|
On September 25 2013 01:29 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 01:26 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 25 2013 01:12 marvellosity wrote:
Tell me VE. Have you ever heard anyone accuse someone before in the first cycle for "not being afraid to die"?
I mean, wtf is that? How is that even a thing? No I get what he was saying. He just wasn't familiar with your meta of playing fearlessly regardless of role or alignment. But yeah, I could get the whole "not afraid to die" thing. Scum know they aren't getting night-killed right? So they make assumptions about what they'll do the following day and shit like that not taking into account the fact that they might get nightkilled. That was not odd to me. What's odd to me is his insistence that you should die for being alive. That IS odd. I can't think of a single instance where someone's been accused on the basis that Matt accused me. Certainly not on cycle 1, and I don't think any cycle. Can you think of an example?
No, I just understand the accusation. I don't care about precedents. I care about whether the line of thought makes sense or not.
Do you not understand the idea behind it or are you just salty that I don't agree that that particular instance of it is scummy?
|
On September 25 2013 01:29 marvellosity wrote:
It's my '10' penis.
Now i get what Fank saw in you, when you got married.
|
On September 25 2013 01:30 geript wrote:
Very simply you of all people should understand VE. I think scum have 2-4 active players controlling the thread similar to in The Game. I think they want to keep thread control.
4 active players controlling the thread
This is fucking ridiculous.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On September 25 2013 01:30 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 01:29 marvellosity wrote:On September 25 2013 01:26 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 25 2013 01:12 marvellosity wrote:
Tell me VE. Have you ever heard anyone accuse someone before in the first cycle for "not being afraid to die"?
I mean, wtf is that? How is that even a thing? No I get what he was saying. He just wasn't familiar with your meta of playing fearlessly regardless of role or alignment. But yeah, I could get the whole "not afraid to die" thing. Scum know they aren't getting night-killed right? So they make assumptions about what they'll do the following day and shit like that not taking into account the fact that they might get nightkilled. That was not odd to me. What's odd to me is his insistence that you should die for being alive. That IS odd. I can't think of a single instance where someone's been accused on the basis that Matt accused me. Certainly not on cycle 1, and I don't think any cycle. Can you think of an example? No, I just understand the accusation. I don't care about precedents. I care about whether the line of thought makes sense or not. Do you not understand the idea behind it or are you just salty that I don't agree that that particular instance of it is scummy?
I care about precedents, because it shows it's not something that's occurred to accuse people of before in any other game in my mafia memory. Which suggests it's either a) fabricated or b) large paranoia.
I understand what the concept is supposed to be, but it's just nonsense.
|
No it's not. We did that in the game.
|
On September 25 2013 01:22 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 01:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay Mocsta now you are lying. You said at the start of the game clearly that you are on the right.. Tru dat. You will have to make up ya own mind. Btw, if you haven't learnt by now. Town Mocsta loves engaging in live convo, often at the expense of not filter diving so a lot of stuff said is based off first impressions. Its a really bad habit/flaw in play. As a replacement, i am not as exposed to this issue, because theres no need to be a thread driver. Only ppl like marv (when at his peak) can maintain thread driving presence AND filter diving presence. Also means mafia dominates life.. so...  I tell you though as an aside, if by some miracle you are scum.. I will be devastated. (Srsly) After GoT I made a hoohaa about clear differences in ya town/scum play, and I had a hard town read on you early. so would be embarassing
Yeah i get it. I actually do pretty much the same. that's why i misremember stuff. I dislike filter diving and bank more on my memory of what has happened and who were interested in important discussion topics and who were not. When i read filters and find a scummy post i click on the # button and read the post in context. But all in all i miss a fuckton of stuff/people especially in large games.
lol at your second paragraph. That was actually very well put about differences in my scum/town play you wrote after GoT, probably closest anyone has ever put it.
I gtg to work for a couple of hours. I'm waiting for Mattchew & Sentinel to answer. Interrogate the quiet people if they show up guys.
|
On September 25 2013 01:32 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 01:30 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 25 2013 01:29 marvellosity wrote:On September 25 2013 01:26 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 25 2013 01:12 marvellosity wrote:
Tell me VE. Have you ever heard anyone accuse someone before in the first cycle for "not being afraid to die"?
