|
On June 06 2013 13:43 fferyllt wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2013 13:38 Umasi wrote:On June 06 2013 13:37 fferyllt wrote:
All this earnestness is very touching. I'm firming up some more reads, I think. Tell us what you think so far, I will start writing my list. Most of what I'm seeing so far looks town-on-town. And I see trepidation about how serious early votes are, which looks pretty newb to me. Everybody in the game could vote the same player in this next hour and it might not mean a thing in terms of who eventually gets lynched. iVLosK! is provoking lots of reactions and that is good. It gives other players stuff to think about and analyze about every player involved, not just iVLosK!.
This actually makes sense. if i think about it like that then its a pro-town and pro-mafia motive. more likely pro-town cuz mafia would be scared shitless. this convinced me. You sir, are town and a buddie. ( why would mafia want to stop this banter)
|
iV, you DO care if people trust you.
THAT IS HOW YOU WIN THE GAME
You can't be correct on every read and win without convincing everyone else to go along with your read.
|
|
|
On June 06 2013 13:49 Xzavier wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2013 13:43 fferyllt wrote:On June 06 2013 13:38 Umasi wrote:On June 06 2013 13:37 fferyllt wrote:
All this earnestness is very touching. I'm firming up some more reads, I think. Tell us what you think so far, I will start writing my list. Most of what I'm seeing so far looks town-on-town. And I see trepidation about how serious early votes are, which looks pretty newb to me. Everybody in the game could vote the same player in this next hour and it might not mean a thing in terms of who eventually gets lynched. iVLosK! is provoking lots of reactions and that is good. It gives other players stuff to think about and analyze about every player involved, not just iVLosK!. This actually makes sense. if i think about it like that then its a pro-town and pro-mafia motive. more likely pro-town cuz mafia would be scared shitless. this convinced me. You sir, are town and a buddie. ( why would mafia want to stop this banter)
Scared shitless? I have no fear, regardless of alignment. I fart in the face of death.
|
On June 06 2013 13:50 Umasi wrote:
iV, you DO care if people trust you.
THAT IS HOW YOU WIN THE GAME
You can't be correct on every read and win without convincing everyone else to go along with your read.
Wait for it...
Wait for it...
On June 06 2013 13:50 Xzavier wrote:
##unvote iVosk!
Huh, I guess he trusts me. And I did it all without making some shitty "plan" that I'm not going to follow anyway. Go figure.
|
On June 06 2013 13:43 fferyllt wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2013 13:38 Umasi wrote:On June 06 2013 13:37 fferyllt wrote:
All this earnestness is very touching. I'm firming up some more reads, I think. Tell us what you think so far, I will start writing my list. Most of what I'm seeing so far looks town-on-town. And I see trepidation about how serious early votes are, which looks pretty newb to me. Everybody in the game could vote the same player in this next hour and it might not mean a thing in terms of who eventually gets lynched. iVLosK! is provoking lots of reactions and that is good. It gives other players stuff to think about and analyze about every player involved, not just iVLosK!.
I agree that iV provoking votes is good, I disagree that it's town on town, assuming iV is included in the town.
it's giving us stuff to think about, but is it the correct stuff to think about? It wouldn't have taken much to settle the at the beginning minor accusation. If he did diffuse it, town could be doing OTHER productive things.
I wish he'd diffused it, I really do. I think everyone else getting involved in the discussion around iV is town except for iV, who hasn't actually given me a fucking reason to think he's town.
|
My vote rests on you, but in light of Xzav pulling out, I'd be open to other lynch candidates.
I'd 100% rather lynch you than some lurker though.
|
On June 06 2013 13:53 iVLosK! wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2013 13:50 Umasi wrote:
iV, you DO care if people trust you.
THAT IS HOW YOU WIN THE GAME
You can't be correct on every read and win without convincing everyone else to go along with your read. Wait for it... Wait for it... Huh, I guess he trusts me. And I did it all without making some shitty "plan" that I'm not going to follow anyway. Go figure.
