|
Blazinghand
United States25561 Posts
On May 16 2013 06:28 Vivax wrote:
I would also lynch Oats. All he's done so far is troll, being disruptive and ask stupid questions. I've seen him do that as town last time but I don't care. This isn't a game with grushes and kushes and if he wants to be the one guy playing that role, then I'll gladly policy-kick him out of the game.
His defense of Sentinel doesn't make any sense.
He complains about setup talk when this is essentially a team board game.
No WIFOM mindfucks, lynch people playing for scum. Unless he starts contributing meaningfully, he's up for the gallows.
I strongly oppose a policy lynch on Oats. I'm sure the guy is readable. the fact of the matter is, the guy acts like this always in themed games as town. If you lynch him you're saying "i personally don't like oats" at this point
now like i will be on him (and others) for productivity going forwards but based on oats acting like he literally always acts you can't say he's scum. all you can say is you don't like him
|
On May 16 2013 14:00 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2013 06:28 Vivax wrote:
I would also lynch Oats. All he's done so far is troll, being disruptive and ask stupid questions. I've seen him do that as town last time but I don't care. This isn't a game with grushes and kushes and if he wants to be the one guy playing that role, then I'll gladly policy-kick him out of the game.
His defense of Sentinel doesn't make any sense.
He complains about setup talk when this is essentially a team board game.
No WIFOM mindfucks, lynch people playing for scum. Unless he starts contributing meaningfully, he's up for the gallows. I strongly oppose a policy lynch on Oats. I'm sure the guy is readable. the fact of the matter is, the guy acts like this always in themed games as town. If you lynch him you're saying "i personally don't like oats" at this point now like i will be on him (and others) for productivity going forwards but based on oats acting like he literally always acts you can't say he's scum. all you can say is you don't like him
Do you still wanna lynch Vivax? You said you were reading him after other game. Where is the fruit of your labour?
|
Blazinghand
United States25561 Posts
On May 16 2013 14:17 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2013 14:00 Blazinghand wrote:On May 16 2013 06:28 Vivax wrote:
I would also lynch Oats. All he's done so far is troll, being disruptive and ask stupid questions. I've seen him do that as town last time but I don't care. This isn't a game with grushes and kushes and if he wants to be the one guy playing that role, then I'll gladly policy-kick him out of the game.
His defense of Sentinel doesn't make any sense.
He complains about setup talk when this is essentially a team board game.
No WIFOM mindfucks, lynch people playing for scum. Unless he starts contributing meaningfully, he's up for the gallows. I strongly oppose a policy lynch on Oats. I'm sure the guy is readable. the fact of the matter is, the guy acts like this always in themed games as town. If you lynch him you're saying "i personally don't like oats" at this point now like i will be on him (and others) for productivity going forwards but based on oats acting like he literally always acts you can't say he's scum. all you can say is you don't like him Do you still wanna lynch Vivax? You said you were reading him after other game. Where is the fruit of your labour?
no such labor took place. the other game ended up lasting several hours instead of one and took up my whole afternoon
|
Blazinghand
United States25561 Posts
that being said, I think vivax is certainly wrong for trying to lynch you. couching it as a policy lynch based on animus is scummy but it's the kind of thing a lower-tier player would think is actually legit so yeah
|
On May 16 2013 14:37 Blazinghand wrote:
that being said, I think vivax is certainly wrong for trying to lynch you. couching it as a policy lynch based on animus is scummy but it's the kind of thing a lower-tier player would think is actually legit so yeah
animus?
Also since Vivax is off your hitlist, who is on top?
|
Blazinghand
United States25561 Posts
i'd say vivax is on top of my hitlist
|
Blazinghand
United States25561 Posts
maybe ghost. need to read ghost
but yeah vivax isn't making sense
|
On May 16 2013 15:13 Blazinghand wrote:
i'd say vivax is on top of my hitlist
wait wait, so the policy lynching me cause he doesnt like my playstyle is null right? What makes him scum other than that then?
I am in favor of giving ghost more time, he did say that he was really busy. And I dislike lurker lynches.
|
Blazinghand
United States25561 Posts
yeah but that policy lynch is literally the most usefu lthing he's done all game
you know what yeah i'm right
as always
hey vivax time to get dunked
##vote vivax
|
On May 16 2013 15:24 Blazinghand wrote:
yeah but that policy lynch is literally the most usefu lthing he's done all game
you know what yeah i'm right
as always
hey vivax time to get dunked
##vote vivax
No you arent always right.
but sheepy sheepy sheepy.
##Vote Vivax
|
Hey all. Sorry I've been completely inactive. I have one more final tomorrow and then I'm out for the summer. I've been keeping up as best I can, but I don't have any particularly convinced reads at the moment. I have a few people I'm averse to lynching, but that's about it.
