and i can't tell what they are gonna say when they come back (if they do).

I don't accept Oats or marv as lynch.

Likewise Risen was his 2nd top town read, and he holds some reservations about switching his vote onto me? How is me dying (opposed to Dirk) a bad scenario?

You could argue that I'm angling for a potential rayn bus. ... yea you could. I'm gonna say I was distracted from having to explain all my scummy actions earlier on.

On October 04 2013 08:12 marvellosity wrote:
Effectively slOosh has no scumreads, he proceeds to agree with me when I go after BH, then proceeds to agree with BH when BH claims doctor.

True. This is actually true, as at the time I was scrambling to catch up and everything was too fast paced.

pg 56 I drop my "i'm dying here's what I have" post. people start feeling feels, and the wagon is looking unsecure. Cue rayn's entry.

Risen phone posting, looking to secure a lynch. See's BH pushing rayn wagon of justice, and is ok so joins. A stronger followup to his case would be more assuring, but it is totally understandable how little audience he has.

pg 65 Risen indignant that Oats is saying he could be scum. I'd probably be that angry too. BH stole his thunder yo.


So, as a pure objective observer, the lynch order should be
slOosh, Dirkzor, ???

Why ??? because if I'm that wrong about Dirk then my opinions shouldn't have too much bearing 3 cycles later. I don't like a vengeful lynch on marv.

Plus Dirk can flail some more with me out of the equation, and given the vast majority of town + sensible heads, shouldn't be too much of problem.

p.s. paranoia says ??? should be marv because I have an unreasonable fear of his scum game, despite not actually having played against it.
slOosh
Profile Joined October 2009
3291 Posts
October 04 2013 22:35 GMT
#1615
Oh I just contradicted myself "don't like vengeful lynch on marv" + "paranoia says ?? should be marv". Just oozing that scumminess :<
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25550 Posts
October 04 2013 22:42 GMT
#1616
so who you wannah lunch
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25550 Posts
October 04 2013 22:43 GMT
#1617
like what kind of sho post is this u want us 2 lynch 7??
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25550 Posts
October 04 2013 22:44 GMT
#1618
u want us 2 lynch u and dirk and that's it?? wtf
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
slOosh
Profile Joined October 2009
3291 Posts
October 04 2013 23:02 GMT
#1619
I want to lunch Dirkzor. Then I don't want to lunch anyone. Marv lunch is only up there because he is really good with ketchup, but he is not eating with ketchup today. He could be hiding it well, but then clarity, would notice because they are sharing a meal.

Based purely on rayn's departure, Risen is the least likely I would want to lunch. I don't even think it was a potentially well planned lunch between the two.

Holyflare and rayn did not eat lunch together well, so since rayn ate lunch HF doesn't.

Feeling good about Oats. Last time I wanted to lunch him so hard, but someone took it away from me. Probably the same thing here.
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25550 Posts
October 04 2013 23:03 GMT
#1620
or you want oats alive at lylo for obvious reasons
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Prev 1 79 80 81 82 83 155 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
2025 GSL S2 - Ro8 Group B
CranKy Ducklings113
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft609
NoRegreT_ 46
Ketroc 7
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 8996
Artosis 710
HiyA 132
Aegong 64
Sharp 34
Icarus 6
Dota 2
LuMiX0
League of Legends
Trikslyr72
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1513
Stewie2K355
Other Games
summit1g5340
C9.Mang01026
shahzam802
WinterStarcraft124
Maynarde105
Mew2King65
Temp023
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1222
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH276
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki12
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• imaqtpie923
• Scarra552
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
8h 49m
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
WardiTV Qualifier
14h 49m
PiGosaur Monday
22h 49m
RSL Revival
1d 8h
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
1d 22h
The PondCast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Harstem vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
[ Show More ]
SC Evo League
4 days
Circuito Brasileiro de…
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #3 - GSC
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST Open Fall 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.