The plan talk was just something to get to shitflinging. We got there. im curious as to what else should be done.
|
On June 06 2013 13:53 Umasi wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2013 13:43 fferyllt wrote:On June 06 2013 13:38 Umasi wrote:On June 06 2013 13:37 fferyllt wrote:
All this earnestness is very touching. I'm firming up some more reads, I think. Tell us what you think so far, I will start writing my list. Most of what I'm seeing so far looks town-on-town. And I see trepidation about how serious early votes are, which looks pretty newb to me. Everybody in the game could vote the same player in this next hour and it might not mean a thing in terms of who eventually gets lynched. iVLosK! is provoking lots of reactions and that is good. It gives other players stuff to think about and analyze about every player involved, not just iVLosK!. I agree that iV provoking votes is good, I disagree that it's town on town, assuming iV is included in the town. it's giving us stuff to think about, but is it the correct stuff to think about? It wouldn't have taken much to settle the at the beginning minor accusation. If he did diffuse it, town could be doing OTHER productive things. I wish he'd diffused it, I really do. I think everyone else getting involved in the discussion around iV is town except for iV, who hasn't actually given me a fucking reason to think he's town.
If he'd diffused it, then I probably wouldn't have any town reads in my hip pocket right now. And I'd be suspicious as fuck of him for trying to smooth things over.
|
On June 06 2013 13:54 Umasi wrote:
My vote rests on you, but in light of Xzav pulling out, I'd be open to other lynch candidates.
I'd 100% rather lynch you than some lurker though.
"pulling out"
teeheehee.
Oh yeah? Well as soon as that random OMGUSer shows up, Im gonna take my vote of him and put it on you. The accumulated filth from all your badness and lack of player reading ability will foam up about your waist and you will look up and shout "Save me!" ... and I'll whisper "No."
How does that make you feel?
|
On June 06 2013 13:51 iVLosK! wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2013 13:49 Xzavier wrote:On June 06 2013 13:43 fferyllt wrote:On June 06 2013 13:38 Umasi wrote:On June 06 2013 13:37 fferyllt wrote:
All this earnestness is very touching. I'm firming up some more reads, I think. Tell us what you think so far, I will start writing my list. Most of what I'm seeing so far looks town-on-town. And I see trepidation about how serious early votes are, which looks pretty newb to me. Everybody in the game could vote the same player in this next hour and it might not mean a thing in terms of who eventually gets lynched. iVLosK! is provoking lots of reactions and that is good. It gives other players stuff to think about and analyze about every player involved, not just iVLosK!. This actually makes sense. if i think about it like that then its a pro-town and pro-mafia motive. more likely pro-town cuz mafia would be scared shitless. this convinced me. You sir, are town and a buddie. ( why would mafia want to stop this banter) Scared shitless? I have no fear, regardless of alignment. I fart in the face of death.
Scared shitlesd to Post that much early and draw THAT much attention.
|
On June 06 2013 13:59 fferyllt wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2013 13:53 Umasi wrote:On June 06 2013 13:43 fferyllt wrote:On June 06 2013 13:38 Umasi wrote:On June 06 2013 13:37 fferyllt wrote:
All this earnestness is very touching. I'm firming up some more reads, I think. Tell us what you think so far, I will start writing my list. Most of what I'm seeing so far looks town-on-town. And I see trepidation about how serious early votes are, which looks pretty newb to me. Everybody in the game could vote the same player in this next hour and it might not mean a thing in terms of who eventually gets lynched. iVLosK! is provoking lots of reactions and that is good. It gives other players stuff to think about and analyze about every player involved, not just iVLosK!. I agree that iV provoking votes is good, I disagree that it's town on town, assuming iV is included in the town. it's giving us stuff to think about, but is it the correct stuff to think about? It wouldn't have taken much to settle the at the beginning minor accusation. If he did diffuse it, town could be doing OTHER productive things. I wish he'd diffused it, I really do. I think everyone else getting involved in the discussion around iV is town except for iV, who hasn't actually given me a fucking reason to think he's town. If he'd diffused it, then I probably wouldn't have any town reads in my hip pocket right now. And I'd be suspicious as fuck of him for trying to smooth things over.
