|
On July 28 2013 23:43 Clarity_nl wrote:I kinda want to lynch Koshi now. I can't explain him not giving a read with reasons as town, but I can't explain it if he's scum either. Doesn't make sense as either alignment = scum. Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 23:35 VayneAuthority wrote:
Don't you feel he's scared that im vig or something and will shoot him oats? He doesnt actually give a good reason for lynching me. Haha.
I dont know if hes scared scum or town though What's this random mention of vigi? If you were vigi (which is town only) why would you shoot someone trying to lynch you, or why would the person trying to lynch you be afraid of that. I'm confused.
Here is a game for you with hzflank as scum.
The guy can make a million posts, make sense and still be scum.
I see him playing the same game here, but this time I don't agree with his case. But I am not saying he is scum, he can be town, I just put him under investigation.
I have read everybody his posts. I do not find somebody lynchworthy for Day 1. That's how I feel, if you don't like it. Bad fucking luck.
Also, I am waiting on Vivax to name the scums.
|
I do not defend myself because there is nothing to defend against. There is only oats case which I think I defended well enough. Of the others noone did even really make a case against me so how should I defend against that?
|
Anyone want to lynch a lurker?
|
On July 28 2013 23:55 Oatsmaster wrote:
Anyone want to lynch a lurker?
kinda, lets wait to see what rayn and stutters have to say before discussing it
|
Weren't you 2 giving me a bad time 15 minutes ago for wanting to lynch a lurker?
|
On July 28 2013 23:58 Koshi wrote:
Weren't you 2 giving me a bad time 15 minutes ago for wanting to lynch a lurker?
And?
|
On July 28 2013 23:59 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 23:58 Koshi wrote:
Weren't you 2 giving me a bad time 15 minutes ago for wanting to lynch a lurker? And?
What the fuck Oatsmaster? You can't have fucking double standards.
|
On July 29 2013 00:00 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 23:59 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 28 2013 23:58 Koshi wrote:
Weren't you 2 giving me a bad time 15 minutes ago for wanting to lynch a lurker? And? What the fuck Oatsmaster? You can't have fucking double standards.
I am ok with it... It's just funny.
|
On July 28 2013 23:49 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:
@exarezee
Why are you still on this silly idea that having two wagons is a good idea? It is not. It allows scum to control the lynch by swinging their votes on one person or the other.
Here's some advice for you: find your biggest scumread, and vote for them. Savvy?
Because I KNOW I'm town. How does this allow the scum to control the lynch? Why is my idea silly? Don't give a blanket statement that "it allows the scum to blah blah." So, if I said paper is scummy, and tofu is scummy, then it's ok? Ideally we want a consensus on votes. Ideally we would like votes spread around 2 people ONLY. We would have way more information than say there were 1 votes on everybody and 2 votes on another that got that person lynched.
|
On July 29 2013 00:00 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 23:59 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 28 2013 23:58 Koshi wrote:
Weren't you 2 giving me a bad time 15 minutes ago for wanting to lynch a lurker? And? What the fuck Oatsmaster? You can't have fucking double standards.
I know you.
|
On July 29 2013 00:03 exarezee wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 23:49 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:
@exarezee
Why are you still on this silly idea that having two wagons is a good idea? It is not. It allows scum to control the lynch by swinging their votes on one person or the other.
Here's some advice for you: find your biggest scumread, and vote for them. Savvy? Because I KNOW I'm town. How does this allow the scum to control the lynch? Why is my idea silly? Don't give a blanket statement that "it allows the scum to blah blah." So, if I said paper is scummy, and tofu is scummy, then it's ok? Ideally we want a consensus on votes. Ideally we would like votes spread around 2 people ONLY. We would have way more information than say there were 1 votes on everybody and 2 votes on another that got that person lynched.
Because you are trying to pidgeon-hole town into doing what you want. That's not very townie to do, is it? Not everyone is going to agree with BOTH of your lynch candidates. You need to pick one and let the rest of town either agree with you or bring up another wagon. It will happen naturally.
"If you try to chase two rabbits, you will lose them both"
-Native American Proverb
|
Unofficial Votecount:
Paperscraps (3):
exarezee, hzflank, justanothertownie
exarezee (1):
FirmTofu, Paperscraps, FirmTofu
Clarity_nl (1):
VayneAuthority
Stutters (1):
Vivax
Firmtofu (1):
Clarity_nl, Oatsmaster, Malongo
justanothertownie (1):
Oatsmaster, Oatsmaster
Oatsmaster (0):
IMCaptainJackSparrow
hzflank (0):
Malongo
Deadline is in
Friendly reminder from mr clarity, this is majority lynch.
