|
sadjfkskre4w5ewq78qyaznmnarqyuqyaamu1qqyt13eadyuayazuaaqkreutrtyzcvmznvb
|
Oats, i never said i wanted to lynch a cohost. I wanted to know why Vivax asked a role specifically from Palmar and Acro commented that he's responsible from Vivax' role. Don't you think that's odd at all? Kita wanted to lynch cohosts at the beginning. Then he said he wanted to lynch other people and not cohosts. I wondered why the sudden change of mind. I missed the fact that apparently(?) cohosts can't be lynched.
Your case is bad. Useless people who still "contribute" should be lynched as they have a clear mafia motivation.
At this point i want to lynch into Vivax/hopeless/BH. I'll make a decision tonight when i reread.
|
Hey guys. Sorry for the inactivity as I was super busy these last two days, I am catching up now.
|
Okay, so I am trying to understand this game ... some things I noticed while reading:
@Vivax:
On May 25 2013 20:22 Vivax wrote:
Actually I think BH and yamato might both be scum trying to shit into the thread as much as possible. Fun, but neither of them needs to play like that to achieve their goals. You can't persuade scum and you don't have to persuade one townie if it's the only guy who wants to lynch you.
On May 25 2013 22:06 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On May 25 2013 21:53 kitaman27 wrote:On May 25 2013 18:16 yamato77 wrote:
Now that there's actually a game, there are a ton of lurky fucks, myself included. On May 25 2013 18:27 yamato77 wrote:
I'll fully admit to not really reading the thread too much before now, because the trolling is difficult to sift through. Now that I have the motivation to do stuff, things are a little clearer. Yamato opens his series of posts stating that activity has been poor so far this game. If he is town, it would establish the idea that a town player may not be motivated to post much so far, so activity this early in the game probably wouldn't be a good foundation to build your scum reads upon. On May 25 2013 18:46 yamato77 wrote:
BHs filter is really, really bad. At no point does he seem at all interested in people's alignments. On May 25 2013 19:17 yamato77 wrote:
My analysis is "you aren't doing shit and don't seem to be looking for mafia" However, that seems to be the exact reasoning that he comes out with his scum read on BH. Knowing that the exact same argument could have been used against him moments earlier, it seems to me that he is looking for someone that he could push, rather than hunting for mafia. On May 25 2013 19:23 yamato77 wrote:
Whatever. It's clear to anyone reading that I'm trying to figure out the game On May 25 2013 18:58 yamato77 wrote:
No, but I have to prod you toward contributing to the hunt at some point. People are doing nothing and I really hate losing. These posts make me think that yamato cares about looking good to others, rather than having a natural town motivation to scum hunt. You could say he's trying to look good, you could also say he's trying to get BH to play differently. Where do you draw the line? It's always possible that a townie does something he was himself guilty of earlier. If he hinders his own scumhunting by ignoring scummy things he has done himself it's going to do him no good, it would only be self-serving. Aside from that, I see his first two sentences as an early disclaimer for not having a grasp of the whole game due to the initial chaos, that's something different than he's criticizing about BH, which is an attitude apparently unmotivated to scumhunt. Note that I'm citing yamato here, not myself, I'd rather give an own impression of BH's play once I feel like.
On May 26 2013 05:46 Vivax wrote:I'm rereading the whole situation cause I only had skimmed it earlier putting it away as a bunch of omgus, but some of your arguments were truly strange, yamato, the co-host thing is not a good argument, and you backpedaling in front of Oats saying it was useless anyway strikes me kinda as strange, too. Nontheless, you proceed to call BH scum when he mocks you, then you say you're not sure. I'm actually not sure about both of you but you should not use your pride to make reads, if you're town. It only makes you look terrible. Show nested quote +On May 25 2013 18:49 yamato77 wrote:On May 21 2013 07:38 Blazinghand wrote:
##vote: Ange777 for cohost. She's a very solid co-host, and it would be a great practical joke to make her have to host the first game she's /inned for for a long time of just hosting. On May 21 2013 16:52 Ange777 wrote:
##Vote: Blazinghand for cohost so that the poor guy won't end up dead again in the early stages of a mafia game because no one likes to play with him <3 It's worth noting that both of these players voted for the other for cohost and both of them are lurky and non-contributing. 2 solid scum reads already. Show nested quote +On May 25 2013 19:00 yamato77 wrote:On May 25 2013 18:58 Oatsmaster wrote:
It's worth noting that both of these players voted for the other for cohost and both of them are lurky and non-contributing. 2 solid scum reads already.
