Acro
Mocsta
SnB
Onegu
Johnnywup
Clarity (or you off him now?)
Anyone Im missing?
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 17 2013 14:34 GMT
#3962
Acro Mocsta SnB Onegu Johnnywup Clarity (or you off him now?) Anyone Im missing? | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 17 2013 14:50 GMT
#3968
On August 17 2013 23:45 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On August 17 2013 23:34 Onegu wrote: Rayne how many scum reads do you have jeez. Acro Mocsta SnB Onegu Johnnywup Clarity (or you off him now?) Anyone Im missing? I do not think you and Clarity are mafia, because apparently i have too high expectations of how people play this game. Last time i checked i called SnB town. Why do you ask me and not Xatalos who just softly proposed half of the living players as lynch targets instead of the red check guy? Ok sorry didnt realize you were off me just clarity, and misread the SnB thing. | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 17 2013 15:08 GMT
#3989
| ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 17 2013 15:41 GMT
#4013
| ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 17 2013 16:05 GMT
#4028
On August 18 2013 01:04 Clarity_nl wrote: Show nested quote + On August 18 2013 01:00 strongandbig wrote: On August 18 2013 00:13 Xatalos wrote: This might have actually been the most pro-town action for him I guess? Saving us some KP and a lynch. Strategic self-modkill is right up there with ubsanctuoned editing of posts on the "cheating" list. That's what I said. Only clevererer Thats what I was going to say but only more clever | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 17 2013 18:04 GMT
#4101
On August 18 2013 03:02 s0Lstice wrote: Show nested quote + On August 18 2013 02:59 Acrofales wrote: On August 18 2013 02:52 s0Lstice wrote: On August 17 2013 14:07 Acrofales wrote: On August 17 2013 14:06 s0Lstice wrote: On August 17 2013 14:05 Acrofales wrote: On August 17 2013 14:01 Mocsta wrote: Hhmmm why did xatalos relinquish? That is far from the most interesting question. WTF happened in Winterfell? SnB scum and some kinda coupe? what do you mean? We'll know soon enough. If Rayn, Mocsta and Grack instavote for someone, we're fucked. On August 17 2013 14:15 Acrofales wrote: On August 17 2013 14:10 s0Lstice wrote: we aren't at mylo are we? because that is not a concern otherwise. Closed setup, so good luck defining whether we're at lylo or not. House Stark not having a leader seems like a scumplay. The lack of deaths seems like IF it was a power grab it only half-succeeded at best. I'm gonna park my vote. Plurality lynch, so better be paranoid as hell. ##vote Strongandbig Ok. These two quotes came before the ones I presented to you. So your thought process at the time of these quotes is that Sharrant is town and the check is valid and scum must be making a big play. Within that idea of a big play is that Mocsta, SnB, and Grack/Rayn are scum. How does this quote exist at the time that it happened then? On August 17 2013 14:45 Acrofales wrote: Also, I think I'm wrong on Rayn. Mocsta was incriminating him in PM and telling me to push his lynch while calling SnB town. This game is too easy. Scum surrender pl0x? You can't be thinking that scum is making a big play (which requires a scum Rayn) and also thinking that Sharrant is town-->has a valid check-->Mocsta is scum-->Rayn is innocent because of attacks by Mocsta. Like these two thoughts cannot exist at the same time. Well, for starters, I received the PM from Mocsta in which he pushed Rayn hard AFTER the first post. Secondly, the red check happened, and it's very different to have suspicions on Mocsta and have a credible red check on Mocsta. ahh k this makes sense just as an aside, not at all related to our alignments, do you think this game should be declared a draw? Yes most likely draw, but I really enjoyed this game. | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 18 2013 15:12 GMT
#4232
On August 08 2013 17:10 Grackaroni wrote: That was late lol, with your who voted for Oberyn?? post I was under the impression you guys didn't put much effort into your election. What gave you this impression, because it wasnt true between me and oberyn or kirby. Only me and Yamato didnt talk much the first night. On August 09 2013 10:58 Grackaroni wrote: Show nested quote + On August 09 2013 10:32 iamperfection wrote: This message is for everyone. We are simply not lynching ryan or acro under any circumstances this cycle and i want your help to find the true scum in this game. Regardless of what you think of the two their activity alone makes them not the best chance to lynch scum. We all know that scum tend b e less active than town and like to lurk in the shadows. This biting each others heads off serves no purpose but to create an atmospher not productive to town because it allows to lurkers to continue to lurk and the scum along with them. I want to know have nonposters in your house been active in pms. Gumshoe has contacted me stating that he will be on later and as of yet still hasnt posted. I havent heard from grack to last night. I want to know if any non posters are in contact with you and if you have suspicion of them from their n0 commitment and recent pms. regardless if they are pm'ing you i want to know why they arent posting in the thread. IE ( Sharrant is in contact with you but isnt posting in the thread acro) these are the pieces of shit that come to mind FirmTofu- Decided to complain about activity and did nothing else Gumshoe- Had a good feeling from pms that he was town but is mia Grack- Mia since last night Kush- Non contributer who i want kp directed at because he can contribute as town and isnt nacho- non poster and i havent heard anything about his pms Sharrant- as stated before Piece of Shit reporting for dut I will read through the thread and and get some reads sometime tonight. it might not be for hours, not making any promises. You may be around but I don't think you have done anything, unless you have been particularly busy in PM's. I believe that your involvement in pm's dropped quite significantly as well after you got elected, at least from my perspective and xata seemed less sure of you late in the night as well. Do some scumhunting or at least build a case on me, calling out