Golden Sun: The Broken Seal Mini Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 11 2013 05:41 FirmTofu wrote: If DarthPunk dies N1, I will give him a virtual cookie to compensate. I will do it! I'll shoot DP N1 if I am scum ![]() | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
Can't stop the signal, Mal. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [notes] + Up through P6 Koshi says policy is "lynch scum". joking? meaningful? what does this mean. says that grack is not a troll. votes SnB for saying "ok but how will you make sure the rest of town doesn't lynch not scum" in response to policy post. wtf? SnB notes PS is coaching a newbie game and asks about it. This is actually pretty next-level and tells me he is town. why is PS and Koshi voting SnB for trying to figure out who PS is? SnB noticing PS in a newbie game and making this connection... means he is probably town. This kind of extra level of thinking is something a town who is honestly trying to figure things out would do. Grack is policy lynching kush. I am okay with this-- kush is illegible. TL towns don't policy lynch nearly enough. P7 Koshi's thing about SnB's word choice is stupid. his word choice being different could be because he has a different alignment, but could be do to any other number of variables, including being presented with a novel "policy" Kush is trolling and I feel stronger about grack's policy vote on kush. His aggression towards kush seems a little over the top but it's okay. Vayne comes in and is actually making a lot of sense. I'm glad he was here at this time. Papasmurf swapping votes to VA seems pretty obviously a knee-jerk reaction. Judging from his word choice, high post count, and the way he moves his votes in response to innocuous statements, he is probably BH. I know you think this kind of thing is real pressure BH/PS, but it's really not. all it does is make your vote meaningless. I revise my read in papasmurf from scummish to townish if he is really BH-- this is how BH plays as town. Vayne's post #137 further reinforces my idea that he is town. His questions are good but don't take into account who papasmurf is. I don't like SnB's #138 though. His responses aren't really meaningful and dont' promote discussion, but it looks like he's contributing. If SnB is scum, I'd be more convinced by hist post #138 than by the other posts he's made before that. P8 Papasmurf is being typical blazinghand in his argument with VA. VA equivocating in post #143 sounds like backtracking, but when you've got PS/BH on you for every little turn of phrase, posts like that get made. Still, a point against him. What is Koshi saying here? SnB's post here isn't scummy but it's not very well-thought-out. why ask all these questions in one post? of course you don't find someone defending you worrying, because he's DEFENDING you. VA's defense is reasonable and people's attacks on SNB prior to P7 second half are unreasonable, but VA has definitely defended SnB on relatively shakey grounds with SnB only had two votes on him. Who is SnB to say that VA wasn't "trying to be right" as so many scum do? What we have here is SnB 'wants' VA to be town, because he doesn't like the idea of being defended by scum. Not saying it's true/false, but SnB what you're doing here is stating a conclusion then looking for evidence to back it up, rather than the other way around. PS/BH with the classic "dumb or scum" statement. P9 VA's "my two cents" and "lol" strike me as odd in 162. Would you say that as town? off-handedly, sure. I like VA for town still. I could see him diffusing tension after this, though. I have questions for him. WoS's inactivity claim strikes me as very convenient. This should be considered a mark against him regardless of circumstances. GK's entrance is solid. It's the kind of question someone who just caught up reading would ask-- he's actually reading the thread for sure. So, now that I'm caught up, a few statements and questions S + Q 1. I know this game is very conversational, but all the spam and one-lining makes it difficult to read and analyze. Some people have that style, and it doesn't take that much longer to read, but it will take me a little bit of time to get used to it. I am glad that people are getting involved! 2. Yes, I am a smurf. I have played on TL before and thought I could use a new start... the hosts know about this and are okay with it. 3. I know we're long past policy, but since I am a smurf and don't have a history written out of what policies I like, here are my thoughts on policy: i. TL towns do not policy lynch enough, not by far ii. the policy lynch should be used D1, not any time close to lylo, since the d1 lynch is the least useful iii. the policy lynch must be stated with full willingness to follow through, and mislynch, as a result iiii. policy lynch should be used on fake-claimers, liars, lurkers, and players whose play is generally unacceptable. v. I may have a scumread today I consider more strongly than a policy lynch. I will be open as possible with my reads and thoughts so that i can be convinced, and convincing. I think our best play on D1 can be to policy lynch though... it makes play stronger. I am aware this is a controversial opinion, but it is also a good one. If you disagree with me, that is okay 4. This is @vayneauthority: despite the fact that you have interacted obliquely with Koshi, you do not mention him ever. Do you think he is town, or he is scum? What do you think of his initial vote on SnB for questioning his "policy" of lynching scum? What do you think of his "policy"? Why haven't you weighed in on him yet? 5. this is @SnB: you think koshi is "uncomfortable" and "projecting"... and you also say he is "silly". do you have a scumread on him or not? 5.b this is @SnB: what do you think of VA, in light of my notes on him? Would you say your perception of him is colored by his defense of you? taking that into account, do you see why he is viewed as scummy? 6. this is @papa_smurf: why did you smurf into this game? Are you really BH? After you unvote SnB you don't mention him again. Do you still have a scumread on him, or do you think he is town because VA is scum? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [P11 and P12 notes[/spoiler] + P10 GK's question of grack is reasonable grack's response is also seems reasonable wow, I really like GK's followup analysis/summary in post #183. I hadn't realized this sort of contradiction in grack's reasoning. After all, it does seem weird for VA to have a strong townread so suddenly, but he did give a reason. the natural point to turn on thwn would be to engage that reason in discussion/analysis. WoS's followup looks town-motivated to me. I don't like that he calls SnB's unusually strong effort not-townie. SnB seems like a somewhat obvious town to me at least in terms of how he's thinking. If his usual level of effort is less than this, and he stepped it up, he should be town. WoS could really not know what to think of this, but i dont' see why this would not be a towntell for SnB. I haven't been paying an appropriate amount of attention to grack, and WoS's read looks like a solid one to me. He is jumping the gun by voting on small evidence, but perhaps that is his style-- all ##vote and no ##fos. I will be interested to see his target's regracktion to this attack. A standard call-out of a /confirmer and a name-claimer, nothing too special at the end there. Overall, I am less interested in a WoS lynch today after this post. If he will be posting like this regularly he is worth keeping around. His statement on Kush intrigues me. I am not familiar with Kush's meta other than that many players consider him bad/trollish. I don't understand VA's non-3p read. That's not a useful read to make at all. 8( Ah, here we see debears smurf-slipping, as mentioned to me. Papa_smurf, what a chump! VA is backtracking and equivocating again. This is not what I would expect a town player to do. his response to the debears smurfslip is immediate suspicion based on... lying? P11 It looks like now there is a discussion about Aperture mafia and these players interacted there. PS/DB's read on VA's early strong read (something that scum would do, say, on a townie to collect towncred) is supposed to not make sense given that PS/DB played with VA in Aperture. I'm not sure why PS/DB backs off from VA here. 1. @VA, if you are accusing PS/DB of not understanding your meta and hiding that fact based on events in Aperture, you should quote, link, or otherwise point us towards the incrongruity. 2. @WoS, I would like to know about your read on SnB. SnB's finding out that PS is coaching a newbie game, then asking him about it, strikes me as townie. After all, making that connection is not something he'd have to do as scum. Townies inherently are trying to find things out about the game, whereas scum are trying to conceal. You also make a meta note that SnB is trying much harder to help and be productive this game. Why doesn't this result in a townread on SnB for you? I'd like to hear your thought process. 3. @VA (again), I'd like to know specifically what lead to your non-3p read on WoS. You say it was just a joke, but this is the second time you have backtracked/equivocated. I'm willing to accept it as a joke, especially with the smiley face, but what brought it to mind? Why, in a post in which you explicitly buddy WoS, do you say your read on him is non-3p, and not say, townie? I know you have history with him, but surely you'd prefer to just call him town? 4 @PS/DB, I am okay with kush's policy vote on WoS-- it is not a scumtell. I am willing to policy lynch kush based on his previous play, but we have not come to that part of the day yet. There is much to see and talk about first. Would you be interested in policy lynching kush? unless we have a vigilante, we can expect him to be a burden at LYLO. he has said and analyzed nothing, and his taste in culinary television is questionable at best. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
Also: when I go to bed tonight, I won't be back before the lynch deadline tomorrow. I'll wake up a little early in the morning so if anyone leaves me an urgent message (say my name, Old Partner and I will CTRL+F it) I can swap my vote or something before work. During the weekend, of course, I will be around for any deadlines. I'm going to continue catching up in the thread and will post again once I have done so. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
P11 thoughts Kush do you play on mafiascum? I don't recognize your SN. This is not on-topic though, and is part of the reason why you are a good policy lynch today. P12 pandain seems like a buddying dude but otherwise reasonable. I like that he agrees with my catch on SnB reading up on papasmurf coaching. That being said, I don't consider this to be alignment-indicative. I consider his thing stating zealous seeming town then being "a lurker" isn't necessarily contradictory. He's just wrong. I'm sure scum get rolenames to claim. Overall this isn't a very interesting entry post by him, but the one thing I like is he isn't sure about my alignment. It would be easy for him to just call me town (or call me scum), but he is somewhat suspicious because of what i've revealed about my talents. This is a guy who doesn't want to be misled. Kush martyring. yeah, policy him. claiming that he's not gonna do anything D1. Definitely policy him. Like, honestly, what did you expect? We can't allow play like this. Pandain being on lurkers as a matter of policy is annoying but fine. not worth a D1 lynch based on that. Grack's case seems interesting but take a look at his reasoning. Pandain's post didn't analyze, but it's still fairly early in the game. His reasoning on SnB being town might be bad, but why doesn't that apply to my reasoning? Pandain not coming to a conclusion on me is based on his estimation of my skills. This is not a towntell, but it is not a scumtell either. His statements about policy lynches on grack, kush, and lurkers could be considered scummy, but honestly the entirety of grack's "case" in post 228 is fluff. It looks like Grack is taking a stance just to take a stance, and jumping on a guy who just happened to post. It looks like legitimate analysis, but it is not. For this post, I upgrade Grack from "not worth lynching D1" to "potentially worth lynching D1" and a ##Fos Grack. Papa_smurf gets points for his principled stand against the SnB town-read for out of game reasons. I disagree with him, but from his point of view, his own post out of the game thread seems "obvious" to notice. He misunderstands that SnB didn't say "look, PS is a smurf" and therefore SnB is town, SnB was looking into PS/DB's posting history to try to figure things out. SnB wouldn't be just hanging out in a newbie game, see? He didn't accidentally run into PS's out-of-game post. He searched for it. He looked for it. If SnB was coaching or hosting that game, then it would be a null tell. But the fact that he legitimately went out of his way and did research on PS tells us that he is trying to figure things out. Scum wouldn't care at all. Now, scum might be good enough at pretending to care, sure, yada yada yada. But it's still much more likely that SnB is town based on this. PS/DB here is wrong but in the way that a town player would be wrong. Here in post 232 I think Grack's interacting with PS is weird. PS is being normal, but look at what Grack says here. He doesn't try to convince PS/DB about his case. He's not collaboratively building a case or tryign to explain things. He's just being like "do you think panda is scum, what did i misinterpret." Your mindset as a town player, when interacting with someone you nominally assume to be scum (and PS is active enough to assume to be scum), is to convince him, not to butt heads with him. Post 233 by PS/DB shows imo how a townie thinks. He explains his thoguht process. P234 he breaks down his understanding of pandain's thoughts and what he thinks is scummy. Contrast that with grack's previous posts (not trying to explain thought process). Grack