This seems extremely tenuos. How is the cohost election in anyway alignment indicative? Why not just randomly pick a cohost as both alignments like what we did? Makes no sense Yamato. It's just weird. I guess I should just ignore the whole cohost election? It seems mostly useless anyway, I suppose.
At first you put Yamato down as a scum read, then it seems as if you are trying to explain his behaviour towards BH (it looks a bit like a soft defense to me) and in the end you go back to reproving Yamato for his poor play. What's your stance on him? In the latest post you say you are not sure but isn't your vote still on him?
|
@Oatsmaster:
I don't like your case on rayn.
On May 26 2013 10:57 Oatsmaster wrote:Guys. Thoughts on Rayn, who has used the excuse of being 'useless' to want to lynch me, even though he knows that me being 'useless' is me being town like in LXI. Show nested quote +On May 25 2013 08:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:Okay. I don't understand why Vivax asked a role specifically from Palmar. I also don't understand why Acro commented that in a way he did. There is at least one scum in Palmar/Vivax/Acro (Palmar the least) or Vivax and/or Acro are trolling hard. But this is still a mafia game, so lynch one of them. Vivax seemed to think the Day 0 election was in fact a lynch and wanted to lynch/elect Hopeless as "it would not matter". lol. Also he said "Palmar will probably be modkilled".. wtf?? Vivax why is Acro scum cohost? Hopeless came on with this: On May 23 2013 21:35 Hopeless1der wrote:further to the above: On May 19 2013 02:54 iGrok wrote:
As promised, with the 10th signup, here is a bit of setup info:
Co-host Elections will take place AFTER alignments have been revealed, but before the game officially starts. There will be one cohost popularly elected, and one cohost randomly selected from the faction that Cohost #1 was not, ensuring one Town cohost and one Mafia cohost. These two demigods will be responsible for arming you to the teeth to do battle for my amusement. If you believe you can discern alignment based on who tried to get "their" cohost elected, be my guest. Otherwise roll with it, enjoy the spoilers and have fun. This is dumb and does not say anything. What are you trying to say with this? Because i get the feeling you know something i don't.. Oats is useless and if he continues to do so i wanna lynch him. kitaman: On May 23 2013 09:55 kitaman27 wrote:
All I know is that I plan on blitz lynching the co-hosts after they get elected since its like a guaranteed opposite parity check. The wording also kinda confirms that there are only two factions. I asked him who would he lynch now: On May 24 2013 21:51 kitaman27 wrote:yamato for the terrible slip. Maybe Prom for making me think I'd actually get a vote in an election, then ripping my heart out  Hurry up and give me my incredibly imbalanced role! Why not Acro/Palmar? Why the sudden change of mind? yamato why did you claim scum? geript also looks bad, dunno what to think of him because i basically ignored him on LXI after marv stuff. Case on This whole post makes 0 sense. None whatsover. Why is he putting so much into lynching 'cohosts'? Rayn is an experienced player. He knows that in a normal game, you dont lynch cohosts, so other experienced players talking about it is just joking around. Why does he post this post then? ##Vote: Rayn
Your suspicions seem to be based on the fact that rayn should know better instead of doubting kita's reasoning on why he would refrain from lynching the hosts as they are unlynchable.
It is my first time playing a bastard game and until know the only thing I am sure of is to take everything the hosts post with a grain of salt. I see no reason why rayn would not ask for an explicit explanation for kita's change of heart. And I feel like your post was just trying to demonstrate activity by nitpicking.
|
I want to lynch kitaman.
