|
Message GMarshal if you request a ban please ^_^
Also when the game you're sitting out is over! ~GMarshal |
On June 04 2015 17:46 marvellosity wrote: tbh I'm with geript, I'd tone it down a little. I don't think it was malicious, just stupid. I dunno, I believe bans are meant to serve a purpose (getting a message across that what someone did was unacceptable). I'd argue a 3-game ban is more suited here because sl is still trying to justify what he did, whereas in the cases of repeated offenses (see Robik and co) it's generally a case of someone knowing, but just being unable to control theirselves. In that light I personally support a 3-game ban.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
that's why I'm sexier than you.
|
That's not what she said.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
no, it's what *he* said though.
|
On June 04 2015 14:32 Half the Sky wrote: Sicklucker, sometime back in November when I first started in Student IV you were berating Batsnacks for being impatient/BM with all the newbies, Rasputin, Breshke, and myself after he got himself lynched and we wind up in triple mylo. I remember that quite distinctly.
So to see you turn around and do the same thing here and now is quite disappointing to say the least.
I said it before and I'll say it again - not everyone sees things the way you did. There was enough doubt being created that scum could have gotten an ML off disformation given how everywhere his reads were.
This is a newbie game and that was an opportunity for both BF and disformation to learn.
I was coaching disformation and I was concerned about his presentation going into D5 and he was concerned about getting mislynched. Granted though it was amusing how the game was going in general, but you had told me whilst playing dota the other night that I should to tell my mafia scumlet to concede.
At first I thought you were trolling me but I also wasn't going to say anything that confirmed anyone I was coaching or what I was coaching. But you also confirmed yourself to me, which you probably didn't realise. I never would have told any of my newbies, but that's besides the point. Only problem was that I thought it was a joke until I woke up and saw what you'd done to BF and that's when I realised the full extent of what was going on.
Regardless of which faction I was working with, this game would not have been for my benefit. That wasn't the point.
Who knows Boxerfred or some of these others might be your mafia teammate in a future game. Just saying.
You know well that you just can't be right as town you also have to be persuasive. You can't just kick and scream your way to the finish the way you did. And especially not in a newbie game.
I mean you told Bats he couldn't act the way he did with us newbies in our first game. So why did you think it was any more acceptable to do the same here?
Horribly disappointing. Especially from someone who has coached me before :/
I feel the ban is quite deserved.
In my game people were lynching the uncced cop I've never done anything like what SL did here. Don't lump me in with this kthx.
|
2 games is more than enough though imo,1 is probably better, SL probably just got too excited about defending that no-lynch record of his ![](/mirror/smilies/wink.gif)
He didn't ruin the game or anything.
|
On June 04 2015 19:57 batsnacks wrote:2 games is more than enough though imo,1 is probably better, SL probably just got too excited about defending that no-lynch record of his He didn't ruin the game or anything. That is very debatable. And being afraid of losing the no-lynch record that only exists in his own head is not an excuse for berating a newbie in pms during a fucking newbie game.
|
In any case, I'm with Artanis and JAT on this one, I'd say 2-3, 3 especially if there's been prior/other issues.
|
2 games is like a 30 day ban at least. That seems harsh.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
I'm enjoying this unholy alliance with bats
|
On June 04 2015 14:32 Half the Sky wrote: Sicklucker, sometime back in November when I first started in Student IV you were berating Batsnacks for being impatient/BM with all the newbies, Rasputin, Breshke, and myself after he got himself lynched and we wind up in triple mylo. I remember that quite distinctly.
So to see you turn around and do the same thing here and now is quite disappointing to say the least.
I said it before and I'll say it again - not everyone sees things the way you did. There was enough doubt being created that scum could have gotten an ML off disformation given how everywhere his reads were.
This is a newbie game and that was an opportunity for both BF and disformation to learn.
I was coaching disformation and I was concerned about his presentation going into D5 and he was concerned about getting mislynched. Granted though it was amusing how the game was going in general, but you had told me whilst playing dota the other night that I should to tell my mafia scumlet to concede.
At first I thought you were trolling me but I also wasn't going to say anything that confirmed anyone I was coaching or what I was coaching. But you also confirmed yourself to me, which you probably didn't realise. I never would have told any of my newbies, but that's besides the point. Only problem was that I thought it was a joke until I woke up and saw what you'd done to BF and that's when I realised the full extent of what was going on.
Regardless of which faction I was working with, this game would not have been for my benefit. That wasn't the point.
Who knows Boxerfred or some of these others might be your mafia teammate in a future game. Just saying.
You know well that you just can't be right as town you also have to be persuasive. You can't just kick and scream your way to the finish the way you did. And especially not in a newbie game.
I mean you told Bats he couldn't act the way he did with us newbies in our first game. So why did you think it was any more acceptable to do the same here?
Horribly disappointing. Especially from someone who has coached me before :/
I feel the ban is quite deserved.
I was pretty nice to the newbies... I dont think outside of ticktock any of them have anything bad to say about me where is this coming from
Im not on trial for my manners here
|
I kinda feel I'm also responsible for this indirectly with me testing out stuff. So in my opinion it was really not malicious intent from SL but rather impatience and a sudden surprise, when he thought the game was pretty much over, that led to this. SL already implied he wanted that game over early into N4.