lurkers is useless and that's the most I've seen from you. @All lords, I would like to know how frequently Iamperfection has been PMing you and any impressions you have gotten from those PM's Here he calls out iamp for pressureing lurkers. On day one. Iamp called him out for lurking and his response isnt to come back and scum hunt, it is to attack back. This is a scum reaction not town. Then see at the end he asks for reactions from the lords without giving good impressions himself from his own PMs. On August 09 2013 18:00 Grackaroni wrote: Finally read the thread, I am most suspicious of Jrkirby. First off Nobody in House Martell has gotten a good read off of him because nobody in House Martell really talked to each. The best contribution in thread he made was calling out S0lstice for not electing his town read and naming 2 people town who the majority of town has already agreed were town. After that he started making posts such Show nested quote + On August 09 2013 06:35 jrkirby wrote: Finally, why have all the houses not posted a list of their members yet? I think that it's actually beneficial to town to post these lists, and here's why: 1) Once scum have a list of 5 of the houses, they have a list of every house. 2) in a 24 player game, scum almost guaranteed have 4-6 members. Scum are spread out (I think it's random or something, right?) so they already know probably 3-4 houses at the start. 3) 2 (or is it 3?) houses have already posted their list. There's a good chance this fills in the missing info for scum. 4) All the house lists will probably be posted by day 2 anyway. Scum will only be missing this info for a short time. 5) Scum know all the lords already. This further helps them fill in the gaps. 6) Knowing the houses is not too beneficial to scum. Scum are more likely to want to eliminate every non-scum player in a house than an entire house (based off my possibly flawed logic - they can use this to WIFOM, be careful). 7) Knowing the houses is beneficial to town. We can help predict who will be lord in later days, we can help predict who is likely to be shot. We know who can PM a certain player, so it's easier to find people with reads on them. We don't think two people are on a scumteam together when they're just house buddies. Things are simpler, we don't get confused when REDACTED is posted. The list goes on. 8) Displaying all houses gives more info to town than it gives to scum. 9) Transparency is beneficial to town, and giving out house lists helps with transparency. I can think of one good reason why we might not want to give out house lists: 1) There might be 3P that wants to eliminate a house, or secondary objectives for scum to eliminate a house. This is entirely speculation though, so I don't put too much weight into it. This is a post that I would be ok with if it was in the start of the game, but he chose to talk about this during a time when scumhunting was actually taking place and he could actually participate in conversation. Show nested quote + On August 09 2013 06:41 jrkirby wrote: One question I would like to ask the thread: Does anyone KNOW how much HP they have? I do not know how much HP I have. If you know, obviously I'm not asking you to announce how much HP you have to the thread. Actually, don't even say that you know how much HP you have. I just want to announce that I do not know how much HP I have. This could be beneficial to town because then they can do better speculation on what people's roles are like. Choosing to talk about setup rather than scumhunting and he has already disappeared without really pressuring or conversing with anybody Everyone else has seemed engaged in the current conversations and actively scumhunting and these posts just didn't fit in with what I think a townie would be posting about during the time of the thread. He seems like he is more interested in blending into town than scumhunting. There was an exchange between Oats and Yamato at the start of the game that rubbed me the wrong way. It was so disruptive and anti-town, that I have trouble believing that it came from 2 town players. It didn't seem normal to me and I even got a little bit of a staged feeling (as in they could be both scum randomly attacking each other at the start of the game). I think remember someone claiming they were probably town for being aggressive but some scum are more comfortable getting in arguments with people to help buff up their post count and mask their lack of contributions. @Xata/Clarity/anyone awake. Is there anybody you would like me to comment on before i go to bed? Ok I have gone over this before, either he is making a very large leap in logic form 1-2 post about oberyn and jrkirby talking about yamato. Or he is in scum QT with yamamto and because our house didnt talk to yamato much he thinks our entire house isnt PMing each other. Look I dont mind him going after jrkirby as he hasnt played with him before, but he is going after the easiest target to geta mislynch. Then a small little tidbit about ots and yamato that means very little. And he already knows what is going on in thread as he mentions the oats yamato thing, so why does he ask who to look at? Why not look at yamato or oats sinch you said both cant be town. On August 09 2013 18:15 Grackaroni wrote: ok 15 minutes past and nobody read my post. cya tomorrow guys Ahhh so sad T_T On August 10 2013 05:32 Grackaroni wrote: Show nested quote + On August 10 2013 05:28 Chromatically wrote: On August 10 2013 05:19 Grackaroni wrote: @Chromatically, what part of my opening post gave you scum vibes? On August 08 2013 15:16 Grackaroni wrote: On August 08 2013 14:53 iamperfection wrote: Im going to let my black sheep some time in the thread see if he does anything. I would love to stay and chat but its late Doesn't that defeat the purpose of waiting to see if I do anything? Hello all, I am the aforementioned "black sheep", My house is Lannister- Xatalos Gumshoe Iamperfection Grackaroni So far Xatalos has been very aggressive and has tunneled both me and Gumshoe. he put lots of effort into a very long mayor post and has been pming a lot more than he had to so by effort alone I think he is town. And he has annoyed the crap out of me and I think generally people who annoy you are town. Gumshoe has seemed to have