##vote and shizzles
|
On May 26 2013 21:17 Ange777 wrote:@Oatsmaster: I don't like your case on rayn. Show nested quote +On May 26 2013 10:57 Oatsmaster wrote:Guys. Thoughts on Rayn, who has used the excuse of being 'useless' to want to lynch me, even though he knows that me being 'useless' is me being town like in LXI. On May 25 2013 08:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:Okay. I don't understand why Vivax asked a role specifically from Palmar. I also don't understand why Acro commented that in a way he did. There is at least one scum in Palmar/Vivax/Acro (Palmar the least) or Vivax and/or Acro are trolling hard. But this is still a mafia game, so lynch one of them. Vivax seemed to think the Day 0 election was in fact a lynch and wanted to lynch/elect Hopeless as "it would not matter". lol. Also he said "Palmar will probably be modkilled".. wtf?? Vivax why is Acro scum cohost? Hopeless came on with this: On May 23 2013 21:35 Hopeless1der wrote:further to the above: On May 19 2013 02:54 iGrok wrote:
As promised, with the 10th signup, here is a bit of setup info:
Co-host Elections will take place AFTER alignments have been revealed, but before the game officially starts. There will be one cohost popularly elected, and one cohost randomly selected from the faction that Cohost #1 was not, ensuring one Town cohost and one Mafia cohost. These two demigods will be responsible for arming you to the teeth to do battle for my amusement. If you believe you can discern alignment based on who tried to get "their" cohost elected, be my guest. Otherwise roll with it, enjoy the spoilers and have fun. This is dumb and does not say anything. What are you trying to say with this? Because i get the feeling you know something i don't.. Oats is useless and if he continues to do so i wanna lynch him. kitaman: On May 23 2013 09:55 kitaman27 wrote:
All I know is that I plan on blitz lynching the co-hosts after they get elected since its like a guaranteed opposite parity check. The wording also kinda confirms that there are only two factions. I asked him who would he lynch now: On May 24 2013 21:51 kitaman27 wrote:yamato for the terrible slip. Maybe Prom for making me think I'd actually get a vote in an election, then ripping my heart out Hurry up and give me my incredibly imbalanced role! Why not Acro/Palmar? Why the sudden change of mind? yamato why did you claim scum? geript also looks bad, dunno what to think of him because i basically ignored him on LXI after marv stuff. Case on This whole post makes 0 sense. None whatsover. Why is he putting so much into lynching 'cohosts'? Rayn is an experienced player. He knows that in a normal game, you dont lynch cohosts, so other experienced players talking about it is just joking around. Why does he post this post then? ##Vote: Rayn Your suspicions seem to be based on the fact that rayn should know better instead of doubting kita's reasoning on why he would refrain from lynching the hosts as they are unlynchable. It is my first time playing a bastard game and until know the only thing I am sure of is to take everything the hosts post with a grain of salt. I see no reason why rayn would not ask for an explicit explanation for kita's change of heart. And I feel like your post was just trying to demonstrate activity by nitpicking.
Wrong.
His points are total bullshit and he should feel bad. Super bad. Or scum.
When people do stuff like this, they are either new, or scum. Rayn isnt new.
So you and him scumteam, OK?
Ok.
And CC. .
Dandel, can you explain why kita is scum, or is your mind too small to explain anything?
|
On May 26 2013 21:27 Dandel Ion wrote:
I want to lynch kitaman.
##vote and shizzles
Why? Because of this?
On May 26 2013 04:54 Dandel Ion wrote:
Also kita's weird "make me cohost and kill us both to trade 1-1" sounds like the exact same shit he pulled in themed and people actually were less willing to lynch his scummy ass for it (why) so he must think it works now and i bet he thinks it's supposed to be a really townie thing to say too so i attribute a repeat performance to similarity in alignment because he wants to say townish things instead of actually being town to cover up how hes not town
discuss
punctuation is for pussies
discuss
|
On May 26 2013 21:30 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On May 26 2013 21:17 Ange777 wrote:@Oatsmaster: I don't like your case on rayn. On May 26 2013 10:57 Oatsmaster wrote:Guys. Thoughts on Rayn, who has used the excuse of being 'useless' to want to lynch me, even though he knows that me being 'useless' is me being town like in LXI. On May 25 2013 08:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:Okay. I don't understand why Vivax asked a role specifically from Palmar. I also don't understand why Acro commented that in a way he did. There is at least one scum in Palmar/Vivax/Acro (Palmar the least) or Vivax and/or Acro are trolling hard. But this is still a mafia game, so lynch one of them. Vivax seemed to think the Day 0 election was in fact a lynch and wanted to lynch/elect Hopeless as "it would not matter". lol. Also he said "Palmar will probably be modkilled".. wtf?? Vivax why is Acro scum cohost? Hopeless came on with this: On May 23 2013 21:35 Hopeless1der wrote:further to the above: On May 19 2013 02:54 iGrok wrote:
As promised, with the 10th signup, here is a bit of setup info:
Co-host Elections will take place AFTER alignments have been revealed, but before the game officially starts. There will be one cohost popularly elected, and one cohost randomly selected from the faction that Cohost #1 was not, ensuring one Town cohost and one Mafia cohost. These two demigods will be responsible for arming you to the teeth to do battle for my amusement. If you believe you can discern alignment based on who tried to get "their" cohost elected, be my guest. Otherwise roll with it, enjoy the spoilers and have fun. This is dumb and does not say anything. What are you trying to say with this? Because i get the feeling you know something i don't.. Oats is useless and if he continues to do so i wanna lynch him. kitaman: On May 23 2013 09:55 kitaman27 wrote:
All I know is that I plan on blitz lynching the co-hosts after they get elected since its like a guaranteed opposite parity check. The wording also kinda confirms that there are only two factions. I asked him who would he lynch now: On May 24 2013 21:51 kitaman27 wrote:yamato for the terrible slip. Maybe Prom for making me think I'd actually get a vote in an election, then ripping my heart out Hurry up and give me my incredibly imbalanced role! Why not Acro/Palmar? Why the sudden change of mind? yamato why did you claim scum? geript also looks bad, dunno what to think of him because i basically ignored him on LXI after marv stuff. Case on This whole post makes 0 sense. None whatsover. Why is he putting so much into lynching 'cohosts'? Rayn is an experienced player. He knows that in a normal game, you dont lynch cohosts, so other experienced players talking about it is just joking around. Why does he post this post then? ##Vote: Rayn Your suspicions seem to be based on the fact that rayn should know better instead of doubting kita's reasoning on why he would refrain from lynching the hosts as they are unlynchable. It is my first time playing a bastard game and until know the only thing I am sure of is to take everything the hosts post with a grain of salt. I see no reason why rayn would not ask for an explicit explanation for kita's change of heart. And I feel like your post was just trying to demonstrate activity by nitpicking. Wrong. His points are total bullshit and he should feel bad. Super bad. Or scum. When people do stuff like this, they are either new, or scum. Rayn isnt new. So you and him scumteam, OK? Ok. And CC. . Dandel, can you explain why kita is scum, or is your mind too small to explain anything?