This guy gets a fucking gold star. Keeping up with me (almost) every step of the way.
|
|
|
On June 06 2013 14:03 fferyllt wrote:
I'm not a guy.
This non-gender-specific being gets a gold star. Gold star for you, non-gender-specific being!
|
On June 06 2013 14:03 iVLosK! wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2013 13:59 fferyllt wrote:On June 06 2013 13:53 Umasi wrote:On June 06 2013 13:43 fferyllt wrote:On June 06 2013 13:38 Umasi wrote:On June 06 2013 13:37 fferyllt wrote:
All this earnestness is very touching. I'm firming up some more reads, I think. Tell us what you think so far, I will start writing my list. Most of what I'm seeing so far looks town-on-town. And I see trepidation about how serious early votes are, which looks pretty newb to me. Everybody in the game could vote the same player in this next hour and it might not mean a thing in terms of who eventually gets lynched. iVLosK! is provoking lots of reactions and that is good. It gives other players stuff to think about and analyze about every player involved, not just iVLosK!. I agree that iV provoking votes is good, I disagree that it's town on town, assuming iV is included in the town. it's giving us stuff to think about, but is it the correct stuff to think about? It wouldn't have taken much to settle the at the beginning minor accusation. If he did diffuse it, town could be doing OTHER productive things. I wish he'd diffused it, I really do. I think everyone else getting involved in the discussion around iV is town except for iV, who hasn't actually given me a fucking reason to think he's town. If he'd diffused it, then I probably wouldn't have any town reads in my hip pocket right now. And I'd be suspicious as fuck of him for trying to smooth things over. This guy gets a fucking gold star. Keeping up with me (almost) every step of the way.
Probably every. you just dont want to admit it. and i just learned alot lol. like doing shit for reaction is acceptable.
|
On June 06 2013 14:00 Xzavier wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2013 13:51 iVLosK! wrote:On June 06 2013 13:49 Xzavier wrote:On June 06 2013 13:43 fferyllt wrote:On June 06 2013 13:38 Umasi wrote:On June 06 2013 13:37 fferyllt wrote:
All this earnestness is very touching. I'm firming up some more reads, I think. Tell us what you think so far, I will start writing my list. Most of what I'm seeing so far looks town-on-town. And I see trepidation about how serious early votes are, which looks pretty newb to me. Everybody in the game could vote the same player in this next hour and it might not mean a thing in terms of who eventually gets lynched. iVLosK! is provoking lots of reactions and that is good. It gives other players stuff to think about and analyze about every player involved, not just iVLosK!. This actually makes sense. if i think about it like that then its a pro-town and pro-mafia motive. more likely pro-town cuz mafia would be scared shitless. this convinced me. You sir, are town and a buddie. ( why would mafia want to stop this banter) Scared shitless? I have no fear, regardless of alignment. I fart in the face of death. Scared shitlesd to Post that much early and draw THAT much attention.
I'm just an attention whore. I don't like it when you talk about that bitch Rachel. I should be what's on your mind.
|
Umasi, I told you that your shitty list of reads were shitty. A response to that would be nice so we can make sure you don't disappoint me in the future.
|
On June 06 2013 14:11 iVLosK! wrote:
Umasi, I told you that your shitty list of reads were shitty. A response to that would be nice so we can make sure you don't disappoint me in the future.
I don't deal with disappointment well, sometimes it results in... Lynchings. 
Anyways, that's all for me tonight, folks. Work in the morning, usually work 9-10 hours, should be on around 8ish CST.
|
Alright. ill probably move to reading a book for a few hours and refreshing every chapter. Night.
|
On June 06 2013 13:54 Umasi wrote:
My vote rests on you, but in light of Xzav pulling out, I'd be open to other lynch candidates.
I'd 100% rather lynch you than some lurker though.
This interests me, if you think I'm scum, say you think I'm scum. Don't consider other lynches "In light of Xzav pulling out." Why does Xzav have any impact on who you think is scum?
Afraid to go it alone? Keeping our options open? It appears that way to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
