|
WARNING: This game contains RNG. It is definetly possible that you and your team could be favored (or the opposite) by the RNG gods. This is part of the game. If you can't live with that, this game has a high chance of not being for you. (Nobody ever knows with RNG, though.) RNG.
So does that mean I can bitch at you after the game when my team loses because too many vets/not enough vets/newbie scumteam etc?
/in
|
On May 28 2013 01:08 Dandel Ion wrote:Show nested quote +On May 28 2013 00:32 WaveofShadow wrote:WARNING: This game contains RNG. It is definetly possible that you and your team could be favored (or the opposite) by the RNG gods. This is part of the game. If you can't live with that, this game has a high chance of not being for you. (Nobody ever knows with RNG, though.) RNG. So does that mean I can bitch at you after the game when my team loses because too many vets/not enough vets/newbie scumteam etc? /in I didn't even mean that with the RNG warning, though obviously I WILL RNG the teams too. Sure you can bitch, but I'm just gonna tell you that I warned you and not listen to you. This guy. Complains when people doesn't get that he's trolling/kidding and then goes all spr srs just 'cause he's a big bad host.
|
One morrreeeee Wanna dunk me some townies
|
On May 30 2013 09:43 Stutters695 wrote: Lynch WoS first imo. I never get lynched breh
|
On May 31 2013 03:07 Promethelax wrote: /out. really sorry. Prom NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO At least recruit someone of your exact skill calibre and personality before you go!
|
|
ohai guise. I town. Doing some stuff but I'll be around in an hour or less. Less lynch some scum k? K.
|
On June 04 2013 09:20 Stutters695 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2013 08:59 s0Lstice wrote: I think he is saying he doesn't do much on day 1 and wants to see a flip before he puts work in? Yeah that makes sense, same thing he did in les although he was scum there. I need to check if he does that every game. He does (or at least says he does) in pretty much every game yeah. Alignment null. Vayne I hope you ARE scum this game so I can have the pleasure of fitting your head in a noose.
|
On June 04 2013 11:01 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: Hot damn. This is the first game where I've either played with everyone on the list or been in a game hosted by them.
Except for Vayne. Never played with Vayne before
OCD tiem
##Vote: VayneAuthority Or me...?
|
On June 04 2013 11:10 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2013 11:06 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 04 2013 11:01 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: Hot damn. This is the first game where I've either played with everyone on the list or been in a game hosted by them.
Except for Vayne. Never played with Vayne before
OCD tiem
##Vote: VayneAuthority Or me...? Could've sworm I played with you before Narp. Ok setup spec bores me. Wat we do till something happens?
|
On June 04 2013 11:29 Ace wrote:we could randomly start voting people off and see who goes apeshit It doesn't work if you TELL them that's what you're gonna do.
|
On June 04 2013 12:15 Stutters695 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2013 11:27 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 04 2013 11:10 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On June 04 2013 11:06 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 04 2013 11:01 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: Hot damn. This is the first game where I've either played with everyone on the list or been in a game hosted by them.
Except for Vayne. Never played with Vayne before
OCD tiem
##Vote: VayneAuthority Or me...? Could've sworm I played with you before Narp. Ok setup spec bores me. Wat we do till something happens? I haven't really read the scum qt from Les Mis, was JJD active in there despite his lack of posting in the thread? Oooo I like this question. JJD was decently active though I'm not sure he was more active than the points in time he was active in the thread exactly. I would say he was around in the scum QT when we needed him so him lurking is *probably* scum-indicative if we're going all meta on him. It's funny because my bus cases against JJD were pretty damn accurate and I wonder if my mathematical analysis of his posting will follow in this game (it certainly pointed to his activity being scummy in Les). Even so it's way too early to determine if JJD is scum based on activity just yet. (I also probably wouldn't call someone scum based solely on activity anyway.)
|
I may advocate a lurker lynch today. I am aware that people (ie Vivax) have stated their activity may be low but everybody can't be excused. I would not be surprised in the least if 1 or 2 scum are hiding thus far since there has been essentially no reason to post yet. Activity is shit so far and there is nothing useful to talk about yet; as far as I can tell people who have planted their votes have done so with mostly minimal reasoning and if the intent was to generate discussion, well it hasn't really.