So rayn and I are scum for the above. Why CC?
|
Oats are you doing that thing again where you soft accuse a whole bunch of people so when one of them flips scum you can look like you contributed?
|
On May 26 2013 21:47 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
Oats are you doing that thing again where you soft accuse a whole bunch of people so when one of them flips scum you can look like you contributed?
No Im doing this thing again where I soft accuse a whole bunch of people and lynch scum. Duhhhhhhh.
|
On May 26 2013 21:34 Ange777 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 26 2013 21:30 Oatsmaster wrote:On May 26 2013 21:17 Ange777 wrote:@Oatsmaster: I don't like your case on rayn. On May 26 2013 10:57 Oatsmaster wrote:Guys. Thoughts on Rayn, who has used the excuse of being 'useless' to want to lynch me, even though he knows that me being 'useless' is me being town like in LXI. On May 25 2013 08:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:Okay. I don't understand why Vivax asked a role specifically from Palmar. I also don't understand why Acro commented that in a way he did. There is at least one scum in Palmar/Vivax/Acro (Palmar the least) or Vivax and/or Acro are trolling hard. But this is still a mafia game, so lynch one of them. Vivax seemed to think the Day 0 election was in fact a lynch and wanted to lynch/elect Hopeless as "it would not matter". lol. Also he said "Palmar will probably be modkilled".. wtf?? Vivax why is Acro scum cohost? Hopeless came on with this: On May 23 2013 21:35 Hopeless1der wrote:further to the above: On May 19 2013 02:54 iGrok wrote:
As promised, with the 10th signup, here is a bit of setup info:
Co-host Elections will take place AFTER alignments have been revealed, but before the game officially starts. There will be one cohost popularly elected, and one cohost randomly selected from the faction that Cohost #1 was not, ensuring one Town cohost and one Mafia cohost. These two demigods will be responsible for arming you to the teeth to do battle for my amusement. If you believe you can discern alignment based on who tried to get "their" cohost elected, be my guest. Otherwise roll with it, enjoy the spoilers and have fun. This is dumb and does not say anything. What are you trying to say with this? Because i get the feeling you know something i don't.. Oats is useless and if he continues to do so i wanna lynch him. kitaman: On May 23 2013 09:55 kitaman27 wrote:
All I know is that I plan on blitz lynching the co-hosts after they get elected since its like a guaranteed opposite parity check. The wording also kinda confirms that there are only two factions. I asked him who would he lynch now: On May 24 2013 21:51 kitaman27 wrote:yamato for the terrible slip. Maybe Prom for making me think I'd actually get a vote in an election, then ripping my heart out Hurry up and give me my incredibly imbalanced role! Why not Acro/Palmar? Why the sudden change of mind? yamato why did you claim scum? geript also looks bad, dunno what to think of him because i basically ignored him on LXI after marv stuff. Case on This whole post makes 0 sense. None whatsover. Why is he putting so much into lynching 'cohosts'? Rayn is an experienced player. He knows that in a normal game, you dont lynch cohosts, so other experienced players talking about it is just joking around. Why does he post this post then? ##Vote: Rayn Your suspicions seem to be based on the fact that rayn should know better instead of doubting kita's reasoning on why he would refrain from lynching the hosts as they are unlynchable. It is my first time playing a bastard game and until know the only thing I am sure of is to take everything the hosts post with a grain of salt. I see no reason why rayn would not ask for an explicit explanation for kita's change of heart. And I feel like your post was just trying to demonstrate activity by nitpicking. Wrong. His points are total bullshit and he should feel bad. Super bad. Or scum. When people do stuff like this, they are either new, or scum. Rayn isnt new. So you and him scumteam, OK? Ok. And CC. . Dandel, can you explain why kita is scum, or is your mind too small to explain anything? So rayn and I are scum for the above. Why CC?
