| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On June 11 2013 05:47 Hapahauli wrote: It's beyond the point of anti-town. It's just terrible sportsmanship no matter what your alignment, so shut the fuck up and start playing the game. Dude, how is this your problem with my play and not my blatant sheep on your jampi case? Take a chill pill. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On June 11 2013 05:50 Hapahauli wrote: I have a problem with how you're going out of your way to basically attack and piss off a player outside of the context of the game. Like the bolded. What the fuck is the point of the bolded? Does it add to your argument? Does it do anything other than piss people off? It doesn't. And it's been happening over and over again for the last 40 hours. I don't care if you're scum or town, but that shit is unacceptable, and I'd debate mod-killing you if I was hosting this game. I'm just pointing out that the glaring flaw in his logic is on par with my interactions with him. Look, I actually had a pretty strong case against oats when I voted him the second time, Hapa. The fact that he asserted I was scum while at the same time asserting that he can't trust my townread on you because you could be scum pushing me, a non-scum (as opposed to saying he doesn't trust me in general, or any other number of potential problems with the read) is utterly logically inconsistent. If anyone else (barring a few people) made a statement like that, i'd lynch them for it. And in fact, I did vote oats for making something that so clearly couldn't have come from a town mindset, something that was so clearly illogical. Having thought about it though, oats does weird shit like this all the time. He makes basic mistakes all the time-- so it's not reasonable to lynch him based on the idea that he made an illogical claim. I'm giving an explanation as to why I think oats could be town despite my strong case against him earlier. I don't just want to unvote the guy with no explanation. And the fact of the matter is, you're not voting him for the same reason I'm not voting him. Have I been a bit more strident in making my case? sure. And oats, for what it's worth, I'm sorry I called you a jubjub (though you have called me worse this game). I'll do my best to sugar-coat things a bit so hapa can play with me reasonably. There's no need to unnecessarily upset an important town player like him. And hapa, I'd also like to apologize to you for my conduct so far. I'd like to put this behind us. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On June 11 2013 06:00 Hapahauli wrote: You're a college-graduate arguing with a 17-year-old High Schooler from Singapore. Just please keep that in mind before you start something like this again. just for the record I didn't START anything here. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On June 11 2013 06:04 Hapahauli wrote: Anyway BH, I'm suspicious of you because your contributions to this game so far have been incredibly lacking. You've made a town-case on me, launched on what I perceive to be a really bad tunnel of Oats, and made a bunch of one-lined troll remarks. Furthermore, your attitude in pushing Oats seemed like you were more interested in provoking him and pissing him off rather than actually calling him scum and pushing his lynch. Dude, I literally dont' know what to tell you other than that oats started it and I have been reasonable and backed off of him the first time when I realized my initial case was bad. And also, shit man what do you think my goal was to piss oats off and stop him from contributing all the useful stuff he normally does? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On June 11 2013 06:07 GravityMan wrote: Yes, that would be the post, thank you. While you are at it, Blazinghand, are you the type to back down when admonished? Does this Hapahaulli play the role of 'thread police' often? No I usually don't back down when admonished. I don't remember if hapa plays the 'thread police' very often but he seems unusually butthurt this game so just be nice to him. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On June 11 2013 06:08 Stutters695 wrote: Sorry I'm still catching up. What scum slip/how does a rb claim affect it? Don't both sides have a potential roleblock? scumslips don't exist. are we going to have to do this again? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On June 11 2013 04:00 GravityMan wrote: Given recent developments, I find this line of questioning more pertinent than ever. Blazinghand, I ask politely that you respond to the following section of my earlier post. Yeah so basically I initially said this: On June 10 2013 03:22 Blazinghand wrote: I'm not complacent with blindly voting him, but that is because I don't see anyone here as qualified to be mayor except for me, hapa, and VA-- and until I have solid townreads on either of them the only trustworthy one of the lot is me. because coming into this blind I percieved 3 players who I've played with before who are good. Me, hapa, Vayne. The initial statement was "i'd only consider these 3" since they're the only qualified ones. Hapa and me for obvious reasons, vayne because he schooled me last game. Now, I don't know if i came off correctly when I was trying to explain why i was voting hapa and vayne, but basically i was saying "vayne is qualified, but have a townread on hapa". the idea is that i think (or thought, at the time ) of vayne as a good player based on my previous play. As a scum player he looked a lot like a town player, and yeah obviously that wasn't a town game but a guy that smart has gotta make a good town player, right? well apparently not, he claimed cop D1. so yeah, vote hapa | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On June 11 2013 06:15 Hapahauli wrote: That still doesn't change the fact that you've done very little. While you've no doubt made a scene in previous games that you're capable of such things as town on Day 1, it's still terrible play and makes it impossible to reliably read you. Can I expect you to be an active contributor tomorrow? The answer to this question regardless of my alignment is "yes" but for reasonableness' sake, yes, you can expect me to continue to contribute tomorrow. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV 2025
Spirit vs YoungYakov
Rogue vs Nice
Scarlett vs Reynor
TBD vs Clem
uThermal vs Shameless
PiGosaur Cup
WardiTV 2025
MaNa vs Gerald
TBD vs MaxPax
ByuN vs TBD
TBD vs ShoWTimE
OSC
YoungYakov vs Mixu
ForJumy vs TBD
Percival vs TBD
Shameless vs TBD
The PondCast
WardiTV 2025
Cure vs Creator
TBD vs Solar
WardiTV 2025
OSC
CranKy Ducklings
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
