On October 03 2013 09:58 slOosh wrote:
There's nothing too compelling in the case on Clarity. There's a potentially good point in how clarity retracted his townread of me, but given clarity's explanation and the fact that he actually draws attention to it is a plus for him.

That's what I said. Nothing that sticks out too much for me in Risen's case. If I see a weak case, then I'll call it weak. Doesn't matter what kinds of reads I have on Risen / clarity, a case's robustness is independent of that.

The quotes I bring up are not in Risen's case.

On October 03 2013 12:18 slOosh wrote:
Booorinngg

The following quotes contain wiffle-waffle: Agree / Disagree?

Show nested quote +

There's no contradiction here, just a failure (by readers) to consider context.

Now why I find problem with this wiffle waffle, is that clarity doesn't have a good read on BH (and spends lots of words explaning how he isn't sure), but finds it pertinent to speak on behalf of BH to rayn. How does this pursue a better read on BH? Why would you speak up for someone who you want a better read of?

slOosh

3291 Posts

October 03 2013 20:42 GMT

#844

On October 04 2013 05:40 marvellosity wrote:
slOosh, we really just need to know what your current reads and shit are.

Still reading dude.

slOosh

3291 Posts

October 03 2013 20:44 GMT

#846

On October 04 2013 05:41 Clarity_nl wrote:

Show nested quote +

So... that makes you feel good about your vote on me? The fact that the guy I don't really have a read on, who I don't want to lynch today, is not being pursued by me?

You aren't just waiting on the sidelines to see how he will act given more time. You spoke on his behalf instead of letting him being questioned. This being someone you would actually want a better read on. Why?

slOosh

3291 Posts

October 03 2013 21:23 GMT

#878

Alright, someone who was there when it happened, maybe you can clear this up for me.

On October 04 2013 02:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Well i do not think Sloosh is necessarily mafia. I do not think Risen is mafia.
I think Dirkzor is mafia.

I hope i am gonna be back before the deadline. cya fuckers!

Regarding rayn, how did I go from 2nd scum read to "not necessarily mafia", despite not having posted (and from what I've skimmed no one really argued well for my towniness)?

On October 04 2013 01:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay so, i need to decide my vote now.
I prefer Dirkzor. Clarity you are bad or scum.
I guess my other options are Risen and Sloosh?

If i should switch marv tell me now who to switch on. I trust you the most. I don't wanna lynch Risen, i don't wanna lynch Sloosh either.. because they have not been here, and i can't tell what they are gonna say when they come back (if they do).

I don't accept Oats or marv as lynch.

Likewise Risen was his 2nd top town read, and he holds some reservations about switching his vote onto me? How is me dying (opposed to Dirk) a bad scenario?

slOosh

3291 Posts

October 03 2013 21:34 GMT

#882

On October 04 2013 06:26 Clarity_nl wrote:
I'd rather hear more about your vote on me sloosh.

I think it was alright at the time. Don't hold the opinion right now give how many intertwining you've been doing with marv.

slOosh

3291 Posts

October 03 2013 21:46 GMT

#899

On October 04 2013 06:41 Clarity_nl wrote:
Blazing, please some bullet points as to why you think sloosh is town?

Sloosh, please some bullet points as to why you thought I was scum? And what has changed since?

I've already said in my initial post. You spend a couple of posts, solely stating "I don't know how I feel about BH. I don't want to lynch him though. But I don't know how I feel.", and showed no interest in actually pursuing that. Plus you shut down a possible rayn - BH interaction by answering on behalf of BH.

You did have some overlap with marv, but I took that to be too small a sample size. Given another 20+ pages, as well as some resilience to prodding, I don't feel as strong about the initial feelings.

slOosh

3291 Posts

October 03 2013 21:48 GMT

#900

Plus I was contemplating a Clarity BH scum team. It made sense to me at the time.

slOosh

3291 Posts

October 03 2013 21:57 GMT

#915

Ok so I'm approaching this game from a Foolishness-esque townie elimination approach. Cause why not right? There's only 8 players to evaluate, and picking out townies can somewhat be easier than finding scum.

Right now there is a very lazy wagon on me, mostly from what I can tell, a lack of good alternatives. Scum would be ok with this. They want it to eventually land on me, but in the meantime they want to make a pretense of contribution (but not too much lest the wagon actually shifts).

So I'm working with a pool of rayn and BH ... ehhh ....

slOosh

3291 Posts

October 03 2013 22:12 GMT

#945

Yea. I'll back that up.

On October 03 2013 15:51 Blazinghand wrote:
I don't like sloosh's reasoning for voting clarity. scummy, but not oats tier.

On October 04 2013 01:25 Blazinghand wrote:
OK, so I take it back. Sloosh lynch is lynching sloosh for being sloosh imo

On October 04 2013 02:08 Blazinghand wrote:
There is literally no possible situation in which my vote goes on sloosh

On October 04 2013 06:32 Blazinghand wrote:

Show nested quote +

i don't think he's scum, i won't vote him.

On October 04 2013 06:35 Blazinghand wrote:
ok so sloosh I don't think I can stop this wagon on you so you got 2.5 hours to live. hit me. hit me bro

i want to know what you know. my mind to your mind my thoughts to yours let's meld and get some reads out

Thinks I'm town, does little to actually prevent my wagon and doesn't actually offer up anything that would make him consider me town. Pretending to care about something that doesn't matter.

##Unvote: Clarity_nl
##Vote: Blazinghand

slOosh

3291 Posts

October 03 2013 22:16 GMT

#955

On October 04 2013 07:14 Blazinghand wrote:
man sloosh I still don't see you taking up that offer to like share reads with me or whatever

what is WITH people nowadays

I'm looking into rayn right now so we can talk about that soon after I finish.

In the meantime, could you explain how you have a strong town (not null) read on me?

slOosh

3291 Posts

October 03 2013 22:22 GMT

#976

BH where you get your town read of me??

slOosh

3291 Posts

October 03 2013 22:29 GMT

#995

Yea I don't get it. Your town read of me is stemming from my inactivity? Because you mention nothing else about me. Plus my scum games are relatively low activity if anything. So this meta is whack.

How does that translate to "There is literally no possible situation in which my vote goes on sloosh"?

slOosh

3291 Posts

October 03 2013 22:32 GMT

#1007

Ah crap should have picked up the "im dying tonight" ...

slOosh

3291 Posts

October 03 2013 22:36 GMT

#1017

Marv why am I best bet for scum?

slOosh

3291 Posts

October 03 2013 22:43 GMT

#1046

Marv you would keep Dirk or Risen going into D2 rather than me?

slOosh

3291 Posts

October 03 2013 22:44 GMT

#1047

Btw guys, I have no idea what's going on right now. Clarity ask me some questions I need traction.

slOosh

3291 Posts

October 03 2013 22:50 GMT

#1053

BH's logic is sound. Having a no-lynch isn't of too much consequence, and if scum marv did gain enough traction to hit BH, then he would still have me in the back pocket to push a lynch onto.

He says in his filter than he respects my play, but is content with letting me die, despite having very hazy reads on Dirk and Risen. There still isn't any proper case on me, despite "he was maybe right about dirk before anyone else", and "his read on clarity wasn't that good".

slOosh

3291 Posts

October 03 2013 22:51 GMT

#1054

Like, clarity, do you agree that there is no contradiction in my voting post with me thinking there is not much to note in Risen's case?

Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All

Please or register to reply.

Live Events Refresh