Doctor Who Mafia - Page 4

On May 17 2013 14:09 Blazinghand wrote:
Well, Zephirdd is definitely town, as before. He wouldn't do this as scum.

Vivax/oats interaction doesn't seem to make a hyooj amount of sense for the oats=scum hypothesis just because, if I were scum and trying to get a stupid nonsensical case going against a somewhat incompetent player, I know I sure as hell wouldn't be doing it against a fellow scum guy. It's possible Vivax was busing/distancing Oats, I get that, but what's more likely to me is Vivax was lazy scum looking for an easy lynch and that Oats would be doable since Oats isn't very good. I don't have to make any weird leaps of logic for the "scum vivax launches a bad attack against incompetent Oats that gets himself lynched" theory. I DO have to make some weird assumptions for the "scum vivax launches a bad attack against his own incompetent Oats scumbuddy that gets himself lynched" theory.

I'm gonna get an associative tell + straight-up scumminess case on someone, probably not Oats, going soon. I'm gonna reread people's mentions of vivax and reread the voteswap shennannies at day end.

I never said I was useless on day 1, just that I don't spontaneously offer reads straight off the bat. Your case was 50% meta which I showed to be invalid. The other half of the case was based on me suggesting a bad plan, which I gave a counterpoint to that you haven't responded to...

Just popping in for a few minutes, looks like oats slipped hard.

##Vote Oatsmaster

I agree that oats' play day one wasn't particularly scummy. However that slip us way too blatant for us to ignore as a mistake. First of all oats would have to not read up on how the movement works,secondly the hosts would have to not inform him that he moved illegally and finally the hosts would have to willingly put his move through. If he is a blue that knows his position, why hasn't he at least soft claimed instead of disappearing off the face of the earth.

On May 18 2013 09:30 ghost_403 wrote:
Just noted that Zephh brought up that maybe Oats is a blue who knew his piece as part of his role. Possible, but I feel unlikely. A blue should (being the operative statement here) have stuck around to try and prove his use to the town. As a power role, they have responsibilities to make sure that they're not dead. That's not his reaction to this situation. Instead, he makes a few less than helpful comments and leaves the thread entirely. Either he's a blue who's rage quit, or he's a scum that got caught.

On May 18 2013 13:07 Sharrant wrote:
Oats, I like this post from you, but I'd just like you to give me a quick (one paragraph at most and no more than that) explanation of your movement claim. I don't have much time tonight or tomorrow before the deadline, but if you can explain it in a manner that makes sense to me, I'll reconsider. I do like your points on Deconduo, I'm interested in your thoughts on anyone you think is important right now. If I don't think your explanation matches up to what happened, I at least want as much information from you as I can get.

On May 18 2013 22:04 deconduo wrote:
Well seeing as I don't have much of a choice.

I'm Billy Shipton, a DT that can check people next to me. If I finish the turn next to someone, I get told they are town or not. If I finish next to multiple people, I get told how many are town. This is one of the reasons I suggested that everyone group together, it makes my role much more powerful. I also know that there is no godfather in the game.

I figure as I'm A and oats is B, if I move towards him and he moves towards me I can check him tonight. If I die, you know he's an angel and you can lynch him tomorrow. Alternatively Sentinel is within range of me checking them as well, but I still think oats is a better option.

On May 18 2013 23:52 deconduo wrote:


So you will move towards me? Grand

Also saying to lynch me if I survive is a bit stupid. While I fully expect to die, whats to stop mafia leaving me alive to save their KP for someone else and waste a lynch on me tomorrow?

On May 19 2013 00:00 deconduo wrote:


I don't get more checks if I'm lynched...

On May 19 2013 00:17 deconduo wrote:


I don't know what you mean?

On May 19 2013 00:23 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:


Everytime I make jokes people accuse me of being a scum

On May 19 2013 03:28 Blazinghand wrote:
Oatsmaster, this is important, fferyltt has NEVER TAKEN LEGIT STANCES. he's not playing the game. he's posting once every few days or whatever with oneliners. VOTE HIM

Decon and Oats are already close to each other, with the correct movements Sentinel and me can get to them as well. This is something that we should try to achieve IMO. I'd say ideally we make sure that we lit each other up (increased field of view), but don't get right next to each other (avoid kill through possible puppet) except for decon and Oats. What do you guys say about that?

On May 20 2013 23:22 ghost_403 wrote:


Honestly, I never bothered to read the game that he referenced. I was trusting in BH's integrity as a player. Only an idiot would give me the wrong conclusion before telling me to come to my own. And, yes, I did vote for him (at that point) strictly on the wording of his answer. His answer implies a certain mindset; one that knows more than us. His actions since then have reinforced my views on him.

On May 20 2013 23:26 ghost_403 wrote:
Explain what, Oats?

On May 20 2013 23:40 ghost_403 wrote:


If anyone other than Oats is interested in my thoughts on this, I'm happy to answer. I believe that I've made myself clear on this, but I'm happy to clear this up for anyone else.

On May 20 2013 23:48 ghost_403 wrote:
@oats: Since you seem to be a bit dense on this, let me spell it out for you. There is literally nothing I can say to change your view of your alignment. I'm not going to waste my breath on that. It's everyone else I have to convince. So if they want me to spell it out, I will.

Now, why don't you tell me who you'd like to lynch next. You've been awfully vague on that.