Sorry to be a downer but I both love and hate D1 and this game has me leaning towards the hate side, strongly.
Sloosh, is your lurking indicative of you being scum, ie Carnival Cruise?
Rayn, where you at?
JJD having just played scum with me, if you had to evaluate my play thus far, what would you think? Vayne you can answer as well.
|
ACE WTF Y U VOTE ME IM NOT SCUM RRRAARGRAHGAHRGH
Actually, though, got anything interesting to contribute?
|
On June 05 2013 00:28 Ace wrote: not yet. Game seems so blasé right now Fixed that for you.
If the game continued as is, would you be content with a lurker lynch or would you rather attempt to lynch from those who have contributed so far?
|
Ah, discussion created. Excellent. Let's see if I can't add a little input here. Regarding Oats: can't read him worth shit. He trolls heavily with brief moments where he appears to be contributing but I honestly can never tell what he's up to. I'd be tempted to policy lynch if I were that sort of person, but I'm not.
Regarding me: it's been almost 24h into the game and every single game I've played in has had WAY more activity than this by this point. You can call it feigning annoyance if you will but the lack of conversation truly bothers me as I am generally a very high activity player. My advocacy for a lurker lynch is combination that frustration and a conversation-starter and as such, mission accomplished. As far as buddying up to previous scum, look into that as much as you feel like, but it was honestly just asking for people's opinions.
Zephirdd, it seems as though you're looking into my play and taking the absolute worst perspective possible without considering the town motivation behind it whatsoever. Would you consider that good scumhunting?
|
On June 05 2013 04:26 Vivax wrote: Anyway.
First of all, I have three exams in the upcoming weeks, the 10th my oral as addendum to my written exam of today, two other written ones with two other orals, then another written one the 26th without oral.
This is a disclaimer for everyone who will try to judge me on my activity. I should be reading books, not mafia, and I will give my best with the time I have. Judge me on the content of my posts.
If anyone tries to dig up some meta shit or activity argument to push my lynch, they will be claiming scum in the thread, and I will hit them so hard that they will regret herping so hard that they derped.
Now, off to le notions I have to rewrite, I'm slightly drunk sorry.
@ Stutters
Your case against prplhz is that you think he's wrong about what he says in his case, and that he plays differently from his past games. Nothing in what you say proves a scum mentality. You prove he's wrong about Zeph with more meta about Zeph. All your arguments seem to be meta, can you at least find me one that isn't? I absolutely hate this shit. It's arrogant and completely shuts down discussion before it can even be had. Scum BH said something like this in Carnival Cruise regarding prplhz and his meta case on kush which turned out to just be mafia fucking with the thread.
If people want to make meta cases on you they can go right ahead and fucking do it.
Now:
On June 05 2013 03:22 Zephirdd wrote:Show nested quote +On June 05 2013 03:13 WaveofShadow wrote: Ah, discussion created. Excellent. Let's see if I can't add a little input here. Regarding Oats: can't read him worth shit. He trolls heavily with brief moments where he appears to be contributing but I honestly can never tell what he's up to. I'd be tempted to policy lynch if I were that sort of person, but I'm not.
Regarding me: it's been almost 24h into the game and every single game I've played in has had WAY more activity than this by this point. You can call it feigning annoyance if you will but the lack of conversation truly bothers me as I am generally a very high activity player. My advocacy for a lurker lynch is combination that frustration and a conversation-starter and as such, mission accomplished. As far as buddying up to previous scum, look into that as much as you feel like, but it was honestly just asking for people's opinions.
