|
I am soon going to write what i think, but you need to answer this first:
On July 24 2013 19:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
This is what i mean. Why the fuck should i scumhunt like this:
"Hi ShiaoPi, why did you claim VT? It's scummy or stupid, or maybe you have some sort of a plan, like gauging reactions which is reasonable for a townie to do. Which is it?"
Why the fuck should i give you the answers that are right? What's the point of questions in that case?
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
You do not even get the point do you?
There is no need to question me on the claim, just note it down like you would a miller claim or something. You cannot prove it you cannot make out whether I am lying or not until I flip. You could have easily just noted my lack of activity right after as Z boson did, as that is much more alignment indicative than the claim.
Do I have to repeat myself? Well whatever you are scum bro
|
Why are you avoiding my question?
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
hahahahaha, I am avoiding the question? Are you sure you are reading what I am posting? Even without my claim there was plenty of other possible discussion you could do in thread about usage of the QT for example. Scumhunting in there is something you have done, sure but your reaction to my claim and the subsequent vote now is just terrible beyond measure.
|
Lol why would I actually lie? The hit would be known anyways. However it is not my call anymore, as I sent the kill when I made the first post and the pm asking to stop it when ryan contacted me.
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
Malongo, clarify please what you meant by "threat" regarding Lazer
|
On July 24 2013 20:13 ShiaoPi wrote:
hahahahaha, I am avoiding the question? Are you sure you are reading what I am posting? Even without my claim there was plenty of other possible discussion you could do in thread about usage of the QT for example. Scumhunting in there is something you have done, sure but your reaction to my claim and the subsequent vote now is just terrible beyond measure.
Yes you are avoiding the question.
Another one. Why do you want people to talk about setup rather than other people's actual actions in this game? Setup talk usually finds you scum right?
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
I have no clue in what delusional space you live in rayn /shrug
Not saying that I am encouraging setup speculation, I am saying that the discussion about QTs had more worthwhile things going on than a claim, which is not alignment indicative at all. Seriously you even reading what I am writing without trying to twist the words?
|
What exactly about them is more important? And btw i told my stance on the QT's very clearly because i find that discussion irrelevant to finding mafia.
|
On July 24 2013 20:17 ShiaoPi wrote:
Malongo, clarify please what you meant by "threat" regarding Lazer
I meant that he looks more mafioso. The way he presented his suppositions were far more suspicious than a player claiming vet day1. My first thought was that the mason pairing was random and I didnt even realize that mafia doesnt need to mason, but he went all the way a step further: he thought what was actually "good" for the mafia (1 on 1 pairings).
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
Look for example at FirmTofu's posts on QTs:
He first asks questions to the thread in regards to stances on QT (in this case whether or not to reveal you mason partner): but avoids posting this first:On July 24 2013 15:20 FirmTofu wrote:
I agree with rayn. The claim rubs me the wrong way. I don't understand it.
Where I stand:
People should NOT be anonymous in their QTs. There is no reason to do that.
People should be trying to discern the alignment of their partner, but not to the point where they stifle discussion in the QT. Pressure him, but don't argue incessantly.
People should not tell the thread who their partners are. If the partners are both town, we end up denying scum a TON of useful information by not saying who your partner is. It will also be useful to find mini-mason circles to confuse scum.
Which would instantly clarify his stance in any case. Why test the waters first with questions, if you have already made up your mind? It is scummy to me, trying to blend in with threadflow after asking where it is.
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
@Malongo: What is your opinion on FirmTofu?
|
On July 24 2013 20:30 ShiaoPi wrote:Look for example at FirmTofu's posts on QTs: He first asks questions to the thread in regards to stances on QT (in this case whether or not to reveal you mason partner): but avoids posting this first: Show nested quote +On July 24 2013 15:20 FirmTofu wrote:
I agree with rayn. The claim rubs me the wrong way. I don't understand it.
Where I stand:
People should NOT be anonymous in their QTs. There is no reason to do that.
People should be trying to discern the alignment of their partner, but not to the point where they stifle discussion in the QT. Pressure him, but don't argue incessantly.
People should not tell the thread who their partners are. If the partners are both town, we end up denying scum a TON of useful information by not saying who your partner is. It will also be useful to find mini-mason circles to confuse scum. Which would instantly clarify his stance in any case. Why test the waters first with questions, if you have already made up your mind? It is scummy to me, trying to blend in with threadflow after asking where it is.
I don't understand a single bit of this post. Are you accusing me of blending in by asking you questions, when i have clearly stated what my thought process was?
|
On July 24 2013 20:35 ShiaoPi wrote:
@Malongo: What is your opinion on FirmTofu?
Not so firm. But no that mafiaso either. If we are looking lynch targets I rather lynch a non poster. There are at least 4 people that have yet to post once. Lynching a participative player is dumb when mafia is more likely to be inactive.
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
On July 24 2013 20:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2013 20:30 ShiaoPi wrote:Look for example at FirmTofu's posts on QTs: He first asks questions to the thread in regards to stances on QT (in this case whether or not to reveal you mason partner): but avoids posting this first: On July 24 2013 15:20 FirmTofu wrote:
I agree with rayn. The claim rubs me the wrong way. I don't understand it.
Where I stand:
People should NOT be anonymous in their QTs. There is no reason to do that.
People should be trying to discern the alignment of their partner, but not to the point where they stifle discussion in the QT. Pressure him, but don't argue incessantly.
People should not tell the thread who their partners are. If the partners are both town, we end up denying scum a TON of useful information by not saying who your partner is. It will also be useful to find mini-mason circles to confuse scum. Which would instantly clarify his stance in any case. Why test the waters first with questions, if you have already made up your mind? It is scummy to me, trying to blend in with threadflow after asking where it is. I don't understand a single bit of this post. Are you accusing me of blending in by asking you questions, when i have clearly stated what my thought process was?
You really aren't reading what I am posting....
You asked what I thought was important from the QT discussions. I provided an example from it, further enhancing why FirmTofu is securely in the scumcamp for me (besides the claim thingie).
|
Any more questions ShiaoPi?
What do you think of lynching Koshi first day?
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
On July 24 2013 20:45 Malongo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2013 20:35 ShiaoPi wrote:
@Malongo: What is your opinion on FirmTofu? Not so firm. But no that mafiaso either. If we are looking lynch targets I rather lynch a non poster. There are at least 4 people that have yet to post once. Lynching a participative player is dumb when mafia is more likely to be inactive.
Assume for a second that there are no other players besides those who have posted until now. Who do you want to kill?
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
ebwop: why koshi? why not artanis or dandel or rainbows or stutters who have done exactly the same thing? what makes koshi stand out?
|
On July 24 2013 20:48 ShiaoPi wrote:
ebwop: why koshi? why not artanis or dandel or rainbows or stutters who have done exactly the same thing? what makes koshi stand out?
I answered 2 questions already.
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
On July 24 2013 20:50 Malongo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2013 20:48 ShiaoPi wrote:
ebwop: why koshi? why not artanis or dandel or rainbows or stutters who have done exactly the same thing? what makes koshi stand out? I answered 2 questions already.
and that makes you unable to answer more questions?
No to koshi right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
