EPTBut why are you asking warning for s0sltice?
TL Mafia Ban List 2.0 - Page 8
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Message GMarshal if you request a ban please ^_^ Also when the game you're sitting out is over! ~GMarshal | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
But why are you asking warning for s0sltice? | ||
|
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On November 06 2013 23:32 Koshi wrote: Ofc I remember. Oo But why are you asking warning for s0sltice? Because he used the baby seal? uh... did I miss something? Edit: I wasn't really asking for a warning, it was just a joke, as was your post. right? RIGHT? | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On November 06 2013 23:41 phagga wrote: Because he used the baby seal? uh... did I miss something? Edit: I wasn't really asking for a warning, it was just a joke, as was your post. right? RIGHT? No mine wasn't a joke. Cephiro used the baby seal as town, imagine if people start using the baby seal as town, there will be no feel of joy anymore when you see a baby seal. The only feeling you will have is doubt and after a while anger. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Babyseals = scumclaim Therefore town should not use babyseals, and when they do they should be punished mercilessly is the gist of it | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9647 Posts
On November 06 2013 23:47 Koshi wrote: No mine wasn't a joke. Cephiro used the baby seal as town, imagine if people start using the baby seal as town, there will be no feel of joy anymore when you see a baby seal. The only feeling you will have is doubt and after a while anger. um...... you are joking right? | ||
|
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On November 06 2013 23:48 marvellosity wrote: Poor phagga. Babyseals = scumclaim Therefore town should not use babyseals, and when they do they should be punished mercilessly is the gist of it I feel stupid. But can anyone explain me the story behind that one? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Cephiro broke the mould (apparently) by posting baby seals as town. | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On November 06 2013 03:51 Ange777 wrote: They used something else than QT (LoL) to communicate as a non confirmed mason pair. Previously they had asked us whether they could use something else (Skype) for their communication. We explicitely told them to keep all conversation strictly to QT. We did have suspicions whether they overextended their communication into another cycle but decided to not pursue that anymore as both said they had not. I agree that we handled the modkill baldy. There have been communication issues (inconsistent statements between co-hosts and primary host) and I do regret that it resulted in misunderstandings for StorrZerg and Mattchew but there has not been another reason for me to modkill them besides what I just wrote. They actively and knowingly broke our rule which in my opinion warranted a modkill. I know that this is more of a "minor crime" as nothing game-changing happened, they did not break the game by talking to each other on LoL which is why I only requested a warning for them. "suspicious that we overextended our communications" bullshit that is why we got mod killed in the first place, and it was wrong Getting mod killed for the wrong reason (communicating about the game when our QT had ended), explicitly stating that if we had done this "out of game communication while our QT was up" that it would only be a warning. Dragged through the mud, had ban reason changed several times along with "well if you did this instead or that then only a warning" (ange my claim she never changed her reason, but i cannot prove she did. All i can show is what i was told from the mod acct) So my issue isn't that i was mod killed, i will argue things were not very clear on mason qts. However my issue ishow the mods handled it. In the real world ange, it isn't as simple as "o my employee fucked up, well so did you mr customer. A simple thing as "well i have the final say so it doesn't matter that my asst mod fucked up" is a load of crap. So even though i screwed up, i still believe the mods treated me poorly, lied to me, accused me of things i didn't do, and i don't find that acceptable. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
Cephiro should die by clubbing for his transgressions. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18326 Posts
On November 07 2013 01:01 Hopeless1der wrote: When there is obviously no possible chance that you live, as mafia, you post baby seals as a scumclaim to usher yourself out of the game. I'd like to believe it was Hapa's brainchild, at least he's the first person I remember doing it. Cephiro should die by clubbing for his transgressions. I don't think you understand the aim of baby seals. Baby seals are innocent. Anybody posting baby seals is claiming to be innocent. You seeing it as an admissal of guilt is just your jaded view of the world. Both town and scum have motive to claim they are innocent. I have not even looked at the game where Cephiro claimed to be innocent by using baby seal pictures, but presumably he had given up on reasoning with people, and had done all he could for town. All he had left was one last plea that he was innocent: a baby seal. Of course, scum also want to look innocent despite not being so, and are usually less concerned with things like helping town with their last breath, hence the jaded view of baby seal pictures being an admission of guilt. When what they actually are are protestations of the poster's innocence. PS. I don't disagree with your conclusion that Cephiro should die by clubbing, just with the reason for doing so. Baby seals exist to be clubbed to death in mafia games. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On November 07 2013 00:19 phagga wrote: I feel stupid. But can anyone explain me the story behind that one? It began in liquid city mafia when Hapa was outed as scum by a super OP town role at day start. He posted a ten page filter of bay seal pictures in the next day cycle while we lynched him. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9856 Posts
(I haven't read the game, but I assume that Cephiro had tried to avoid the lynch/help town and only posted baby seals when it was clear he was going to be lynched. If Cephiro was intentionally trying to get lynched throughout the game as town then he should get a warning for playing against his win-con.) | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9856 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9856 Posts
-Grack out. ^_^ | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9856 Posts
On November 07 2013 04:19 Koshi wrote: Just here protecting the babyseals. Liar! I am here protecting the seals by defending the right of a townie to post baby seals. You are attempting to create a scenario where baby seals must be clubbed! | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
Everything that Ange wrote on the account, she signed. This statement is 100% true. She even signs things on her main account as Ange. If her name is written on the message, she wrote it. If it's not, it wasn't her. Stop calling us liars and bad hosts. You and Mattchew are the cause of all of this. You two willingly chose to not listen to us and you paid the price for it. Stop complaining and be lucky you only got a warning. It's a freaking slap on the wrist for breaking a very serious rule. You should be thanking her for only requesting a warning, not bitching to her about it. End of discussion. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
I think a better way to look at it would be like this: it's clear that storrzerg is not pleased with being modkilled. However, he is not being faced with any consequences such as being banned, so what's in the past is in the past. There's no way to unmodkill him. So unless he wants to have his warning removed, or he wants Ange to be punished, there's no reason to continue posting. Post in this thread only with a goal, not to vent. His conclusion isn't "I don't deserve a warning" and it isn't "Ange777 should be removed from the host list", it's "I am mad at what happened" and that's not something that belongs here, REGARDLESS as to whether it's justified or not. If Storrzerg wants to contest his warning he has every right to do so, but that's not what he's doing. | ||
| ||
