EPTOn May 26 2013 05:07 geript wrote:
Vivax is 100% scum. BH is 80% scum. Iamp is 80% scum. Prome I'm less sure on. Yamato is town.
Vivax is 100% scum. BH is 80% scum. Iamp is 80% scum. Prome I'm less sure on. Yamato is town.
[T] Bastard "Mini" Mafia! - Page 60
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Ange777
Germany1164 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
Ange777
Germany1164 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
I think it is scummy because after he dropped his case against Yamato he pushes for a lurker lynch. There have been quite a few interactions this day which should give him some reads and I don't see any reason for prefering to lynch a lurker instead of someone suspicious. Nice OMGUS rather than actually scummy play. Why doesnt he pressure people that are more active than the lurkers as scum? Why is pressuring lurkers scummy? Its early day 1, surely he wants everyone to post right? | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On May 27 2013 00:59 Ange777 wrote: I just wrote down why Vivax is scummy -.- I don't like that he goes for a lurker lynch when there are so many other people to discuss. He did some analysis on mostly Yamato which I liked and if Vivax comes back with some more contribution I will consider another lynch target for today. But for now, it's him. Expound on that. Because so far I've seen you call Oats' case on rayn bad and then a lot of useless complaining about trolling. And then more complaining. I don't really see you discuss people meaningfully, even though there are so many of them to discuss. And no "Oh Mr CC why do you troll" is not meaningful discussion. Discussion about trolling is exactly as worthless as discussion about lurkers, which you seem to see as a scumtell. So tell me why it's not a scumtell for you. Or else. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
Blazinghand (2)[: yamato77 (3): [s]Blazinghand[s], [UON]Sentinel, kitaman27, Vivax, oatsmaster (0): geript (2): ObviousOne, iamperfection ObviousOne (1): Blazinghand raynpelikoneet (1): Oatsmaster kitaman27 (1): Dandel Ion Vivax (1): Ange777 | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Not your stinking ass around here again? Cant you find some dogs to befriend or something? | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18246 Posts
On May 27 2013 01:06 geript wrote: Unofficial Vote Count Blazinghand (2)[: yamato77 (3): oatsmaster (0): geript (2): ObviousOne, iamperfection ObviousOne (1): Blazinghand raynpelikoneet (1): Oatsmaster kitaman27 (1): Dandel Ion Vivax (1): Ange777 | ||
|
Ange777
Germany1164 Posts
On May 27 2013 01:05 Oatsmaster wrote: Nice OMGUS rather than actually scummy play. Why doesnt he pressure people that are more active than the lurkers as scum? Why is pressuring lurkers scummy? Its early day 1, surely he wants everyone to post right? I never said his play sucks. Are you intentionally misrepresenting the facts? It's the fact that he has voiced suspicions on other major targets of the discussion and then after he drops Yamato he does not try to pursue his other suspicions but just proposes to lynch a lurker. I don't have a problem with lynching lurkers per se, it's a) why lynch a lurker when there are others who have behaved suspicious and should give us more information if they flip and b) why ignore your previous suspicions and go for a lurker lynch that makes him scum. | ||
|
Ange777
Germany1164 Posts
On May 27 2013 01:06 Dandel Ion wrote: Expound on that. Because so far I've seen you call Oats' case on rayn bad and then a lot of useless complaining about trolling. And then more complaining. I don't really see you discuss people meaningfully, even though there are so many of them to discuss. And no "Oh Mr CC why do you troll" is not meaningful discussion. Discussion about trolling is exactly as worthless as discussion about lurkers, which you seem to see as a scumtell. So tell me why it's not a scumtell for you. Or else. See the above for why discussion about lurkers is not per se a scumtell for me. I can't really get a discussion going on when the people I have questions for don't answer or are not here ... And I am not discussing trolling. I guess you misunderstood my post. On May 27 2013 00:41 Ange777 wrote: And seriously, why CC? I don't understand why everyone feels like they need to troll this game to the utmost ... This post was for Oats, who has put CC as his third scum read. And I would like to know why he picked CC instead of others who have been trolling like you. And I only complained once about it  | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
I never said his play sucks. Are you intentionally misrepresenting the facts? No. But you are mentioning things that are bad plays and not scummy plays. Where has he voiced suspicions on other major targets? And why lynch yamato if he thinks yamato is town. It seems like you think that dropping yamato as a target is scummy. No, no its not. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
