I think not reading your role PM goes completely against the spirit of the game and I find it absolutely disgusting.

In Red Team I joined Hapa's policy lynch on OO for a while when he said he didn't read his role PM without saying much about it before leaving it alone and not talking about it.

I'm not wasting my time thinking about something that's basically the height of unsportsmanship.

I pretty much agree with this. I can't honestly think of any reason why you wouldn't read your role. If you're so bored you feel like 'spicing up the game' or something by not reading it basically amounts to trolling which is, by definition, anti-town.
Which, funnily enough, also relates to this:

On May 18 2013 07:32 Dandel Ion wrote:
Hey guys this thread looks extraordinarily dumb and only dumb shit is happening and I am extremely uninterested in everything that's happened so far.

I just was like "oh yeah another thread that's as full of irrelevant bs as Personality*, that gotta be FUN" so I just HAD to replace in.

Now I shall read my role PM.
Or shall I?
I guess I shall, but I'm not decided yet!

Yes, apparently he read his PM but why the fuck post and ask us 'whether or not he should read it?' Again, anti-town mentality. No reason that checking your role PM shouldn't be the first fucking thing you do, even if you replace in. (Weak support I know, but I feel it's worth bringing up.)

Marv and solstice, I am curious as to where this is going, btw. What are your reads on each other because I'm not sure if either of you have posted them.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2013 00:52 GMT

#1803

I did post my read on s0lstice, probably within the last page, dear.

s0Lstice

United States1833 Posts

May 21 2013 00:54 GMT

#1804

I'm reading Marv as being entirely too petulant right now. I'm getting to his alignment.

WaveofShadow

Canada31495 Posts

May 21 2013 00:56 GMT

#1805

On May 21 2013 09:52 marvellosity wrote:
I did post my read on s0lstice, probably within the last page, dear.

Ok you're right. Missed it 'cause posting. I'm actually kinda surprised at that read...you compare him to iamp? You didn't find iamp towny despite him masoning you?

Also why the fuck are all of my scumreads avoiding me.
/sort of sarcasm
Where the fuck are GK and Dandel
ragerageragerageragerage

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2013 00:58 GMT

#1806

On May 21 2013 09:56 WaveofShadow wrote:

Show nested quote +

no no, I meant iamp's read on him in his will post.

WaveofShadow

Canada31495 Posts

May 21 2013 01:03 GMT

#1807

On May 21 2013 09:58 marvellosity wrote:

Show nested quote +

no no, I meant iamp's read on him in his will post.

Oh lol I knew that was weird.
Alright carry on.
Man since you're around I feel like we should discuss something but I don't know if I have anything left to ask you. I need a break from this.

s0Lstice

United States1833 Posts

May 21 2013 01:03 GMT

#1808

WoS, since marv is doing the electronic equivalent of sticking his fingers in his ears and going 'nah nah nah nah can't hear you'...I'll ask you.

Are you following my reasoning here? Making a post painting GK in a bad light that cites posts that come prior to his claim of not reading his role PM requires SOME opinion on whether he checked his role PM. Citing those posts carries with it an assumption that GK was being truthful in his claim.

I'm just not seeing how one could pursue GK without considering it, as it directly affects whether certain of his posts are alignment indicative.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2013 01:04 GMT

#1809

On May 21 2013 10:03 WaveofShadow wrote:

Show nested quote +

Oh lol I knew that was weird.
Alright carry on.
Man since you're around I feel like we should discuss something but I don't know if I have anything left to ask you. I need a break from this.

That's fine, bed time is around now for me anyways ^_^

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2013 01:07 GMT

#1810

On May 21 2013 10:03 s0Lstice wrote:
WoS, since marv is doing the electronic equivalent of sticking his fingers in his ears and going 'nah nah nah nah can't hear you'...I'll ask you.

Are you following my reasoning here? Making a post painting GK in a bad light that cites posts that come prior to his claim of not reading his role PM requires SOME opinion on whether he checked his role PM. Citing those posts carries with it an assumption that GK was being truthful in his claim.

I'm just not seeing how one could pursue GK without considering it, as it directly affects whether certain of his posts are alignment indicative.

Why are you lying? I answered that question, I just stopped when you started asking me dumb questions about my reactions in Red team.

s0Lstice

United States1833 Posts

May 21 2013 01:11 GMT

#1811

I wouldn't have asked you the question I just asked him

But you can go now. /ignore? really? just lol

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 21 2013 01:14 GMT

#1812

On May 21 2013 10:11 s0Lstice wrote:
I wouldn't have asked you the question I just asked him

But you can go now. /ignore? really? just lol

i have a very low tolerance for stupidity.

anyway i'll draw you a little tree

GK's claim.

If false -----> lynch
If true ------> lynch if analysis lines up with lynching him

Now I'm not going to spend time thinking about whether he's telling the truth, because it's dumb. So to lynch GK, I have to work on the 'If true' part of the equation, because the If False one is already dealt with.

Now go back and read my posts and actually understand the analysis instead of nitpicking on something completely irrelevant. Assume we're working on the 'If true' tree, which is part of my argument.

s0Lstice

United States1833 Posts

May 21 2013 01:29 GMT

#1813

sigh

if you are citing posts from before the claim, like you did to make him look scummy, then you are saying they are alignment indicative, and therefore he lied. done, lynch the liar.

you can't cite posts from before the claim without dealing with the claim. you can't ignore it.