Cause you arent reading the fucking thread. Read it.
Ange, since you nicely defended Rayn, who do you wanna lynch?
|
Right now I am most concerned with Vivax <-> geript. I would like to see both players explain their thought process better. And I don't see you refering to CC as a scum read in your filter. So what should I have read to explain your CC scum read?
|
On May 26 2013 21:32 Ange777 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 26 2013 21:27 Dandel Ion wrote:
I want to lynch kitaman.
##vote and shizzles Why? Because of this? Show nested quote +On May 26 2013 04:54 Dandel Ion wrote:
Also kita's weird "make me cohost and kill us both to trade 1-1" sounds like the exact same shit he pulled in themed and people actually were less willing to lynch his scummy ass for it (why) so he must think it works now and i bet he thinks it's supposed to be a really townie thing to say too so i attribute a repeat performance to similarity in alignment because he wants to say townish things instead of actually being town to cover up how hes not town
discuss
punctuation is for pussies
discuss
And because he has a doubled 7 in his name.
That's almost as bad as potato.
|
On May 26 2013 22:04 Ange777 wrote:
Right now I am most concerned with Vivax <-> geript. I would like to see both players explain their thought process better. And I don't see you refering to CC as a scum read in your filter. So what should I have read to explain your CC scum read?
Why are you looking at my filter and not the past 3 pages. GIRRLLLL Why are you not reading the thread/??????????
What about Vivax and geript concerns you.
|
On May 26 2013 22:09 Dandel Ion wrote:Show nested quote +On May 26 2013 21:32 Ange777 wrote:On May 26 2013 21:27 Dandel Ion wrote:
I want to lynch kitaman.
##vote and shizzles Why? Because of this? On May 26 2013 04:54 Dandel Ion wrote:
Also kita's weird "make me cohost and kill us both to trade 1-1" sounds like the exact same shit he pulled in themed and people actually were less willing to lynch his scummy ass for it (why) so he must think it works now and i bet he thinks it's supposed to be a really townie thing to say too so i attribute a repeat performance to similarity in alignment because he wants to say townish things instead of actually being town to cover up how hes not town
discuss
punctuation is for pussies
discuss And because he has a doubled 7 in his name. That's almost as bad as potato.
Stfu potato is master fruit
|
On May 26 2013 22:11 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On May 26 2013 22:04 Ange777 wrote:
Right now I am most concerned with Vivax <-> geript. I would like to see both players explain their thought process better. And I don't see you refering to CC as a scum read in your filter. So what should I have read to explain your CC scum read? Why are you looking at my filter and not the past 3 pages. GIRRLLLL Why are you not reading the thread/?????????? What about Vivax and geript concerns you.
You don't want people reading your filter.
Noted.
|
On May 26 2013 22:13 Dandel Ion wrote:Show nested quote +On May 26 2013 22:11 Oatsmaster wrote:On May 26 2013 22:04 Ange777 wrote:
Right now I am most concerned with Vivax <-> geript. I would like to see both players explain their thought process better. And I don't see you refering to CC as a scum read in your filter. So what should I have read to explain your CC scum read? Why are you looking at my filter and not the past 3 pages. GIRRLLLL Why are you not reading the thread/?????????? What about Vivax and geript concerns you. You don't want people reading your filter. Noted.
You cant read man. Illiterate Austrian scum.
|
Oh, you meant CC's recent posts? I assumed you had mentinoned him previously. Fair enough, although I don't really see any difference between his trolling and for example Dandel's latest post ... In fact, there is no real content in Dandel's filter either is there? Just a lot of trolling and aggressive statements. So why not pick Dandel over CC?
To be honest, I don't know what to make of the accusations made between Vivax and geript. At the moment I am inclined to give geript a slight town read but I really do hope he steps up his contributions. I am not sure about geript's case on Vivax though. Vivax did spend a lot of time discussing some major targets of this day but in the end he didn't really give any conclusion and just dropped his case against Yamato. If I were not sure about my suspected target's alignment, I would try to get more information instead of suggesting some lurker lynches.
|
Yeah I'm now fine with lynching Ange too for playing the game of "try your best to find a "better" policy-lynch than yourself" instead of "try to find scum"
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
