| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On September 03 2013 22:20 Oatsmaster wrote: I said 3 dudes are scum without proper reasoning. I think thats pretty town oats. I think that as well. But not as first post :D | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
Also, I am not even voting you. Just giving reasons why you are scummy. | ||
|
AxleGreaser
Australia1154 Posts
On September 03 2013 21:59 Clarity_nl wrote: Keep in mind that oats got mislynched in desert for similar reasons guys. And Cephiro, Oats isn't wrong. You've been shouting that he's scum but done not much else. I don't like his lynch today at all so please focus elsewhere and return to it later if you must. Everyone should be consolidating and placing their vote if they haven't yet. We're 11 hours away and ANYONE could be lynched with the amount of people who haven't voted. alakaslam, geript, randombum, OO and.... hassy I guess. Stick to those five, votes anywhere else are just useless. Everyone should be consolidating and placing their vote if they haven't yet. AND STATING WHY with like a real explanation.... Note "he totes scum, shit scum hunting all day LOL lol Vote...." | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
also thats totally town oats for my first post after I miss the start of the game. LOOK AT OTHER GAMES KOSHI. When I come into the thread after the start, I almost always post that I wanna lynch like 1 or 2 dudes. Look. Koshi, get off your fucking tunnel and lynch slam and geript. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On September 03 2013 22:27 Oatsmaster wrote: Yeah I wasnt able cause I wasnt in the thread at the same time of any of them except maybe Kita. Also its hard to barrage them with questions in a big game. also thats totally town oats for my first post after I miss the start of the game. LOOK AT OTHER GAMES KOSHI. When I come into the thread after the start, I almost always post that I wanna lynch like 1 or 2 dudes. Look. Koshi, get off your fucking tunnel and lynch slam and geript. Well, if you do it always and you are aware of it. Then it is not allignement indicative. Certainly not totes town because totes scum would also do it. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On September 03 2013 22:37 Koshi wrote: Well, if you do it always and you are aware of it. Then it is not allignement indicative. Certainly not totes town because totes scum would also do it. except I dont do it in my scum games.................... | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On September 03 2013 21:26 Koshi wrote: If you are scum Oats, you really have a completely different meta as scum. It's crazy obvious. On September 03 2013 21:49 Oatsmaster wrote: Im a lot less useful and I havent got into any shitfights with anyone yet. On D3 start i read Oats' filter and tell you if he is scum or not. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On September 03 2013 14:40 Felkyr wrote: S&B Would you comment on that? Why would you boldface that sentence? Anyone who grew up watching the Pokemon cartoon knows why I molded that sentence. It was not a breadcrumb and Pokemon have nothing to do with my role. I wanted someone to explain why geript was the right lunch choice when I believed he wanted people to vote for him, and randombum had just posted recently; plus I figured it was a good chance to get him to post more of his thought process cause I didn't have a good read on him. On September 03 2013 11:48 randombum wrote: Ok I'm back. First thing's first I still believe geript is scum. There's just this sense of not caring about the lynch. Then there's the fact that he basically wasted everybody's time with his un-lynchable claim (which was a lie) and subsequent discussion about it. He eliminated a lot of town information by using this ability so early. As he said Vote placement is normally a good source of information for town since when somebody flips we know his alignment and who voted/pushed for him. And it doesn't help that he killed a townie. Basically, everything he did day 1 has hurt town. He wasted our time, denied us information, and killed a town player. This is all true... I wonder if I'm getting my feelings towards geript and grush confused, because I want to say "this is just what he does as town, he doesn't actually try to play the game" but I know geript has, like, hosted newbie games and shit so that doesn't actually seem true. Can people comment? Is geript usually a grush style player? On September 03 2013 20:41 Koshi wrote: ahhh. ok. Well I am torn about Alakaslam tbh, because I somewhere can believe he did this as town, but I am lynching him. What What what If you believe his actions can have come from town, why doesn't that make you reconsider lynching him? Why is the fact that you are currently voting for him relevant to your decision whether to vote for him? alakazam's item