EPT1) blazing makes a shitload of effort to look at iamp's meta, having played with iamp before
2) blazing makes no effort to look at iamp's meta, despite having played with iamp's meta before
i'm liking the difference between 1 and 2 right now
[M][N] Les Mafia - Page 23
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
1) blazing makes a shitload of effort to look at iamp's meta, having played with iamp before 2) blazing makes no effort to look at iamp's meta, despite having played with iamp's meta before i'm liking the difference between 1 and 2 right now | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
##vote: blazinghand | ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:33 Blazinghand wrote: having read that, I now remember it! It didn't come to mind previously though. "I'm fox!" lolololololol | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:35 marvellosity wrote: i'm voting for blazing. his stutters case is totally underwhelming. ##vote: blazinghand Which point don't you like in the stutters case? | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9649 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:34 marvellosity wrote: Like, seriously. We have 2 scenarios: 1) blazing makes a shitload of effort to look at iamp's meta, having played with iamp before 2) blazing makes no effort to look at iamp's meta, despite having played with iamp's meta before i'm liking the difference between 1 and 2 right now dude I legit forgot, and fwiw I just voted him because he was being a douchebag. Given that you literally just went through this same thing like minutes ago I don't see how you're not aware of this. Once you brought up his meta, i did unvote him you know | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:37 iamperfection wrote: blazinghand does have a point about jar jar he looks kind of tera bad agreed, the biggest issue is that blazing is voting stutters, and not jarjar. do you see what i'm saying? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:37 marvellosity wrote: blazing, i kinda feel ok about a Jarjar vote instead. how does that feel? if a stutters lynch isn't happening, jarjar is acceptable. that being said, I'd much prefer stutters. What do you think of his post about VA? Isn't that like a pretty scum-motivated move? | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9649 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:37 marvellosity wrote: blazing, i kinda feel ok about a Jarjar vote instead. how does that feel? On May 18 2013 08:37 iamperfection wrote: blazinghand does have a point about jar jar he looks kind of tera bad I feel very good about a town marv now this has happened before. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
i've seen you in recent games say "if you can't support this case with meta, your case sucks". can you? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:39 marvellosity wrote: Let's put it this way Blazing. Stutters is always a useless pile of shit. literally always. i've seen you in recent games say "if you can't support this case with meta, your case sucks". can you? if he's a kushm4sta, then my case on him isn't valid. I'll go dive some meta then. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:39 iamperfection wrote: I feel very good about a town marv now this has happened before. and i feel very good about you saying this. can we have sex now? | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9649 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:40 marvellosity wrote: and i feel very good about you saying this. can we have sex now? i dont want to risk our friendship | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:40 Blazinghand wrote: if he's a kushm4sta, then my case on him isn't valid. I'll go dive some meta then. I don't like this, Blazing. i'm not going to shout at you, because I don't feel it's... productive. I know you're "up" on the TL scene to know enough that Stutters is generally an extremely lurky mofo. he has played 10 town games or so and always been lurky/useless in all of them. I don't like how much you generally like meta and how little you're willing to look into Stutters' meta. Do you understand my concerns? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:42 marvellosity wrote: I don't like this, Blazing. i'm not going to shout at you, because I don't feel it's... productive. I know you're "up" on the TL scene to know enough that Stutters is generally an extremely lurky mofo. he has played 10 town games or so and always been lurky/useless in all of them. I don't like how much you generally like meta and how little you're willing to look into Stutters' meta. Do you understand my concerns? no given that I just said I'll look into his meta what is it with people just expecting me to pull meta cases out of my ass constantly | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
and by "constantly" i mean "today" | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
:/ | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9649 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:43 Blazinghand wrote: no given that I just said I'll look into his meta what is it with people just expecting me to pull meta cases out of my ass constantly well it gives an impression that you half assing your cases which i would think would be more likely from a scum bh. | ||
| ||
