|
On June 06 2013 12:57 Umasi wrote: ##VOTE iVLosK!
Why are you asking to be voted upon this early?
FOS's are weak and can be easily backed down from.
I like for my accusers to put their money where their mouth is.
|
On June 06 2013 13:05 iVLosK! wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2013 12:57 Umasi wrote: ##VOTE iVLosK!
Why are you asking to be voted upon this early? I think that what you're doing is antagonistic. I think that, if you were townie, you'd voice concern about these weak FOS's, try to correct them, and develop reads on us based on that. You didn't correct them....You're asking for votes on you. That's confusing, and not wise no matter the case. You wouldn't be poking the fire if you were town, and scum wants to poke the fire. Or at least, you wouldn't have motivation to poke the fire as town, but you would as scum. If mafia want to sow confusion, why are you doing something I think is scum-like, if you are town? Since I feel confused, I'm feeling even more of a scum read on you, so my vote rests. First underline: Ask that other guy from OMGUS who my vote is on. I give literally zero fucks about your FOS's. In my original post where I "excused myself for future scumminess" or whatever, I was simply stating that I'll do what I want regardless of what you think is scummy. If I don't want to vote for a lurker, I won't. And if I feel like voting for a lurker, bet your fine ass that I will. Regardless of what I've said in the past. Second underline: Maybe you should adjust what you think is "scum-like." I would suggest it, actually. If you and I are going to be friends. I would like to be friends. Also "since I feel confused, you are therefore scum." is literally the dumbest thing that I have ever heard in my life. And I actually laughed quietly to myself upon reading it. First of all, thanks for saying something other than brofists as a response. Second, your second underline: I'll make this clear. Scum want to sow confusion and get emotional. I think brofists is an emotional term. Scum want to sow confusion, and you did not do something to figure things out, you, as I said, "poked the fire". Don't try to say that's not what scum want to do, that's the entire POINT of what scum wants to do. I'm not sure you're scum, but I think you've a better chance of flipping scum than anyone else here at this point.
And I still think you were trying to excuse yourself for future scumminess, which I dislike.
|
On June 06 2013 13:09 Xzavier wrote: You still havnt given a pro-town motivation for defending lurkers. and imo there isnt one. lurking hurts the town. says so in every guide iv read. And sometimes lurkers are town and you end up using your lynch on a townie instead of finding scum. Says so in every logic I've read.
I didn't say "I'll never vote for a lurker." I said "This is a noob game, there are going to be lots of lurkers, I will use my own discretion regardless of activity levels."
|
I was at first to. but the more he posts the less pro-town he gets. he could b the fucking SK for all i know.
|
Nononono. you always look for scum. if nobody is finding any you lynch a lurker. thats what iv been trying to say. lynching scum es priority one
|
Vote SlaveCount
LoneMeow (0): Umasi Skanjab1s (1): iVLosK! iVLosK! (2): Xzavier, Umasi
iVLosk! is currently set to be lynched. Voting is mandatory. This is a plurality lynch. The deadline is at [unparsable timestamp format], in [unparsable timestamp format]
If there's a mistake, let me know!
|
On June 06 2013 13:11 Umasi wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2013 13:05 iVLosK! wrote:On June 06 2013 12:57 Umasi wrote: ##VOTE iVLosK!
Why are you asking to be voted upon this early? I think that what you're doing is antagonistic. I think that, if you were townie, you'd voice concern about these weak FOS's, try to correct them, and develop reads on us based on that. You didn't correct them....You're asking for votes on you. That's confusing, and not wise no matter the case. You wouldn't be poking the fire if you were town, and scum wants to poke the fire. Or at least, you wouldn't have motivation to poke the fire as town, but you would as scum. If mafia want to sow confusion, why are you doing something I think is scum-like, if you are town? Since I feel confused, I'm feeling even more of a scum read on you, so my vote rests. First underline: Ask that other guy from OMGUS who my vote is on. I give literally zero fucks about your FOS's. In my original post where I "excused myself for future scumminess" or whatever, I was simply stating that I'll do what I want regardless of what you think is scummy. If I don't want to vote for a lurker, I won't. And if I feel like voting for a lurker, bet your fine ass that I will. Regardless of what I've said in the past. Second underline: Maybe you should adjust what you think is "scum-like." I would suggest it, actually. If you and I are going to be friends. I would like to be friends. Also "since I feel confused, you are therefore scum." is literally the dumbest thing that I have ever heard in my life. And I actually laughed quietly to myself upon reading it. First of all, thanks for saying something other than brofists as a response. Second, your second underline: I'll make this clear. Scum want to sow confusion and get emotional. I think brofists is an emotional term. Scum want to sow confusion, and you did not do something to figure things out, you, as I said, "poked the fire". Don't try to say that's not what scum want to do, that's the entire POINT of what scum wants to do. I'm not sure you're scum, but I think you've a better chance of flipping scum than anyone else here at this point. And I still think you were trying to excuse yourself for future scumminess, which I dislike. 1. I wasn't the one who used the term brofists, I believe that was Xzavier.