use was blatantly antitown and his playstyle hasn't shown any serious attempt to find scum. (Although "why would scum claim the use of a blatantly antitown item" is a good-ish point; but the fact that nothing in his play makes sense from a strategical perspective makes that point less relevant, i could believe that he just used it for the sake of red alert references). But this post makes me wonder if its time to revive "kill the koshi" Anyway: Kita, there is one key piece of information that I don't have about your role. Does your role reveal the names of the actions performed on VE or does it reveal their effects? Please ask greymist and commit to one or the other in the thread. If its names, we should 100% kill hassy. Dandelion's role proves that not every ability in the game has a name, but I'm willing to gamble that most do, and there's no way an action that does what hassy claims would just be called "shooting". On the other hand, if your role reveals effects of actions, then we are in a difficult place. The more I think about it, the less reasonable it seems for hassy to claim a failed protection on VE as scum. Note that VE's role does not explain the no-flip, and neither does any action on him. so either his no-flip was an effect of whatever KP was used on him (factional power or special role that's not just a vig shot?) or there's a role which somehow conceals one player's flip without targeting that player. So here's another thing for you to ask greymist, Kita: if VE was killed by some role which had other effects than just a KP, would you still get back "shot"? For now, I'm keeping my vote on hassy. But I want to know more about this situation. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
On September 03 2013 17:14 cakepie wrote: If stutters actually used his ability, then it would have affected onegu instead. What bugs me about this is that we haven't heard from stutters all day. Also Onegu can you give us the timestamp of the discussion between you and stutters in the BM QT? Nope not allowed to give timestamps or quotes. You will have to trust me. | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
##unvote ##Vote: Hassybaby | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
What did hiro do that changed your mind? | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
I compared hassy and kita, hassy is morelikely to be scum. | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
Imo one of them has to be scum | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On September 03 2013 23:52 strongandbig wrote: Shiaopi do you think that hassy is scum from his filter? Or are you sure that the only explanation of Kita's and hassy's claims is that hassy is scum? What did hiro do that changed your mind? Happy Birthday! | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 03 2013 23:27 strongandbig wrote: Kita, there is one key piece of information that I don't have about your role. Does your role reveal the names of the actions performed on VE or does it reveal their effects? Please ask greymist and commit to one or the other in the thread. If its names, we should 100% kill hassy. Dandelion's role proves that not every ability in the game has a name, but I'm willing to gamble that most do, and there's no way an action that does what hassy claims would just be called "shooting". On the other hand, if your role reveals effects of actions, then we are in a difficult place. The more I think about it, the less reasonable it seems for hassy to claim a failed protection on VE as scum. Note that VE's role does not explain the no-flip, and neither does any action on him. so either his no-flip was an effect of whatever KP was used on him (factional power or special role that's not just a vig shot?) or there's a role which somehow conceals one player's flip without targeting that player. So here's another thing for you to ask greymist, Kita: if VE was killed by some role which had other effects than just a KP, would you still get back "shot"? For now, I'm keeping my vote on hassy. But I want to know more about this situation. The role PM is pretty ambiguous, but any role such as a tracker/watcher/PGO that I've ever seen is always triggered by targeting, with the exception of a roleblock. Hassy stated that he had to target VE via PM to a host, so it doesn't make sense that it wouldn't show up as "VE was targeted with the Dice of Fate" or whatever it may be. I'll try to clarify with GreYMisT if he is able to comment. | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
ooh its after midnight in korea woooo | ||
| ||
|
OSC
Big Brain Bouts
Rex vs INexorable
GgMaChine vs HeRoMaRinE
Reynor vs herO
AI Arena Tournament
BSL: Ladder Tournament
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Patches Events
BSL Open Qualifier
BSL Open Qualifier
WardiTV Weekly
PiGosaur Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
