|
Let's play a game... |
On June 07 2013 01:37 Hurndall3 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2013 00:42 TheDavison wrote: H3
The candidates for this lynch are: TomB4, Eccleston and Hurndall3.
You need to step up; because that vote on PT earlier was a load of bullocks.
Are you going to vote Tom or not. I dont like any of those lynches though! Haven't looked into Tom real close but his activity looks pretty town just from glancing at it. Why not PT ;_;
Make your case if you think it's PT,
Look at Tom real close.
Or just keep playing like scum.
|
On June 07 2013 01:37 Hurndall3 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2013 00:42 TheDavison wrote: H3
The candidates for this lynch are: TomB4, Eccleston and Hurndall3.
You need to step up; because that vote on PT earlier was a load of bullocks.
Are you going to vote Tom or not. I dont like any of those lynches though! Haven't looked into Tom real close but his activity looks pretty town just from glancing at it. Why not PT ;_;
On June 04 2013 11:29 Hurndall3 wrote: truth is td and ecc were both way scummier than jp ever was ....
|
yeah I think i changed my mind about those guys
|
right
OK.. I like mccoy reasoning on a.mcgann
Im happy with a team of H3 / TomB4
|
hold up I want to put time into this game but I can't at this moment
|
i dont care H3.
McCoy.. im gonna disappear and come back at lynch deadline.
i dont care who is voted between tom or H3.
|
I'm not convinced on Tom and I sure as shit don't want to be on any lynch with backflip mcgee Davison.
I'll leave my vote right where it is.
Don't like the eccleston lynch either, the fact that its majority is woeful.
|
Back flip? LOL
I said from the start, Tom was my focus.
and by process of elimination at the time, you were my 2nd choice.. and i havnt pushed you. Thats staying true to my intention.
OK, you are not convinced by Tom, yet you haven't challenged a single item I raise.
|
McGann, I am negatively surprised by your approach to this, I have yet to see your arguments for Davis being scum, weighed against the arguments for him being town, which were brought up during D2 before people switched to JP.
|
On June 07 2013 02:22 TheDavison wrote: Back flip? LOL
I said from the start, Tom was my focus.
and by process of elimination at the time, you were my 2nd choice.. and i havnt pushed you. Thats staying true to my intention.
OK, you are not convinced by Tom, yet you haven't challenged a single item I raise.
Yes. Backflip.
Case on H3
Back out of H3
start of case on PT
more on PT
Back out of case on PT, onto Tom
Tell me again how tom was your focus? You have none, you just fling shit in every direction to see what sticks.
|
The thing is that this is majority lynch.
I would tell you to lynch me and flip me as town but I doubt you'd get the support for that. You need 5 votes.
I don't even think Eccleston has 5 votes. I think he has 4.
|
On June 07 2013 02:23 SMcCoy wrote: McGann, I am negatively surprised by your approach to this, I have yet to see your arguments for Davis being scum, weighed against the arguments for him being town, which were brought up during D2 before people switched to JP.
These are the reasons you used to discount Davison:
On June 03 2013 06:05 SMcCoy wrote:If we don't lynch JP the only guy I'll vote today will be HartnellWill, I've grown doubts about Davis cause of this post: Show nested quote +On May 30 2013 23:54 TheDavison wrote: Doc, don't you feel bad for accussing someone of "maybe not reading the thread" when you yourself are clearly not reading the thread. You 'could kill him' someone else 'has a point' you couldn't be less committal if you tried.
Baker, you are right. DocT is one scummy mother fucker. This was right after DrT jumped onto the Trout wagon. If Davison is his scumbuddy, why would he try to disrupt the only way for DrT to save himself? Also, I think this post is really townie, although I don't agree with his conclusion since HW also made clear he would switch onto Trout: Show nested quote +On June 02 2013 04:51 TheDavison wrote: Actually this is interesting, there was a time on page 7-8 where Trout was leading in votes four to three by my count. It was at that time when HWill came in and voted DrT bringing him to four as well. While I was feeling bad on the Hwill voting I really like his timing. I think a scum coming into the thread at that time would try to push the trout lynch and, with a few reasoned arguments could probably actually sway people. Feeling better about Hwill after that read. I'd suggest everyone go look at page 7 and 8 actually. No Davis lynch please. I think we have a false positive here.
If that first quote is so damn townie, where's the vote. No vote, no pressure. Saying one thing (calling DrT scummy) while voting H3, and then proceeding to vote Tom later in the day is scummy. Not town. Scum.