And seriously, why CC? I don't understand why everyone feels like they need to troll this game to the utmost ... [QUOTE]On May 26 2013 12:04 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: [QUOTE]On May 26 2013 12:02 Oatsmaster wrote: [QUOTE]On May 26 2013 12:01 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: [QUOTE]On May 26 2013 11:59 Oatsmaster wrote: [QUOTE]On May 26 2013 11:56 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Have I been called scum yet?[/QUOTE] funnily enough, noooo. [/QUOTE] Okay, who should I vote for Oats and why? [/QUOTE] you should vote for Rayn cause he is a scummy fuck. Also cause he has no objective with his questions and just seems to be bombarding everyone to no clear objective. And he isnt pushing anyone.[/QUOTE] That's entirely suboptimal considering he's my scumbuddy. Can we consider another target, perhaps?[/QUOTE] Really Ange? Really?[/b] | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On May 27 2013 00:41 Ange777 wrote: And seriously, why CC? I don't understand why everyone feels like they need to troll this game to the utmost ... On May 26 2013 12:04 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: That's entirely suboptimal considering he's my scumbuddy. Can we consider another target, perhaps? Really Ange? Really? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On May 26 2013 05:04 iamperfection wrote: kita what did you mean by oats attitude? What are you talking about? What is scummy about it? There is a line between playing trolly, while still getting your way, and playing trolly, while playing as if you aren't even a member of the game. His early posts have been so uninterested in pulling off a lynch to the point where I started to question if he has a post restriction. Since this post, however, I've changed my mind on oats with his more recent posting, which seems to indicate he cares more about the lynch than it first appeared. | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
That said the pressure on ange seems better than the pressure on any of the other people with votes on them, except yammo and maybe rayne? Question for sentinel, Kita, and vivax - could you explain to me why you think he's the right person to be lynching right now? | ||
|
Ange777
Germany1164 Posts
On May 27 2013 01:21 Oatsmaster wrote: No. But you are mentioning things that are bad plays and not scummy plays. Where has he voiced suspicions on other major targets? And why lynch yamato if he thinks yamato is town. It seems like you think that dropping yamato as a target is scummy. No, no its not. No, I don't think dropping yamato as a target is scummy. I have a town read on yamato right now so I can totally understand it if he feels like yamato has gone from a scum to a town read. But Vivax' vote is still on him. On May 26 2013 05:14 Vivax wrote: Although I must say I'm a little suspicious about BH and iamp as well. If geript was good he would have caught it up I would like to hear Vivax elaborate on iamp and BH. And those two to contribute some more as well. BH for example promised to surprise us with an amazing case on ObviousOne which is still missing. Off to dinner now. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On May 27 2013 01:27 kitaman27 wrote: There is a line between playing trolly, while still getting your way, and playing trolly, while playing as if you aren't even a member of the game. His early posts have been so uninterested in pulling off a lynch to the point where I started to question if he has a post restriction. Since this post, however, I've changed my mind on oats with his more recent posting, which seems to indicate he cares more about the lynch than it first appeared. :ooooooo 180s! ERRYDAY. Woop. Who do you wanna lynch kita? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On May 27 2013 01:28 strongandbig wrote: Why are bad people playing like they are good? What the fuck is going on? None of you have earned the right to play like this. Marv and palmar have been setting a bad example but you gotta earn it. That said the pressure on ange seems better than the pressure on any of the other people with votes on them, except yammo and maybe rayne? Question for sentinel, Kita, and vivax - could you explain to me why you think he's the right person to be lynching right now? Nah man, you're wrong. Im really good.  | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On May 27 2013 01:29 Ange777 wrote: No, I don't think dropping yamato as a target is scummy. I have a town read on yamato right now so I can totally understand it if he feels like yamato has gone from a scum to a town read. But Vivax' vote is still on him. Votes not important, actually I tend to leave my votes on dudes as town more than scum cause I dont care until I find another person I think is scum. Treat that as non alignment indicative. Is Vivax still scum after all I said? | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On May 27 2013 01:28 strongandbig wrote: Why are bad people playing like they are good? What the fuck is going on? None of you have earned the right to play like this. Marv and palmar have been setting a bad example but you gotta earn it. That said the pressure on ange seems better than the pressure on any of the other people with votes on them, except yammo and maybe rayne? Question for sentinel, Kita, and vivax - could you explain to me why you think he's the right person to be lynching right now? who r u | ||
| ||
