Desert Mini Mafia - Page 48

On August 31 2013 04:29 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Otas is town. He does not attack you if he was scum. He can't because you murder him. FFS.
marv totally misrepresents Oats' meta. Oats, can you clarify this? Take a look what me and marv talked about you. Comment on it please.

Rayn, this is a perfect example of how being spammy can be bad, even if you're asking OK questions. You really shouldn't expect people to give you every single reasoning behind their every line of questioning. When I asked those questions I had specific goals in mind, and it is counterproductive for you to ask me to talk about things that I'd rather the mafia team not hear. Even when the theory I'm working with doesn't pan out, I'm still going to want to keep my motives under warp a while longer. As soon as someone fully explains a question, that question and similar strategies lose their scumhunting potential for the rest of the game. You couldn't even wait for Hopeless to respond before you interrupted and started asking questions. However, we're long past that point in the game so I'll give you a full explanation.

On August 29 2013 09:06 Tutankoopa wrote:


1. Can you clarify what you found to be stupid about rayn's play?
2. When you saw my vote, did you think I was seriously going to push for rayn's lynch on D1?

Also, you say rayn's play is stupid yet you also claim to not understand the policy lynch. Explain?

On August 29 2013 09:14 Hopeless1der wrote:


1) Scum are more than capable of making Sn0's OP, which in and of itself is a stupid reason for rayn to come up with a town read. However, the part that I felt to be most stupid is that if Rayn is scum, he's revealed himself in all of 2 posts.
2) It doesn't matter what you were planning to do, I see your actions as scummy and I've voted accordingly. Your initial vote was not entirely damning. Dropping things off here + Show Spoiler + just when you seemed to have gotten rolling does not strike me as town motivated.

"Also") Was stupid the policy? Iuno...

On August 29 2013 19:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Tutankoopa i would like you to explain a couple of things:

How does the bolded part make sense? If Hopeless did not understand the "policy", why is it wrong for him to call my play stupid? What did he need to explain? To me his thought process makes sense.


What's your thought process between starting and finishing this post? Did you read Oats filter between writing the post? Why? In the start of the post you say something, then you say another thing at the end of it. Why would you not read the whole thread before posting so you are on top of things and not need to change your opinion in the same post?

On August 30 2013 23:36 Tutankoopa wrote:
I didn't follow it up because I didn't get the damming result I was fishing for so there was literally nothing to say. You also kinda interrupted whatever train of thought I might have had when you decided to press the smurfing issue.

On August 31 2013 04:50 Hapahauli wrote:
The thing with this Rayn, is that I don't understand the mafia-motive behind this inconsistency/lie/whatever.

Yes it is an inconsistency. Yes his reply is a bit wonky. But is it completely out of the realm for a townie to do? What is "scum TK" trying to acccomplish here?

On August 31 2013 04:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:

The thing is he is not making any sense. His thought process does not exist because it's a lie. Scum get away with this bullshit because town does not reread. It.. does.. not.. make... sense1!!!!

On August 31 2013 04:57 FirmTofu wrote:
I can't believe it... Is Yamato seriously scum again?

On August 31 2013 04:58 FirmTofu wrote:

He's voting all the easy inactives like he did in Persona and is posting one-liners with no substance. This is hilarious.