genuine frustration in his responses to Xatalos' tunnel at the start of the game. (from the excerpts I've seen). he pmed me afterwards recommending me to vote for Iamp and was suspicious of Xata during a time when I would have percieved his actions to be more town-like. I don't think he faked his emotion and am leaning town on him. Iamperfection I am null on. We've talked to each other less than I have talked to anyone else and probably less than he has talked to anybody else as well. He believes that I have been apathetic towards the game but quite frankly I think I've been putting in plenty of effort. I voted him in the early phase of the game because he said he wanted to use the lord's pm's to pressure people for reads. Afterwards I tried to tell Xata and Gumshoe that I was less confident in him and would rather elect somebody else but it was clear that neither was interested in switching. Scum come into the thread unsure of what they should post. This looks like you're trying to find anything that you can to post about, and none of it is concerned with finding scum. Providing some townreads and a null read do nothing to help find scum, and show an interest in "contributing" rather than looking for scum. I like how you reacted and explained the Sol situation though, so maybe not. I don't really understand why my post is more scummy than others, I wanted to start discussing people and the only way we could do that is if I started talking about who was in my house and my perceptions of them. If we just continued talking about if we should reveal houses all game we would be nowhere right now. And that's what other first posts were concerned about. Here he defends his first post which is fine, but his very first line. Why even say that? Just defend your post if you are going to say that give examples of someone elses first post being more scummy than yours. On August 10 2013 05:47 Grackaroni wrote: Show nested quote + On August 10 2013 05:38 Chromatically wrote: On August 10 2013 05:30 raynpelikoneet wrote: I read Crackaroni as the exact opposite compared to Chromatically, based on that post. Why is that a non-contribution Chrom? How is it a contribution? There's no scumhunting and doesn't help town at all. I would expect town to post the part on iamp and try to do some pressure, or jump on something in the thread, but listing your house and giving townreads is useless. It just seems odd to me that you choose my first post, which I thought was more pro-town and working towards starting building reads than other first posts, as reason for me to be scum. My first post is totes pro town leave me alone guys. On August 10 2013 06:06 Grackaroni wrote: Show nested quote + On August 10 2013 06:04 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 10 2013 06:02 Acrofales wrote: On August 10 2013 06:00 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 10 2013 05:54 Acrofales wrote: A pressing matter has arisen in the Reach. I must return there post-haste. I should be back in time for the formal vote, but if I am not, please record that I want to lynch jrkirby, whose few contributions do not seem compatible with loyalty to the realm. I should be back in plenty of time, so feel free to continue sending me ravens. Remember my earlier speech. Please make sure to decide on a list of priorities for sending our swords after tonight, and each lord should publicize when he will send his swords in order to use them optimally. I will be around for another 15 minutes or so, while my servants saddle my horse. ##vote jrkirby I still don't really understand. He came into the thread late and talked about setup, classic newbie mistake for either alignment. What are the other points against him? How is this different from a lurker lynch? Also, is anyone other than rayn willing to lynch Onegu right now? He's a lurker who has contributed NOTHING, nor given any intention of contributing anything. Why do you think he's a loyalist? Who would you prefer we kill today? My horse is ready. Adieu! Did I say he's a loyalist? He's basically a lurker lynch. Didn't we all agree we have KP for that? It's a policy lynch, coinflip. What information do we gain if he flips town? I like an onegu lynch. Risen are you ever going to explain your scumread on me? Apparantly I'm your main lynch candidate. Onegu lynch looks good to me, he was really eager for the game to start pregame and since then all he has done is pop in and comment on little pieces of information without probing alignments or looking for scum. Happy to jump on my lynch with very little justification and no specific reasons or anything new to add. On August 11 2013 14:24 Grackaroni wrote: We used our check on our own house before the end of the night and Me/Iamp/Xatalos all had 7 hp. Gumshoe had 1, so every lord did shoot him but why wouldn't they since he was town... Wait didnt we find out not every lord shot him? On August 11 2013 15:46 Grackaroni wrote: Show nested quote + On August 11 2013 15:19 Oberyn wrote: I've got to get to bed and I'm not sure I'll be able to be very active the first half of the cycle, but something that comes to mind: gumshoe has 7 kp. The Lords shoot 6 kp, meaning the mafia likely finished him off. 4 players knew it would take a single kp to finish off gumshoe. The mafia obviously aren't going to spend more kp than they have to on a 2 post inactive like gumshoe. Extreme FOS to the players who had knowledge of his hp check. Actually now that I think about it, it's the exact opposite of that. Mafia have no kills most likely because they spread out their kp towards too many targets and didn't expect us to have 7 hp. So if the people such as myself who knew of the hp check were mafia there would be dead townies today aside from Gumshoe. No this isnt actully true mafia has spread out thier KP again, so you are saying is wrong, and mafia having your info helps them and lets them make thier shots correctly anyway. And because he died that night where they couldnt be certain he was at one hp without the check makes me believe they wouldnt have shot him without your info. On August 11 2013 17:33 Grackaroni wrote: Show nested quote + On August 11 2013 17:10 Clarity_nl wrote: Alright so grack just put info in the thread recklessly. At least we can talk about it now. Everyone