EPTOn July 25 2014 13:13 Chairman Ray wrote:
No mafia for me for a while
No mafia for me for a while
Serves you right
TL Mafia Ban List 2.0 - Page 75
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Message GMarshal if you request a ban please ^_^ Also when the game you're sitting out is over! ~GMarshal | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
Serves you right | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
I don't think it carried the same malicious intent that other stuff gets banned for. I think it was against the spirit of the game (not reading PM) and stupid (posting screenshot after death) but not malicious. I think CR was just "lololol i was really telling the truth" without thinking what that meant for the game. Much as I'm a fan of punishing stupidity, I do think 4 is kinda harsh. Say he sits out a couple - is another 1-2 on top of that really necessary to remind him that he simply can't do that? I don't really think so... Compare to say 2 of the requests on Storm - kush purposefully and knowingly getting himself banned midgame + a history of other abuses, or Corazon getting modkilled despite strong host warnings + a history of doing very similar things in previous games. I can't possibly see how these warrant less than a one-off dumb offence from an otherwise quite normal member. | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On July 25 2014 20:06 marvellosity wrote: and BM is/was a serial offender and CR simply isn't. It's the significant difference that you happily ignore. Woof woof. So everyone can cheat freely once and get away with it? I do not understand. As for BM, he got permabanned for his "work" but he was getting banned for his actions. Dura lex sed lex. EDIT: You know that I am very easy on people who get modkilled for activity. I would love to let this slide, but it was a clear-cut cheating. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
bh says the former, marv says the latter. if bh is right 3 sounds correct. 2 if we are being nice and because CR is nice. If marv is right 1 sounds right. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On July 25 2014 22:18 Kurumi wrote: So everyone can cheat freely once and get away with it? I do not understand. As for BM, he got permabanned for his "work" but he was getting banned for his actions. Dura lex sed lex. EDIT: You know that I am very easy on people who get modkilled for activity. I would love to let this slide, but it was a clear-cut cheating. That is clearly not what I said, so I have no idea why you are trying to make it look like I said that. Bad argument. | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On July 25 2014 22:27 Koshi wrote: Did CR show his unanswered PM to hide his teammate or to show he really didn't read his PM? bh says the former, marv says the latter. if bh is right 3 sounds correct. 2 if we are being nice and because CR is nice. If marv is right 1 sounds right. He posted a screenshot of his inbox after his death. Marv I said I do not understand your argument. You want to let this slide because CR did not intend it to be harmful? | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
On July 25 2014 23:18 Kurumi wrote: He posted a screenshot of inbox shortcut after his death. Marv I said I do not understand your argument. You want to let this slide because CR did not intend it to be harmful? Can you put messages you read back to unread on TL? | ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On July 25 2014 23:21 Koshi wrote: Can you put messages you read back to unread on TL? Yes. CR was CLEARLY doing this to prove he didn't read it and had no idea of the implications it would have on the game. Thinking otherwise is absolutely bonkers and you should smack yourself for thinking he had any ulterior motives | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
True story, Marv isn't on irc | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On July 25 2014 23:18 Kurumi wrote: He posted a screenshot of his inbox after his death. Marv I said I do not understand your argument. You want to let this slide because CR did not intend it to be harmful? I said 4 was too many, not to let it slide Much as I'm a fan of punishing stupidity, I do think 4 is kinda harsh. Say he sits out a couple - is another 1-2 on top of that really necessary to remind him that he simply can't do that? I don't really think so... thought this was relatively clear tbh | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
| ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
Plus, who doesn't feel bad for a guy who has rolled mafia in like 90% of his games on TL | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On July 25 2014 23:33 IAmRobik wrote: I, for one, am certain that a 2 game ban will make CR never do that again. Plus, who doesn't feel bad for a guy who has rolled mafia in like 90% of his games on TL This. He won't ever do it again. Plus 2 games is still like a month. Don't get why people would want more for this guy. Other than insane bloodlust and schadenfreude. Which I don't put past most people tbh. | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On July 25 2014 23:28 IAmRobik wrote: True story, Kurumi modkilled me for questioning him during night phase in a private chat True story, Marv isn't on irc You were berating me, calling me a terrible mod, that I should never host, that I am showing "Polish salt". Look, I never wanted to bring this up because I gave you a second chance. I told myself not to play with you for some time. You on the other hand still go for this black PR any chance you get it. I asked you to stop and you refused. I am not your personal toy to channel anger at. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On July 25 2014 18:41 marvellosity wrote: Compare to say 2 of the requests on Storm - kush purposefully and knowingly getting himself banned midgame + a history of other abuses, first i purposefully AND knowingly got myself banned? are those different things? can you do something on purpose without knowing it? also no, I had no idea saying that was going to get me banned actually. I was not thinking about that at all when I wrote it. | ||
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On July 22 2014 02:34 Palmar wrote: Storm Mafia ban requests
Corazon: This is easy, this isn't your first offense, and frankly, if the host asks you to tone it down, you should really tone it down, its not that hard. I know you get heated in the moment, etc, etc, etc, but come on, you've played dozens of games. Learn to take a step back and not call someone names a lot. I agree that three is harsh, so I'm going to say this, 2 game ban, and if you get modkilled for behavior again, you'll get an extra ban tacked on to it. This is a gesture of good faith. Kush - usually we try not to add punishment to getting banned, as its usually not intentional, and not done with the intent of ruining a game, and it just feels like adding insult to injury. Could you elaborate on what he posted after death? Alakaslam - Yeah, this seems reasonable, he's allowed to sit out one while banned, but he still has to serve two when he gets back. ExO_ - sure. Twitterverse 4 game ban to Chairman Ray for cheating. He repeatedly claimed not to have read his role PM during D1, which is acceptable to claim. However, after he was lynched for it, he posted the following: http://i.imgur.com/6of12Zd.png . This is a screenshot of his inbox, of the Role PM he received from me, unread. This falls under rules 5 and 6 in cheating from my OP: "5. Posting screenshots of your inbox, or really any screenshots of things from the game. 6. Posting or sharing any PM you receive from a host." as well as rule 1: "1. Posting after death. You may have one polite goodbye post, but it may not contain any potentially game-changing information." By revealing he had not read his Role PM via screenshot (which is cheating anyways) after he was dead, Chairman Ray demonstrated to the town that none of what he said about people was motivated by him knowing who his scumbuddy was, etc etc. And it's a freaking screenshot of his unread role PM! It was pretty damn game-changing and is basically as clear-cut as it gets. And he was dead! I cannot possibly imagine an argument that would convince me that Chairman Ray should not get a serious ban for this Yeah, this is a pretty serious violation, reading the discussion following it though, I think a three game ban is more in line with the level of maliciousness. Still breaking two of the written rules is bad -__- | ||
| ||
