|
On October 03 2013 12:55 Blazinghand wrote: he's been on my dick. just finished ocelot barbery, time to look at clarity dirk and sloosh Do you two have such a history of such being upons?
|
On October 03 2013 13:33 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2013 13:31 slOosh wrote:On October 03 2013 12:55 Blazinghand wrote: he's been on my dick. just finished ocelot barbery, time to look at clarity dirk and sloosh Do you two have such a history of such being upons? ok i must be having a brain fart because I really don't understand this question. what is "such being upons" and who is "you two" You and clarity. Does he have a history of "beeing on your dick"?
|
Damn 20 pages since I've been gone.
K, from what I've skimmed so far people don't like that I somehow switched onto clarity?
On October 03 2013 09:58 slOosh wrote: There's nothing too compelling in the case on Clarity. There's a potentially good point in how clarity retracted his townread of me, but given clarity's explanation and the fact that he actually draws attention to it is a plus for him. That's what I said. Nothing that sticks out too much for me in Risen's case. If I see a weak case, then I'll call it weak. Doesn't matter what kinds of reads I have on Risen / clarity, a case's robustness is independent of that.
The quotes I bring up are not in Risen's case.
On October 03 2013 12:18 slOosh wrote:Booorinngg The following quotes contain wiffle-waffle: Agree / Disagree? Show nested quote +On October 03 2013 03:01 Clarity_nl wrote: I think that's just blazinghand being blazinghand. He likes numbers and theorycrafting so despite having a scumread on oats he considers possibilities where he's town and justifies the lynch in that case. That's my interpretation anyway.
He has contributed quite a bit, I don't have a solid read on him but I think he's a poor lynch today.
I'd like to hear more about your thoughts on oats, and please comment on dirk as well. Show nested quote +On October 03 2013 03:02 Clarity_nl wrote: Like, it's not improbable for him to be scum doing all this rng business but I can't tell. He's clearly putting effort in and that's cool. There's no contradiction here, just a failure (by readers) to consider context.
Now why I find problem with this wiffle waffle, is that clarity doesn't have a good read on BH (and spends lots of words explaning how he isn't sure), but finds it pertinent to speak on behalf of BH to rayn. How does this pursue a better read on BH? Why would you speak up for someone who you want a better read of?
|
On October 04 2013 05:40 marvellosity wrote: slOosh, we really just need to know what your current reads and shit are. Still reading dude.
|
On October 04 2013 05:41 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 05:33 slOosh wrote:Damn 20 pages since I've been gone. K, from what I've skimmed so far people don't like that I somehow switched onto clarity? On October 03 2013 09:58 slOosh wrote: There's nothing too compelling in the case on Clarity. There's a potentially good point in how clarity retracted his townread of me, but given clarity's explanation and the fact that he actually draws attention to it is a plus for him. That's what I said. Nothing that sticks out too much for me in Risen's case. If I see a weak case, then I'll call it weak. Doesn't matter what kinds of reads I have on Risen / clarity, a case's robustness is independent of that. The quotes I bring up are not in Risen's case. On October 03 2013 12:18 slOosh wrote:Booorinngg The following quotes contain wiffle-waffle: Agree / Disagree? On October 03 2013 03:01 Clarity_nl wrote: I think that's just blazinghand being blazinghand. He likes numbers and theorycrafting so despite having a scumread on oats he considers possibilities where he's town and justifies the lynch in that case. That's my interpretation anyway.
He has contributed quite a bit, I don't have a solid read on him but I think he's a poor lynch today.
I'd like to hear more about your thoughts on oats, and please comment on dirk as well. On October 03 2013 03:02 Clarity_nl wrote: Like, it's not improbable for him to be scum doing all this rng business but I can't tell. He's clearly putting effort in and that's cool. There's no contradiction here, just a failure (by readers) to consider context. Now why I find problem with this wiffle waffle, is that clarity doesn't have a good read on BH (and spends lots of words explaning how he isn't sure), but finds it pertinent to speak on behalf of BH to rayn. How does this pursue a better read on BH? Why would you speak up for someone who you want a better read of? So... that makes you feel good about your vote on me? The fact that the guy I don't really have a read on, who I don't want to lynch today, is not being pursued by me? You aren't just waiting on the sidelines to see how he will act given more time. You spoke on his behalf instead of letting him being questioned. This being someone you would actually want a better read on. Why?
|
Alright, someone who was there when it happened, maybe you can clear this up for me.
On October 04 2013 02:00 raynpelikoneet wrote: Well i do not think Sloosh is necessarily mafia. I do not think Risen is mafia. I think Dirkzor is mafia.