in that house seems to have 7 hp, iamp revealed the hp check result to his house before night was over. Then gumshoe died in the nightpost. House kp is likely 1. The people of that house's hp was likely 7. One of scum heard about gumshoe having 1 hp and finished him off, and put their other kp somewhere else, which was either blocked or not enough to kill. Logical conclusion, at least one person in this house is scum: iamperfection Xatalos Grackaroni Scum had no reason to target gumshoe otherwise. (although even with him having 1 hp, they had no real reason to kill him if they thought their kp couldn't kill a second person, making it more likely the other kp got blocked?) I'm interested, could anyone in house Lannister tell us who gumshoe was voting for? iamp as well? Did he show suspicion of anyone in pms? Gumshoe has not pm'd anybody all night and did nothing since n0 besides the last minute unnecessary vote in thread to avoid mod-kill. I don't think he sent a lord vote. Every lord KP was aimed at Gumshoe. The second one lord revealed that in the thread people would not leave him for house kp shots a 2nd night, he would become the automatic lynch target and it would be a lynch and a days worth of discussion gone. In a setup with 24 players I would assume there is enough kp in scum hands to be able to kill at least 2 players per night. Logical Conclusion, No person in this house is scum : iamperfection Xatalos Grackaroni Scum should have been able to have killed a townie besides gumshoe otherwise and must have spread their kp too thin trying for more kill because they were unaware of how much hp a townie had. I dont understand the first part, did a lord say that? They couldnt have because it was night, unless a lord told scum in PM. But what you are saying makes little sense. Second part how is that in anyway a logical conclusion? On August 11 2013 17:48 Grackaroni wrote: Show nested quote + On August 11 2013 17:40 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 11 2013 17:33 Grackaroni wrote: On August 11 2013 17:10 Clarity_nl wrote: Alright so grack just put info in the thread recklessly. At least we can talk about it now. Everyone in that house seems to have 7 hp, iamp revealed the hp check result to his house before night was over. Then gumshoe died in the nightpost. House kp is likely 1. The people of that house's hp was likely 7. One of scum heard about gumshoe having 1 hp and finished him off, and put their other kp somewhere else, which was either blocked or not enough to kill. Logical conclusion, at least one person in this house is scum: iamperfection Xatalos Grackaroni Scum had no reason to target gumshoe otherwise. (although even with him having 1 hp, they had no real reason to kill him if they thought their kp couldn't kill a second person, making it more likely the other kp got blocked?) I'm interested, could anyone in house Lannister tell us who gumshoe was voting for? iamp as well? Did he show suspicion of anyone in pms? Gumshoe has not pm'd anybody all night and did nothing since n0 besides the last minute unnecessary vote in thread to avoid mod-kill. I don't think he sent a lord vote. Every lord KP was aimed at Gumshoe. The second one lord revealed that in the thread people would not leave him for house kp shots a 2nd night, he would become the automatic lynch target and it would be a lynch and a days worth of discussion gone. In a setup with 24 players I would assume there is enough kp in scum hands to be able to kill at least 2 players per night. Logical Conclusion, No person in this house is scum : iamperfection Xatalos Grackaroni Scum should have been able to have killed a townie besides gumshoe otherwise and must have spread their kp too thin trying for more kill because they were unaware of how much hp a townie had. What the fuck. You actually believe this? Explain why scum would kill gumshoe, with what reasoning. You think that scum didn't know how much hp a townie had (and therefore lannisters are clean) because they killed gumshoe and no one else? You're telling me you think they focused all their kp on GUMSHOE?!?!?!? I believe that there are townies besides lords with kp, one of them shot gumshoe because his only contributions to the thread were these 2 posts : Show nested quote + On August 10 2013 11:19 gumshoe wrote: Hey, I'm alive, been busy, ill vote tofu as well. Why do you automatically assume it was mafia that killed him? From my POV I know that I'm town, and xatalos and iamperfection have both been very pro-town in thread. So my explanation is much more logical to me. How do you get to this conclusion? Most likely scum figured out it would only take a one kp to off him and since they were all ready spreading out kp he was a easy shot for free town kill. On August 11 2013 18:22 Grackaroni wrote: Show nested quote + On August 11 2013 18:09 Clarity_nl wrote: Because he's 1 hp and if one of you is scum it makes it easier to elect yourself? Because he might be blue? (less likely) Like I said, I dunno where the rest of scum's kp went, but it either got blocked or they spread it out to kill 4 people n2 or whatever. that's 1 hp town would be forced to use the subsequent night to get rid of him. I was not going to be made lord with or without gumshoe, and gumshoe is the only person who would possibly have voted for me due to his lack of posts. (Realize I post only in defense of myself because were are both in agreement that xata/iamp are both likely town) Also I would like to believe that if I was secretly passing on this information to scum, I would realize that our house's hp should not be something that I would want scum to get their hands on. Again trying to show scum didnt take the shot, but he is off here as its not 100% lords would finish him off, he could have come back shown himself uber pro town and lords not finish him, scum didnt want to take that chance and just get the almost free townie kill. On August 13 2013 05:46 Grackaroni wrote: I really just look at everything that goes into the thread and makes assumptions from there, maybe not the best assumption with yamato being scum but still not a bad one. (besides Onegu has confirmed that I was right.) At the time I also think I believed they only elected Oberyn because of lore. jrkirby seemed pleasant