Zephirdd, it seems as though you're looking into my play and taking the absolute worst perspective possible without considering the town motivation behind it whatsoever. Would you consider that good scumhunting? I don't know, its hard to find the townie perspective of your questions. Both the "what do you think of my play" and the lurker lynch consideration were way too early to have a town motivation, when compared to scum motivation for that. Knowing that there is low activity, and the fact that you don't seem to be bringing new things into the table(low post count =/= lack of content), do you consider yours a good town gameplay so far? what do you make of s0lstice's case on jaybondage, for example? Town motivation was literally asking questions of people to try and divine their alignment. Knowing how both JJD and Vayne played scum last game, I was curious if their answers towards my questions would help me figure out anything about the way they would be playing this game. If you choose to ignore this point then that's your prerogative. As far as new things brought, I brought plenty of new things to the table, including the suspicion and discussion towards me. Any discussion is good discussion on D1 even if the subject is somewhat misguided; it will allow people to get reads of me, with which I am fine. I consider my own townplay perfectly good and accomplishing exactly what I have set out to do, whilst being completely transparent in my thought processes in the meantime.
Regarding Solstice's case: The fact that he recognizes himself as occasional lynchbait without going out of his way to correct this is either absolutely awful townplay or scum pre-emptively making excuses. There is no other explanation I can think of and therefore agree with Solstice's and layabout's point. I'm not sure how *pokes with sitck* constitutes meaningless pressure though; it honestly doesn't even look like pressure at all so I find it kind of odd that anyone would be quick to jump on that particular post of jay's. Something very odd going on here though because jay's post after that strikes me as even weirder:
On June 04 2013 11:59 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2013 09:19 layabout wrote:On June 04 2013 09:14 jaybrundage wrote:On June 04 2013 08:28 VayneAuthority wrote:+ Show Spoiler +im all in on 31, spin the wheel m'boy.
I have drank heavily on the past night so I am taking a nap this day. Wake me up when the sun sets. I have been drinking so i will not post for a while + Show Spoiler +pointless pressure Layabout its not even real pressure it seems pretty obvious to me that he was role playing. Havent you ever wanted to poke a drunk with a stick :D Show nested quote +On June 04 2013 09:29 layabout wrote:On June 04 2013 09:22 VayneAuthority wrote:On June 04 2013 09:19 layabout wrote:On June 04 2013 09:14 jaybrundage wrote:On June 04 2013 08:28 VayneAuthority wrote:+ Show Spoiler +im all in on 31, spin the wheel m'boy.
I have drank heavily on the past night so I am taking a nap this day. Wake me up when the sun sets. I have been drinking so i will not post for a while + Show Spoiler +pointless pressure I'm just trollin' around with the theme, I didn't actually drink today nor yesterday. What is your concern jaybrundage? If you say that you arent going to post, pressuring you for a contribution serves no purpose for a townie Also i plan to pressure who ever i want for any reason i want or for no reason at all. How exactly can what Vayne said be interpreted as roleplaying? I get the poking a drunk with a stick but that's a really odd interpretation of what appeared to me to simply be Vayne excusing his play. (The fact that it turned out to be fake means jay somehow already knew this?)
He then goes on to say he can pressure who and how he wants which is probably a towny post on its own, but again, can what he did actually be said to be pressuring at all? A very aggressive stance to take where in my opinion, none was necessary.
There are oddities in jay's play, to be sure, and the main point I agree with of Solstice's is the fact that Jay felt the need to make excuses for his play early on while apparently AWARE of his bad play rather than correct it. I would like to see more from jay himself before making a call. Solstice's case was really just a rehashing and agreement of what layabout had already said so while the point was good, it doesn't really give me any info about Solstice's alignment other than the fact that he is content to sheep others thus far while contributing nothing new of his own.