I don't have any unique insight to add. I'm not really ready to place a vote, and I don't feel like I've seen anything I could point at and say, "Yes, I find this scummy." My D1 vote is probably going to the person who I have least reason to believe is town, but I won't be able to actively participate and figure out who that is until I'm done with my last exam in a few hours.
Oh, as for mechanics, etc. I'm down with the "reveal our movements shortly before the daypost" plan. It definitely seems best to at least find where we all are on the map, try to decrease the information advantage of the angels.
|
On May 16 2013 17:16 mkfuba07 wrote:
Hey all. Sorry I've been completely inactive. I have one more final tomorrow and then I'm out for the summer. I've been keeping up as best I can, but I don't have any particularly convinced reads at the moment. I have a few people I'm averse to lynching, but that's about it.
I don't have any unique insight to add. I'm not really ready to place a vote, and I don't feel like I've seen anything I could point at and say, "Yes, I find this scummy." My D1 vote is probably going to the person who I have least reason to believe is town, but I won't be able to actively participate and figure out who that is until I'm done with my last exam in a few hours.
Oh, as for mechanics, etc. I'm down with the "reveal our movements shortly before the daypost" plan. It definitely seems best to at least find where we all are on the map, try to decrease the information advantage of the angels.
WHY WOULD YOU POST?/?????????
god. Why?
|
On May 16 2013 08:54 ghost_403 wrote:*crickets in the thread* And people wonder why I don't post. A brief retort at Marv and Dec: Only an idiot would completely ignore the mechanics of a game. I chimed in my two cents, and then I was off to scum hunt. Unfortunately, it seems that no one is around whenever I'm here. Your reasons for voting me are terrible. Not a good sign, haven't decided what to make of that. I'm not impressed by Dec's play, but I might just be mad at him for voting me. I really don't like Oats play this game: plans are good, plans are bad, I'm on board, I feel like he's all over the place. I can't be arsed to look into his meta, otherwise I would lynch him for begin all over the place and generally unhelpful. BH's vouching for his meta is stopping me from voting him at the moment. I trust his read, haven't thought too much about his alignment. I'm not happy with Vivax's play, but I'm never happy with Vivax's play. I really don't like this post: + Show Spoiler +On May 16 2013 05:17 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2013 03:40 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On May 15 2013 22:42 deconduo wrote:
Can an Angel's movespeed be reduced to 0 if enough people are looking at it?
If this is the case, it makes a good argument for gathering in the middle with everyone looking outwards. If they can't reach us they can't kill us. But wouldn't mkfuba have to actively respond to the PM to participate in the game? I wouldn't say lynch him outright, but I'm a little suspicious. Let's see how the day goes though. My only red leaning read at this point is Vivax, whose filter after game start seems to be weak counterarguments to a fairly solid plan. His last post (the big one) also references the fact that with everyone moving at max speed, it would be easier to discern who is who. After explicitly saying that by learning this, Angels can figure out who is dangerous and vulnerable. I feel as if he is looking for this information for this reason. ##Vote: Vivax This is a scumslip, the host explicitly said that it's possible that the angels know our movement speeds already. You showing this level of security as to immediately call me scum in spite of that fact, is proof that you are either not reading the thread with your due diligence, or scum with the information that angels don't know our movement speed, given your overall play I'm strongly leaning on the latter. I'm expecting your explanation for this, and I want reads from you on every player who posted something substantial in the thread. Until someone convinces me that leaving Vivax in game is a good idea, ##vote vivax
Sentinel actually did what you're accusing me of, as you would know if you read my posts.
Could you specify what you mean with "I immediately dropped it, but it's hard to tell?" and what relevance does it have for your read?
|
On May 16 2013 18:24 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2013 17:16 mkfuba07 wrote:
Hey all. Sorry I've been completely inactive. I have one more final tomorrow and then I'm out for the summer. I've been keeping up as best I can, but I don't have any particularly convinced reads at the moment. I have a few people I'm averse to lynching, but that's about it.
I don't have any unique insight to add. I'm not really ready to place a vote, and I don't feel like I've seen anything I could point at and say, "Yes, I find this scummy." My D1 vote is probably going to the person who I have least reason to believe is town, but I won't be able to actively participate and figure out who that is until I'm done with my last exam in a few hours.
Oh, as for mechanics, etc. I'm down with the "reveal our movements shortly before the daypost" plan. It definitely seems best to at least find where we all are on the map, try to decrease the information advantage of the angels. WHY WOULD YOU POST?/????????? god. Why?
To not get modkilled maybe.