Sorry if I made a mistake somewhere.
|
It's majority lynch and we need 8 votes. We will consolidate later anyway so for now I do not see a good reason to push for more than one person to be lynched.
|
On July 29 2013 00:06 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 00:00 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:On July 28 2013 23:59 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 28 2013 23:58 Koshi wrote:
Weren't you 2 giving me a bad time 15 minutes ago for wanting to lynch a lurker? And? What the fuck Oatsmaster? You can't have fucking double standards. I know you.
You do! Good. I'm CaptainJackSparrow!
|
On July 28 2013 23:57 Clarity_nl wrote:kinda, lets wait to see what rayn and stutters have to say before discussing it
Are you for real? I've really liked all of your posts so far with the exception that you don't really explain when you move papers from town to scum lean. But this post is making me SMH.
|
is SMH, snort with humor?
|
|
|
On July 29 2013 00:08 exarezee wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 23:57 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 28 2013 23:55 Oatsmaster wrote:
Anyone want to lynch a lurker? kinda, lets wait to see what rayn and stutters have to say before discussing it Are you for real? I've really liked all of your posts so far with the exception that you don't really explain when you move papers from town to scum lean. But this post is making me SMH.
I can't find fucking scum which means there's a couple in lurkers which gives us a decent chance.
Still got plenty of time to find scum but yeah, the timing in which oats asked if I wanted to lynch a lurker I kinda just wanted to say yeah fuck it
|
On July 29 2013 00:06 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 00:03 exarezee wrote:On July 28 2013 23:49 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:
@exarezee
Why are you still on this silly idea that having two wagons is a good idea? It is not. It allows scum to control the lynch by swinging their votes on one person or the other.
Here's some advice for you: find your biggest scumread, and vote for them. Savvy? Because I KNOW I'm town. How does this allow the scum to control the lynch? Why is my idea silly? Don't give a blanket statement that "it allows the scum to blah blah." So, if I said paper is scummy, and tofu is scummy, then it's ok? Ideally we want a consensus on votes. Ideally we would like votes spread around 2 people ONLY. We would have way more information than say there were 1 votes on everybody and 2 votes on another that got that person lynched. Because you are trying to pidgeon-hole town into doing what you want. That's not very townie to do, is it? Not everyone is going to agree with BOTH of your lynch candidates. You need to pick one and let the rest of town either agree with you or bring up another wagon. It will happen naturally. "If you try to chase two rabbits, you will lose them both" -Native American Proverb
Why would I NOT pidgeon-hole this town into doing what I want. I'm 100% confident that I'm town unless I have completely misread my PM. I have no side agendas. I don't know for a certainty whether any of you have side agendas. This so stupid. LIke I can prove this mathematically for you if you like.
|
On July 29 2013 00:11 exarezee wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2013 00:06 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:On July 29 2013 00:03 exarezee wrote:On July 28 2013 23:49 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:
@exarezee
Why are you still on this silly idea that having two wagons is a good idea? It is not. It allows scum to control the lynch by swinging their votes on one person or the other.
Here's some advice for you: find your biggest scumread, and vote for them. Savvy? Because I KNOW I'm town. How does this allow the scum to control the lynch? Why is my idea silly? Don't give a blanket statement that "it allows the scum to blah blah." So, if I said paper is scummy, and tofu is scummy, then it's ok? Ideally we want a consensus on votes. Ideally we would like votes spread around 2 people ONLY. We would have way more information than say there were 1 votes on everybody and 2 votes on another that got that person lynched. Because you are trying to pidgeon-hole town into doing what you want. That's not very townie to do, is it? Not everyone is going to agree with BOTH of your lynch candidates. You need to pick one and let the rest of town either agree with you or bring up another wagon. It will happen naturally. "If you try to chase two rabbits, you will lose them both" -Native American Proverb Why would I NOT pidgeon-hole this town into doing what I want. I'm 100% confident that I'm town unless I have completely misread my PM. I have no side agendas. I don't know for a certainty whether any of you have side agendas. This so stupid. LIke I can prove this mathematically for you if you like.
You are trying to convince us to kill either FirmTofu or Paperscraps. How are you not trying to pidgeon-hole us?
Please tell me how mathematically, we can lynch both of them today. I'd love to see it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