I hope i am gonna be back before the deadline. cya fuckers! Regarding rayn, how did I go from 2nd scum read to "not necessarily mafia", despite not having posted (and from what I've skimmed no one really argued well for my towniness)?
On October 04 2013 01:53 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay so, i need to decide my vote now. I prefer Dirkzor. Clarity you are bad or scum. I guess my other options are Risen and Sloosh?
If i should switch marv tell me now who to switch on. I trust you the most. I don't wanna lynch Risen, i don't wanna lynch Sloosh either.. because they have not been here, and i can't tell what they are gonna say when they come back (if they do).
I don't accept Oats or marv as lynch. Likewise Risen was his 2nd top town read, and he holds some reservations about switching his vote onto me? How is me dying (opposed to Dirk) a bad scenario?
|
On October 04 2013 06:26 Clarity_nl wrote: I'd rather hear more about your vote on me sloosh. I think it was alright at the time. Don't hold the opinion right now give how many intertwining you've been doing with marv.
|
On October 04 2013 06:41 Clarity_nl wrote: Blazing, please some bullet points as to why you think sloosh is town?
Sloosh, please some bullet points as to why you thought I was scum? And what has changed since? I've already said in my initial post. You spend a couple of posts, solely stating "I don't know how I feel about BH. I don't want to lynch him though. But I don't know how I feel.", and showed no interest in actually pursuing that. Plus you shut down a possible rayn - BH interaction by answering on behalf of BH.
You did have some overlap with marv, but I took that to be too small a sample size. Given another 20+ pages, as well as some resilience to prodding, I don't feel as strong about the initial feelings.
|
Plus I was contemplating a Clarity BH scum team. It made sense to me at the time.
|
Ok so I'm approaching this game from a Foolishness-esque townie elimination approach. Cause why not right? There's only 8 players to evaluate, and picking out townies can somewhat be easier than finding scum.
Right now there is a very lazy wagon on me, mostly from what I can tell, a lack of good alternatives. Scum would be ok with this. They want it to eventually land on me, but in the meantime they want to make a pretense of contribution (but not too much lest the wagon actually shifts).
So I'm working with a pool of rayn and BH ... ehhh ....
|
Yea. I'll back that up.
On October 03 2013 15:51 Blazinghand wrote: I don't like sloosh's reasoning for voting clarity. scummy, but not oats tier.
On October 04 2013 01:25 Blazinghand wrote: OK, so I take it back. Sloosh lynch is lynching sloosh for being sloosh imo
On October 04 2013 02:08 Blazinghand wrote: There is literally no possible situation in which my vote goes on sloosh
On October 04 2013 06:32 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 06:13 Holyflare wrote: Confused why BH absolutely wouldn't vote sloosh in this case then? i don't think he's scum, i won't vote him.
On October 04 2013 06:35 Blazinghand wrote: ok so sloosh I don't think I can stop this wagon on you so you got 2.5 hours to live. hit me. hit me bro
i want to know what you know. my mind to your mind my thoughts to yours let's meld and get some reads out Thinks I'm town, does little to actually prevent my wagon and doesn't actually offer up anything that would make him consider me town. Pretending to care about something that doesn't matter.
##Unvote: Clarity_nl ##Vote: Blazinghand
|
On October 04 2013 07:14 Blazinghand wrote: man sloosh I still don't see you taking up that offer to like share reads with me or whatever
what is WITH people nowadays I'm looking into rayn right now so we can talk about that soon after I finish.
In the meantime, could you explain how you have a strong town (not null) read on me?
|
BH where you get your town read of me??
|
Yea I don't get it. Your town read of me is stemming from my inactivity? Because you mention nothing else about me. Plus my scum games are relatively low activity if anything. So this meta is whack.
How does that translate to "There is literally no possible situation in which my vote goes on sloosh"?
|
Ah crap should have picked up the "im dying tonight" ...
|
Marv why am I best bet for scum?
|
Marv you would keep Dirk or Risen going into D2 rather than me?
|
Btw guys, I have no idea what's going on right now. Clarity ask me some questions I need traction.
|
BH's logic is sound. Having a no-lynch isn't of too much consequence, and if scum marv did gain enough traction to hit BH, then he would still have me in the back pocket to push a lynch onto.
He says in his filter than he respects my play, but is content with letting me die, despite having very hazy reads on Dirk and Risen. There still isn't any proper case on me, despite "he was maybe right about dirk before anyone else", and "his read on clarity wasn't that good".
|
Like, clarity, do you agree that there is no contradiction in my voting post with me thinking there is not much to note in Risen's case?
|
|
|
|