eventually tries to explain a little in #236 but honestly this is not very convincing. What he says after the "koshi has awaken" post is a little better. Still, I'd say after this interaction I'm leaning scummer on grack and towner on PS/DB just based on how they're talking. One is trying to explain a thought process, and the other (grack) had to be backed into explaining things. It's not a hard read, but it's something. P13 I like this first post from grack a little better. He's trying to involve koshi. that being said, I don't consider it inherently townie. getting a read out of koshi on this (and he has already provided one on pandain) isn't something scum wouldn't do. I see koshi disagrees with me on pandain's motives for putting some suspicion on me, but we can reasonably disagree on that. @rayn. I strongly think papa_smurf is town. his activity and his interacting with grack... it looks like he's trying to figure things out and he is being transparent with his thought process. There is 0 chance we should lynch PS/DB today. Rayn has an interesting critique of my initial posts. However, for the most part I suspect rayn wouldn't dislike anything I said if I just didn't include my notes in my posts. I can't say much in response to what he doesn't like about my posts here other than that he's overreacting. If he doesn't understand my questions, that's unfortunate for him. Probably the only damning thing that can be said about my initial posts, that rayn touches on but fails to focus on, is that I dont' call anyone scum, FoS, or vote. I don't take a strong stance. Stuff like "breaking up townies plans" as he said in post 257 is a bunch of horsecock. Rayn is attacking me for very weird reasons. As a result, I feel suspicous of him. That being said, this is somewhat reduced by the fact that he's chosen to attack me, a smurf and an unknown player. scum might be more hesitant to attack me. I just really don't like the way he chose to attack me. As a line of attack, it doesn't make sense from a town perspectiive. Why not focus on my lack of stance-taking, the obvious thing? Why jump through hoops about me "breaking up town plans"? I'm not ready to vote him, but at this moment I will ##FoS Rayn. P14 Koshi's list is meaningless. needs better explanation. Rayn points this out, but no town points for such an obvious point-out. The FoS stands. WoS for "general uselessness' ![]() I don't understand rayn's comparison between me and pandain. I see he brings up the reads thing, which means he was clearly aware of it but did not emphasise it in his previous follow-up posts. I don't understand what's going on in koshi's post #271. Rayn's response regarding the comparison between me and Pandain still doesn't make a whole lot of sense. If he's saying "Pandain is scummy", how does that make me scummy? If he's saying my posting is worse than Pandain's, why not just objectively point out how bad my posting is to Koshi? Sure, Koshi seems to have a scumread on Pandain and not me, but a good amount of what Pandain did was rehash points what I made, which is different than making those posts to begin with. Again, I don't like how Koshi responds to people. #274 in my opinion doesn't appropriately answer rayn's questions, even if rayn's questions are assinine. Zealos entering and just giving a nullread on kush is worthless. Therefore: ##FoS Zealos. The fact that this is his contribution at this stage in the game is not appropriate. Blubbdavid also appears at this moment. I like his posting on Koshi. No FoS or strong statement of scumitude other than an implied ##IGMEOY. A fluffly entrance. I keep him on my consideration for D1 policy. addendum: the vote is fine but the transition to grack, although it is a useful one (since grack is acting scummy) takes power away from the vote in the same post. is BD really trying to pressure or lynch Koshi when he's pivoting at the same time? Not FoS territory but I don't like it. P15 Koshi seems even weirder on me for stating he thinks my post is scummy, then in post #248 stating he didn't ever do so. A town player generally remembers when he has had his mind changed on a piece of evidence. Although town can forget what they think, it's more common for scum who don't actually think it but pretend to think it, to forget. As a rule of policy I will not be on Koshi today vote-wise (he's actually active... he will give himself away in the event of being scum) but at this point I will say that i will ##IGMEOY Koshi. BD's post of three scumreads, Koshi, Grack, and Kush, aligns with my own suspicions at this point. in post #291 he calls grack out very reasonably. The associative tells between unflipped players are dumb, though. I am unwilling to lynch BD today, just based on post 291, evne with his weird entrance. three good reads, though he should admit his reasoning for wanting to lynch kush is policy. Rayn's post #300 is essentially correct. GK called out grack's equivocation, and was spot on the money for it. A cookie to Rayn for this, and I'll downgrade my scumread on him. He's not worth lynching today, when he's interacting so much. ##unFoS Rayn ##IGMEOY Rayn P 16 At this point, I realize I've spent an hour writing notes on 2 pages, and somehow in the past 20 hours there have been 20 pages posted. I'm going to be a bit briefer in my notes now, since I need to cook dinner and I want to post this before I do that. Koshi's capitulation is a nullread. Kush scumslips here about scum being given fakeclaims. At this point I suggest we policy lynch Kush. ##vote kushm4sta we all know he could easily be scum and despite what people say, there's no way to read him. He's not contributing. This is our least valuable lynch. We lynch him today and end the suffering. Grack is wrong about what to do about kush. Why does he assume we have a vigilante? we sholud just lynch kush and be done with it. Grack's defense of me makes even lsess sense. I'm unuseful, but... he wants me to consolidate? I put my notes in spoilers and made my questions and statements on the bottom. I only made 2 posts, for chrissake. Has grack even read my posts? Snoman's attack on blubb and discussion of names is worthless. ##igmeoy: sn0_man rayn pressuring grack. good. P 17 rayn directing entering players towards his case. this is townie. definitely don't lynch today. Why doesn't grack want to read my two posts? Rayn states pandain is scummy and i am scummier, then says pandain is "golden" for criticizing me... but does pandain really think that? no. Come on rayn. @VA That's not a reasonable reason to not give a read on koshi. You can't just not give a read on someone because you were wrong before. If you're so reliably wrong, just think the opposite of what you want to think. Why are you so hesitant to give a read on him? also people arguing doesn't mean differing alignments ##igmeoy VA. Almost an FoS. What is this BS. Snowman gets a point for defending me, loses a point for criticizing glorious gifs. no change on my status on him. Va's case only follows after being called out. No credit. Grack jumping on board doesn't make me happy either. Rayn is asking the right questions. More points to him. He's not scum. ##unigmeoy rayn P 18 snoman hopping onboard the BD wagon is bad also. this is clearly a mislynch wagon. you're lynching a guy for giving reads that were fine. come on fellas good defesne from BD P20 at this point, still no comment on the kush scumslip. he slips under the radar like this Grack calling vig shots that should be policy lynches. snoman says kush is lynchable in general... instead of right now? why? If we lynch kush, we do it D1. he's right that as scum I'm more likely to slip up with this than any other style. Still, not my place to comment on this. P21 PS/DB an explanation of kush scum/town meta would be ncie rather than saying it exists and leaving it like that. god rayn get off my ass, it's not happening. I don't care about rayn's fakeclaiming history. we lynch liars. SnB needs to take a stance. I downgrade him to "null" for that post #417 P22 PS that's probably not a scumslip from rayn. that's just arrogance. bds' arguments were fine. We can't figure kush out. he's not worth anything, he doesn't contribute, we just lynch him today and be done with it P23 @VA I can also do so much. I will be around to interact now though P24 @Koshi the least active overall, or between me and Panda? Pandain clearly knows that grack's lgoic is flawed. Grack highly lynchable for it. I think we'll hear more from him though, kush is a more worthy D1 lynch. if kush isn't a viable option I am willing to vote grack. AGain, sorry guys, I'm only availle during certain time blocks P25 Pandain I feel is in part defending me here because his post mirrored mine. I am willing to concede that htis could be a scum attempt at buddying. That being said, he's in the thread and posting. this makes him not worth a D1 lynch. I should take a moment to explain my lynch philosophy here. We don't lynch people whose alignments will be clear by lilo. we lynch scummy people and people who won't prove themselves townie. Pandain at least is in the thick of things and posting. We can't afford to go into Lylo with "lylobilities" (think liabilities but for lylo) still alive. pandain loses some points as a result. rayn needs to explain his scumread on pandain. "too busy to make a good case" doesn't cut it. policy on onegus and sheeping on blubb doesn't cut it. ##igmeoy pandain, again, don't lynch him today P26 is his irl name really isaac P27 Rayn's list is bad. Zealos is an acceptable policy. 28 blue hunting is scum motivated, but is abjectly openly do it really scum motivated? get your shit together guys. I really have to go now, I will be back in about an hour and a half. you guys post too much SnB, why did you not respond to my questions we should lync kush, he will never be readable. ##vote kushm4sta ##FoS Zealos, ##FoS Grack ##igmeoy pandain, VA, sn0_man, Koshi I know this shit is a mess. I'm sorry. I will be back. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
I am done with dinner. I thought I'd start by clearing up some misconceptions, stating more clearly some questions that came up during my initial read, and of course contributing to my defense since it seems that Grackaroni has decided to OMGUS me. 0. Jesus H Christ I am sorry for the formatting of the notes. I had "word wrap" on in notepad and it interacted poorly when I pasted it in. Here are the notes with fixed formatting, same as in the previous post. please read them here and not there. + Show Spoiler [reformatted post] + + Show Spoiler + P11 thoughts Kush do you play on mafiascum? I don't recognize your SN. This is not on-topic though, and is part of the reason why you are a good policy lynch today. P12 pandain seems like a buddying dude but otherwise reasonable. I like that he agrees with my catch on SnB reading up on papasmurf coaching. That being said, I don't consider this to be alignment-indicative. I consider his thing stating zealous seeming town then being "a lurker" isn't necessarily contradictory. He's just wrong. I'm sure scum get rolenames to claim. Overall this isn't a very interesting entry post by him, but the one thing I like is he isn't sure about my alignment. It would be easy for him to just call me town (or call me scum), but he is somewhat suspicious because of what i've revealed about my talents. This is a guy who doesn't want to be misled. Kush martyring. yeah, policy him. claiming that he's not gonna do anything D1. Definitely policy him. Like, honestly, what did you expect? We can't allow play like this. Pandain being on lurkers as a matter of policy is annoying but fine. not worth a D1 lynch based on that. Grack's case seems interesting but take a look at his reasoning. Pandain's post didn't analyze, but it's still fairly early in the game. His reasoning on SnB being town might be bad, but why doesn't that apply to my reasoning? Pandain not coming to a conclusion on me is based on his estimation of my skills. This is not a towntell, but it is not a scumtell either. His statements about policy lynches on grack, kush, and lurkers could be considered scummy, but honestly the entirety of grack's "case" in post 228 is fluff. It looks like Grack is taking a stance just to take a stance, and jumping on a guy who just happened to post. It looks like legitimate analysis, but it is not. For this post, I upgrade Grack from "not worth lynching D1" to "potentially worth lynching D1" and a ##Fos Grack. Papa_smurf gets points for his principled stand against the SnB town-read for out of game reasons. I disagree with him, but from his point of view, his own post out of the game thread seems "obvious" to notice. He misunderstands that SnB didn't say "look, PS is a smurf" and therefore SnB is town, SnB was looking into PS/DB's posting history to try to figure things out. SnB wouldn't be just hanging out in a newbie game, see? He didn't accidentally run into PS's out-of-game post. He searched for it. He looked for it. If SnB was coaching or hosting that game, then it would be a null tell. But the fact that he legitimately went out of his way and did research on PS tells us that he is trying to figure things out. Scum wouldn't care at all. Now, scum might be good enough at pretending to care, sure, yada yada yada. But it's still much more likely that SnB is town based on this. PS/DB here is wrong but in the way that a town player would be wrong. Here in post 232 I think Grack's interacting with PS is weird. PS is being normal, but look at what Grack says here. He doesn't try to convince PS/DB about his case. He's not collaboratively building a case or tryign to explain things. He's just being like "do you think panda is scum, what did i misinterpret." Your mindset as a town player, when interacting with someone you nominally assume to be scum (and PS is active enough to assume to be scum), is to convince him, not to butt heads with him. Post 233 by PS/DB shows imo how a townie thinks. He explains his thoguht process. P234 he breaks down his understanding of pandain's thoughts and what he thinks