EPTOn August 12 2013 03:50 Chromatically wrote:
yeah I have a sneaking suspicion about yamato
yeah I have a sneaking suspicion about yamato
bwhahaahahaaha
GoT Mafia: Lords and Liars - Page 100
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
iamperfection
United States9647 Posts
bwhahaahahaaha | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On August 12 2013 03:46 Koshi wrote: I am back. I had soccer and couldn't post till now. I tried to make posts on my phone but it kept saying "Bad Request". I don't know how to fix it. I tried closing my browser, shutting down phone, reconnecting to the internet. Nothing. Only Gumshoe dieing is strange. I can't believe scum hitted him when they knew Lords were going to kill him. This leaves 2 options: Scum knew gum had only 1 hp left or there is an SK that wanted to hide in that kill (I tried that in Sicilian). If the first is true than there is a mole in the Lanister House. iamp saying that it is a vigi is just ridiculous, why would a vigi waste a shot on a target that is going to die anyway? I don't think grack+iamp is scum though, because if they were they should just have kept their mouths shut, and just kill one of their members to keep their House under control and nobody would even find out about the HP check. Mr.X seems like a trustworthy person for Oberyn, otherwise I see no reason why Oberyn hasn't said his name yet. It's a bit unlucky that both Onegu and Mr.X visited Xatalos, otherwise people not dieing could be seen as a successful safe on Xatalos instead of one of the visitors must be scum. Yamato red check is quite damning and should be enough evidence to get him lynched today. Yamato being either miller or being framed is unlikely. If this is the case then this is bad luck. Not lynching yamato is bad play. Why is this unlucky? | ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
On August 12 2013 03:50 Chromatically wrote: yeah I have a sneaking suspicion about yamato ^ listen to him He's really good. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On August 12 2013 00:16 Oatsmaster wrote: Does it matter now rayn? Ok if we lynch yamato and hes town, can I choose who we lynch d3? Now after s0lstice explaining to me what Oats his meta is I must say that Oats is playing like that on D2. However, above post gave me instant flashbacks to Cora in Titanic. Always seeing townreads and then suggesting a "sure" scumlynch. Rayn, Oats and Clarity know what I am talking about. s0lstice is now confirmed town to me. In the night he tried to help me on how to play better, which is something that scum would never do in the way s0lstice did. Sadly I do not have any new scumreads except that everybody who has been posting lately is probably town... I could point out to some inactives but that is just too easy. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On August 12 2013 03:50 Chromatically wrote: yeah I have a sneaking suspicion about yamato Yeah, I was typing that and wanted to add scumlist after that but refreshed and saw what was happening. So I just hitted post... | ||
|
DrParnassus
Afghanistan565 Posts
Vote Count yamato77 (3) Acrofales, Chromatically, iamperfection not voting (3) Oatsmaster, Oberyn, Risen yamato77 is set to be lynched. Deadline is in . If there are any errors please let me know. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
This means that Sharrant is almost confirmed town. I think it's also pretty safe to start looking at Yamato's filter and suspicious interactions with / posts about Yamato. I'm dying to unravel the mystery of my roleblock, but if Oberyn is convinced that the information should be kept hidden, so be it. Acro, why am I apparently your scum suspect? Referring to your PM about Lannisters. I'd really like to know what's your basis. | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9647 Posts
On August 12 2013 03:59 Xatalos wrote: Okay, so Yamato is scum (unless he's playing 100% against his win condition atm). This means that Sharrant is almost confirmed town. I think it's also pretty safe to start looking at Yamato's filter and suspicious interactions with / posts about Yamato. I'm dying to unravel the mystery of my roleblock, but if Oberyn is convinced that the information should be kept hidden, so be it. Acro, why am I apparently your scum suspect? Referring to your PM about Lannisters. I'd really like to know what's your basis. no yamatos filter is useless and is wifom you can get reads possibly from how players interacted with him but not how he interacted with others. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On August 12 2013 03:59 Xatalos wrote: Okay, so Yamato is scum (unless he's playing 100% against his win condition atm). This means that Sharrant is almost confirmed town. I think it's also pretty safe to start looking at Yamato's filter and suspicious interactions with / posts about Yamato. I'm dying to unravel the mystery of my roleblock, but if Oberyn is convinced that the information should be kept hidden, so be it. Acro, why am I apparently your scum suspect? Referring to your PM about Lannisters. I'd really like to know what's your basis. Your math is clearly wrong. I'm not scum. I'm the medic. Didn't you see my breadcrumb? On August 12 2013 03:32 yamato77 wrote: Why are you voting me? Don't you see how non-threatening I am? c ![[image loading]](http://s10.postimage.org/tet33yjdl/Baby_Seal_1.jpg) I have to be - just look at how cute I am! | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
I think both oats and vivax are town. Is that weird? | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
With only Gumshoe dieing we can safely assume that scum tried to kill Xatalos right? Well, it is not 100% certain but chances are high. So most likely both visitors wanted to safe Xatalos instead of killing him? But that is just theorycrafting. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On August 12 2013 04:03 Clarity_nl wrote: Oats was trying to convince me yamato was town and vivax was trying to convince me yamato was scum. I think both oats and vivax are town. Is that weird? ^ listen to this man | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
| ||
|
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
On August 12 2013 04:03 Koshi wrote: With only Gumshoe dieing we can safely assume that scum tried to kill Xatalos right? Well, it is not 100% certain but chances are high. So most likely both visitors wanted to safe Xatalos instead of killing him? But that is just theorycrafting. Why would scum shooting Xat mean that the second visitor was trying to protect him? | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On August 12 2013 04:04 Koshi wrote: Also, can you just stop posting yamato? This is just silly. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/hyhBVNu.gif) | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On August 12 2013 03:24 Acrofales wrote: I think the sky is green. Too bad neither of us have any evidence. what you did this game: 1) rolefish 2) roleplay so since you're only rolling, you're scum. You always rolefish as scum, it's ur META DONT DENY THE META META META LONG LIVE META | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On August 12 2013 04:08 Dandel Ion wrote: what you did this game: 1) rolefish 2) roleplay so since you're only rolling, you're scum. You always rolefish as scum, it's ur META DONT DENY THE META META META LONG LIVE META ^ listen to this man, he's really good | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On August 12 2013 04:01 iamperfection wrote: no yamatos filter is useless and is wifom you can get reads possibly from how players interacted with him but not how he interacted with others. Hmm. I don't entirely agree, but his filter is too chaotic to read to get anything very conclusive out of it. I'm left suspicious with Acro's first list post though. It was basically jrkirby & FT & Yamato (with little reasoning and none for Yamato). Scum often include one scum in their list posts to look like they're "not completely wrong". Considering that the list was weak anyways, I get the feeling he just put two easy mislynch lurkers there and one weak scum (or even 2 scum if jrkirby is scum, but that's less likely). That's the classic and easiest possible tactic for scum to look like they're contributing a bit. I've done and seen it done countless times. Thoughts? | ||
|
s0Lstice
United States1833 Posts
| ||
| ||