enough, but we really didn't take about much of importance. -oberyn With my PMs I felt oberyn was town, jrkirby null, and null/scum on you as I only got 2 PMs from you -Onegu For the record, my house is Oberyn, jrkirby and Onegu. I haven't really talked for very much with any of them, really. -Yamato A lot of time being wasted on this supposed scum slip. Show nested quote + On August 13 2013 00:04 Onegu wrote: On August 13 2013 00:02 kushm4sta wrote: neither. i honestly believe this. for this game and future games we need to start plynching fake claimers so they stop doing it So should I be lynched also, why not actually scum hunt and try to win, once people figure out fakeclaiming is bad they will stop dont need to policy lynch them. I want clarification on this. You are saying fake claiming is bad but you didn't dissuade Oberyn from fakeclaiming and in fact went out of your way to fake claim yourself. If you truly believe this why did you fake claim? Again you either useing a few posts to jump to the conclusion or you were talking to yamato. On August 16 2013 09:59 Grackaroni wrote: Show nested quote + On August 16 2013 09:57 Dandel Ion wrote: So you didn't bother reading the thread before pushing me? I pushed you while I was reading the thread, I skimmed your filter and saw no real thought process and lots of useless spam, and added with Iamp's read on you decided you were someone who had a good chance of flipping scum. Basicly you soft push him with laziness and ask other peoples opinions on him. Not some strong scum hunting. On August 16 2013 10:57 Grackaroni wrote: DI is not going to post any thought process for why I am scum, and frankly I don't think he has any. If Vivax does not flip red I will do everything in my power to see him lynched tomorrow. What happened to this, I know we had the red check, but after that. And you are a lord. On August 18 2013 07:00 Grackaroni wrote: Shits going down. I'm content to lynch Johnnywup since we won't even get him in lord shots tonight and he has the best chance of anyone to flip scum. I did use my pm's, I talked a whole bunch with Mocsta to try to get a better read on him because I wasn't confident he would flip scum when everybody else was throwing him to the wolves. I also talked a bit to Rayn and he seemed to be genuinely convinced Mocsta was scum so I don't think he is the best lynch for today, ##Vote: Johnnywup Yeah this is really bad, you trying to get town cred? Yoir last few posts were all how scummy mocsta was even without the red check, you were throwing him to the wolves in thread. And depending how close we are to lylo we are and only scum has this info, it is perfectly reasonable for scum to be pushimg a lynch strongly. So all of this, plus he comes in at the best times to make him look good, he doesnt post to much but he almost always had a good read on the thread like he is lurking a ton or just getting tldr from scum qt. Lynch him, try to shoot johnny. No matter what you arent going to have enough shots to kill someone during the night so get johnny low and we can finish him off later, but I think grack looks the worse of the 2. | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 18 2013 16:39 GMT
#4242
On August 08 2013 15:16 Grackaroni wrote: Show nested quote + On August 08 2013 14:53 iamperfection wrote: Im going to let my black sheep some time in the thread see if he does anything. I would love to stay and chat but its late Doesn't that defeat the purpose of waiting to see if I do anything? Hello all, I am the aforementioned "black sheep", My house is Lannister- Xatalos Gumshoe Iamperfection Grackaroni So far Xatalos has been very aggressive and has tunneled both me and Gumshoe. he put lots of effort into a very long mayor post and has been pming a lot more than he had to so by effort alone I think he is town. And he has annoyed the crap out of me and I think generally people who annoy you are town. Gumshoe has seemed to have genuine frustration in his responses to Xatalos' tunnel at the start of the game. (from the excerpts I've seen). he pmed me afterwards recommending me to vote for Iamp and was suspicious of Xata during a time when I would have percieved his actions to be more town-like. I don't think he faked his emotion and am leaning town on him. Iamperfection I am null on. We've talked to each other less than I have talked to anyone else and probably less than he has talked to anybody else as well. He believes that I have been apathetic towards the game but quite frankly I think I've been putting in plenty of effort. I voted him in the early phase of the game because he said he wanted to use the lord's pm's to pressure people for reads. Afterwards I tried to tell Xata and Gumshoe that I was less confident in him and would rather elect somebody else but it was clear that neither was interested in switching. His first post, the first post with house members. Not really hard to miss | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 18 2013 18:20 GMT
#4301
On August 19 2013 02:43 Risen wrote: Show nested quote + On August 19 2013 02:38 Koshi wrote: Risen So the best lynch for today would be Xatalos? Fuck no. Best lynch today is Sharrant. Are you kidding me? Things that still hold true in spite of my massive wrongness 1) Cop-claim asks for advice from unknown on who to check. 2) Cop-claim gets red check on scummy target who the thread is already leaning towards lynching. 3) Cop-claim lives to d4. 4) COP-CLAIM WHO CLAIMED ONE SHOT COP GETS RED CHECK ON NOW CONFIRMED GREEN TARGET. IS THIS FOR REAL. So we have a cop not playing like a cop should followed by a lie in his claim followed by a red check on a green target when there's no way someone frames mocsta and IT IS DAY 4 WITH A MEDIC DEAD AND A SCUM TEAM NOT KILLING HIM. How is this just occuring to me rofl. So bad. But sometimes right. That should be my motto. 1) Asks so he can get read on person he asks depending on who they say. 2) not for sure we were lynching him that day 3) n1 spread shots out shot not on shar, n2 finish n1 targets off RB shar, n3 put shots on shar but not enough to kill. Most likely what happened 4) mocsta was framed | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 18 2013 18:24 GMT
#4302