I mean, wtf is that? How is that even a thing? No I get what he was saying. He just wasn't familiar with your meta of playing fearlessly regardless of role or alignment. But yeah, I could get the whole "not afraid to die" thing. Scum know they aren't getting night-killed right? So they make assumptions about what they'll do the following day and shit like that not taking into account the fact that they might get nightkilled. That was not odd to me. What's odd to me is his insistence that you should die for being alive. That IS odd. I can't think of a single instance where someone's been accused on the basis that Matt accused me. Certainly not on cycle 1, and I don't think any cycle. Can you think of an example? No, I just understand the accusation. I don't care about precedents. I care about whether the line of thought makes sense or not. Do you not understand the idea behind it or are you just salty that I don't agree that that particular instance of it is scummy? I care about precedents, because it shows it's not something that's occurred to accuse people of before in any other game in my mafia memory. Which suggests it's either a) fabricated or b) large paranoia. I understand what the concept is supposed to be, but it's just nonsense.
You're nonsense.
|
On September 25 2013 01:33 geript wrote:
No it's not. We did that in the game.
I cant help but notice two things
(1) You refuse to comment on my mattchew case
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=423071¤tpage=144#2869
&
(2) You had an awesome de-lurk just after my mattchew case; and have commenced shitting up the thread talking about BH kills, and making brash accusations on scum control without naming anyone even though its fucking clear who the people are.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
If anyone was curious about my little unvote-vote tango, it was because I remembered/found this:
On September 24 2013 13:21 Mattchew wrote:
Lol im like conf town mutha truckahs
And thought, oh my, we're lynching the doctor! So I unvoted. Then kept browsing his filter and noted that yamato was a scumread of his, so it makes zero sense for him having protected yamato. So I revoted.
|
On September 25 2013 01:40 marvellosity wrote:If anyone was curious about my little unvote-vote tango, it was because I remembered/found this: Show nested quote +On September 24 2013 13:21 Mattchew wrote:
Lol im like conf town mutha truckahs And thought, oh my, we're lynching the doctor! So I unvoted. Then kept browsing his filter and noted that yamato was a scumread of his, so it makes zero sense for him having protected yamato. So I revoted.
If you aint scum.. I would love to know post-game why thats a doc claim.
/bookmarked
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Because successful saves are notified, and if he were doctor protecting yamato he'd be notified that he did so (with yam confirming it).
It's not complicated Moc D:
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On September 24 2013 06:34 Risen wrote:
If VA is alive at daypost I'll be pretty surprised.
Risen, can you explain this comment?
|
|
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
|
Just to clarify, also do you know why i posted that?
|
On September 25 2013 01:45 marvellosity wrote:
Because successful saves are notified, and if he were doctor protecting yamato he'd be notified that he did so (with yam confirming it).
It's not complicated Moc D:
It is complicated.
That quote is from night1. It's almost 24hrs old... There is no notification.
All it says is. I'm town mother trukah
It's not even a crumb.... Will deal with this post flip if scum.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On September 25 2013 01:50 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 01:45 marvellosity wrote:
Because successful saves are notified, and if he were doctor protecting yamato he'd be notified that he did so (with yam confirming it).
It's not complicated Moc D: It is complicated. That quote is from night1. It's almost 24hrs old... There is no notification. All it says is. I'm town mother trukah It's not even a crumb.... Will deal with this post flip if scum.
Well, that makes it even sillier. I just assumed it was from today.
|
On September 25 2013 01:50 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 01:45 marvellosity wrote:
Because successful saves are notified, and if he were doctor protecting yamato he'd be notified that he did so (with yam confirming it).
It's not complicated Moc D: It is complicated. That quote is from night1. It's almost 24hrs old... There is no notification. All it says is. I'm town mother trukah It's not even a crumb.... Will deal with this post flip if scum.
Sorry.
Take it back.
It's past midnight... Gggrrrrer. Misjudged timestamp.
Don't care for it regardless
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On September 25 2013 01:51 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 01:50 Mocsta wrote:On September 25 2013 01:45 marvellosity wrote:
Because successful saves are notified, and if he were doctor protecting yamato he'd be notified that he did so (with yam confirming it).
It's not complicated Moc D: It is complicated. That quote is from night1. It's almost 24hrs old... There is no notification. All it says is. I'm town mother trukah It's not even a crumb.... Will deal with this post flip if scum. Well, that makes it even sillier. I just assumed it was from today.
What? No!
I'm right. It was from the start of Day 2.
I'm not delusional.
Screw you Moccer.
|
I already said sorry.
I processed 13 as 1
And is 12.53 here haha.
Nite
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
