EPTDesert Mini Mafia - Page 50
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:22 Hapahauli wrote: The TK/Hopeless exchange in your last case. The exchange is very clear. TK asks, Hopeless answers. TK does not follow up. Then he says something. I point out a lie. He says something else. Would you make a fucking 7 line "explanation" of something (like he did) if you were not 100% sure what your thought process is? What are you talking about? He clarified his thought process, and he was very clear in it. He was lying. That's it. He is mafia. | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:32 marvellosity wrote: Just to emphasise, I'm curious why Hapa wants to give alakaslam a pass given his posting since he got in the game; I don't find this suspicious from hapa, just the wrong attitude. On August 31 2013 03:40 Hapahauli wrote: I hate to bring up meta-gaming reasons, but usually when someone replaces in a "hopeless" situation (pun intended) such as this, they're usually demoralized town. ... | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:28 marvellosity wrote: Hi, I'm back and sweaty, you lucky things. Question one: why is Firm asking about sciberbia's meta with regards to posting 'formally' and what have you when it's been talked about at least twice in the thread already? Secondly, remember when you talked, rayn, about how you just shout louder than the rest of people and get your lynch just by shouting? Well, hi there. Couple of things I agreed with as I read them, can't remember who said them now - I think Onegu is looking better than I thought earlier in the cycle, his posting seems more sincere and pointed than his first, quite wishy washy post. Also agree with... Hapa? on oats' 'half-heartedness'. Syl doesn't look great to me but he's posting too much for Syl to be a particularly good lynch today, I think I agree with yamato on that one. Slammy has posted but nothing of substance, I still think he's a pretty good lynch. Gonna check me out some Oats stuffs. Here for talkies as well. my case on Tutankhamon is totally valid and he is scum. Why are you ignoring commenting on it? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:34 raynpelikoneet wrote: my case on Tutankhamon is totally valid and he is scum. Why are you ignoring commenting on it? because you're fucking awful and i'm bored of you. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
Do not lynch alaskaslam, he is gonna turn up town. i might or might not be back before the deadline...msda | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:34 marvellosity wrote: that's not even meta-gaming. do you have anything to support that hunch other than gut? Given 75% of replacements will be town anyway? Would a host even let a townie replace out for being 'demoralised'? I don't think so, do you? I'm not saying those are the reasons that Hopeless gave. I'm more suggesting that a scum would be more likely to stick it out (regardless of what RL things are happening), where as a town would be more demoralized and such suspicion would be the tipping point for a replacement. At this point, I'm more waiting on what slam has to say. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:36 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay, idgaf, seriously. I am going to sauna. It's far more "productive" and relaxing than this shit. Do not lynch alaskaslam, he is gonna turn up town. i might or might not be back before the deadline...msda Final, sensible answer because I could do with not shit-fitting with you. Tutan's attempts to talk and rationalise with you look extremely townie to me. It reminds me a lot of Dr Who mafia, where I accused Sharrant of being mafia because of some terrible posts. We had some back and forth over several posts where Sharrant was very reasonable, and my scumread on him turned into a townread in the space of about half an hour. Tutan's attempts to engage with you feel very similar to me as that, except you're too blinded to step back and evaluate this, and you're stuck on your case which isn't a case. Ok? | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:36 marvellosity wrote: Like, actually look at his POSTING, hapa, not some terrible reason about hosts letting a demoralised townie replace out which never actually happens. Idunno. I just tend to give replacements a lot of leeway to prove themselves. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
Both him and tofu have promised more so I'm waiting for them now mostly. Slam sez he's reading onegu and tofu says he's catching up and will explain himself. My problem with lynching syl is that he's voting for onegu right now which is kinda deluded town looking not really scummy. Ofc its just a mid-day vote so I probably shouldn't set much store by it. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:39 Hapahauli wrote: Idunno. I just tend to give replacements a lot of leeway to prove themselves. I tend to try to lynch mafia, and both parts of that slot have looked like mafia. anyway, to the Oats filter! | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:36 Hapahauli wrote: I'm not saying those are the reasons that Hopeless gave. I'm more suggesting that a scum would be more likely to stick it out (regardless of what RL things are happening), where as a town would be more demoralized and such suspicion would be the tipping point for a replacement. At this point, I'm more waiting on what slam has to say. But you're suggesting that Hopeless lied to get a replacement then? Because no host lets someone replace out because they're demoralised. Come on Hapa. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
Mostly its because I feel like if we give oats a bit more rope he could hang himself with it. I feel like I'll get a reasonable read on him given time whereas I'm not convinced my read on say FirmTofu is gonna advance so well and I find tofu just as scummy. Why lynch somebody who will eventually become transparent? | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:40 marvellosity wrote: But you're suggesting that Hopeless lied to get a replacement then? Because no host lets someone replace out because they're demoralised. Come on Hapa. Fair point. I'm just over-thinking this I guess. Regardless, I'm waiting for Slam to finish catching up. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Hapa, I agree with you about the half-heartedness, in that he asked to lynch you, me, and sn0 pretty casually. There's no mega Oats tunnel. His contradiction at the beginning of the game is still meh. What i'm reading most into is this, so someone feel free to talk about this with me. Seems Hopeless came completely out of the blue. The problem is, Hopeless hadn't done anything new to warrant this, it was all old stuff. And relevantly, oats's first target was tutenkhamun, who was Hopeless' target, so he presumably agreed with him? Does it make sense him flipping from one to the other like that with basically nothing from hopeless in between? presumably he liked what hopeless had said about tuten as he agreed with his read? thoughts? | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
| ||
| ||
