EPTsupper
with soup
I Swear This Is Normal Mini Mafia 2 - Page 7
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
supper with soup | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
Dude lost on his second post. | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
| ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
| ||
|
Malongo
Chile3479 Posts
On July 24 2013 20:51 ShiaoPi wrote: and that makes you unable to answer more questions? No to koshi right now. I never said I was unable to answer more, it was You that answered with a question my friend. Who do you want to lynch? | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
| ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
| ||
|
Lazermonkey
Sweden2176 Posts
On July 24 2013 20:29 Malongo wrote: I'm sorry, I literally don't understand this post at all. Like not even a single bit. I'm no veteran and even if I were, why is my way of presenting suspicions scummy? Isn't the mason pairing random? at least I got paired with some random dude. And what do you mean with "he thought what was actually "good" for the mafia (1 on 1 pairings)."I meant that he looks more mafioso. The way he presented his suppositions were far more suspicious than a player claiming vet day1. My first thought was that the mason pairing was random and I didnt even realize that mafia doesnt need to mason, but he went all the way a step further: he thought what was actually "good" for the mafia (1 on 1 pairings). | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12973 Posts
I wish I could date Dandel. he's such a cutie. | ||
|
Malongo
Chile3479 Posts
Do you really think that we have a better shot on an active player than the inactives pool? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
I am scum because i did discuss your claim and wanted to know your reasons for claiming VT. You say i should have focused on other things like QT-talk, which i did. At the same time you accuse FirmTofu of being wishy-washy about the QT-thingy (asking useless questions). By that logic i should come up as townie to you, because i did what you by your own words expect from a townie. You say Z-Boson did a townie thing by saying your claim is not alignment indicative. Guess what. I said that too, i said your reasons for the claim might be alignment indicative. Z-Boson however implies he is supicious of you in the very same post, when activity is really not a thing that's alignment indicative, at least in the first 12 hours of the game. You take that as a face value, actually you YOURSELF call your actions (or rather lack of them - activity) scummy, but when i state my reasons for my actions you are not willing to even try to understand them. By using that logic i could say you are scum because you fucked up at the start. You can't explain that, it is set in the stone. But i am not, so can you now clarify your thought process to me. | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
On July 24 2013 21:03 Malongo wrote: I just named one inactive, it could have been anyone but Koshi is also playing Sicilian mafia, so i guess he could have posted here too. Aside from that nothing special, there was also Artanis, Dandel, Rainbows and Stutter. Do you really think that we have a better shot on an active player than the inactives pool? If you checked the timestamps of his last posts in sicilian you could see that he has not been posting since our game started, probably just no time I would guess. And yes I believe to have a better shot on an active player. Since lynching somebody who has not even posted yet is fucking stupid beyond measure. you might as well flip a coin | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12973 Posts
On July 24 2013 21:03 Malongo wrote: I just named one inactive, it could have been anyone but Koshi is also playing Sicilian mafia, so i guess he could have posted here too. Aside from that nothing special, there was also Artanis, Dandel, Rainbows and Stutter. Do you really think that we have a better shot on an active player than the inactives pool? Why are you calling people inactive 8 hours into the day? We've only just started, some people are still sleeping or browse TL during the evening only. Give people some time, man. | ||
|
Lazermonkey
Sweden2176 Posts
Why would you ask about koshi? it doesn't fucking make any sense at all. What diferentiated him from everyone else who had not posted at that point? You don't make any sense at all. | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
On July 24 2013 21:05 raynpelikoneet wrote: So let me get this straigth ShiaoPi. This is your thought process: I am scum because i did discuss your claim and wanted to know your reasons for claiming VT. You say i should have focused on other things like QT-talk, which i did. At the same time you accuse FirmTofu of being wishy-washy about the QT-thingy (asking useless questions). By that logic i should come up as townie to you, because i did what you by your own words expect from a townie. You say Z-Boson did a townie thing by saying your claim is not alignment indicative. Guess what. I said that too, i said your reasons for the claim might be alignment indicative. Z-Boson however implies he is supicious of you in the very same post, when activity is really not a thing that's alignment indicative, at least in the first 12 hours of the game. You take that as a face value, actually you YOURSELF call your actions (or rather lack of them - activity) scummy, but when i state my reasons for my actions you are not willing to even try to understand them. By using that logic i could say you are scum because you fucked up at the start. You can't explain that, it is set in the stone. But i am not, so can you now clarify your thought process to me. are you familiar with the kenpachi rule? I just used it on you and firmtofu. The point is there is no need for a townie to discuss my claim in any way larger than a passing notice of "alright, let's see what you deliver the following days". Your reaction of first trying to paint me scummy and then backtracking is exactly the scummy reaction I was hoping to receive. Scum will jump on the claim since it is such an easy way to "contribute" and "scumhunt". I do not deny that you were doing correct things as well (such as discussing QT-things). On ZBoson, the important thing is he is not basing his suspicions on the claim but rather on activity, which is a better measure than a VT-claim. You discussing QT-stuff is also the reason you are only my secondary scumread at the moment. FirmTofu is a much more certain scum to me than you right now. What I dislike is your vote on me and attempting to twist my words in the discussion we had earlier. I do not understand what you are trying to say in your last sentence btw. Are you saying I fucked up at start and therefore must be scum? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
But I won't post my thoughts. That'll show them. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On July 24 2013 21:13 raynpelikoneet wrote: I am saying you are saying so. I am not familiar with the Kenpachi rule and i don't even care because i did not call you scummy because of your claim. God, why is that so hard to understand? lol u got kenpachi'd | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
| ||
|
Malongo
Chile3479 Posts
On July 24 2013 21:06 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Why are you calling people inactive 8 hours into the day? We've only just started, some people are still sleeping or browse TL during the evening only. Give people some time, man. Well, in my experience mafia is more likely to skip the starting part of the day. Maybe you want to call them "yet to post" people? I dont really care. | ||
| ||
