EPT##Vote: ghost_403
Doctor Who Mafia - Page 15
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
##Vote: ghost_403 | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
I am willing to believe ghost just didnt have the chance to scumhunt. Both of his posts were close together and at a time where nobody was saying anything but setup stuff. It is as weird as fferlerl;yret posts; So I want to see what he has to say tonight. I also want to stop jumping happily into voting people like I did to vivax. lol. i also totally forgot about the vote thread | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On May 16 2013 05:46 Zephirdd wrote: I can see where ghost comes from the whole "lynch marv past day 3" just because marv is usually a target for normal KP more than any other player. I am willing to believe ghost just didnt have the chance to scumhunt. Both of his posts were close together and at a time where nobody was saying anything but setup stuff. It is as weird as fferlerl;yret posts; So I want to see what he has to say tonight. I also want to stop jumping happily into voting people like I did to vivax. lol. i also totally forgot about the vote thread Why are you posting this exactly? Why are you softdefending ghost? | ||
|
Vivax
21978 Posts
On May 16 2013 05:34 Zephirdd wrote: Ok. We have facing direction and movement direction to discern each other. Done talking. Can you form a case on Sentinel bigger than the said "scumslip"? I had forgotten about the question of the MS you made, and I don't think it's impossible that the same happened there. It's literally on the first page since the game started. Maybe he has a similarly bad memory as yours, but he didn't even try to persuade me that my argumentation was bad, he rather preferred to call me scum immediately for something that is an idea worth considering. Which is something you did as well, but unlike Sentinel, you didn't vote me and fuck off, you kept poking. Hopping onto a quick reason, call someone scum and disappear without questioning your scumread is a solid tell for Sentinel being scum, added to his weird defense of FF. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Crossfire99
United States1529 Posts
Oatsmaster (0): ghost_403 (2): deconduo, marvellosity The lynch will happen in at 20:00 GMT (+00:00). With 12 alive it takes 7 to lynch. Let me know if I missed something or made a mistake. Remember that votes in the voting thread are the only ones that count. | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
On May 16 2013 05:47 phagga wrote: Why are you posting this exactly? Why are you softdefending ghost? because that's similar to other ghost posts from games months ago. I don't know if he changed, but I do remember that he is limited in time for posting. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On May 16 2013 05:53 Zephirdd wrote: because that's similar to other ghost posts from games months ago. I don't know if he changed, but I do remember that he is limited in time for posting. fair enough. I have ghost in the back of my mind, but I'm more interested in Sentinel currently. I hope he returns to the thread soon and tells us a bit more about his scumreads. | ||
|
Vivax
21978 Posts
His defense of Sentinel doesn't make any sense. He complains about setup talk when this is essentially a team board game. No WIFOM mindfucks, lynch people playing for scum. Unless he starts contributing meaningfully, he's up for the gallows. | ||
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
Also, lmao @ marv for voting me for the same reason he voted me last time we played. I flipped town. I'm going to read the thread again and see if anything sticks out. | ||
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
And people wonder why I don't post. A brief retort at Marv and Dec: Only an idiot would completely ignore the mechanics of a game. I chimed in my two cents, and then I was off to scum hunt. Unfortunately, it seems that no one is around whenever I'm here. Your reasons for voting me are terrible. Not a good sign, haven't decided what to make of that. I'm not impressed by Dec's play, but I might just be mad at him for voting me. I really don't like Oats play this game: plans are good, plans are bad, I'm on board, I feel like he's all over the place. I can't be arsed to look into his meta, otherwise I would lynch him for begin all over the place and generally unhelpful. BH's vouching for his meta is stopping me from voting him at the moment. I trust his read, haven't thought too much about his alignment. I'm not happy with Vivax's play, but I'm never happy with Vivax's play. I really don't like this post: + Show Spoiler + On May 16 2013 05:17 Vivax wrote: This is a scumslip, the host explicitly said that it's possible that the angels know our movement speeds already. You showing this level of security as to immediately call me scum in spite of that fact, is proof that you are either not reading the thread with your due diligence, or scum with the information that angels don't know our movement speed, given your overall play I'm strongly leaning on the latter. I'm expecting your explanation for this, and I want reads from you on every player who posted something substantial in the thread. It seems passionate and poorly thought out. He's not trying to figure out Sentinel's alignment, or really thinking about what's going on; he's trying to push him onto the defensive and start an easy lynch. It kind of looks like he immediately dropped it, but it is kind of hard to tell at this point in the game. Until someone convinces me that leaving Vivax in game is a good idea, ##vote vivax | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 16 2013 08:54 ghost_403 wrote: *crickets in the thread* And people wonder why I don't post. A brief retort at Marv and Dec: Only an idiot would completely ignore the mechanics of a game. I chimed in my two cents, and then I was off to scum hunt. Unfortunately, it seems that no one is around whenever I'm here. Your reasons for voting me are terrible. Not a good sign, haven't decided what to make of that. I'm not impressed by Dec's play, but I might just be mad at him for voting me. I really don't like Oats play this game: plans are good, plans are bad, I'm on board, I feel like he's all over the place. I can't be arsed to look into his meta, otherwise I would lynch him for begin all over the place and generally unhelpful. BH's vouching