|
On June 05 2013 05:55 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On June 05 2013 02:25 s0Lstice wrote:Stutters, can you answer your own question? You are voting him (Oats) currently so I assume that you have some reason to think he is more likely to be scum than just a townie not particularly giving a shit. My thinking is I have no idea on his alignment just yet. Generally though being totally careless of the threads opinion of you is a townie trait, so he has that going for now. I gotta say I agree with layabout on jaybrundage. His entry into the thread was filled with trepidation On June 04 2013 09:13 jaybrundage wrote:So im down with the whole claim role thing. But if the scum can also get the roles it doesnt really lead us to any lynches. But i guess the point of it would be transparency and all that jazz. I hate playing with people i never played with before I cant rely on previous experiences Also if anyone has not played with me I would suggest reading a previous game or two I play rather..... unorthodox (I occasionally be hardcore lynchbait D Kinda all over the place but I always feel like day 1 is just typing shit until someone says something questionable. Then the Rage-arguments take place :D It looks to me like he is trying to defuse pressure on him before it even happens. 'I can't rely on previous experiences' is a prepackaged excuse to go light on scum hunting. 'I am occasionally lynch bate' is a prepackaged excuse for looking suspicious. It looks extremely self conscious. This point by layabout too is relevent. On June 04 2013 09:29 layabout wrote:On June 04 2013 09:22 VayneAuthority wrote:On June 04 2013 09:19 layabout wrote:On June 04 2013 09:14 jaybrundage wrote:On June 04 2013 08:28 VayneAuthority wrote:+ Show Spoiler +im all in on 31, spin the wheel m'boy.
I have drank heavily on the past night so I am taking a nap this day. Wake me up when the sun sets. I have been drinking so i will not post for a while + Show Spoiler +pointless pressure I'm just trollin' around with the theme, I didn't actually drink today nor yesterday. What is your concern jaybrundage? If you say that you arent going to post, pressuring you for a contribution serves no purpose for a townie Meaningless pressure. It's a way of looking useful without actually being useful (shit-flinging at somebody who isn't going to be around to take umbrage). This is the direction I want to go. He looks the scummiest of anybody so far. ##vote jaybrundage Maybe you missed the post where i said to go look at previous games. I said that im often lynch bait because its true. As town i often get mislynched. I prefer for people to know this and take at look at my play rather then straight up die as town for my play. Me poking someone with a stick is not pressure. The fact that you have that in your case shows how weak it is. Besides the fact that your just piggy backing of someone elses post. The fact that you think a joke post is the scummiest post as of yet just shows your lack of a real case. #Vote S0lstice No one addresses my post which has said much of the same stuff Vivax did, surprise surprise. AAAANNNNYYWAYYY
Why should we be giving you a free pass exactly if you have acknowledged that you're lynchbait? Why do you continue to play as such?
|
On June 05 2013 06:29 Zephirdd wrote: K I'm back. So, the case vs prplhz was kinda bad. His case on me was kinda sucky too, but there wasn't much going on either. I don't think he is someone to be focused.
Someone to be focused is, however, WoS.
> Complains about thread activity > Only replies to whatever was thrown at him
There are a million methods of bringing in interactions, and his two queries(asking JJD/Vayne and adovcating lurker lynch) were not town methods of bringing in interaction. Any player, scum or town, would answer "null" to his questions; Lurker Lynch would suck here because of the amount of lurkers.
WoS, do you even have any reads? Any posts that strike as scummy instead of stupid? Do you think Vivax might be scum out of that post or do you think it's too early? What do you think of the cases presented in thread? Remember that you don't have to answer everything and you could just tell me to fuck off, but you gotta show your town play! I'm tempted to find you scummy since you are pushing my lynch with no basis whatsoever. You say that I only reply to what is thrown at me yet my very last post before this one was unprovoked as was today's entrance to the thread that you found scummy in the first place.
I have explained the motivation behind everything I've written which is still not good enough for you. I am really not sure what angle you are trying to push, but the more you push it the worse it looks to me. I have a fun little heuristic to go off of, too, and you're ringing them alarm bells, buddeh.
|
Alright you posted before F5ing...I'm willing to take my last post back if you are, good sir.
|
|
|
|