On August 19 2013 03:17 Clarity_nl wrote: Show nested quote + On August 19 2013 03:16 Risen wrote: On August 19 2013 03:15 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:14 Risen wrote: On August 19 2013 03:06 Grackaroni wrote: @Risen I actually like the thoughts you had of the possibility of a DI,Sharrant,Acro scum team but that seems like a lot of risks for a scum team to make when there was no chance this was going to be the final lynch. Mocsta was the lynch 100% Mocsta lynched, night falls. Scum kills three people strategically and vote for themselves as lords because lords are voted in by majority. If they get lord they get additional KP and vote, if they don't get lord at least in some places where there's now only two people one of whom is scum (see three strategical kills part) there's no lord and town doesn't get a vote. This is all correct regardless of sharrant being scum or not. And what made it so Mocsta was the lynch 100% ((the red check on Mocsta from Shar)) Which could be either sharrant being scum or mocsta being framed. If there is a scum framer mocsta was the most likely target. You're talking in circles. How do you feel about an onegu lynch? Jeez why would I make the grack case as scum? And you made a incorrect statement I showed you were wrong. Besides grack is scum, and the first point is more about him throwing shit back at the person who called him out instead of just scum hunting, and ignoreing the person who hadnt done much. | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 18 2013 18:27 GMT
#4306
| ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 18 2013 18:31 GMT
#4310
On August 19 2013 03:27 Clarity_nl wrote: Show nested quote + On August 19 2013 03:24 Onegu wrote: On August 19 2013 03:17 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:16 Risen wrote: On August 19 2013 03:15 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:14 Risen wrote: On August 19 2013 03:06 Grackaroni wrote: @Risen I actually like the thoughts you had of the possibility of a DI,Sharrant,Acro scum team but that seems like a lot of risks for a scum team to make when there was no chance this was going to be the final lynch. Mocsta was the lynch 100% Mocsta lynched, night falls. Scum kills three people strategically and vote for themselves as lords because lords are voted in by majority. If they get lord they get additional KP and vote, if they don't get lord at least in some places where there's now only two people one of whom is scum (see three strategical kills part) there's no lord and town doesn't get a vote. This is all correct regardless of sharrant being scum or not. And what made it so Mocsta was the lynch 100% ((the red check on Mocsta from Shar)) Which could be either sharrant being scum or mocsta being framed. If there is a scum framer mocsta was the most likely target. You're talking in circles. How do you feel about an onegu lynch? Jeez why would I make the grack case as scum? And you made a incorrect statement I showed you were wrong. Besides grack is scum, and the first point is more about him throwing shit back at the person who called him out instead of just scum hunting, and ignoreing the person who hadnt done much. Yeah you're right, scum don't ever make cases, my mistake. Good argument. Im saying why put myself out there. If I am scum I say little become a lord and win the game. There are so many lurkers now I could just blend into the crowd and use the power I will get d5. | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 18 2013 18:34 GMT
#4314
On August 19 2013 03:30 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On August 19 2013 03:25 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: On August 19 2013 03:17 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:16 Risen wrote: On August 19 2013 03:15 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:14 Risen wrote: On August 19 2013 03:06 Grackaroni wrote: @Risen I actually like the thoughts you had of the possibility of a DI,Sharrant,Acro scum team but that seems like a lot of risks for a scum team to make when there was no chance this was going to be the final lynch. Mocsta was the lynch 100% Mocsta lynched, night falls. Scum kills three people strategically and vote for themselves as lords because lords are voted in by majority. If they get lord they get additional KP and vote, if they don't get lord at least in some places where there's now only two people one of whom is scum (see three strategical kills part) there's no lord and town doesn't get a vote. This is all correct regardless of sharrant being scum or not. And what made it so Mocsta was the lynch 100% ((the red check on Mocsta from Shar)) Which could be either sharrant being scum or mocsta being framed. If there is a scum framer mocsta was the most likely target. You're talking in circles. How do you feel about an onegu lynch? Clarity, why was Mocsta a likely frame target? And what do you think of Sharrant saying the opposite when he was questioned about why he did check Mocsta? I don't recall him explaining his reasoning for why he checked mocsta, but I bet it's about the same as the reasons I call mocsta a likely frame target. Clarity, why was Mocsta a likely frame target? Fuck you. Sharrant said on D3 end his scumreads were Koshi and SnB. Now if Sharrant is town and scum have a framer why the fuck would they frame Mocsta over Koshi/SnB? You are not even reading the posts you are arguing about and somehow you get to say "fuck you" to me. Now again, why do you think Mocsta was the most likely frame target? I have explained this also when I defended mocsta, it doesnt matter what shar has wrote or told people in PMs he actively tries to decieve scum into thinking who he will check and then checking another read of his. So you have to guess who he will check based on town sentiment and logical scum reads | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 18 2013 18:36 GMT
#4317