This is the first time I played with SL. Although I believed in his honour, as it will also be reflected in this future games, I couldn't be 100% sure. If I knew him any longer I'm pretty sure I'd just leave it at the BF block, and not perceive him as an dangerous element in the off-chance he is the mafia.
Sure I think SL PMing BF was wrong, but it was for reasons of impatience, maybe a bit of anger, but not malicious intent. 2 Gane-Ban is fine?
|
On June 04 2015 17:06 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2015 16:43 justanothertownie wrote:On June 04 2015 15:12 geript wrote: I think the SL ban should be 2 games at most not 3. We've reserved the 3 game ban for pretty major things. While PMing someone to convince them to concede is definitely out of bounds, I don't think it fits the line we've set for 3 game bans which historically has been a long history repeated offenses without improvement, completely ruining the game for others (outing your scum team, etc.), etc. First of all I would consider this a major offense and second of all he was just warned recently (for other things though). Well deserved ban. If he has a warning I think the amount of games banned goes up by one?
I dont have a warning tho? jats stretching the truth or making things up I cant remember. I dont know where thats coming from at all
|
On June 04 2015 21:07 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2015 17:06 Blazinghand wrote:On June 04 2015 16:43 justanothertownie wrote:On June 04 2015 15:12 geript wrote: I think the SL ban should be 2 games at most not 3. We've reserved the 3 game ban for pretty major things. While PMing someone to convince them to concede is definitely out of bounds, I don't think it fits the line we've set for 3 game bans which historically has been a long history repeated offenses without improvement, completely ruining the game for others (outing your scum team, etc.), etc. First of all I would consider this a major offense and second of all he was just warned recently (for other things though). Well deserved ban. If he has a warning I think the amount of games banned goes up by one? I dont have a warning tho? jats stretching the truth or making things up I cant remember. I dont know where thats coming from at all
On May 16 2015 03:16 Onegu wrote: Ok yeah that is fine.
Add warnings to Stutters and Sicklucker. 2 pages ago.
|
Not that my opinion matters but a problem I see here is that SL still seems to be justify what he did therefore i'm led to believe he still doesn't think he did anything wrong.
|
I dont really no. I think you all need lives because you make drama about nothing
|
On June 04 2015 21:03 sicklucker wrote: I was pretty nice to the newbies... I dont think outside of ticktock any of them have anything bad to say about me where is this coming from
Im not on trial for my manners here
From pages 129-30, 132 of the respective game thread:
On June 03 2015 15:32 boxerfred wrote: wow guys I'm conceding.
I actually thought that my vote switch on sl would get him lynched instead of bunnies. that was a huge mistake. Now, I was thinking about getting SL lynched, then be all surprised about him flipping green, I'd kill Barakos and go full tinfoil on Dis. Given how tictock has been thinking, that was actually likely.
However at this point I just feel so fucked up about SL's "C'MON CONCEDE ALREADY" posts that I'm just done with it. Even receiving PM's from him on that, like what kind of way is that to play a newbie game?
On June 03 2015 16:43 Rels wrote: When I play werewolf IRL, it's considered BM to push someone to concede. I think it's way cooler to watch the almost confirmed mafia struggle ... and when he wins 1% of the time, the entire group lose its shit and calls him gosu.
So I think all your "don't concede=idiot" were BM. And of course PM was rule breaking. A shame 'cause you're super funny and your posts made me laugh all game long )=
On June 03 2015 22:59 boxerfred wrote: [...] That error, in conjunction with SL's behaviour, really made me feel dumb. So I decided to grab a straw: plots' "yolo block". When I found out that this would not work, it was easy for me to claim that I was blocked, CC'ing SL. By now I think it would've been even better to have claimed that I was not blocked: I would only say that SL lied, even without CC'ing him, thus making Dis still a probable scum member.
If the lynch on SL would've gotten through, the game was still winnable. Even in the situation of CC'ing SL, I had a thing prepared: when he'd be lynched and flip town, I'd just say that he lied about having been blocked for the sake of confirming me scum. I think with tictocks alive as the decider between disinfo and me, this might have actually worked out.
However I'm not wasting another 48hrs + 24hrs + 24/48hrs on someone who's continuesly dragging the game in the mud. I'm here for the funsies, not for the frustrations. Therefore I conceded even before EoD. I think the chances of actually winning this game for scum were somewhere around 20-40%, depending on Dis' behaviour D4.
On June 04 2015 06:18 boxerfred wrote: You shouldnt play newbie games
On June 04 2015 06:21 boxerfred wrote: Mafia is like verbal fencing. You were practicing drunken boxing. Im really pissed towards your behaviour. So i said this now, gonna shut up about it now. By the way my coach even advised me to keep on playing since its at least worth the experience. Really sl never play a newbie game again.
This isn't even from me. I'm not making this up. I could be misunderstanding the bolded, but otherwise I really think the quotes here speak for themselves.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
sicklucker taking his defence lessons from the kushm4sta manual
|
On June 04 2015 21:19 marvellosity wrote: sicklucker taking his defence lessons from the kushm4sta manual lol, I literally thought exactly the same a few minutes ago.
|
Thats just him being a sore loser
The only ounce of symphony I have is that it was in a newbie game.
|
|
|
|