The second quote is a scum doling out a town read, that's easy for scum to do.
|
On June 07 2013 02:35 A McGann wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2013 02:23 SMcCoy wrote: McGann, I am negatively surprised by your approach to this, I have yet to see your arguments for Davis being scum, weighed against the arguments for him being town, which were brought up during D2 before people switched to JP. These are the reasons you used to discount Davison: Show nested quote +On June 03 2013 06:05 SMcCoy wrote:If we don't lynch JP the only guy I'll vote today will be HartnellWill, I've grown doubts about Davis cause of this post: On May 30 2013 23:54 TheDavison wrote: Doc, don't you feel bad for accussing someone of "maybe not reading the thread" when you yourself are clearly not reading the thread. You 'could kill him' someone else 'has a point' you couldn't be less committal if you tried.
Baker, you are right. DocT is one scummy mother fucker. This was right after DrT jumped onto the Trout wagon. If Davison is his scumbuddy, why would he try to disrupt the only way for DrT to save himself? Also, I think this post is really townie, although I don't agree with his conclusion since HW also made clear he would switch onto Trout: On June 02 2013 04:51 TheDavison wrote: Actually this is interesting, there was a time on page 7-8 where Trout was leading in votes four to three by my count. It was at that time when HWill came in and voted DrT bringing him to four as well. While I was feeling bad on the Hwill voting I really like his timing. I think a scum coming into the thread at that time would try to push the trout lynch and, with a few reasoned arguments could probably actually sway people. Feeling better about Hwill after that read. I'd suggest everyone go look at page 7 and 8 actually. No Davis lynch please. I think we have a false positive here. If that first quote is so damn townie, where's the vote. No vote, no pressure. Saying one thing (calling DrT scummy) while voting H3, and then proceeding to vote Tom later in the day is scummy. Not town. Scum. The second quote is a scum doling out a town read, that's easy for scum to do.
Vote or not, Trout just went up to 4 votes when he wrote that. What intention could Davis have had with that post if he's scum? That wagon was DrT's last chance and there was JP, a townie, pushing it, so they should have had some hope for a while. Painting your scumbuddy's only way of escape red isn't exactly a good strat.
H3 was among the last to jump onto the wagon with a reasoning he used previously to defend DrT. THAT's scummy, and that's the reason H3 has to die today. Else he will keep being useless all game long and you won't do anything about it -> gg town, you left alive the only dude who openly played scummy cause he played too scummy to be scum.
|
The same reasoning you're trying to use could be applied to you as well. You AGREED with the points brought against DrT at the time, only to say that you wanted to wait for him to respond to Baker's points before casting your vote, and in the meantime you were asking (I think) PT a question. Where was your vote, McGann? Does that make you scum?
|
My vote was uncast. I was asking Davison a question, which he ignored. I had not decided which way my vote was going for the day.
|
McGann, what's your current stance on the eccleston lynch
|
On June 07 2013 02:53 SMcCoy wrote: McGann, what's your current stance on the eccleston lynch
!!
On June 07 2013 02:18 A McGann wrote: I'm not convinced on Tom and I sure as shit don't want to be on any lynch with backflip mcgee Davison.
I'll leave my vote right where it is.
Don't like the eccleston lynch either, the fact that its majority is woeful.
40 minutes ago. I swear why am I even here, its not like anyone reads anything I write.
|
Just something I took note of on my sheet of paper while analyzing early game (which led me to that question)
You and Eccleston were both very early contributors, but both disappeared when DrT was caught in the crossfire that got him lynched. When me and Baker and Smith raised our suspicion, you didn't post anything for 14 hours, and only came back with that post of yours where you waited for DrT to reply.
You also had replied to Eccleston's last post with "quite the vague answer", but despite his disappearance you lost track of him and preferred to ask Davis a question.
That's why I would like to hear your detailed reasoning for you disliking the Eccleston lynch
|
On June 07 2013 02:45 SMcCoy wrote: H3 was among the last to jump onto the wagon with a reasoning he used previously to defend DrT. THAT's scummy, and that's the reason H3 has to die today.
This is not really true. At first I said his overdefense could just be him wanting to talk about something. Later when i voted for DrT i said actually it does look like a scummy overdefense. The change in my mind was a result of more thoroughly the overdefesnse and the post it was responding to. I don't think that is that scummy.
|
Suuure, you read the same stuff he wrote twice, and once it was just talking about something and once it was overdefense.
You can't play the dumb townie for everything.
|
|
|
|
|
|