is scummy. Contrast that with grack's previous posts (not trying to explain thought process). Grack eventually tries to explain a little in #236 but honestly this is not very convincing. What he says after the "koshi has awaken" post is a little better. Still, I'd say after this interaction I'm leaning scummer on grack and towner on PS/DB just based on how they're talking. One is trying to explain a thought process, and the other (grack) had to be backed into explaining things. It's not a hard read, but it's something. P13 I like this first post from grack a little better. He's trying to involve koshi. that being said, I don't consider it inherently townie. getting a read out of koshi on this (and he has already provided one on pandain) isn't something scum wouldn't do. I see koshi disagrees with me on pandain's motives for putting some suspicion on me, but we can reasonably disagree on that. @rayn. I strongly think papa_smurf is town. his activity and his interacting with grack... it looks like he's trying to figure things out and he is being transparent with his thought process. There is 0 chance we should lynch PS/DB today. Rayn has an interesting critique of my initial posts. However, for the most part I suspect rayn wouldn't dislike anything I said if I just didn't include my notes in my posts. I can't say much in response to what he doesn't like about my posts here other than that he's overreacting. If he doesn't understand my questions, that's unfortunate for him. Probably the only damning thing that can be said about my initial posts, that rayn touches on but fails to focus on, is that I dont' call anyone scum, FoS, or vote. I don't take a strong stance. Stuff like "breaking up townies plans" as he said in post 257 is a bunch of horsecock. Rayn is attacking me for very weird reasons. As a result, I feel suspicous of him. That being said, this is somewhat reduced by the fact that he's chosen to attack me, a smurf and an unknown player. scum might be more hesitant to attack me. I just really don't like the way he chose to attack me. As a line of attack, it doesn't make sense from a town perspectiive. Why not focus on my lack of stance-taking, the obvious thing? Why jump through hoops about me "breaking up town plans"? I'm not ready to vote him, but at this moment I will ##FoS Rayn. P14 Koshi's list is meaningless. needs better explanation. Rayn points this out, but no town points for such an obvious point-out. The FoS stands. WoS for "general uselessness' ![]() I don't understand rayn's comparison between me and pandain. I see he brings up the reads thing, which means he was clearly aware of it but did not emphasise it in his previous follow-up posts. I don't understand what's going on in koshi's post #271. Rayn's response regarding the comparison between me and Pandain still doesn't make a whole lot of sense. If he's saying "Pandain is scummy", how does that make me scummy? If he's saying my posting is worse than Pandain's, why not just objectively point out how bad my posting is to Koshi? Sure, Koshi seems to have a scumread on Pandain and not me, but a good amount of what Pandain did was rehash points what I made, which is different than making those posts to begin with. Again, I don't like how Koshi responds to people. #274 in my opinion doesn't appropriately answer rayn's questions, even if rayn's questions are assinine. Zealos entering and just giving a nullread on kush is worthless. Therefore: ##FoS Zealos. The fact that this is his contribution at this stage in the game is not appropriate. Blubbdavid also appears at this moment. I like his posting on Koshi. No FoS or strong statement of scumitude other than an implied ##IGMEOY. A fluffly entrance. I keep him on my consideration for D1 policy. addendum: the vote is fine but the transition to grack, although it is a useful one (since grack is acting scummy) takes power away from the vote in the same post. is BD really trying to pressure or lynch Koshi when he's pivoting at the same time? Not FoS territory but I don't like it. P15 Koshi seems even weirder on me for stating he thinks my post is scummy, then in post #248 stating he didn't ever do so. A town player generally remembers when he has had his mind changed on a piece of evidence. Although town can forget what they think, it's more common for scum who don't actually think it but pretend to think it, to forget. As a rule of policy I will not be on Koshi today vote-wise (he's actually active... he will give himself away in the event of being scum) but at this point I will say that i will ##IGMEOY Koshi. BD's post of three scumreads, Koshi, Grack, and Kush, aligns with my own suspicions at this point. in post #291 he calls grack out very reasonably. The associative tells between unflipped players are dumb, though. I am unwilling to lynch BD today, just based on post 291, evne with his weird entrance. three good reads, though he should admit his reasoning for wanting to lynch kush is policy. Rayn's post #300 is essentially correct. GK called out grack's equivocation, and was spot on the money for it. A cookie to Rayn for this, and I'll downgrade my scumread on him. He's not worth lynching today, when he's interacting so much. ##unFoS Rayn ##IGMEOY Rayn P 16 At this point, I realize I've spent an hour writing notes on 2 pages, and somehow in the past 20 hours there have been 20 pages posted. I'm going to be a bit briefer in my notes now, since I need to cook dinner and I want to post this before I do that. Koshi's capitulation is a nullread. Kush scumslips here about scum being given fakeclaims. At this point I suggest we policy lynch Kush. ##vote kushm4sta we all know he could easily be scum and despite what people say, there's no way to read him. He's not contributing. This is our least valuable lynch. We lynch him today and end the suffering. Grack is wrong about what to do about kush. Why does he assume we have a vigilante? we sholud just lynch kush and be done with it. Grack's defense of me makes even lsess sense. I'm unuseful, but... he wants me to consolidate? I put my notes in spoilers and made my questions and statements on the bottom. I only made 2 posts, for chrissake. Has grack even read my posts? Snoman's attack on blubb and discussion of names is worthless. ##igmeoy: sn0_man rayn pressuring grack. good. P 17 rayn directing entering players towards his case. this is townie. definitely don't lynch today. Why doesn't grack want to read my two posts? Rayn states pandain is scummy and i am scummier, then says pandain is "golden" for criticizing me... but does pandain really think that? no. Come on rayn. @VA That's not a reasonable reason to not give a read on koshi. You can't just not give a read on someone because you were wrong before. If you're so reliably wrong, just think the opposite of what you want to think. Why are you so hesitant to give a read on him? also people arguing doesn't mean differing alignments ##igmeoy VA. Almost an FoS. What is this BS. Snowman gets a point for defending me, loses a point for criticizing glorious gifs. no change on my status on him. Va's case only follows after being called out. No credit. Grack jumping on board doesn't make me happy either. Rayn is asking the right questions. More points to him. He's not scum. ##unigmeoy rayn P 18 snoman hopping onboard the BD wagon is bad also. this is clearly a mislynch wagon. you're lynching a guy for giving reads that were fine. come on fellas good defesne from BD P20 at this point, still no comment on the kush scumslip. he slips under the radar like this Grack calling vig shots that should be policy lynches. snoman says kush is lynchable in general... instead of right now? why? If we lynch kush, we do it D1. he's right that as scum I'm more likely to slip up with this than any other style. Still, not my place to comment on this. P21 PS/DB an explanation of kush scum/town meta would be ncie rather than saying it exists and leaving it like that. god rayn get off my ass, it's not happening. I don't care about rayn's fakeclaiming history. we lynch liars. SnB needs to take a stance. I downgrade him to "null" for that post #417 P22 PS that's probably not a scumslip from rayn. that's just arrogance. bds' arguments were fine. We can't figure kush out. he's not worth anything, he doesn't contribute, we just lynch him today and be done with it P23 @VA I can also do so much. I will be around to interact now though P24 @Koshi the least active overall, or between me and Panda? Pandain clearly knows that grack's lgoic is flawed. Grack highly lynchable for it. I think we'll hear more from him though, kush is a more worthy D1 lynch. if kush isn't a viable option I am willing to vote grack. AGain, sorry guys, I'm only availle during certain time blocks P25 Pandain I feel is in part defending me here because his post mirrored mine. I am willing to concede that htis could be a scum attempt at buddying. That being said, he's in the thread and posting. this makes him not worth a D1 lynch. I should take a moment to explain my lynch philosophy here. We don't lynch people whose alignments will be clear by lilo. we lynch scummy people and people who won't prove themselves townie. Pandain at least is in the thick of things and posting. We can't afford to go into Lylo with "lylobilities" (think liabilities but for lylo) still alive. pandain loses some points as a result. rayn needs to explain his scumread on pandain. "too busy to make a good case" doesn't cut it. policy on onegus and sheeping on blubb doesn't cut it. ##igmeoy pandain, again, don't lynch him today P26 is his irl name really isaac P27 Rayn's list is bad. Zealos is an acceptable policy. 28 blue hunting is scum motivated, but is abjectly openly do it really scum motivated? get your shit together guys. I really have to go now, I will be back in about an hour and a half. you guys post too much SnB, why did you not respond to my questions we should lync kush, he will never be readable. ##vote kushm4sta ##FoS Zealos, ##FoS Grack ##igmeoy pandain, VA, sn0_man, Koshi I know this shit is a mess. I'm sorry. I will be back. 1. Igmeoy is "I've got my eye on you" 2. I probably should have ##FoSed or ##igmeoyed SnB when I realized he hadn't responded to my questions. However, in my rush to finish things up I only had time to slap down a question for him about why he didn't respond. It didn't occur to me, but it is a reasonable point that I should call attention to him for dodging. ##FoS SnB 3. You're welcome to say that I don't understand where the thread's at at any given moment, and that's okay. It's a criticism of my read-through and I accept that. Honestly, it ended up more rushed than I thought it would be. The fact that we have like 30 pages of posts for halfway through D1 in a game with 15 players is pretty rough. It's easy to say "OP should know where the thread is and what's going on" when you were there live, or you had more than an hour or so to read through things. I made a mistake reading the thread, or I missed something. I'm sorry-- I'll do better. I'm here now and willing to discuss things. 3. On September 13 2013 11:19 kushm4sta wrote: So all policy votes on me, (which im pretty sure is all of them) should come off right now. Because I AM PROMISING to do shit tonight and if I don't you can auto lynch me. No. This argument is not persuasive at all. If you're really promising to do shit between now and the deadline, why should I unvote you now, rather than after this shit you plan on doing? 4. I have some specific questions from within my notes that I'd like to bring up for people. I am summarizing things here so that they cannot be ignored, despite Grackaroni's misleading accusations (which are really just stolen from rayn anyways. no credit for you grack) 5. regarding my particular style: it's different from how I play not in this smurf, but not different by a large amount. I'm smurfing because I want to experiment with a new style without getting lynched for meta reasons. why else would you smurf? Questions Here they are: 1. Why doesn't grack want to read my two posts? I get it that the one I just made was poorly formatted but that has been fixed now. 3. @snoman you say kush is lynchable in general... instead of right now? why? If we lynch kush, we do it D1 3.a in general @people who don't want to lynch kush. Do you really think he's readable? He's done nothing to indicate that, put no effort forward, and generally doesn't do so. He's 100% going to be a liability if he's alive at LYLO. you can pretend that it's not the case and try to be nice, but let's be honest-- if kush is scum and we don't lynch him on policy, we're not gonna somehow catch him acting differently. He always is the same. 4. @Koshi on p 24 you say we should lynch the least active. do you mean overall, or between me and Panda? 5. this isn't necessarily a question but I am willing to policy lynch Onegu or zealos instead of policy lynching Kush, but only if a kush policy lynch is not possible. Who else is interested in a policy lynch today? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