On August 19 2013 03:33 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On August 19 2013 03:31 Onegu wrote: On August 19 2013 03:27 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:24 Onegu wrote: On August 19 2013 03:17 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:16 Risen wrote: On August 19 2013 03:15 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:14 Risen wrote: On August 19 2013 03:06 Grackaroni wrote: @Risen I actually like the thoughts you had of the possibility of a DI,Sharrant,Acro scum team but that seems like a lot of risks for a scum team to make when there was no chance this was going to be the final lynch. Mocsta was the lynch 100% Mocsta lynched, night falls. Scum kills three people strategically and vote for themselves as lords because lords are voted in by majority. If they get lord they get additional KP and vote, if they don't get lord at least in some places where there's now only two people one of whom is scum (see three strategical kills part) there's no lord and town doesn't get a vote. This is all correct regardless of sharrant being scum or not. And what made it so Mocsta was the lynch 100% ((the red check on Mocsta from Shar)) Which could be either sharrant being scum or mocsta being framed. If there is a scum framer mocsta was the most likely target. You're talking in circles. How do you feel about an onegu lynch? Jeez why would I make the grack case as scum? And you made a incorrect statement I showed you were wrong. Besides grack is scum, and the first point is more about him throwing shit back at the person who called him out instead of just scum hunting, and ignoreing the person who hadnt done much. Yeah you're right, scum don't ever make cases, my mistake. Good argument. Im saying why put myself out there. If I am scum I say little become a lord and win the game. There are so many lurkers now I could just blend into the crowd and use the power I will get d5. Interesting. So if you are scum and become a lord on D5 you "just win the game". How is that? Because I am fairly sure scum are setting this up so they can all be lords on d5 have majority get the lynch, lords kp and scum kp. That should be close to enough for a win.... | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 18 2013 18:39 GMT
#4319
On August 19 2013 03:35 Koshi wrote: Show nested quote + On August 19 2013 03:31 Onegu wrote: On August 19 2013 03:27 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:24 Onegu wrote: On August 19 2013 03:17 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:16 Risen wrote: On August 19 2013 03:15 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:14 Risen wrote: On August 19 2013 03:06 Grackaroni wrote: @Risen I actually like the thoughts you had of the possibility of a DI,Sharrant,Acro scum team but that seems like a lot of risks for a scum team to make when there was no chance this was going to be the final lynch. Mocsta was the lynch 100% Mocsta lynched, night falls. Scum kills three people strategically and vote for themselves as lords because lords are voted in by majority. If they get lord they get additional KP and vote, if they don't get lord at least in some places where there's now only two people one of whom is scum (see three strategical kills part) there's no lord and town doesn't get a vote. This is all correct regardless of sharrant being scum or not. And what made it so Mocsta was the lynch 100% ((the red check on Mocsta from Shar)) Which could be either sharrant being scum or mocsta being framed. If there is a scum framer mocsta was the most likely target. You're talking in circles. How do you feel about an onegu lynch? Jeez why would I make the grack case as scum? And you made a incorrect statement I showed you were wrong. Besides grack is scum, and the first point is more about him throwing shit back at the person who called him out instead of just scum hunting, and ignoreing the person who hadnt done much. Yeah you're right, scum don't ever make cases, my mistake. Good argument. Im saying why put myself out there. If I am scum I say little become a lord and win the game. There are so many lurkers now I could just blend into the crowd and use the power I will get d5. LooooooooL Koshi: Made a case vs Risen SnB: Made a case vs Johnny Grack: Voting for Johnny Rayn: Voting for Johnny So it seems like scum controls the vote in Onegu his mind and decided to lynch his other scumtarget. Or scum is not controling the vote but Grack and SnB are bussing Johnny. Nothing is set in stone with votes yet. And I am leaning less likely on SnB being scum now. So its more likely rayn, and lo and behold he just changed his vote, lets see if grack does the same. | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 18 2013 18:45 GMT
#4323
On August 19 2013 03:40 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On August 19 2013 03:36 Onegu wrote: On August 19 2013 03:33 raynpelikoneet wrote: On August 19 2013 03:31 Onegu wrote: On August 19 2013 03:27 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:24 Onegu wrote: On August 19 2013 03:17 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:16 Risen wrote: On August 19 2013 03:15 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:14 Risen wrote: [quote] Mocsta was the lynch 100% Mocsta lynched, night falls. Scum kills three people strategically and vote for themselves as lords because lords are voted in by majority. If they get lord they get additional KP and vote, if they don't get lord at least in some places where there's now only two people one of whom is scum (see three strategical kills part) there's no lord and town doesn't get a vote. This is all correct regardless of sharrant being scum or not. And what made it so Mocsta was the lynch 100% ((the red check on Mocsta from Shar)) Which could be either sharrant being scum or mocsta being framed. If there is a scum framer mocsta was the most likely target. You're talking in circles. How do you feel about an onegu lynch? Jeez why would I make the grack case as scum? And you made a incorrect statement I showed you were wrong. Besides grack is scum, and the first point is more about him throwing shit back at the person who called him out instead of just scum hunting, and ignoreing the person who hadnt done much. Yeah you're right, scum don't ever make cases, my mistake. Good argument. Im saying why put myself out there. If I am scum I say little become a lord and win the game. There are so many lurkers now I could just blend into the crowd and use the power I will get d5. Interesting. So if you are scum and become a lord on D5 you "just win the game". How is that? Because I am fairly sure scum are setting this up so they can all be lords on d5 have majority get the lynch, lords kp and scum kp. That should be close to enough for a win.... So who exactly is setting this up? I didn't see Clarity in your reads list as mafia. As far as i know he is willing to lynch you. Can you explain your thought process of what's going on here and and who is setting up what? If scum can get 3/6 houses they should be able to force a mislynch. Then have 3 more kp to use from lords. But anyway Im guessing NK will be me, shar, and I will have to look at houses to see the third but, me and shar for sure | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 18 2013 18:47 GMT