Do you think that post looks scummy?
|
On May 16 2013 18:34 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2013 18:24 Oatsmaster wrote:On May 16 2013 17:16 mkfuba07 wrote:
Hey all. Sorry I've been completely inactive. I have one more final tomorrow and then I'm out for the summer. I've been keeping up as best I can, but I don't have any particularly convinced reads at the moment. I have a few people I'm averse to lynching, but that's about it.
I don't have any unique insight to add. I'm not really ready to place a vote, and I don't feel like I've seen anything I could point at and say, "Yes, I find this scummy." My D1 vote is probably going to the person who I have least reason to believe is town, but I won't be able to actively participate and figure out who that is until I'm done with my last exam in a few hours.
Oh, as for mechanics, etc. I'm down with the "reveal our movements shortly before the daypost" plan. It definitely seems best to at least find where we all are on the map, try to decrease the information advantage of the angels. WHY WOULD YOU POST?/????????? god. Why? To not get modkilled maybe. Do you think that post looks scummy?
yes.
13 pages. And he has no reads. Like where is the town motivation for posting this post? It does not help town at all. At all.
So he says he has reads. But oh man I dont really wanna share them cause they are MINE, MINE!!!!!!. Also he overexplains his acceptance of the obviously great plan.
|
On May 15 2013 11:44 Sharrant wrote:
Hey, guys, just got home. Bunch of random things in no particular order:
1. My activity's going to suck for a bit. I'll have about 2 hours tomorrow where I'm on the bus (potentially up to 4), I can't guarantee I'll post during that time because I hate phone posting, but I'll at least be giving the game some thought. I won't be back until about 10 PM EST, and I work the day after at 3 PM, so that's when you're going to get the most activity out of me.
This is way too confusing for me to understand when you'll be around and when not, but you have been gone for 30 hours. Who do you want to lynch and why?
On May 16 2013 06:28 Vivax wrote:
I would also lynch Oats. All he's done so far is troll, being disruptive and ask stupid questions. I've seen him do that as town last time but I don't care. This isn't a game with grushes and kushes and if he wants to be the one guy playing that role, then I'll gladly policy-kick him out of the game.
His defense of Sentinel doesn't make any sense.
He complains about setup talk when this is essentially a team board game.
No WIFOM mindfucks, lynch people playing for scum. Unless he starts contributing meaningfully, he's up for the gallows.
Where does Oats troll? And how is he playing for scum?
@Almost everyone, Start using the voting thread!
|
On May 16 2013 19:29 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2013 18:34 Vivax wrote:On May 16 2013 18:24 Oatsmaster wrote:On May 16 2013 17:16 mkfuba07 wrote:
Hey all. Sorry I've been completely inactive. I have one more final tomorrow and then I'm out for the summer. I've been keeping up as best I can, but I don't have any particularly convinced reads at the moment. I have a few people I'm averse to lynching, but that's about it.
I don't have any unique insight to add. I'm not really ready to place a vote, and I don't feel like I've seen anything I could point at and say, "Yes, I find this scummy." My D1 vote is probably going to the person who I have least reason to believe is town, but I won't be able to actively participate and figure out who that is until I'm done with my last exam in a few hours.
Oh, as for mechanics, etc. I'm down with the "reveal our movements shortly before the daypost" plan. It definitely seems best to at least find where we all are on the map, try to decrease the information advantage of the angels. WHY WOULD YOU POST?/????????? god. Why? To not get modkilled maybe. Do you think that post looks scummy? yes. 13 pages. And he has no reads. Like where is the town motivation for posting this post? It does not help town at all. At all. So he says he has reads. But oh man I dont really wanna share them cause they are MINE, MINE!!!!!!. Also he overexplains his acceptance of the obviously great plan.
On May 16 2013 00:25 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2013 00:22 marvellosity wrote:On May 16 2013 00:21 Oatsmaster wrote:On May 16 2013 00:20 deconduo wrote:On May 16 2013 00:15 Oatsmaster wrote:
I hate plans. Plans suck.
How about for day 1. EVERYONE JUST CHOOSES RANDOM ACTIONS AND DIRECTIONS???????.
zeph and deconduo have only been talking about setup. Only. Hmm. Easy to do as scum.
Zeph, do you have reads?
Deconduo, do you have reads? Nothing yet, but its only just started. Also this is far from your normal game, so figuring out the setup is pretty damn important. Same with plans, if we can't figure out who is who, we are just moving randomly around the board and we will lose very quickly. plan is. everyone claims their 3 things, direction/number of spaces moved/looking where. K. Moving on. Why no reads boyo? Why don't you give your own, before asking other people for theirs? cause thats how I roll. Also read above. I dont like how its quite far into the game and dudes are still discussing plans. Also you. Why did you say that you didnt like mechanics, but still didnt scumhunt?