You say I should be "engaging with the thread" and that's true, but right now the thread is basically just me. People have effectively bailed since I have posted my summary and questions. That being said, I will talk with you, since you are here. Is this still your position on Kush? On September 12 2013 16:08 Grackaroni wrote: Lets get real, Kush playing anti-town is nothing new from him. He does it as both alignments. If he doesn't start contributing, we vig him and we move on. Lynches should be used on players we can actually analyze. On September 13 2013 02:38 Grackaroni wrote: @Blubbdavid, If onegu doesn't start playing then he is a solid vig shot as well. I've played with kush before and I doubt he is going to start playing at this point, but there's no way of reading him so it's a waste of a lynch. We don't use lynches on anti-town players we use them on scum players. If we pushed lynches on players such as kush who play anti-town regardless of alignment, then everybody would be in agreement and drop their vote on kush and we would have no information for day2 You are the only player I can remember arguing that kush is likely scum. Everybody else is voting for kush as a policy. To punish kush for playing the way he does and to discourage him from playing like that again in future games. What happens if Kush is alive tomorrow because town has no vigis? Would you policy lynch him D2? You dont' think he's going to start playing, you think he's unreadable, and so you want to him to get vigged. We dont' know if there is a vig. If it turns out there isn't, then you MUST be onboard for a D2 kush policy lynch. Why not just lynch him today? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 13 2013 12:29 Grackaroni wrote: Your questions are really your main participation, nobody responds to your notes, and your only mention of me was why I didn't want to read your posts and many people have stated they don't want to read your posts. You mentioned before that my lack of engaging with people about my scum read is scummy so you must think that scum avoid doing that. (which you are avoiding) I'm not actually concerned about Kush right now. Kush can readable as town but oftentimes he chooses not to and trolls. judging from the start of the game I thought this was going to be one of Kush's troll games but now I think its more likely after his last 2 posts that he will start showing his hand one way or another. More concerned about Zealos/Onegu still being Mia if I was looking to lynch an unreadable. So you're basically saying that you expect Kush is gonna become readable. If he doesn't, (and he may not), and we don't have a vigi, then you MUST be planning to policy lynch him D2... which is terrible. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 13 2013 12:50 Grackaroni wrote: I think that came right out of the mouth of OP. Not sure if that's something I should read into. Really reread the game again because I don't think that's what's been going on at all. I don't jump on others targets, I make the targets. I began the push on Pandain, I wasn't the first to vote blubbers but I expressed my concern on him before Vayne did and as for OP, most of my reasoning is coming from Rayn but I did say before my dislike of OP's posting and added in my own points. Imagine a scenarion in which Grack is scum: You expressed "concern" about BD, then when town opinion shifted onto him, you had an excuse to vote. If town opinion hadn't shifted, your concern would be forgotten. This is a common scum tactic. And your attack on me has no new information in it, you're just parroting Rayn, which is very different than coming up with ideas. Sure, maybe you attacked pandain first, but you have been opportunistically sheeping ever since. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 13 2013 12:55 Grackaroni wrote: I think that lynches should be used on scummy players rather than anti-town players for 2 reasons, 1) they are more likely to be scum 2) their flip actually gives us information and something to analyze rather than, welp we all lynched kush and he flipped town. Least he's gone. Onegu next. I'm not happy that we have these 3 anti-town players right now that town will have to deal with, but if I think there is a player who has a good chance of flipping scum (you) then I'm going to lynch him. "town will have to deal with", you mean town will have to policy lynch. If there's even one scum in there and we don't lynch them all, we lose. Scum won't shoot them. A vigi might but there are three. Even if a vigi shoots, say, Onegu, we should at least policy lynch one of them today. You can say "oh, nobody cares about who voted what on a policy lynch" but the fact we're having a conversation about this right now proves you wrong. Policy lynches are necessary and nobody on TL is willing to admit it. If Kush flips scum/town that tells us about the people that defended/attacked him. Don't pretend people will wave it off as "oh, policy lynches don't count" when we're arguing about it this much. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 13 2013 13:08 kushm4sta wrote: @op the problem is if i flip town, that tells you nothing about the people who pushed OR defended my plynch. It certainly tells me less than it would if you flipped scum. That being said, look at it from my position, Kush. I personally am not able to read you. Some people claim it's possible sometimes, but it's not clear that they're really correct. So, it comes down to whether or not you've been helping this game. You've made one or two reasonable statements but not enough for me to get a townread on you. You've promised more action later, but haven't delivered yet. If you were in my shoes, wouldn't you be at least tempted to policy lynch you? What about the two players (zealos and onegu) who are hard lurking? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
I'm Blazinghand. You know it's me because I used the word "Illegible" in this post http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=19725485 and that word is my watchword for how I refer to people. I'm also claiming Survivor. I voted Zealos to save myself. I did it because I didn't want to die. I figured as BH, the master of shenannies, I'd pull it off, and I did. If you're going to vigi me, that's fine. But you should know the bullet is wasted. I will make this promise: I'll write a death post that will help town. If I get vigied, follow my reads. If I don't, i'll do my best to contribute before being policied tomorrow. Scum obviously won't shoot me, so my goal here is to help the town. My survivor crumb is the bolded "S" in this post. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:13 Pandain wrote: I still think OP is town though. Like if in the same position I would've done that too. Your faith is commendable, but misplaced. Sorry! | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
Honestly, there's a strong chance I'll get policy lynched here. However, I promise to use my considerable scumhunting powers for good rather than evil if you don't lynch me! | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:15 Zealos wrote: That's not really much of a crumb? Oh, gee, I'm sorry, was my SURVIVOR crumb not obvious enough to you? Look, there aren't other roles that start with S. I crumbed an S. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:16 raynpelikoneet wrote: no vig him. he is not helping town, that's clear already. Well yeah I was planning to just sort of have a "style" and skate by without getting shot or lynched. Now, that's no longer an option. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:18 Zealos wrote: I think OP/BH needs to die. Survivor = lynch I doubt he even is Survivor. His attempt to argue his way out of it is crummy, at best. Get it? ##Predayvote:OP vigipls On September 14 2013 07:18 raynpelikoneet wrote: He actually claims SQUM. Just vig the scum. My last claim: On June 12 2012 01:55 Blazinghand wrote: Ok guys, fine. You caught me. I fucked up and you caught me. I am the Serial Killer. N1 I fired at Furerkip, and was RBed. N2 I fired at VE. I did so because given a town JK and a town RB, it was weird that we'd have a miller. The Mafia haven't killed anyone yet this game. Don't lynch me YET, town. I CAN HELP YOU. I have infinite bullets. I don't know if I still have my night life, but I can at least try to kill a scum tonight, and maybe they won't shoot me anyways because you'll have to lynch me eventually. I know as an SK it's terrible to claim, but if I die today I definitely can't win. Let me help you. I even fuckign crumbed my goddamn SK role cause I thought it might come down to this. I was super sure Mafia RBed me AND shot me N1, too! My crumb is Grail, an out of place word that is a holy vessel-- and Vessels are the signature unit of SK terran. SK = Serial Killer. Yes, I'm not town-aligned. But don't kill me today. Let me help you. My only crumb for the VE kill was that he was the first guy I mentioned in my just-before-day post. I wanted it to be obtuse because I was hoping the town RB would claim and save me, but he's either an ass or he realized i'm the SK. On June 12 2012 02:10 ghost_403 wrote: Blazinghand, the only person you've pushed as a lynch target so far today is Palmar. You've been profoundly unhelpful at helping us find scum. This combined with the fact that we need to lynch you anyway makes you the ideal lynch candidate. On June 12 2012 02:08 ghost_403 wrote: ![]() Still voting blazinghand. On June 12 2012 02:01 Palmar wrote: oh rofl, while I was writing that you claimed SK gg baddie. On June 12 2012 02:22 zelblade wrote: Sigh ok I just realized someone is going to claim rb every night anyway. Let's lynch bh AND THEY LOST | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:19 Sn0_Man wrote: OP's claim is bullshit I think. Unless BlazingHand is a character in Golden Sun? Also I didn't see any particularly out-of-place capital S in that post but it was about 2000 words so I may just not have seen it. Blazinghand is a player. I am Blazinghand. Jesus christ man have we never played? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:20 Pandain wrote: Can you actually now help the thread OP? honestly it's my only option now. I'm probably getting policied anyways but scum sure aint shooting me. I have to do something to avoid getting lynched. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:21 Koshi wrote: Ok I don't understand why OP (=BH) is claiming atm. Well, it was an obvious lie that I couldn't be around for the deadline, and showing up at the last minute to vote to save myself? That would look okay for Blazinghand, but not for Old Partner who has a 9-5 job and no Smartphone. I have a smartphone. I gotta claim BH. But then, why am I playing so weirdly if I am BH? Well, the truth must come out. ![]() | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:23 raynpelikoneet wrote: Are you a character in Golden sun? This is important. :D I'm the Captain. I've never played Golden sun so I don't know who that is. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:23 strongandbig wrote: why are you ignoring the other component of your breadcrumb. you revealed that its a crumb, but unless you specify i'm just gonna assume you crumbed multiple different things and are only using the ones that are convenient. Its the part that's outside of the spoiler, and the part that's bolded. I wasn't JUST gonna bold the S, so I made "S and Q" or whatever and bolded the whole deal. Have you never seen my crumbs before? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:26 Koshi wrote: Ok. But people where moving away from you. You weren't going to get lynched it seems. But you joining the townie team is fine :D. I thought I'd get lynched! As a Survivor, if you die, you lose. None of this "town wins after you die so it's still a win" shit | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:27 strongandbig wrote: oh its supposed to stand for "statements plus questions" yeah bh i have seen your breadcrumbs before and this one sucks ass compared to the usual standard. yeah, it does, but i promised myself I wouldn't claim 3p again. MISTAKES WERE MADE OK | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:31 strongandbig wrote: okay bh why should we believe your breadcrumb though? why would you not have done the exact same thing as scum in anticipation of this eventuality? Honestly? My crumb should be fairly meaningless. Role crumbs always are. If I was the SK I could prove it by shooting someone, but I'm Survivor. And as scum I am a tricky, wiley fellow. However, I will say this: as mafia, there are better "characters" I can play as a smurf than the kind of guy Old Partner was. Did you see how intentionally unhelpful I was? I wasn't just trying to avoid getting lynched, I was trying to avoid looking townie enough to get shot, too. I was trying to dodge scum bullets. On September 14 2013 07:26 Koshi wrote: Ok. But people where moving away from you. You weren't going to get lynched it seems. But you joining the townie team is fine :D. I'll see what I can do to dodge the upcoming liar policy lynch, and actually get a real lynch On September 14 2013 07:27 Pandain wrote: OP can you just tell me how I'm doing with analysis and stuff? Since I assume you've been reading them. I'd say you've done a good job of proving yourself townie after a slightly rough start. You've been a bit irrational about voting near the deadline but I wouldn't be surprised if you got shot tonight. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:33 strongandbig wrote: you have a 1-shot hide power? do you have any other powers? 2-shot! But ideally I use it later in case scum starts to lose and tries to shoot me. Original Message From ShiaoPi: You are the Captain. Having sailed on the Sea of Karagol for years and years already. You have been able to profit highly from the traffic between Kalay and Tolbi. With the eruption of Mt. Aleph however, those days are gone. Monsters rampant and the terrifying rumors of a giant kraken are more than enough to keep you on your toes. Worst of all the tourists are all gone. Thankfully you can always rely on the protective power of your Anchor Charm to guide you through these troubled times. You do not care about psynergy and the fate of the world. Actually you are blissfully oblivious to all these things happening in the grand scheme of things. All you want to do is make it through alive, with your ship and find a nice place to retire. Twice in the game you can choose to invoke the powers of your Anchor Charm, rendering you immune against attacks and other actions launched on you that night. If you choose to do so, simply PM the hosts during the night with: ##Anchor Charm. You win, if you are still alive at the end of the game, regardless which faction wins. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:36 raynpelikoneet wrote: Blazinghand the SQRVIVOR: Here is what you are gonna do. You are gonna tell your scumreads on N1 with reasoning. Then you are going to contribute towards a scum lynch on D2. If you fail to do so, you will get killed. This is not a deal, this is what you are gonna do if you want to win as survivor. If your N1 does not impress we lynch you on D2. Now get off from BH and find scum. Entirely reasonable. Anything friendlier to me than this honestly is kinda scummy (Pandain, Koshi >.>) | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:37 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay i think you got yourself modkilled. That's okay for me. Oh fuuu are we allowed to post role pm | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:40 strongandbig wrote: cool massclaim with role pms asap? Probably better at the start of D2. do you really want a doctor or cop claiming right now in the middle of N1? Or do you think we will catch scum with pants down? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:41 raynpelikoneet wrote: Am i allowed to fake my role PM and make it look like it is from the hosts in case i want to? The answer to this question is obviously yes or we could all just claim PMs and scum would lose because their PMs are scum, right | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay BH, go! Who is scum? Immediate thoughts are that shenannies could tell us something. Grack swapped away from me at the last minute, maybe to avoid getting bad cred for lynching a townie. He was probably scum starting a wagon and hoping it wouldn't roll across the line, then jumped overboard. I'm also still suspicious of kush (especially that he believed me so easily-- what does he know that rayn doesn't), along with his "scumslip". that being said, I dont' think we should policy lynch kush. He IS readable. I was lying. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