for his meta is stopping me from voting him at the moment. I trust his read, haven't thought too much about his alignment. I'm not happy with Vivax's play, but I'm never happy with Vivax's play. I really don't like this post: + Show Spoiler + On May 16 2013 05:17 Vivax wrote: This is a scumslip, the host explicitly said that it's possible that the angels know our movement speeds already. You showing this level of security as to immediately call me scum in spite of that fact, is proof that you are either not reading the thread with your due diligence, or scum with the information that angels don't know our movement speed, given your overall play I'm strongly leaning on the latter. I'm expecting your explanation for this, and I want reads from you on every player who posted something substantial in the thread. It seems passionate and poorly thought out. He's not trying to figure out Sentinel's alignment, or really thinking about what's going on; he's trying to push him onto the defensive and start an easy lynch. It kind of looks like he immediately dropped it, but it is kind of hard to tell at this point in the game. Until someone convinces me that leaving Vivax in game is a good idea, ##vote vivax Just popping in before bed. No, the reasons for voting you, that I agreed with certainly, are not terrible at all, they're pretty solid. Trying to dismiss them as terrible when they simply aren't smells bad. In addition, you don't need other people present in the thread to give your thoughts and look for mafia, that's a pretty shoddy excuse for only having 2 posts up to that point as well. I also find it interesting how you categorise it as BH's vouching for Oats' meta, when BH was voting for Oats before I pushed him off it? That's a very interesting interpretation that you repeated twice. I'm not really happy with this post at all, but I don't know if it's because you're scum or because you're not at a level I'd hope from you. I'd say expect, but ya know, red-check lylo thing ;p I'm pretty keen on hearing your thoughts on Sentinel, he's a pretty central figure in this game with fairly obvious and notable things that he's done, and yet you've brushed him over. Indulge me. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
On May 16 2013 09:07 marvellosity wrote: I'm not really happy with this post at all, but I don't know if it's because you're scum or because you're not at a level I'd hope from you. I'd say expect, but ya know, red-check lylo thing ;p I think I'm going to burn this account and start a new one as ghost_404 just so everyone will stop bringing that up. | ||
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
| ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
On May 16 2013 05:17 Vivax wrote: This is a scumslip, the host explicitly said that it's possible that the angels know our movement speeds already. You showing this level of security as to immediately call me scum in spite of that fact, is proof that you are either not reading the thread with your due diligence, or scum with the information that angels don't know our movement speed, given your overall play I'm strongly leaning on the latter. I'm expecting your explanation for this, and I want reads from you on every player who posted something substantial in the thread. It's possible. Which means maybe yes, maybe no. If yes, then angels gain nothing and town gains something. If no, then the angels and town both gain something, but angels gain more because they can use the info to win whereas town only needs to coordinate. However, in the second scenario, townies are able to lie/stay silent to protect themselves. If my movement speed was 5, for instance, I could say I had 2-3 movespeed to attract nearby angels. I see something I'm not supposed to, I can use all 5 the next night and dart around like the wind. Again, assuming the angels know nothing. Really it's all chance. And I don't think it's worth a night experimenting with it. So I'm going to back away from this and agree to disagree. At the very least we will voice our movements before the deadline for clarity's sake. Anything else, like you said, is open to discussion. ##unvote Time for some thoughts on Ghost's recent post. I chimed in my two cents, and then I was off to scum hunt. Unfortunately, it seems that no one is around whenever I'm here. I find a bunch of problems with this alone. Being alone while scumhunting makes my mafiadick hard. It means I can focus on what's already present in the thread with a clear mind, without having to worry about changing conditions. A lot of my reasoning goes out the window when the thread updates. I don't know why you'd have a problem with it and resort to lurking. I'm not happy with Vivax's play, but I'm never happy with Vivax's play. Sentinel's play has been bad this game as well, but IIRC, I always think that. Explain me why you vote for Vivax and not myself. That's a shitty vote to throw around. Game plan for myself is to organize my thoughts because that's what I'm lacking right now. I'm going to draft up another spreadsheet to consolidate my reads tomorrow and then start making calls from that. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On May 16 2013 06:28 Vivax wrote: I would also lynch Oats. All he's done so far is troll, being disruptive and ask stupid questions. I've seen him do that as town last time but I don't care. This isn't a game with grushes and kushes and if he wants to be the one guy playing that role, then I'll gladly policy-kick him out of the game. His defense of Sentinel doesn't make any sense. He complains about setup talk when this is essentially a team board game. No WIFOM mindfucks, lynch people playing for scum. Unless he starts contributing meaningfully, he's up for the gallows. Read my fucking posts dude. No disruption, no stupid questions. Can you say that I have not helped you obtain a read on anyone due to my interactions with them? If I did that, Im not useless. On May 16 2013 08:07 ghost_403 wrote: I was inclined to lynch oats based on his general demeanor and unhelpfulness, but I'm inclined to listen to Blazinghand's interpretation of his play. Also, lmao @ marv for voting me for the same reason he voted me last time we played. I flipped town. I'm going to read the thread again and see if anything sticks out. What? why is your read so wishywashy? What about my general demeanor and unhelpfulness is scummy? Explain please. | ||
| ||