2. I don't think my remarks were particularly confusing. I said, and bear with me, this must be the 4th time. "I don't like lynching lurkers in a noob game. But I will lynch the fuck out of some lurkers if I feel like they're scum." And then I said "I don't really care if you think this is scummy." The fact that you find that confusing really isn't my fault.
3. Then we can't be friends then.
|
Where the fuck is my OMGUS friend?
|
On June 06 2013 13:12 Xzavier wrote: I was at first to. but the more he posts the less pro-town he gets. he could b the fucking SK for all i know. Some scum players play aggressively. I'm really not seeing the gain for scum (or sk) in drawing early attention, pushing for reactions, etc.
On the other hand, pushing players for reactions is something town players should want to do.
In a regular game I'd be looking around to see who stopped posting when the brouhaha started. In a newbie game, not so much. Scum players sometimes feel uncertain when the game thread suddenly takes off or changes direction, and wait to see where town players go with things before jumping back in.
|
On June 06 2013 13:12 Xzavier wrote: I was at first to. but the more he posts the less pro-town he gets. he could b the fucking SK for all i know.
Haha this actually makes sense. It doesnt seem he is pro town or pro mafia. But if he is mafia I am confused so he did his job well...
|
On June 06 2013 13:19 Onegu wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2013 13:12 Xzavier wrote: I was at first to. but the more he posts the less pro-town he gets. he could b the fucking SK for all i know. Haha this actually makes sense. It doesnt seem he is pro town or pro mafia. But if he is mafia I am confused so he did his job well... Yes... Yes. I am now in possession of the majority of votes. Everything is going exactly according to my nefarious plan.
|
On June 06 2013 13:04 Firere345 wrote: Wait guys, this seems too easy. Is there a jester or other role that wins from being lynched? The setup is a semi-open setup for 13 players; that is, all the possible roles are given but the number of each is not known. Not all of the roles will necessarily be present. If a role is not in the OP, it's not possible for it to be in the game.
|
You're right, brofists was not a term you coined. You ran with it though. Even aside from brofists, I think that telling us to vote you is stupid. Scum? maybe! stupid? yes! WHY WOULD YOU WANT TO BE VOTED. I DO NOT THINK THERE IS A JESTER if you want us to put our money where our mouth is, and we are, and you aren't responding to our "money", then what are we supposed to think? I'm going to back up and reread everything in this exchange to make sure I'm not overlooking something, but my feeling on you keeps growing scummier, just because of the tone of your responses. There is a possibility I'm just awful! or overlooking something! so I'll go reread.
I do not think that talking about lurkers is important with iV, just what has resulted from it.
|
On June 06 2013 13:01 Onegu wrote: can lurkers be replaced after thier ban? Hopefully I won't have to modkill. If it is necessary, I may or may not replace, depending on situation, availability of replacements, etc. etc.
|
ebwop: apparently no jester, so why would you want to be voted.
|
fferyllt and Onegu. You guys are saying you think Im scum but your votes aren't on me. I don't like that shit, throw 'em on.
|
On June 06 2013 13:23 iVLosK! wrote: fferyllt and Onegu. You guys are saying you think Im scum but your votes aren't on me. I don't like that shit, throw 'em on. The hell I am. I'm saying I am leaning town on you, brah.
|
On June 06 2013 13:22 Umasi wrote: You're right, brofists was not a term you coined. You ran with it though. Even aside from brofists, I think that telling us to vote you is stupid. Scum? maybe! stupid? yes! WHY WOULD YOU WANT TO BE VOTED. I DO NOT THINK THERE IS A JESTER if you want us to put our money where our mouth is, and we are, and you aren't responding to our "money", then what are we supposed to think? I'm going to back up and reread everything in this exchange to make sure I'm not overlooking something, but my feeling on you keeps growing scummier, just because of the tone of your responses. There is a possibility I'm just awful! or overlooking something! so I'll go reread.
I do not think that talking about lurkers is important with iV, just what has resulted from it. 1. No but you've responded to me. Which is all I need, silly billy.
2. This is a distinct possibility.
|
On June 06 2013 13:23 iVLosK! wrote: fferyllt and Onegu. You guys are saying you think Im scum but your votes aren't on me. I don't like that shit, throw 'em on. I never said you were scum I just said what you were doing was confuseing... I actually think you could be town just playing confuseing, I havent made up my mind yet on who to vote so I will not vote until I have a better understanding.
|
On June 06 2013 13:25 fferyllt wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2013 13:23 iVLosK! wrote: fferyllt and Onegu. You guys are saying you think Im scum but your votes aren't on me. I don't like that shit, throw 'em on. The hell I am. I'm saying I am leaning town on you, brah. Aight denn, brah. Welcome to the smart kids club. Let's talk about smart kid things while these punks try to figure me out. (Pro tip: You can't.)
|
|
|
|