Hah, nice try. I'll take the bait, though: scum doesn't know who's 3p and who's not. As far as you knew, you were pushing a townie. When support appeared for the lynch,, you freaked out about leading a mislynch and jumped off. Zealos has 1 vote at the time. you didn't think he'd get lynched. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:44 raynpelikoneet wrote: Is Grack everything you got? He is like the towniest town in this thread... Man gimme a moment will you, I was playing this game up until this point trying to to appear TOO townie or else I'd draw shots early on. Having coherent scumreads is hard for me! | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:47 Grackaroni wrote: I'll give you that, I see what you are saying. If I was scum I would THINK you were a townie. My gut response was that all of a sudden you changed yourself from survivor to innocent townie victim. yes, i'm sure that was your "gut response" and not a cleverly concocted "townslip" | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:53 Grackaroni wrote: BH's read on me is suspicious, I don't think he's trying to solve the game right now. He's played with me more than anybody else in this thread and caught me in the only scum game that I have played. Out of all the people in the thread I would most expect BH to get a proper read on me. "BH is scum because he thinks I am scum. i will OMGUS him and pretend this is an okay argument" | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 07:59 Koshi wrote: btw BH. I would use that escape thingie tonight. Scummers don't want BH alive. I am pretty sure I don't count as a "townsperson" for the mafia wincon. They can certainly win with me alive. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
that doesn't change the fact that scum automatically win when they control the lynch, right? Here's the wincon: If the mafia at any time outnumber or equal the townspeople, they win. The town's goal is to lynch all the members of the mafia. I'm just saying, scum probably wants to shoot townies and not survivor (i don't know how the math works out-- I'll check) so they win sooner | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
So we have 15 players, 4 scum is a safe bet. in a 10-1-4 setup, assuming town has a vigi and he shoots N1 and misses and we always mislynch, we can go like this D1 10-1-4 D2 8-1-4 D3 6-1-4 MYLO see, the idea koshi is that if I were a townie, 7-4 would not be LYLO. If scum shoots me instead of a townie, D3 is 7-4, not LYLO. they wont' shoot me. now if there's no vigilante, then we're talking about a different story. i'm kind of assuming there is since I have a 2-shot hiding mechanism. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 08:58 raynpelikoneet wrote: Where are those reads BH? You are full of crap atm as is SnB and debears (they are scum thouhg, soo...). jeez man hold your horses | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 10:40 kushm4sta wrote: im a little confused OP why did you feel the need to claim? nothing is scummy about voting a town read to save yourself. To break it down again: I had claimed that I wasn't available ever for the lynch deadline due to work and not having a smartphone. however, showing up to save myself would have proved that I was available. At this point I basically have to claim that i'm blazinghand right. But then people see "oh wtf this kid is blazinghand" so i basically had to lay out my whole gameplan | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 11:22 Grackaroni wrote: did you think at all about claiming at the start of the game? Like you said even if you are catching scum it's not in scum's interest to kill you because you don't count against their win condition and if you had been really pro-town and helped catch scum you wouldn't be lynched. i, what. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 11:38 Grackaroni wrote: That's how I would have chosen to play as that role. Better to just come out with it and act really pro-town and lynch scum in order to not get lynched then playing like a scum player without the advantage of a scum team and somehow expecting to make it to the endgame. no that's not | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 11:55 Grackaroni wrote: haha I would. But I also would claim Miller at the start of the game if I was SAM so it could just be a stylistic difference. Yeah, the difference between good style and grack style | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 13:26 Papa_Smurf wrote: I can see BH pulling a stunt like that. No necessarily just any random person smurfing. I am also the king of last-minute vote shenannies, for what it's worth. And I think the fact I call a guy "illegible" is pretty much a BH-tell. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 13:28 Oatsmaster wrote: So if OP is BH, you think OP is scum. Is that right? Wait, if he thinks i'm lying about being BH, then... I'm mafia? or I'm not mafia? Should I have pretended to forget what i claimed in mario mini to dodge the wrath of PS/DB? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 13:44 Pandain wrote: OP how about you stop trolling on useless matters and help analyze WoS so I can get a fresh perspective. This is a reasonable request. I'll take a look at his filter. Is there anything in particular you want me to keep an eye out for while I do so? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 13:59 VayneAuthority wrote: hey im here for a bit to discuss anything if anyone wants to, otherwise heading to bed. to pandain's last point, we can always lynch OP to buy us time for a day if we ever unsure at some point. We always have that as a back option due to his claim. you're literally scum | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
He says this: On September 14 2013 03:35 WaveofShadow wrote: Vayne the problem is it is what amounts to a flat-out lie by SnB without him addressing it. I agree he is tunneling pretty hard on it but it's Rayn. As town I'm pretty sure he's lynched both town and scum in this way. As far as Rayn's Oats example goes I'd probably accept that lol. and he continues with this: On September 14 2013 04:08 WaveofShadow wrote: Who said specifically they don't want to vote SnB because they think your case is bad? I'm still waiting on SnB to come back and explain the apparent lie you found (and even more so why he came back already and didn't address it) but aside from that I wouldn't be sure enough to vote him today even if he doesn't come back JUST because of that lie (as I feel that is the strongest part of your case). and so he lays suspicion on SnB without voting him at a time when were sitting on about 2-3 votes on each of SnB, Blubb, and me. he continues here to sheep umasi who has basically said nothing all game: On September 14 2013 04:14 WaveofShadow wrote: Fuck it. Make of this what you will but I really don't think Blubb is scum. I've noticed that before people get lynched they are expected to make some sort of a reads post or something to help people out if they happen to flip town (never mind the=at TL towns ignore that shit anyway but whatever). I think out of all the games I've played in, scum has made a post (for WIFOM) like this ONCE that I can think of offhand, and that was ShiaoPi in LXI. Most often scum simply don't want to bother. Blubb has made a post like this recently, and specifically told us to watch out for debears (I'm not saying debears is scum). The reason I didn't want to reveal this until later is because I'd want to see if he repeats this behaviour closer to deadline but since I'm not here I have to reveal it now. TL;DR Scum don't give reads before getting lynched. I don't think blubb is scum. Make of the above what you will but I think at this point I'd lynch OP simply by process of elimination. On September 14 2013 05:18 WaveofShadow wrote: Alright kush with effort. I will have faith. I'm gone as well guys. vote: old partner Ultimately, I don't think WoS's opinions here are inherently bad. What's bad are two things: one, he has to be backed into them, and dodges my SnB question. Two, he doesn't vote me because he thinks I'm scum. He doesn't write a case that would convince other people, he states a process of elimination. I could see this coming from a town perspective, but there's a couple things to bear in mind here 1) at this point there are several closely competing wagons, all of which have few votes. A serious case could change things here 2) WoS comes out without a clear opinion on SnB. He defends Blubb, but the fact that his defense is so brief (and he doesnt hang out after he votes me to argue or push, or even defend bluff seriously!) makes me think WoS wanted to be able to come back and say "wow, i tried to save blubb but you guys are bad!" Now, when he votes me is actually about an hour after he says "I'd lynch OP by process of elimination". In this hour, it goes from closely contested wagons to me being out in front. WoS piling on is actually a point in his favor in my opinion-- if he was scum pushing one townie wagon or another (from his PoV) doesn't make a huge amount of sense. That being said, he's no longer the deciding vote, at least at the time he votes. he states an intention to vote me i the least commital way possible, makes no attempts to ACTUALLY save blubbdavid (WHO HE THINKS IS TOWN), and votes me AFTER he sees which way the wind is blowing. I'd say WoS is high on my list of lynchable candidates. And it is AWFULLY convenient of him to be afk for some time now, isn't it? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 14:29 Grackaroni wrote: The people moving the lynch off of you are more likely to be mafia? Why would they stick themselves out like that when a non-mafia player (yourself) is getting lynched.. I don't agree with this at all. Mafia would be content with the lynch and not pulling last minute shennanies.... Zealos moved his vote to the 3-vote kush wagon from the 1-vote snb wagon. SnB voted Zealos and WoS voted me Of the three who last minute shenannied and aren't me, it's blubbdavid (town), grack (you), and panda. Panda then moved over to blubb and you ended the day with your vote on a zealos who conveniently didn't get lynched (he had 1 vote before the shenannie began) and blubb had unvoted. -- all this in the last few hours, all ending with a tiny plurality lynching blubbdavid with almost no real opposition. you think scum wasn't involved? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
There's much to be gained from debating with him. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
Man, looking back on it I just can't shake the idea that strongandbig HAS to be town. The fact that he noticed PS/DB coaching a newbie just doesn't seem like something scum would be motivated to do. I know I've ##FoSed SnB, but if I'm going to be honest here (and I must), the fact that he has ignored me isn't the most terrible thing. SnB's finding out that PS is coaching a newbie game, then asking him about it, strikes me as townie. After all, making that connection is not something he'd have to do as scum. Townies inherently are trying to find things out about the game, whereas scum are trying to conceal Scum could do it. If SnB was hosting that other game or something I'd see it. But really, looking to see where else the obvious smurf has posted, just to call him out for it... I think this isn't something that would occur to a scum player. This is the kind of thing you only look into if you're naturally inquiring. SnB probably just didn't give a dick about me posting once or twice a day and ignored me or forgot me. It happens. I think this is a genuine insight into his mindset: he is town. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 05:02 Grackaroni wrote: What happened to you being busted by your last minute switch of lying about being unable to post at work and not having a phone. Nobody would believe that i just claim Blazinghand, no problem. man you slow | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 05:05 Grackaroni wrote: So you are BH the Vigi who lied about being unavailable to avoid posting? Ha Yes, and I'd be able to sell it, too. I'm freaking Blazinghand, king of convincing people of weird shit, master of misleading, shaman of shenanigans. You'd believe it. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 05:27 Koshi wrote: I am just interested. No answer? why would you ask this now and not in 30 minutes | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
