Basterd Mini Mafia - Page 132

On July 09 2013 18:18 marvellosity wrote:
why did the game end? didn't town have 3 votes on s0lstice first?

edit: Vivax fucked it up by not voting, or?

On July 09 2013 21:20 Lazermonkey wrote:
GG wp scum.

What do you guys think of my play?

I don't think this game was so scum favoured tbh, maybe slightly but town didn't really play that well.

WoS, I seriously belive you played survivor the "wrong" way. First off, as marv said earlier, you can die in two ways, either by lynch or by scum shooting you. One of these you can control, the other you cannot. TBH, the theory behind playing survivor should be kinda easy, at least in this setup..

1. Claim survivor. Scum now know you are survivor so they will not shoot you, the only way you can die is by getting lynched.
2. Play for town. Town now knows you are either scum or survivor and by playing for town you eliminate the risk of getting lynched.

If scum is winning, then take that as a nice bonus. But always play for town. This is at least my thoughts on the matter-

On July 09 2013 23:15 Stutters695 wrote:


I think he played pretty well because as soon as he saves someone he's pro town in my eyes and I have to shoot him. Sure we waste 1kp, but after a save he's demonstrated that he's pro town and I'd rather take the chance on being absolutely sure and not risk getting stopped again and wasting a second anyway. As you saw he was completely safe claiming d2. The only reason he almost got lynched was town indecisiveness about who was scum and the numbers not working in his favor on the second to last day. That probably would be the same scenario if he was pro-town all game too though as it was the best play available for town if they weren't sure between JJD/S0l.

His d2 claim was also really good. We instantly knew he was 3p when he claimed RB and left us with the ability to corroborate his story but we fucked it up.

On July 09 2013 23:30 Lazermonkey wrote:
Well, I almost can get this if you are in a really really tough situation as scum because a survivor is essentially aligned with the team that is doing best at the moment. But at point where it is somewhat equal or if scum is ahead (all this game, for example) I'd say its madness to be aiming on the survivor.

On July 09 2013 23:52 Vivax wrote:
I don't get what this story of throwing the game is.
It wasn't instant majority lynch. There was a countdown in the daypost.

No way I could convince WoS of being scum.
I told Oats that he really improved his D1 play when he said that he (undefined) should have claimed scum earlier.

Best thing would have been if two townies fakeclaimed scum, Oats had the chance.
How did my vote matter, it was all about convincing WoS on who was scum and persuade him to join them.

On July 09 2013 23:53 VayneAuthority wrote:


Not an 100% victory cuz they still had to find scum, but if you just voted when you first came into the thread for s0lstice then he would have reached 3 votes first and would have been lynched.

On July 10 2013 00:05 marvellosity wrote:
Vivax I know you have it in for me and that's fine, but you have to find a way to listen to basic logic and reading the game if I'm in a game with you :/ I was obviously really townie after day 2, the fact you were pushing me after that was mindblowing.

You're not bad at all if you're thinking, but for whatever reason you just decided to stop thinking