I hope you see the irony.
|
On May 16 2013 19:29 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2013 18:34 Vivax wrote:On May 16 2013 18:24 Oatsmaster wrote:On May 16 2013 17:16 mkfuba07 wrote:
Hey all. Sorry I've been completely inactive. I have one more final tomorrow and then I'm out for the summer. I've been keeping up as best I can, but I don't have any particularly convinced reads at the moment. I have a few people I'm averse to lynching, but that's about it.
I don't have any unique insight to add. I'm not really ready to place a vote, and I don't feel like I've seen anything I could point at and say, "Yes, I find this scummy." My D1 vote is probably going to the person who I have least reason to believe is town, but I won't be able to actively participate and figure out who that is until I'm done with my last exam in a few hours.
Oh, as for mechanics, etc. I'm down with the "reveal our movements shortly before the daypost" plan. It definitely seems best to at least find where we all are on the map, try to decrease the information advantage of the angels. WHY WOULD YOU POST?/????????? god. Why? To not get modkilled maybe. Do you think that post looks scummy? yes. 13 pages. And he has no reads. Like where is the town motivation for posting this post? It does not help town at all. At all. So he says he has reads. But oh man I dont really wanna share them cause they are MINE, MINE!!!!!!. Also he overexplains his acceptance of the obviously great plan.
That post is so bad that I could see it coming from a townie, actually. I'd rather expect him to do some forced bullshit push, or jump on the bandwagon against me at this point, not apologize and admit that he's got nothing to contribute.
+ Show Spoiler +On May 16 2013 19:38 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2013 19:29 Oatsmaster wrote:On May 16 2013 18:34 Vivax wrote:On May 16 2013 18:24 Oatsmaster wrote:On May 16 2013 17:16 mkfuba07 wrote:
Hey all. Sorry I've been completely inactive. I have one more final tomorrow and then I'm out for the summer. I've been keeping up as best I can, but I don't have any particularly convinced reads at the moment. I have a few people I'm averse to lynching, but that's about it.
I don't have any unique insight to add. I'm not really ready to place a vote, and I don't feel like I've seen anything I could point at and say, "Yes, I find this scummy." My D1 vote is probably going to the person who I have least reason to believe is town, but I won't be able to actively participate and figure out who that is until I'm done with my last exam in a few hours.
Oh, as for mechanics, etc. I'm down with the "reveal our movements shortly before the daypost" plan. It definitely seems best to at least find where we all are on the map, try to decrease the information advantage of the angels. WHY WOULD YOU POST?/????????? god. Why? To not get modkilled maybe. Do you think that post looks scummy? yes. 13 pages. And he has no reads. Like where is the town motivation for posting this post? It does not help town at all. At all. So he says he has reads. But oh man I dont really wanna share them cause they are MINE, MINE!!!!!!. Also he overexplains his acceptance of the obviously great plan. Show nested quote +On May 16 2013 00:25 Oatsmaster wrote:On May 16 2013 00:22 marvellosity wrote:On May 16 2013 00:21 Oatsmaster wrote:On May 16 2013 00:20 deconduo wrote:On May 16 2013 00:15 Oatsmaster wrote:
I hate plans. Plans suck.
How about for day 1. EVERYONE JUST CHOOSES RANDOM ACTIONS AND DIRECTIONS???????.
zeph and deconduo have only been talking about setup. Only. Hmm. Easy to do as scum.
Zeph, do you have reads?
Deconduo, do you have reads? Nothing yet, but its only just started. Also this is far from your normal game, so figuring out the setup is pretty damn important. Same with plans, if we can't figure out who is who, we are just moving randomly around the board and we will lose very quickly. plan is. everyone claims their 3 things, direction/number of spaces moved/looking where. K. Moving on. Why no reads boyo? Why don't you give your own, before asking other people for theirs? cause thats how I roll. Also read above. I dont like how its quite far into the game and dudes are still discussing plans. Also you. Why did you say that you didnt like mechanics, but still didnt scumhunt? I hope you see the irony.
Two questions:
- What's your read on Oats
- What do you think of Sentinel's latest posting?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
BH, you backing off the idea of Sentinel mafia and preferring Vivax? I'm still struggling to get over that early fferyltt thing to be honest.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Just re-read Sentinel's post. I like this:
On May 16 2013 10:46 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +Sentinel's play has been bad this game as well, but IIRC, I always think that. Explain me why you vote for Vivax and not myself. That's a shitty vote to throw around.
Very inconsistent. Maybe my vote's in the right place already.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