I still want to note that WoS was "defending" blubbdavid without every defending him, last minute voted, and peaced without trying to convince anyone. Get around what he said-- take a look at what he did. He didn't actually try to convince anyone. If he really thought BD was town, where was the defense? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 06:29 Pandain wrote: So was I right or not in that disregarding OP's vote, who I didn't see because it literally came at the last second, OP was going to be lynched? And that only switching to blubbers would change to outcome? Not to be contrary here because I like you being alive pandain, but blubbers got lynched anyways. if I had voted blubbdavid instead of zealos, nothing would have changed. I voted Zealos because I was freaking out and saw what I thought was a last-minute swap to him, and wanted to make sure it would work. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
BD pandain OP in that order, D1. And with it being a tossup between OP and BD, he certainly COULD have pushed harder for a BD lynch, but I don't see what's scummy about that. Are you worried about his accusations against you? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
I 'm pretty sure sn0_man won't get shot unless he's getting bluesniped. if he's town he's not really threatening anyone with strong analysis or good plays. That being said-- he acted kind of like a lazy town would when there are two competing wagons both of which he is ok with. BD happened to flip town, yes. But that doesn't make sn0_man scum. If he's scum, he's scum for other reasons. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 06:40 Pandain wrote: Never said he was scum, to be honest I haven't really looked into him. Which is why I wanted you to. I only gave a quick read-through which didn't really bring me up any useful information, which is why I wanted you to help bring any insights. I honestly don't see any actual accusations. And I don't feel like going through all my actions when I don't even remember all of them. Oh, On September 13 2013 06:34 Sn0_Man wrote: Pandain is only understandable if you assume he is scum. Then it starts to make sense. On September 13 2013 05:40 Sn0_Man wrote: Since you have yet to learn to read rayn, 1) Pandain is blue hunting. This is 100% unarguably SCUM MOTIVATED. 2) Pandain wants to lynch kush. His reason? we can't hit scum. YEAH RIGHT. SCUM MOTIVATED. 3) Pandain sees pressuring himself as townie. THATS IMPLIED GUILT. SCUMMY. 4) this one is dumber but pandain literally claims "nobody has reasons for lynching blubbers just gut" after everybody explained why blubbers was looking like scum. This one could be explained as Pandain merely lacking a brain but I was going with scum. This is entirely apart from his awful thread entry and other crap like "I'm the towniest guy in the thread" like what bollocks. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
WoS Kush Grack Are probably my top 3 candidates for D2 lynch | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 07:29 Umasi wrote: someone might have landed a protect. doesn't matter, he's obviously anti-town now, unless there are two of the same role in this game :|||| YOU KNOW this isn't the first time this has happened to me... (link) I can't imagine how I could convince you guys not to lynch me short of writing a super case on scum. fuck fuck fuck | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
1) how would I know that survivors are two-shot hiders unless I too was a survivor? 2) all the arguments about why I'm survivor and not scum STILL APPLY IN FACT, my suspicion on WoS WAS GOOD. He wasn't a townie! AND I FIGUrED THAT OUT. I should get credit for that at least! | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 07:41 Koshi wrote: You should have picked another fake role provided by the hosts ##vote: Old Partner Why the dicks would hosts provide a survivor role to scum when there's already a survivor in the game? That would be like bastard host tier. Look, at least admit there's a CHANCE I am who I say I am. There is, isn't there? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 07:41 Umasi wrote: upon cursory glance at wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Golden_Sun_characters) and ctrl-f ing 'captain' it doesn't exist. OK 1) why wouldn't you bring this up earlier 2) how the dicks am I supposed to know, I haven't played the golden sun. If I were going to construct my own fakeclaim i'd probably use something from wikipedia or something right? In fact, the fact that it's not on wikipedia is evidence that my claim is legit! A fakeclaimer would use something obviously from the game. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 07:43 Koshi wrote: Doesn't matter, the fact that he got the "hide" right it means that it is a fake role provided by the hosts or he is indeed the survivor. He didn't make up the entire role. this logic is sound. The 2-shot hiding ability means that there are only two possibilities 1) I am who I say I am 2) I got the role from the hosts there's no chance (or at least an unbelievably slim chance, one not worth mentioning) that I made up the role PM on my own AND happened to make it up to be a 2-shot hider. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 07:43 Koshi wrote: 1% 2 survivors could be but then there is no SK And I tell you this: WoS was not killed by scummers. Unless some sick bluehunting was going on. Far be it from me to speculate about night actions, but I'm betting WoS WAS killed by scummers. The reason I say this is that he got killed N1. If you are a 2-shot hiding survivor, and you're telling the truth about being AFK for like 30 hours or whatever during N1, you would sure as hell decide to ##hide because of the possibility of being vigied. The only way he could be dead is that scum hid their roleblock under him. They RBed him, cancelling his hide, and shot him. The other possibility is an SK has a "always works" night kill, and I guess WoS wasn't exactly a town leader, which makes scum less likely to shoot him. However, I could see WoS as a bluesnipe. He was acting strangely-- strangely enough that I noticed, for example, and if you're scum and you see someone acting strange, you dont' think "scum"-- you think "blue" | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 07:48 Koshi wrote: 2 options: 1) SK that doesn't care and snipes out WoS because WoS likely wasn't scum. But also wasn't scumhunting. SK wants a good balance. 2) Scumteam that thought that WoS was blue. The first is way more likely. Only if you don't factor in the idea that WoS probably ##hided last night. Then you're comparing the relative likelihoods of SK having protection-piercing bullets (reasonably common) or scum having an RB (very common) and using it on him. Not that it matters a huge amount to me. I need to write the mother of all cases to not get lynched today. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 07:46 Grackaroni wrote: I'm just going to ignore BH, he's the lynch for the day. the chance of 2 survivors combined with his play this game makes it a 99.99% chance he is a baddie. We can still do some scumhunting aside from him. Ok Grack ignoring me is not the right move here. How about this: you're not obligated to unvote me. Maybe you think there really is only a one in ten thousand chance that ShiaoPi put two survivors in this game. I think the chance is somewhat higher in general, but maybe you think that. Still, my goal here is to write a case so good that it convinces people not to lynch a 2nd survivor claim. Surely you can see why something like that is worth reading, even if it's not worth unvoting me? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 07:54 Umasi wrote: why would they? scum doesn't control the vote, and that's normally the wincon. the wincon this game it's different. it's "outnumber townspeople" in 6 - 2 - 4, scum doesn't win since there are 6 townspeople and 4 scum. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
scum can win a little earlier without controlling the vote. for example: 1-2-2 in this case, with 1 townsperson, 2 survivors, and 2 scum, scum does not control the vote, but they win because they outnumber the townspeople. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 08:03 Grackaroni wrote: I'm going to feel so stupid if BH is actually a 2nd survivor lol. how else do you explain the changed scum wincon? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 08:23 Koshi wrote: THERE IS NO CHANGE IN THE SCUM WINCON. I quoted it.... btw, obviously scum got cop/doc/survivor/vt claims lol... What do you mean there is no change? Most of the time the wincon is "scum win when they control the lynch" this time it's "scum win when they equal or outnumber the townspeople" which is different, but only in this situation: 1 VT, 2 Survivors 2 Scum in which scum DO NOT control the lynch, but they DO outnumber townspeople. This only exists in a game with two survivors! | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 08:48 Koshi wrote: Dont spew bullshit. Go read the rules of the newbie games. Go read the rules of Sicilian. Persona/Titanic says scum needs to outnumber town. If you are clinging to something silly like this -_-. Just provide us with a 96% scum tomorrow and we wont lynch you! You are 95% scum or SK. bah it's just one among many points why it's clearly POSSIBLE I'm a 2nd survivor. If people at least admit the possibility! Then there's a chance I live! | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 09:38 Zealos wrote: yeahh... no. Would still rather kill SnB tho. Man SnB is actually town but if enough people want to lynch him that it will save me, fuck it, i'm down | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 10:08 Pandain wrote: Zealos besides SnB who do you think is scum. Why did you make this post and how can you justify it; When before you made this post. oh shit this is so on the money I take back my last statement and I +1, Like, and Give 2 Eprops to this statement | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 11:15 Koshi wrote: So SnB is likely town and BH is going to yell that WOS got RB and that SnB is scum. Funzies for tomorrow. Sleepy time for me. except SnB is town. he's always been town | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 15 2013 12:04 Pandain wrote: I'm going through what, first, is the obvious choice. Lynch OP . His original posts following the thread: show or indicate a mindset where he is willing to give up. As in, he doesn't believe he can prove he's town. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=410972¤tpage=71#1410 read this page and be proven wrong | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On May 20 2013 12:51 DarthPunk wrote: I know scumslips are real, having made them myself and by catching mafia with them, and i can tell the difference between something a townie could make and scum could make. Furthermore a townie wouldn't work so fast in covering their tracks. I would expect a townie to be like WTF??!?!? in a similar way that WoS reacted to me calling you out. You reacted in the exact same way you said you did as scum in the post game for "the game?". When you say something scummy you try and immediately call it out yourself so as people can;t call you out for it. Obviously I am not going to convince you you are scum. So I am ending this discussion. I will talk to townies about this. On May 20 2013 13:05 DarthPunk wrote: You then have an Oh Fuck! moment when you realize how badly you fucked up. And begin damage control. and so on even though I was town that game this is just how I react to things | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
For all you guys who are criticizing my role PM, you guys are like literally retarded. Look, if you think I fakeclaimed Survivor as Scum, then that's fine. But if I did, you should probably assume I got my PM from the hosts. AND EVEN EVEN I MADE THE PM UP, why on god's green earth would I use a character not from Golden Sun? Look, I didn't play Golden Sun. I don't know who the Captain is. Apparently he's not important enough to be on the wiki page or whatever. But BUT BUT If you think I made the Role PM up myself, do you really think I ACCIDENTALLY picked a 2-shot hiding ability? No, if you think I'm fakeclaiming, you MUST think that either 1) I am an SK with a 2-shot hiding ability, then HAPPENED to write my fake survivor claim PM in EXACTLY the same way that WoS's PM was. 2) I am scum who got survivor as one of the fakeclaim PMs from hosts in a game where there already is a survivor neither of which strike me as particularly sensible. now, admittedly, 2 survivors in a game is pretty rare. But the idea that I ACCIDENTALLY faked a survivor claim perfectly? Jesus christ man. And now that I've written it I've realized there's no chance to convince PS/DB anyways fack | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 16 2013 02:49 raynpelikoneet wrote: I think you are either 1) SK with BP ability, or 2) Scum In either case The Captain is your fakeclaim. I agree with you that people questioning the rolename are dumb. You have yet to deliver. Now stop defending yourself and tell people who is scum and why. yeah yeah I know defending myself has zero impact on whether or not I get lynched, but when I see people being WRONG I have to tell them they're wrong. This is just who I am. ![]() | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 16 2013 03:14 Koshi wrote: wtf are you doing OP? contemplating whether I can write a convincing case on PS/DB. In theory, I'd like to be convinced myself by it as well. In practice, if I think I can write a sufficiently convincing one, even if I personally am not convinced I can just pretend to be. What are you up to? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