#4324
On August 19 2013 03:43 Koshi wrote: Show nested quote + On August 19 2013 03:36 Onegu wrote: On August 19 2013 03:33 raynpelikoneet wrote: On August 19 2013 03:31 Onegu wrote: On August 19 2013 03:27 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:24 Onegu wrote: On August 19 2013 03:17 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:16 Risen wrote: On August 19 2013 03:15 Clarity_nl wrote: On August 19 2013 03:14 Risen wrote: [quote] Mocsta was the lynch 100% Mocsta lynched, night falls. Scum kills three people strategically and vote for themselves as lords because lords are voted in by majority. If they get lord they get additional KP and vote, if they don't get lord at least in some places where there's now only two people one of whom is scum (see three strategical kills part) there's no lord and town doesn't get a vote. This is all correct regardless of sharrant being scum or not. And what made it so Mocsta was the lynch 100% ((the red check on Mocsta from Shar)) Which could be either sharrant being scum or mocsta being framed. If there is a scum framer mocsta was the most likely target. You're talking in circles. How do you feel about an onegu lynch? Jeez why would I make the grack case as scum? And you made a incorrect statement I showed you were wrong. Besides grack is scum, and the first point is more about him throwing shit back at the person who called him out instead of just scum hunting, and ignoreing the person who hadnt done much. Yeah you're right, scum don't ever make cases, my mistake. Good argument. Im saying why put myself out there. If I am scum I say little become a lord and win the game. There are so many lurkers now I could just blend into the crowd and use the power I will get d5. Interesting. So if you are scum and become a lord on D5 you "just win the game". How is that? Because I am fairly sure scum are setting this up so they can all be lords on d5 have majority get the lynch, lords kp and scum kp. That should be close to enough for a win.... 1) SnB needs Clarity dead (Clarity confirmed damage) 2) Grack needs Xatalos dead 3) Rayn needs Risen dead 4) Onegu 5) Baratheon can't be touched by Koshi 6) Acro / Sharrant /johnnywup (Sharrant was shot but Acro still full) This doesn't make sense Onegu. Unless you are scum in that list and I am not. Because I can't get to House Baratheon and Acro+Sharrant can't be killed in Tyrell. Also Sharrant taking damage makes no sense because both Risen and Xatalos will not die. So. Unless Onegu is scum, scum can't take the win. I am going to go with the Risen theory and lynch Onegu! Thats why I said if I was scum. But Im not. But when mocsta assholed out, I lost passion for this game. So go ahead and kill me. Btw s0L is confirmed town, dont lynch him. | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 18 2013 18:51 GMT
#4325
| ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 18 2013 19:50 GMT
#4334
Rayne Koshi Grack Last one not 100% Johnny or risen. Look how fast this wagon jumpped on me. Anyone who has looked at me or chatted with me in PMs knows Im town. Oberyn was 100% sure, Mocsta was 100% sure, and this doesnt match my scum meta at all. If it takes my lynch to confirm those are scum than so be it. Sorry I tunneled you SnB I think you are town now. When I flip dont let anyof the people on my list be lord or you will lose as only 5 houses then. | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
August 18 2013 19:53 GMT
#4335
On August 19 2013 04:49 Sharrant wrote: I have to be shot tonight, there's no alternatives. Lynching me is just plain stupid, but I put us in a bad position by telegraphing my target too much. I shouldn't have publicly stated that I have trouble reading Mocsta. When I'm happy with my reads I will post them all later tonight, but I think they need fine tuning as I think I'm off by at least one person. Don't waste the lynch on me, but I do need to die. I'm far too easy of a mislynch at this point, and scum will very likely not shoot me tonight because of the confusion today. According to DI I've been shot before, so hopefully it shouldn't be too hard to kill me. When we get closer to the actual planning of my death, hopefully DI will reveal my HP (or hopefully he's already stated it to a trusted lord) and we can coordinate my death properly. My only concern is that I'm unsure at what stage in the game we're in. I think we can afford for me to die if we elect a majority of townies during the night, and they lynch well. It's possible I'm wrong, and we may need to get rid of a mafia member before I can be safely killed. Risen, I'm seriously concerned at how quickly you turned on me. I get that you're in full conspiracy mode, but you're my strongest town read right now. I need you to remain focused. Your apology in PM's and your explanation of why cemented you as town. Pretend I don't even exist right now, or use me to reflect your thoughts here, who do you want to lynch? They already have shots on you they want the kills, there are so many lurkers and what not you arent the only easy mislynch. You get shot tonight imo. | ||
| ||
Next event in 11h 43m
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH182 StarCraft: Brood War• davetesta39 • musti20045 29 • mYiSmile1 7 • intothetv • Kozan • Gussbus • IndyKCrew • Laughngamez YouTube • LaughNgamez Trovo • aXEnki • AfreecaTV YouTube • Migwel • Poblha Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Kung Fu Cup
OSC
INu's Battles
ByuN vs Dark
Stats vs Rogue
World Team League
Korean StarCraft League
H.4.0.S
World Team League
Sparkling Tuna Cup
World Team League
ESL Open Cup
[ Show More ] ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
|
|