I'm gonna sort of poke through his filter and votes and let you know | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 16 2013 04:08 Koshi wrote: Dude, if you are survivor. Start lynching scums. Because scum is not going to shoot a second survivor. You have been useless for 48 hours since your claim while in those 48 hours you have been saying you will be useful. **yawn** #notimpressedbyBH You clearly dont understand the purpose of a survivor. Obviously scum isn't going to shoot me, but I think my optimal play here isn't to lynch scum, but really to lynch anyone but myself. My goal isn't to find scum, it's to find someone to lynch and write a case on it that will either A) unite the various people who aren't voting for me but are interested in lynching different people or B) get people voting me to unvote me. Now, if it turns out I find scum while I do this, that's fine. Ostensibly, any case I write is in theory trying to convince you that the target is scum. If you think my goal for today is "lynch scum" though you are sorely mistaken. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 16 2013 04:15 Koshi wrote: OK THEN FIND A TOWNIE THAT YOU CAN CONVINCE US THAT IS 100% SCUM. There seriously is no other option. you mean find a player I can convince you that is 100% scum, but yes, a townie would suffice. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 16 2013 05:28 strongandbig wrote: okay actually i don't like that bh leaves out the possibility that he's SK who got a fake survivor claim from the hosts. that's the obviously more likely possibility than the two he outlines but he tries to gloss over it without addressing it. man the point of the thing isn't that it somehow exonerates me, the point of that post is that people who say I made up my role PM are like super double dumb. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
1) i am survivor 2) i was given a fake survivor pm by hosts 3) i made up the pm entirely on my own the point i'm making in that post isn't that #1 is true (though it is), it's that #3 is like profoundly stupid and anyone who things it should feel bad | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
yeah, i know, none of that that i've posted gives anyone any reason to unvote me ;_; I'll think of something, okay! >.> | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 16 2013 05:42 strongandbig wrote: it's not possible that you made up your role pm if you had, you would have known where your character was in the lore, and then given that link to golden sun wikia a long time ago. the possibility is that you asked the hosts "hey can you give me a survivor fake claim" and they copied wos's pm and changed the flavor to a different character in the game. but bh no response to my awesome squirtle breadcrumb uncover? I have a pretty strong opinion on Squirtle | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
##vote Papa_Smurf | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 16 2013 08:20 Koshi wrote: He wasn't going to get lynched. Unless OP would do something spectacular I was always going back to him. FFS aww man i gotta put in EFFORT what is this communist russia | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 14 2013 11:06 Umasi wrote: that would mean I think debs and zealot are town, and I think debs (papa smurf) could be, but zealot I'm less sure on. And it's unclear what your read on PS/DB is. Could you clarify, please? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 16 2013 13:05 Umasi wrote: PS/DB is probably town. how probably is probably | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 16 2013 13:19 Umasi wrote: pretty probably? why does it matter. I'm trying to gauge whether I'll be able to convince you to lynch PS/DB instead of me | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 16 2013 13:24 Grackaroni wrote: Your task was to catch scum and make a convincing case. Why don't you just go do that? Umasi doesn't plan on unvoting me because he's voting me as a matter of policy. Lynch the second Survivor claim. Most of the people on my wagon are like that. The people who aren't voting me can't even get on the PS/DB wagon. Honestly, Zealos is probably the optimal lynch today, the one most likely to hit scum. If I push him, though, all that happens is it's less likely PS/DB gets lynched instead of me. My goal isn't for town to win-- my goal is for me to live. That means trying to get PS/DB lynched even if he's not the scummiest, since that's what the people who aren't voting for me seem to be going for. You really don't understand my situation at all, do you? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
But as a Survivor with a pile of votes on me for reasons of policy, and another pile of votes on a difficult-to-lynch player who's constantly whining about being voted? I guess I should be trying to convince you to vote PS/DB. But it's not happening. There's no point in making a principled stand. Once I'm dead, it's gg. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
tell me about your PS/DB read. and your reason for voting me. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 16 2013 13:36 Grackaroni wrote: Debears has been pro-town all game long Your breadcrumb for being survivor wasn't up to normal BH standards and S&B may have even somehow inexplicably found your actual SK breadcrumb. I do not believe there has ever before been a game on TL with 2 survivors and 15 players. You say debears has been pro-town all game long. Are you referring to his activity levels, his choice of target, his ability / willingness to convince other players, how he's affected town atmosphere, what reads he has had, or some other metric? If I were SK, I would have claimed Vigilante. It's really that simple. Hell, if I were SK, I would claim SK and use my shots for the "good of the town" and try to get into a kingmaker scenario. I sure wouldn't claim survivor. Your statement about the previous setups of 15-player games on TL is true, but I have been in many closed set games that were first-of-their-kinds on TL. It's not a strong argument for my survivorhood, but you can't OUTRIGHT dismiss the possibility. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
just vote for PS/DB... do it... | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 16 2013 16:34 Grackaroni wrote: BH, are you somebody that is able to get a good read on Oats? yes but there's no reason for me to do so, we can't get him lynched today. Honestly this would still be true if we lynched PS/DB, even assuming he flips scum. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 16 2013 16:39 Grackaroni wrote: I don't give a shit if "we can get him lynched today" I want to know what he alignment he is. Everybody claims that they have an easy time reading Oats and I don't know how to read him. If you really want to survive the lynch you should start helping town. It's so obvious but you just aren't getting it for some reason. Why would town want to leave you alive if you are openly going to try to convince town into lynching someone you don't believe is scum in order to save yourself. Grackaroni, there's really only one possible outcome to me writing a case on oats: some of the undecided people who are voting for PS/DB swap over to him. Do you REALLY think some kind of "townie credit" I get from writing a case on oats would cause people to unvote me for him? You can't really think that. This town has a small core of very active players and a large group of lurkers. shenannies aren't going to happen. The people on my wagon are much more sure than the people on the PS/DB wagon. Helping town does nothing for me at this point. Convincing people to vote PS/DB is the only thing that matters, and people on my wagon are a mixture of dumb/vindictive (you) and voting me for sound policy reasons. When it comes down to it, I need to win. And writing a case on oats decreases my chance of survival. If I die, I lose. If I live, I can win. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 16 2013 16:41 Grackaroni wrote: Don't even write a case on oats. just tell me what you think his alignment is and give me a short reason why you think it. You really think I would respond to this with anything other than "hurr durr I think everyone but PS/DB is town" look, I'll leave town a little cookie for after I flip: Zealos is at this moment the player most likely to flip scum. But you don't see me pushing him, cause I want to LIVE. I win by LIVING. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 16 2013 16:52 Grackaroni wrote: lol yes, I would have thought you would respond to this with something besides that. I know you think Zealos is scum you said it earlier. I want reads on other players. I don't care if you want us to believe you are survivor by continuously posting that you will try to convince people to vote for people regardless if you think they are scummy. Personally I'm never going to believe that you are survivor, but if you want to have any possible glimmer of hope of surviving this lynch you will give me your real opinions on players, not the "I agree, let's lynch Debears because he isn't me." lol nice try but you really haven't convinced me that giving opinions on people other than PS/DB will do anything other than just make my situation worse lern2convinc | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 16 2013 17:08 Koshi wrote: BH 1) Why did you keep these long notes on D1? You really read nothing out of that? I don't believe it. 2) The last 100 post you made were actually more anti-town than town. You have been promising shit to us but in the end you don't deliver. This is really the last time I waste a post to you. plzdiethx! 1) The long notes were just there to distract 2) anything that's not a push on PS/DB only hurts me! | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
please let me win! | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
bahhhhhhh bahhhh this kind of bullshit always happens to me. I roll masoner, M1 another masoner is shot and people are like "omg 2 masoners in a 12 man game, no wai" EVEN THOUGH THE GUY I TARGETED N1 CLAIMED IT and now I roll survivor and N1 another survivor is shot wtf is this bullshit | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
I guess we can safely assume if there is a vigi he's multi-shot. seems kinda op in a mini though, i guess it would be less op to have a multi-shot vigi in a game with veterans, doctors, 2 survivors with 2-shot hiding, etc. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
fuuu | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 01:38 Papa_Smurf wrote: PM me when you are dead and I will reveal all in terms of the mafia trends :D what, does it make you look scummy? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 01:43 Papa_Smurf wrote: Can't be giving away my reading methods in the middle of the game. There are still people who fit the criteria Surely if you have people who fit the criteria, you could just say who they are now and say why, and if your methods are really that good that "giving away" your methods is a danger, you would convince people right away, right? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
beagh i can't even insult or spam well my heart isn't in it any more | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 01:54 Papa_Smurf wrote: you're on the right track. There be 1 active skum though I think On September 17 2013 01:54 Oatsmaster wrote: So rayn, why are you lynching OP and appear to not have any scumreads after posting that huge ego post? gasp! | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
![]() | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 01:56 Papa_Smurf wrote: If we are ever masons together I will cherish every moment of it that's what MrZentor thought right up until I accidentally forgot he was my mason partner and I pushed him D1 with a massive 2000 word case | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 02:46 Sn0_Man wrote: I, for one, am reasonably willing to believe you are a survivor. You are getting lynched though. Host would literally have to confirm you in-thread before I unvote you. yeah it's a reasonable policy lynch. I can't really argue with lynching a 2nd survivor claim, it has to be done. it just sucks for me | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
And WoS, despite having a Hiding power, didn't use it N1 and got vigied. Like the level of incompetence it takes to do that is pretty staggering. ._. If only he had hid! I'd still be alive~ | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 02:48 strongandbig wrote: You're claiming you breadcrumbed the letter S. Well it doesn't matter now but I'll admit I had zero plan of claiming Survivor ever this game. It's like almost never a good idea to do it. However, after realizing I had effectively broken smurf, I decided to claim, and fumbled around in my first post for something I could pass off as a crumb. It was an okay lie! plenty of people believed me, up until WoS died. I consider it a not-bad "Scramble" move all things considered. In retrospect when playing 3p I should just crumb all kinds of shit so I have anything ready to go when I need it. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 02:52 raynpelikoneet wrote: You were so obviously anti-town on D1 it's not even funny. Well see back then I had the protection of the Smurf! People thought my long worthless posts meant something! | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
aww come on, you guys TOTALLY did. even if you personally didn't, I had like 4 votes on me at the end of the day. The fact that I almost got lynched with 5 votes in a 15 player game isn't an indication of how scummy it was, it was just you guys couldn't get your shit together on a single wagon with all the lurkers and noobs | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 02:56 raynpelikoneet wrote: +1 What's funny is that some people actually did think so. Or maybe it's scummy. I mean obviously you saw through me, but the thing is, most of this town is bad! I was doing fine ;_; | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 02:58 raynpelikoneet wrote: Before you die tell us who is scum! You can boost your ego! hmmm I'll consider it if only for ego purposes | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 03:06 raynpelikoneet wrote: Hwy, it's obvious you're gonna die. Did you shoot WoS? NO jesus christ if I had kp I'd just claim vigi I don't know why you guys don't get this | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
Either scum shot + RBed WoS or an SK with burrowing shots shot WoS (unlikely 2 survivor 1 SK) and Scum shot someone who could survive or scum shot someone else (SnB JKed, Doctor, Veteran?) and a vigi shot WoS, and the vigi has a 2nd bullet | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 03:03 raynpelikoneet wrote: Like, BH, you could have also have done this because of your hide (in case you really are a survivor): If you think I'd use a youtube video as a crumb like that you really don't understand me at all | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
right now it's 8-1-4 in a situation in which you have a 2-shot vigi, or there's an SK (as opposed to scum shooting WoS), unless the vigi/SK hits scum, tomorrow it will be 6-4 MYLO However, if you lynch someone who's not me, you have a chance of actually getting scum. Granted, if you hit town, tomorrow it will be 5-1-4 LYLO, which I guess isn't that great. i'm not really sure what i'm arguing here since I guess you're boned either way | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 03:14 raynpelikoneet wrote: I meant you could have played pro-town, hid on right night phases and nail scum and therefore have it all (win the game). :D Town victories against scum take a long time. Sometimes 4-5 days. Figuring out when to hide would be hard. Much easier to be useless. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 03:22 Sn0_Man wrote: Its a closed setup with what appears to be 2 survivors lmao whats normal about that? Normal Mini is like literally defined by scum having 1 kp | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 03:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: So what do you make of Pandain saying scum might have 2, hell-.. even 3 KP?! How would scum have 3 KP and there be only 1 NK | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 03:40 strongandbig wrote: I dunno. I think you would have had a better chance to live without the breadcrumb in the first place. Yeah, maybe. Once WoS flipped though it was a moot point. The only thing that REALLY bothers me is that people still think there's a chance I'm the SK. I may not have given good arguments for why I'm the Survivor, but really there's like literally zero chance I'm the SK | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 03:48 kushm4sta wrote: @OP you wouldn't claim vig because that wouldn't account for why you lied about not being here during the lynch personally im pretty much fine with your lynch. I htink you could be survivor, scum, or sk It wouldn't matter if I shot scum, you'd still believe it. I wouldn't even have to claim Blazinghand, I'd just say I lied so scum wouldn't shoot me or whatever | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
like the main argument for why I'm scum is that "as scum, I'd see that this course of action is unlikely for scum BH to take, so I'd take it" which isn't the WORST argument, but it's like, a shitty way to go, you know? | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 05:11 Oatsmaster wrote: Sn0, where did you go? DONT CHANGE TEH SUBJKECT CAN YOU SAVEME?!?! | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
THERE IS STILL TIME IF YOU ARE THE COP | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 05:14 Umasi wrote: BLAZINGHAND, SHUT UP, I'M ACTUALLY CONSIDERING AN OATS KOSHI ZEALOS SCUMTEAM NOW you mean oats as a scum rolecop, and he just scumslipped? Zealos is probably scum. I am down for shenannies. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 05:15 Umasi wrote: No. I mean, Oats covering up a zealos scumslip. that would also tie in with the fact that zealos is almost certainly scum anyways, and oats is trying to prop him up. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
I'm so down for actually lynching scum today isntead of lynching PS/DB or me ##unvote | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 05:17 Oatsmaster wrote: You guys know that I am of the view that Zealos is obv town and that nobody would ever scumslip like that. Ever. Ever. Ever. Ever. Ever.Ever. Umasi considering this is really bad. So is sn0dude. so are you the rolecop or what | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 05:18 Umasi wrote: You're just attacking anyone who suggests it :| yeah it's classic oats scum from Dr Who mafia I played with him, Oats was scrambling to cover up an "obvious" scumslip regarding mechanics. On May 18 2013 09:11 ghost_403 wrote: I have no idea where this train of thought came from. What does his movement say about his alignment? My problem is, what I believe to be, his scumslip. His post clearly states that he meant to make the move that he made. You can believe that he is a townie, and force that upon your interpretation of his words. In that case, he simply stated that the moves performed on his piece were the ones he meant to make. But that's not what he said. The more straightforward way of interpreting his words is simply this: he knew which piece he was and meant to move from where he was to where he is. As far as I can tell, the only way he could have known that was if he rolled scum. His later actions is consistent with someone who outed themselves as scum. Either you shit up the thread, or you stop talking. I don't know his alignment. What I do know is this: the most straightforward way of interpreting "I wanted to move here." implies that he rolled scum. On May 25 2013 22:58 Oatsmaster wrote: BLEHHHHH.. Lol From the scum point of view, I think it was too difficult to feed on people, like I was chasing the same guy for the whole time I was alive and never managed to catch him. Also the movement from the townies and flashlights seemed to be redundant. Like they have no 'objective' other than running to where they hope the angels arent. Not exactly the most strategic game ever. Also Dec, I feel that if you said that me and phagga were both town, we couldve won ![]() Why Dec WHY ![]() I shouldve died when I made that scumslip and disappeared. That was such a bad scumslip man. Thanks BH for being a total boss and bailing me out. ![]() I responded by saying the scumslip wasn't real On May 18 2013 19:55 Blazinghand wrote: Also, remember that if you are postulating that Oats "scumslipped" that he told the hosts to move to a location, you're making a VERY long proposition. You're saying A) the way mafia angels move is by telling the hosts a relative movement using absolute direction (ie move north 3, east 2), despite the fact that the hosts have explicitly asked other members of the game (town) to move using relative direction B) the hosts have chosen to get some of their movement directions in absolutes (from scum), and some of them in relative direction (from town) C) scum ALSO send in the movements for dummies using absolute direction, rather than relative direction (since scum Oats would have to not know about relative direction to "slip" this. remember, he's pretending to be a dummy) D) also, that C) is true despite the fact that some of the "dummies" are town players moving using relative motion and finally, E) that the reason crossfire is receiving some of his orders with absolute and some with relative motion, for both kinds of pieces, and combining these different kinds of motion is that, AND I QUOTE, because it's so much simpler for him to run two parallel systems of movement for some reason THAT IS WHAT YOU FUCKING MORONS ARE SAYING RIGHT NOW BUT I WAS WRONg THAT WAS A REAL SCUMSLIP | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 05:29 kushm4sta wrote: op i think your reads are pretty shitty! that was not a scumslip. possibly a scum mindgame but overall should be a null tell imo ok but we gotta put that into context of the fact that zealos is playing a way that makes YOU look super active by comparison | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 05:31 raynpelikoneet wrote: BlazingHand, you need to learn how to troll properly: + Show Spoiler + spoken like a man who has never seen me troll | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 05:33 Umasi wrote: mvp goes to kush, for at least RESPONDING to the subject matter. you don't think there's anything in Oats response at all? Like, if it was a joke, oats reaction is nonsensical. he was trying to play it off like a joke and failing | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 05:35 Koshi wrote: hahaha still reading but this one is the funniest of em all. I'm feeling more bitter and less good about myself now ._. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 05:37 kushm4sta wrote: wait so you acutally think he posted in the thread instead of in the scumqt... that would be a pretty hard mistake to make imo. @grack, nah bro I didn't read that game yet. sorry! Alternatively, I think that that kind of joke wouldn't occur to a townie, whereas the existence of the scum QT weighs heavily on the mind of the scum. Kind of how a guy tells a joke about raping animals you don't leave him alone with your dog even though you know he was joking. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 05:40 kushm4sta wrote: @bh town makes jokes about the scumqt all the time just saying 1) i wouldn't leave zealos alone with my dog 2) he's scum anyways | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 05:46 Umasi wrote: Fine, here's a specific THOUGHT PROCESS that would occur Zealos slips. Oats, noticing it, laughs to imply it was a joke, and as such trying to make it seem like it was intentional by zealos. That's what I've tried to communciate :| alternative: zealos tells joke oats, notices it, and freaks out, thinking zealos has slipped, and laughs weirdly trying to make joke | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
##vote Papa_smurf | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
##vote zealos | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
BEFORE YOU TELL HIM GOODBYE AND THERE ARE VOICES THAT WANT TO BE HEARD SO MUCH TO MENTION BUT YOU CAN'T FIND THE WORDS THE SCENT OF MAGIC THE BEAUTY THAT'S BEEN WHEN LOVE WAS WILDER THAN THE WIND LISTEN TO YOUR HEART WHEN HE'S CALLING FOR YOU LISTEN TO YOUR HEART THERE'S NOTHING ELSE YOU CAN DO I DON'T KNOW WHERE YOU'RE GOING AND I DON'T KNOW WHY BUT LISTEN TO YOUR HEART BEFORE YOU TELL HIM GOODBYE LISTEN TO YOUR HEART, MMM, MMMMMM I DON'T KNOW WHERE YOU'RE GOING AND I DON'T KNOW WHY BUT LISTEN TO YOUR HEART BEFORE YOU TELL HIM GOODBYE | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
When you look back on games, there are plays that get nominated for the yearly Mafia Awards. Plays like claims, or votes, or cases, or best teams, or whatever. There are even categories for boring stuff like "Best Policy Lynch"-- all these is fine and good. I tell you three times, I tell you now that if you lynch me today, there is no way you will make it into the TL Mafia Awards for this year for the play you make today. You know what's a big play? Not lynching me. Not lynching the guy you are 95% sure is the Survivor. What would be a HYOOOOJ play would be lynching zealos and hitting scum. Players will look back and say "here is a group of players, a town who could have been suckered into not lynching scum 2 days in a row, but got its shit together" and will start to think of you as vets. This will be one of those "plays" that people will point to and write post game analysis about whether or not it's a good idea to lynch based on setup speculation. This would be a Big Play. It might not be the safest play, or the most policy play, to lynch Zealos. But damn it, we all know that Zealos is the most likely guy to flip scum. If it weren't for policy, you wouldn't be lynching me, you'd be lynching Zealos. I can't necessarily say that I'd not policy lynch me if I was you. But I will say this: You don't get a lot of chances to be legendary. Glory is never thrust upon you, it is only seized. Vote Zealos: be glorious. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 06:41 Sn0_Man wrote: Lmao this is too good. TBH I think i'd do it for the "lol what a retard town was" value much like all the hilarious stories from the TL Mafia Quiz thread I was mentioning. But no. It simply can't be right. Especially since there's a real chance you are scum. I suppose it shouldn't matter what order we lynch in (zealos -> you or you -> zealos) but the certainty factor is much higher here. I understand your caution. I can't appeal to a sense of cautious logic in my statement here. I'm saying: If it doesn't matter what order you lynch in, why not start in the way that is badass as fuck? Why not lynch Zealos, and take the step between the real and the mythic? This a chance to be a hero and not a peon. They don't come often. Any REAL big play, anything that's really appreciated post facto, will FEEL hard. If it were easy, it wouldn't be a big play. If it were cautious, it wouldn't be a big play. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
I can't offer you a chance to do something safe. You have that chance, to be safe, to be boring, and probably to have a dull, monotonous loss (or drawn out victory) I'm offering you a chance for something more. | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
OP (7): panda, grack, rayn, P_S, VA, KOshi, Zeal Zeal (3): OP, Umasi, Sn0_man Papa (1): Kush we need like 3 people to swap from my wagon, or 2 from my wagon and 1 from somewhere else | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
![]() | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
On September 17 2013 06:56 kushm4sta wrote: um no. im switching to op to prevent his shenannies the vast majority of shenannies help the town... | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
Good luck, everyone, and have a good game. No death reads since I'm not rooting for a particular side! ![]() | ||
Old Partner
United States274 Posts
| ||
| ||